62.4 F
New York
Thursday, May 9, 2024
Home Blog Page 1613

YouTube Blocked Chess Channel After Mistaking ‘Black vs. White’ Strategy for Racism

0

LUCAS NOLAN

Google-owned video platform YouTube mistakenly suspended the channel of a popular Croatian chess player after his discussion of “black versus white” in terms of chess strategy was flagged by the site’s algorithm as racism. The incident demonstrates that the AI tools the Masters of the Universe rely on to police their platforms are not yet up to the task.

The Daily Mail reports that last summer the popular Croatian chess player and YouTuber Antonio Radic saw his channel on the platform suspended without warning, although service was restored a day later.

Radic, known online as “Agadmator,” produces videos discussing various chess strategies and plays. Computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon suspect that Radic’s discussion with a chess grandmaster of “black vs. white” chess pieces triggered YouTube’s AI filters.

The scientists ran simulations with software trained to detect hate speech and found that more than 80 percent of chess videos flagged for hate speech did not contain offensive speech but did include terms such as “black,” “white,” “attack,” and “threat,” all used in relation to chess.

Researchers suggested that social-media firms incorporate chess-related language into their algorithms to prevent this issue in the future.

At the time of the channel suspension, Radic suggested that the phrase “black against white” led to the ban. Ashiqur R. KhudaBukhsh, a computer scientist at Carnegie Melon’s Language Technologies Institute, stated that he believes that he may be right.

“We don’t know what tools YouTube uses, but if they rely on artificial intelligence to detect racist language, this kind of accident can happen,” KhudaBukhsh said.

YouTube declined to indicate what caused Radic’s video to be flagged, telling the Mail Online: “When it’s brought to our attention that a video has been removed mistakenly, we act quickly to reinstate it. We also offer uploaders the ability to appeal removals and will re-review the content. Agadmator appealed the removal, and we quickly reinstated the video.”

Read more at the Daily Mail here.

Trump Reacts to Supreme Court Letting NY Prosecutor Obtain His Taxes

0
AP

ZACHARY STIEBER

Former President Donald Trump on Monday said New York officials investigating him are participating in a continuation of “the greatest political Witch Hunt in the history of our Country,” after the Supreme Court ruled that a New York prosecutor could obtain Trump’s tax returns.

“For more than two years, New York City has been looking at almost every transaction I’ve ever done, including seeking tax returns which were done by among the biggest and most prestigious law and accounting firms in the U.S. The Tea Party was treated far better by the IRS than Donald Trump,” Trump said in a statement.

“The Supreme Court never should have let this ‘fishing expedition’ happen, but they did. This is something which has never happened to a President before, it is all Democrat-inspired in a totally Democrat location, New York City and State, completely controlled and dominated by a heavily reported enemy of mine, Governor Andrew Cuomo. These are attacks by Democrats willing to do anything to stop the almost 75 million people (the most votes, by far, ever gotten by a sitting president) who voted for me in the election—an election which many people, and experts, feel that I won. I agree!” he added.

The nation’s highest court decided not to take up an application from Trump’s lawyers for a hold on releasing Trump’s tax returns and other financial records. The application was made after an appeals court ruled last year that Trump needed to turn over the records.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, a Democrat, is seeking the information as part of a probe that he has said little about publicly.

In a brief statement following the ruling, Vance said: “The work continues.”

Other New York Democrat officials, such as New York Attorney General Letitia James, have launched probes or taken action against Trump or his business in recent years, as they argue he’s broken the law.

In one example, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is moving to cut off ties between the city and the Trump Organization, which runs popular ice rinks.

Trump on Monday called the targeting part of a “new phenomenon of ‘headhunting’ prosecutors and” attorneys general, who he alleged “try to take down their political opponents using the law as a weapon.”

The phenomenon “is a threat to the very foundation of our liberty,” he said, adding: “That’s what is done in third world countries.”

“Even worse are those who run for prosecutorial or attorney general offices in far-left states and jurisdictions pledging to take out a political opponent. That’s fascism, not justice—and that is exactly what they are trying to do with respect to me, except that the people of our Country won’t stand for it,” Trump continued.

“In the meantime, murders and violent crime are up in New York City by record numbers, and nothing is done about it. Our elected officials don’t care. All they focus on is the persecution of President Donald J. Trump. I will fight on, just as I have, for the last five years (even before I was successfully elected), despite all of the election crimes that were committed against me. We will win!”

SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE STOOPS TO ANTI-SEMITISM TO GET A CHEAP LAUGH

0
AP

By: Rabbi Aryeh Spero

In its latest show, NBC’s Saturday Night Live exploited a vicious stereotype about Jews just to get a laugh.

Its “news anchor” stated that Israel has already vaccinated half of its population.  The anchor then snidely remarked, “I’m going to guess it’s the Jewish half.”

Had Lorne Michaels, founder and producer of Saturday Night Live checked, he would have found that Israel has already vaccinated 70% of its Arab population over 60 years old, directly resulting in a delay for many of its Jewish citizens within Israel. In addition, had Mr. Michaels checked, he would have found that Israel offered the vaccine to Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Arab Authority, who refused the vaccine, placing his hatred of Israel above concern for his own Muslim constituents.

The producers of Saturday Night Live decided they would sacrifice the truth and demonize the Jewish State for the sake of a cheap laugh or, worse, enable an age old blood libel accusing Jews of manufacturing and spreading plagues while being indifferent to others.  Surely Mr. Michaels knows of the heroic efforts Israel has made in creating vaccines, medicines, and state-of-the art medical equipment to alleviate not only the coronavirus but also every type of disease found across the globe.  The Saturday Night Live crew would do best to educate themselves on how Israel, matched only by the United States, has sent its transportable medical units immediately to every part of the globe facing a meteorological or medical catastrophe.

The Saturday Night Live crew would never be this callous, nor stereotype a Muslim or LTGBQ group.  They know that in today’s culture, such demonization would get them cancelled and removed from media outlets.The demands for perfection made by left-leaning media outlets are directed mostly against the United States and Israel.  Why are there never demands that Muslim countries and organizations step up to the plate and help others, as is continually demanded of Israel, the United States, Jews and Christians?”

 

Rabbi Spero is president of Conference of Jewish Affairs author of Push Back: The Battle to Save Our American Judeo-Christian Heritage, and an advisor to public office holder

 

 

 

 

 

NYC Mayor Appoints “Recovery Czar”

0

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio has appointed a  COVID “recovery czar” following months of criticism of his leadership of the city’s public health resources.

The mayor’s pick is Lorraine Grillo, who will lead a newly-constituted, weekly “war room” that spans across government leaders, agencies, business leaders and nonprofits in the city.

Zero Hedge pointed out Lorraine Grillo might actually be the right person for the job.

Zero Hedge reported:

Grillo is an experienced bureaucrat and already holds 2 key construction-related appointments. She’s the president of the New York City School Construction Authority, where she started working in city government nearly three decades ago. Her record of steady leadership offers a notable contrast to the sometimes erratic management strategy of the De Blasio Administration. She most famously oversaw the post-Sandy rebuilding effort and said she wanted to bring those lessons to help rebuild the city after COVID.

The mayor said the city had been overwhelmingly focused on “the emergency reality of turning this city around and the battle of Covid,” de Blasio said during a Monday press briefing.

“Now, to bring all these strands together, we decided a czar could really make this thing go into the next gear.”

After Long Wait, New Jersey Moves Ahead On Recreational Pot

0
AP

(AP) — A recreational marijuana marketplace, cannabis decriminalization and looser penalties for underage possession of the drug and alcohol became law Monday in New Jersey, more than three months after voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot question to legalize adult use of the drug.

Acknowledging that the legislation took much longer to be enacted than expected, Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy cast aside critics’ attacks the legislation was about filling the state’s coffers with tax revenue or easing penalties on underage possession to the point of making policing difficult.

“The reason I signed these bills, the reason why we’ve been in this fight is for social justice,” he said Monday during a news conference.

He alluded to decades-old stringent policing of marijuana laws frequently called the War on Drugs that resulted in Black residents facing disproportionate consequences.

“At long last, we’ve broken through and as of today, better days are here, and lives that have been nicked or in some cases ruined we’ll be able to correct. At long last and from this moment going forward, we won’t have to see that same chapter written again in our state’s history.”

Murphy signed the bills just in time. He faced a Monday deadline to enact two of three of the bills, and signed the third shortly after the Democrat-led Legislature sent it to him.

Still, it could be about six months before the legalized marketplace is up and running, Murphy and industry analysts estimated. That’s because the state’s new Cannabis Regulatory Commission has to get up and running, and put in place regulations and licenses.

Legislation that passed only on Monday after weeks of negotiation makes underage possession of alcohol and marijuana subject to a written warnings that escalate to include parental notification and a referral to community services upon subsequent violations.

Currently, underage drinking is punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.

Part of the legislation makes it so towns will no longer have the authority to enact ordinances with civil penalties or fines concerning underage possession or consumption violations on private property, among other measures.

It also increases the liability for suppliers of cannabis items to underage people by making a third or subsequent violation a petty disorderly persons offense.

Some Republicans seemed aghast at reducing penalties.

“There’s no consequence,” GOP Sen. Bob Singer said. “We’re now saying if you’re caught with it underage it’s a free pass.”

Murphy responded Monday saying that marijuana should be treated with “responsibility.”

“The words adult-use have been associated with this from Day One,” he said.

State Police Superintendent Col. Pat Callahan said in a brief interview that the attorney general and his office were coming with guidelines for all law enforcement officials across the state about how to enforce the new laws.

For consumers, the marketplace legalization means the state’s 6.625% sales tax applies. Seventy percent of the proceeds will go to areas disproportionately affected by marijuana-related arrests. Black residents were likelier — up to three times as much — to face marijuana charges than white residents.

Towns can levy a tax of up to 2% under the measure.

Also under the bill, the Cannabis Regulatory Commission will be able to levy an excise tax, the amount of which will depend on the cost per ounce of cannabis. There will be four levels of tax under the bill, so if cannabis is $350 or more, the tax per ounce will be $10. That rises to $60 per ounce if the retail price of the product is less than $250.

The number of licenses for cultivators will be set at 37 for two years. The state Senate was pushing for no limits, but the Assembly wanted the caps.

The decriminalization measure is necessary because the state’s laws make possession a crime, despite the voter-approved amendment, according to lawmakers. The measure passed with with broad bipartisan support.

The months-long delay in enacting the legislation stemmed from Murphy’s concerns that young people, particularly those in Black and Latino communities, would continue to bear the brunt of arrests and citations. That led to the bill aimed at loosening underage penalties.

The delay sparked widespread frustration.

“This process has been a debacle from the beginning. The voters did their job,” Democratic Sen. Paul Sarlo said. He had opposed marijuana legalization, though was supportive of decriminalization. He voted to pass the bill Monday because he said voters want lawmakers to move on and focus on COVID-19 relief.

Edmund DeVeaux, the head of the New Jersey CannaBusiness Association, called on lawmakers and the governor to get the legislation enacted.

“Enough already. Only in New Jersey could the will of the voters be so callously ignored,” he said in a statement recently.

After Murphy signed the bills, he said it was time to “get down to business.”

“It took us a long time to get here, but thankfully, finally, we can move forward,” he said.

Germany: Nazi Guard Deported From US Agrees To Be Questioned

0
Jan. 27, 2020 file photo people walk behind the writing 'Holocaust' during the international Holocaust remembrance day in the former the Nazi concentration camp Buchenwald near Weimar, Germany. Friedrich Karl Berger, a 95-year-old former Nazi concentration camp guard, was deported to his native Germany on orders from a Tennessee court. Berger has agreed to be questioned by German prosecutors as they re-examine whether there is enough evidence against him to bring charges, authorities said Monday. (AP Photo/Jens Meyer, file)

(AP) — A 95-year-old former Nazi concentration camp guard deported from Tennessee has agreed to be questioned by German prosecutors as they re-examine whether there is enough evidence against him to bring charges, authorities said Monday.

Friedrich Karl Berger arrived Saturday in Frankfurt on a special flight from the U.S. after being ordered deported to his native Germany by a court in Memphis last year.

He was met by Hesse state police detectives at the airport and told them he would be willing to be questioned by investigators with a lawyer present, said Bernd Kolkmeier, spokesman for the Celle prosecutor’s office, which is handling the case.

Organizing counsel and ensuring they are up to speed on the facts will take time, however, so the earliest such an interview would take place would be next month, Kolkmeier said.

A U.S. immigration judge ordered Berger deported a year ago after finding that his “willing service as an armed guard of prisoners at a concentration camp where persecution took place” constituted assistance in Nazi-sponsored persecution.

The court found that Berger, who had been living in the U.S. since 1959, had served at a camp in Meppen, Germany, near the border with the Netherlands, which was a subcamp of the larger Neuengamme concentration camp near Hamburg.

It said during the winter of 1945, prisoners in Meppen were held in “atrocious” conditions and were exploited for outdoor forced labor, working “to the point of exhaustion and death.”

Berger admitted to American investigators that he served in Meppen as a guard for a few weeks near the end of the war but said he did not observe any abuse or killings. The Memphis court found, however, that Berger had helped guard prisoners during a forced evacuation that took nearly two weeks and claimed the lives of 70 people.

Celle prosecutors shelved their initial investigation of him in December, however, saying they had been unable to refute his account. They’re now having another look, with him back on German soil, Kolkmeier said.

“Nothing has changed except that he is now in Germany and we can talk with him,” Kolkmeier said. “We can personally question him, which is naturally different than reading a transcript.”

Kolkmeier would not say whether Berger still had family in Germany nor where he was residing.

Berger, who was born in 1925 in the tiny northern town of Bargen, was serving in the German Navy when he was assigned to guard prisoners in Meppen in 1945, according to the Neuengamme Memorial’s website.

He served between Jan. 28, 1945 and April 4, 1945, as an auxiliary attached to the SS command of the camp, according to Celle prosecutors.

Berger is being investigated under a precedent established in 2011 with the conviction of former Ohio autoworker John Demjanjuk as an accessory to murder on allegations that he served as a guard at the Sobibor death camp in German-occupied Poland. Demjanjuk, who denied the allegations, died before his appeal could be heard.

German courts previously required prosecutors to justify charges by presenting evidence of a former guard’s participation in a specific killing, often a near-impossible task.

However, prosecutors successfully argued during Demjanjuk’s trial in Munich that helping a camp function by serving as a guard was enough to convict someone of accessory to murders committed there.

A federal court subsequently upheld the 2015 conviction of former Auschwitz guard Oskar Groening on the same reasoning.

Since the Demjanjuk conviction there have been a steady stream of new prosecutions and trials in Germany.

Earlier this month prosecutors charged a 100-year-old man on 3,518 counts of accessory to murder on allegations he served as a guard at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp outside Berlin, and a 95-year-old woman on 10,000 counts of accessory to murder on allegations she served as the secretary to the former SS commandant of the Stutthof camp.

The NYC Ice Skating Rink Saga

0
shutterstock

By Monica Showalter(American Thinker)

For leftist failures like New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, nothing trumps Getting Trump.

So it must have seemed natural to him to shut down two big skating rinks in New York City on the grounds that they were managed by the Trump Organization with 250 employees.

According to Deadline:

“New York City doesn’t do business with insurrectionists,” de Blasio tweeted. “We’re taking steps to TERMINATE agreements with the Trump Organization to operate the Central Park Carousel, Wollman and Lasker skating rinks, and the Ferry Point Golf Course” in the Bronx.

While city officials have explored ways to exit the agreements since 2015, de Blasio said in an interview with MSNBC that last Wednesday’s deadly and destructive invasion of the U.S. Capitol left no other option. “The city of New York will no longer have anything to do with the Trump Organization,” he said. He added that he sees the city as standing on “strong legal ground,” should Trump decide to file suit.

Turns out he had another option, and after hearing from angry New Yorkers, he skedaddled as fast as he could to take it.

According to the New York Post:

City Hall on Sunday reversed Mayor de Blasio’s move to shutter Lasker and Wollman rinks in Central Park six weeks ahead of their typical April closing dates — in an effort to freeze-out his political rival.

“New York City kids deserve all the time on the ice they can get this year. The Wollman and Lasker rinks will stay open under current management for the few weeks left in this season,” City Hall Press Secretary Bill Neidhardt told The Post.

It was the stupidest, most disgusting shutdown since Jimmy Carter pulled America out of the 1980 Olympics to protest the Soviet Union’s 1979 invasion of Afghanistan.

It was also a very leftist thing to do. Leftist consider the needs of people last in their political calculations, and this idiocy is no exception.

Did de Blasio care about the kids, particularly minority kids who can’t get out of that miserable city like the rich ones do, the kids who use that rink in the last godawful days of New York’s miserable winters? I’ve lived in that city, I know what it’s like around the tail end of February just in normal times with the filthy snow, the grim, ugly winter coats, the icy freezing rain, and the non-stop cold. For New Yorkers around this time, spring can’t come fast enough.

One of the teeny, tiny diversions in that city is the sweet availability of the inexpensive Central Park skating rinks, which can rent skates for a nominal cost to anyone, let them skate away, and give them happy diversion they don’t have to go to the Hamptons to get.

They are there, and they were made that way by the Trump Organization, which rescued the Wollman rink from socialist-hellhole dilapidation way back in 1986 and made them something authentic and reliable for New Yorkers to enjoy. For a lot of people, that kind of competence is what won Trump his 2016 election. Thomas Lifson tells me that the best chapter in Trump’s famous book, “The Art of the Deal” was on how Trump rescued the Wollman rink from being a dilapidated dysfunctional dump from the clowns then running New York City, and how made it into something nice for New Yorkers, raising their quality of life.

Eric Trump, Trump’s son who along with his brother runs the Trump Organization, pointed out that handicapped kids in skating programs to help them got shut out by this idiocy, for one.

Professional skaters who must use the rink to keep training got hit too, and complained mightily.

Worst hit of all were the minority kids, the kids suffering horribly based on teachers’ unions refusing to open schools for months and months, leaving them unable to see their friends, unable to make new friends, isolated from all human contact, and many now anxious, depressed and even committing suicide. The New York City skating rink, with its wide open-air spaces was one of the few places they could go with little fear of catching COVID, and just a cheap or free subway ride away, and for some, walking distance.

De Blasio’s contract cancellation was amazingly spiteful, given that it normally ran out in April, meaning, these last horrible weeks of the New York winter would have no skating at all for the kids.

All to Get Trump.

It’s notable that de Blasio is a notoriously unpopular mayor whose lockdowns have cut the quality of life in New York to pretty much zero. A third of its restaurants are gone and many are not re-opening on fears that they could be shut down again. Gyms, organized sports, theatre, every possible recreation with a social component is gone in New York with the city easily a model for the Living in a Ghost Town that Mick Jagger sang about.

De Blasio these days is cheering the coming downfall of Andrew “Ozymandias” Cuomo, his bitter leftist rival in the governor’s office. But he’s managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with this idiotic move. Now he’s backtracking. He’s heard from angry New Yorkers, apparently a lot of them and trying to fix it with just a little bit of egg on his face.

That’s a tall order, given that the early West Side Rag reporting had De Blasio minions saying they were busy as beavers working to find replacement contractors or investors from the decades-long Trump management of the rink to replace the Trump Organization. The shutdown and reversal suggest that they failed, and probably won’t now that business is fleeing the city and rich people are moving out. One New Yorker asked if Michael Bloomberg can come to the rescue for the rinks? Hey Mike? (Bloomberg has a special cold spot for the poor, so don’t make any bets). Maybe the city can run it …. like it was run in 1986 before Trump came to the rescue. Meanwhile, de Blasio’s city coffers are looking a little bankrupt these days, particularly the subway, but many others, too. De Blasio’s just waiting with his fingers crossed for Joe Biden’s stimulus to bail him out.

Let’s hope this stupidity directed against the kids of New York takes him down alongside Cuomo. Stupid, cruel acts like these in the name of Getting Trump are perfect reasons to thrown such bounders out.

 

The ZeroCovid Movement: Cult Dressed as Science

0
ucsfhealth.org

Jenin Younes(AIER)

This past year has given rise to some strange and novel methods of disease containment, including lockdowns and mask mandates. It is unsurprising that the natural next step in this progression has been the development of a movement known as “ZeroCovid.” Its growing influence is, perhaps, predictable given that for nearly a year we have been inundated by the views of so-called experts seeking to legitimize their myopic worldview that public health is determined solely by prevention of Covid-19.

Rather than acknowledge to a weary public that their approach has been a failure, they are doubling down and attempting to save their reputations by claiming that the problem is not that lockdowns do not work, but that they have not gone far enough.

There is, apparently, some diversity of opinion among the ZeroCovid crowd as to whether the term is to be interpreted literally, as some of its most impassioned and vocal proponents argue, or whether it simply means a more extreme version of the ideology that has dominated societies around the globe for the past year: the belief that suppressing the coronavirus is a singularly important goal, to replace all others and to be pursued with no or only minimal consideration of the effects of doing so.

ZeroCovid promoters appear to agree that much stricter border controls, lockdowns, and mask mandates are needed than exist in most nations today. Sam Bowman, one of the most prominent ZeroCoviders, claims for instance that the only way to address the coronavirus problem is with “lockdowns, school closures, travel bans, mass testing, contact tracing, and masks.” Likewise, former United Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair’s think-tank has stated that the only way to avoid another lockdown is to bring coronavirus cases to zero. China, Australia and New Zealand are portrayed as successes by ZeroCovid proponents, and prove that suffering now brings with it the promise of eventual freedom.

While marketing themselves as theoretically opposed to lockdowns, ZeroCovid adherents actually aspire to implement a totalitarian-style state, which we are supposed to believe will exist only temporarily. For example, Devi Sridhar, one of the movement’s most public faces in the United Kingdom, has claimed that the only way out of endless lockdown is a “crude, harsh, catastrophic lockdown” now, the first phase. Given that the third phase of Sridhar’s plan entails an “East Asian and Pacific model of elimination” that prohibits travel abroad, I can only imagine precisely what sort of totalitarian nightmare Sridhar envisions during phase one.

Those who follow this philosophy fail to recognize the glaringly obvious truth that suppression tactics have not succeeded because they run contrary to human nature (as well as basic cell biology) and entail severe deprivations of human rights and liberties. They also do not acknowledge the fact that if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) managed to eliminate the coronavirus (a questionable assumption given the CCP’s tenuous relationship with the truth), it did so using tactics that prima facie constitute human rights violations.

Even Australia and New Zealand, which before 2020 were considered beacons of liberal democracy, have recently been the subject of investigations or inquiries by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. The ZeroCovid proponents do not address the reality that China, Australia, and New Zealand have continually had to implement lockdown policies in response to new cases arising even after declaring victory over the virus, and that the latter two are island nations able to effectuate border control in a way that cannot possibly be applied to nations that are geographically proximate to others and in which the virus has already become endemic.

The “Covid Community Action Summit,” a conference held at the end of January, and led and attended by many of ZeroCovid’s main players – needless to say, over Zoom – offers a glimpse into the warped worldview that pervades the ideology.

The architect of ZeroCovid, and the first speaker at the Summit, was Yaneer Bar-Yam, an American scientist who specializes in complex systems and quantitative analysis of pandemics and founded the New England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI). The participants came from a variety of backgrounds: in addition to doctors and scientists, political consultants and communications specialists were in attendance. Many presenters had business interests in pharmaceuticals and diagnostics, and those from the United States tended to be affiliated with Democratic Party politics and campaigns.

One of the most disturbing presentations was delivered by Blake Elias, a researcher at the NECSI who works directly under Bar-Yam. Given Elias’s position, it is fair to assume that his views, as articulated at the Summit, reflected those held by its organizer.

Elias, like numerous other “ZeroCovid” advocates, believes that the “lives versus economy” framing of the problem is incorrect (notably, many lockdown opponents also consider this the wrong lens through which to view the issue, but for different reasons; namely that the economy and people’s lives are inextricably intertwined and lockdown policies do not take into account crucial considerations such as mental health and civil liberties).

Valuing each life–somewhat arbitrarily and without regards to life expectancy–at $10 million, Elias plugged a bunch of numbers into a machine and voila! came up with irrefutable proof that locking down hard and fast is less costly than failing to do so. Elias earnestly stated that his airtight equation demonstrates that if you are against elimination (ZeroCovid) the only conceivable reason could be that you dispute one of his premises, so you therefore believe one of the following: the cost of infections is lower than it is; the cost of lockdowns is more; hospital capacity is greater; the importation rate is higher; or complete vaccination is achievable in a shorter time frame.

At no time did he mention psychology, human rights, or civil liberties. If Elias had the slightest understanding of these concepts, he did an exceptional job of hiding it.

Michelle Lukezic and Eric Nixon, like Elias, gave a presentation akin to what I imagine it would be like to watch aliens discuss human psychology and behavior. Presumably a couple, Lukezic and Nixon founded a company called MakeGoodTogether, and believe that the coronavirus problem boils down to a lack of individual discipline and accountability. They acknowledged that the extreme social distancing they touted as the answer to the world’s woes is contrary to our nature, but insisted that we simply must try harder.

We could eradicate coronavirus, they solemnly instructed us, if only we would insist upon declining social invitations, and suggested that people post pledges on social media to that effect. They apparently spent little time considering the plight of essential workers whose employment does not allow them the luxury of distancing, apart from a comedic description of the psychic discomfort they experienced when the mask of a workman in their home slipped down his face. Lukezic was very proud of Nixon for refusing to shake the man’s hand upon his departure. I had to double-check the link a couple of times to make sure I had not inadvertently stumbled upon a Saturday Night Live episode.

Another noteworthy contributor to the ZeroCovid Summit was Michael Baker, the architect of New Zealand’s coronavirus strategy. Baker insisted that “following the science” indisputably leads to the ZeroCovid strategy, as though science alone informs policy. He made several stunning admissions, among which are that containment should also be the strategy for influenza, and that the coronavirus pandemic has given us the opportunity to reset in order to address inequities in society and threats posed by climate change. In other words, Baker does not foresee a return to normal life.

As demonstrated by its presenters at the Summit, ZeroCovid is the unfortunate end result of the inexplicable belief held by too many people that it makes sense to fixate upon one problem to the exclusion of all others. No one at the Summit, or in any other context for that matter, has ever made a convincing case for elevating the coronavirus pandemic above all other considerations. There is a reason for this: the facts and logic all point in the opposite direction.

An argument could certainly be made that a virus or other threat calculated to wipe out humanity or a significant portion of it, across age ranges, warrants exclusive focus on that threat for its duration. As I and others have written before, the coronavirus simply does not constitute such a danger. We now have a year of data from which to conclude beyond all doubt that exposure to the virus only poses a significant risk, beyond those we are accustomed to taking in everyday life, to the very old. The overwhelming majority of those infected with the virus suffer not at all, or minimally, and recover within days or weeks. This does not mean that the problem should be ignored, but rather that it should be addressed utilizing the same methodology with which we approach all public health matters: by taking into account the effects of the policies enacted in response to them.

ZeroCovid adherents are not qualitatively different from the epidemiologists and politicians who have advocated for and imposed lockdowns and mask mandates across the globe. They all believe that they can force billions of people to behave, for an indefinite time period, in ways that are contrary to our nature and deleterious to our well-being. They see nothing wrong with assuming control over every facet of our lives.

They are maniacally focused upon theories and models, and uninterested in what works in practice. They have no conception of human liberty or dignity. Rather than recognize that lockdowns, forced human separation, and masks are ineffective at quelling the spread of the coronavirus, while carrying enormous costs, not least among them the erasure of liberal democracy, the most fervent adherents to this ideology believe that the answer is more, and harder. That means deprivation of our rights and liberties, and denial of our basic human needs, until the coronavirus is eradicated from the globe. If they get their way, that may well be until the end of time.

Many thanks to my friends and colleagues Phil Magness and Kiley Holliday, who assisted me in researching and writing this article.

Khamenei threatens to enrich uranium up to 60%

0

(Arutz Sheva)   Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threatened Monday to enrich uranium to even higher levels if the US does not remove sanctions on the Islamic Republic, vowing to “not back down on the nuclear issue.”

Khamenei threatened that Iran would enrich uranium to 60%, further shortening the breakout time to a nuclear bomb.

In January, Iran began enriching uranium to 20% in violation of the 2015 nuclear deal which capped Iran’s enrichment levels at 3.67%. There is no civilian use for enriching uranium to 20%. Uranium must be enriched to 90% to develop a nuclear weapon.

“Iran’s enrichment limit will not be 20%, and we will act to the point that is needed and the country requires,” Khamenei said. “The Islamic republic will not back down on the nuclear issue and will strongly continue down the path of what the country requires for today and tomorrow.”

USA Today Poll: Newsmax Rising Fast Against Fox News

0

USA Today reports that a new poll by Suffolk University shows that “most people have missed the shift of Trump voters away from Fox News and into the hands of Newsmax and One America News Network, two news outlets that are only 6 years old but in that short time have managed to greatly improve their standing in conservative circles.”

The new data indicates that Newsmax has risen as one of the most trusted news sources for Trump voters.

The poll found that “among Trump voters, 34% trusted Fox News the most, followed by 17% for Newsmax, 9% for One America News Network, with every other network at 3% or less.”

The Suffolk Poll appears to be consistent with a McLaughlin & Associates poll that reported that fully 20% of U.S. voters – or 30 million Americans – watch Newsmax regularly, compared to 40% who tune into Fox News.

While insurgent Newsmax is ranked as the second leading news source for conservatives after Fox, it has grown quickly in recent months.

The poll also found Newsmax viewers are solidly more pro-Trump than Fox News.

USA Today’s analysis found that the “recent Senate impeachment trial had a doubling down effect for 64% of Newsmax viewers who said the trial made them more supportive of Trump. Among OANN, 49% were more supportive, followed by 41% of Fox viewers.”

Asked if history would record Trump as a great president, 64% of Newsmax viewers said he would, while only 45% of Fox News viewers agreed with that sentiment.

And when viewers were asked if the were more loyal to Trump or the Republican party, 51% of Fox News viewers said they backed Trump, while 72 percent of Newsmax viewers sided with the former president.

Israel Demands Apology from NBC After ‘Saturday Night Live’s’ Michael Che Jokes Country Only Vaccinating Jews

0
izuayehu Tesfaye/AP Images for T-Mobile

DEBORAH BRAND

Israeli officials have demanded an apology from the NBC television network after a Saturday Night Live comedian joked Israel has only been vaccinating half its population, the Jewish half — a lie made all the more absurd in light of Israel’s heavy — and successful — campaign to persuade its Arab population to get the vaccine.

“Israel is reporting that they’ve vaccinated half of their population, and I’m gonna guess it’s the Jewish half,” quipped Weekend Update co-host Michael Che to laughter.

Some 4.3 million Israelis, which is close to 50 percent of the population, have received the first vaccine dose of the Pfizer vaccine and 2.9 million received both.

Among those, more than two thirds are Arab citizens over the age of 60. Around three million Israelis, including minors and those who have recovered from COVID-19, are not currently eligible for the vaccine.

Vaccinations have been offered to all Israeli citizens: Jews and Arabs as well as Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem. The country has also offered non-citizen residents to be vaccinated.

The Palestinian Authority on Friday also said it had closed a deal with Israeli Health Ministry to vaccinate 100,000 Palestinians who work in Israel in addition to several thousand vaccines it had already given to the PA to inoculate medical workers.

Israel’s Ambassador to the United States and the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, said such jokes perpetuate anti-Semitic tropes and demanded SNL issue an apology.

“Your ‘joke’ is ignorant – the fact is that the success of our vaccination drive is exactly because every citizen of Israel – Jewish, Muslim, Christian-is entitled to it. Apologize!” he said on his Twitter account.

The American Jewish Committee also launched a petition censuring NBC, saying: “Saturday Night Live’s ‘joke’ isn’t just untrue — it’s dangerous, a modern twist on a classic anti-Semitic trope that has inspired the mass murder of countless Jews throughout the centuries.”

“In the Middle Ages, thousands of Jews were burnt at the stake after being blamed for the Black Death and accused of protecting only themselves. In the 20th century, the Nazis accused Jews of spreading disease and seized on that falsehood to justify imprisoning Jews in ghettos and carrying out the mass murder of European Jewry,” the AJC added.


“Words have consequences, and Jews are at risk when a major American TV company joins those who claim Israel is favoring only a portion of its citizens in its admirable efforts, praised by Dr. Anthony Fauci and others, to vaccinate all of its residents.”

Israel’s Consul General in New York Israel Nitzan mentioned SNL in a tweet, writing, “Spreading anti-Semitic lies & misinformation is already a problem. Fanning the flames just to get a laugh is not only wrong, it’s irresponsible. Israel has made the vaccine available for its entire population equitably, regardless of gender, race or religion.”

Ellie Cohanim, the Trump administration’s deputy anti-Semitism czar, tweeted, “Under the Oslo Accords the Palestinian Authority is responsible for all health & social welfare needs. Contact SNL & NBC and demand they apologize for their modern day blood libel against Jews.”

Che has been accused of spreading anti-Semitic tropes in the past. During an item about Go Daddy shutting down a “Miss Hitler Beauty Pageant” last May, the SNL actor ended by remarking that the winner of the pageant was “Miss Israel.”

Breitbart

US coronavirus death toll approaches milestone of 500,000

0
In this Feb. 19, 2021, file photo President Joe Biden, right, and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, left, tour a Pfizer manufacturing site in Portage, Mich. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

The U.S. stood Sunday at the brink of a once-unthinkable tally: 500,000 people lost to the coronavirus.

A year into the pandemic, the running total of lives lost was about 498,000 — roughly the population of Kansas City, Missouri, and just shy of the size of Atlanta. The figure compiled by Johns Hopkins University surpasses the number of people who died in 2019 of chronic lower respiratory diseases, stroke, Alzheimer’s, flu and pneumonia combined.

“It’s nothing like we have ever been through in the last 102 years, since the 1918 influenza pandemic,” the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

The U.S. virus death toll reached 400,000 on Jan. 19 in the waning hours in office for President Donald Trump, whose handling of the crisis was judged by public health experts to be a singular failure.

The first known deaths from the virus in the U.S. happened in early February 2020, both of them in Santa Clara County, California. It took four months to reach the first 100,000 dead. The toll hit 200,000 deaths in September and 300,000 in December. Then it took just over a month to go from 300,000 to 400,000 and about two months to climb from 400,000 to the brink of 500,000.

Joyce Willis of Las Vegas is among the countless Americans who lost family members during the pandemic. Her husband, Anthony Willis, died Dec. 28, followed by her mother-in-law in early January.

There were anxious calls from the ICU when her husband was hospitalized. She was unable to see him before he died because she, too, had the virus and could not visit.

“They are gone. Your loved one is gone, but you are still alive,” Willis said. “It’s like you still have to get up every morning. You have to take care of your kids and make a living. There is no way around it. You just have to move on.”

Then came a nightmare scenario of caring for her father-in-law while dealing with grief, arranging funerals, paying bills, helping her children navigate online school and figuring out how to go back to work as an occupational therapist.

Her father-in-law, a Vietnam vet, also contracted the virus. He also suffered from respiratory issues and died on Feb. 8. The family isn’t sure if COVID-19 contributed to his death.

“Some days I feel OK and other days I feel like I’m strong and I can do this,” she said. “And then other days it just hits me. My whole world is turned upside-down.”

The global death toll was approaching 2.5 million, according to Johns Hopkins.

While the count is based on figures supplied by government agencies around the world, the real death toll is believed to be significantly higher, in part because of inadequate testing and cases inaccurately attributed to other causes early on.

Despite efforts to administer coronavirus vaccines, a widely cited model by the University of Washington projects the U.S. death toll will surpass 589,000 by June 1.

“People will be talking about this decades and decades and decades from now,” Fauci said on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”

___

Associated Press Writer Heather Hollingsworth in Kansas City, Missouri, contributed to this report.

Wuhan Lab Kept NIH Funding Despite Trump Crackdown

0

(FREE BEACON )

Federal records show the U.S. government is partnering with the Wuhan Institute of Virology even though the Trump administration pledged to ban funding for the Chinese laboratory located at the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak.

President Donald Trump promised that he would “end” public funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology during an April 17 press conference. Despite his promise, the National Institutes of Health has left untouched a 2019 neuroscience research grant that disbursed hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Chinese laboratory, according to a federal expenditure database. The NIH earmarked most of the $4.3 million grant to U.C. Irvine, which the California public university used to funnel $216,108 in taxpayer money to a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher as a “sub-grant.”

The Trump administration previously cracked down on a different U.S.-based group that occupied a similar intermediary role between the NIH and the Chinese lab. The Trump-era NIH temporarily stopped funding a bat coronavirus research project managed by New York-based environmental nonprofit EcoHealth because nearly $600,000 of the $3.7 million grant went toward the Chinese institute. The NIH later reinstated some of the funding after intense blowback from academics but imposed hefty conditions on its usage that EcoHealth said would “effectively block” it from finishing the bat coronavirus research project.

U.C. Irvine also funneled some of its NIH grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but the California university appears to have been spared the funding restrictions imposed on EcoHealth: The database shows that the U.C. Irvine project remains fully funded to this day. The taxpayer-funded grant supported the publication of two academic articles, including one that was published months after Trump pledged to suspend government funding for the Chinese lab.

Justin Goodman, vice president of the White Coat Waste Project, a government watchdog group, said the U.S. government should suspend all ties to the Chinese laboratory.

“Shipping U.S. tax dollars to a notorious CCP-run animal laboratory lab … is a recipe for disaster,” Goodman told the Washington Free Beacon. “Taxpayers should not be forced to bankroll this reckless research, and it’s incredibly troubling that the Wuhan Institute still has authorization to keep getting our money.”

The NIH previously received bipartisan criticism for its research ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which some U.S. officials say accidentally leaked the coronavirus to the general public. State Department reports warned that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had significant safety issues as far back as 2018. The World Health Organization said it is “unlikely” that the virus leaked from the laboratory, but China has frequently stonewalled WHO investigators from accessing information about the virus’s origins.

U.C. Irvine received the NIH grant money to conduct a three-year research project on using genetically engineered herpesviruses to map the human brain. The grant listed Prof. Min-Hua Luo, a group leader at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as one of the “multiple principal investigators” for the project and noted that she and her colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology will play a significant role in the research project. “Prof. Luo and other key investigators in her group at Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences will collaborate with [U.C. Irvine Prof.] Xiangmin Xu and other [multiple principal investigators] in the U.S.,” the research grant read.

Luo was listed as a coauthor in both of the academic articles published with the support of the NIH grant.

Goodman said the NIH’s opaque funding practices could be concealing even more examples of taxpayer money going toward the Chinese laboratory.

“These grants … are very secretive and not transparent,” Goodman said. “Often it’s impossible to connect the dots between foreign and U.S.-based institutions using NIH’s database.”

U.C. Irvine did not respond to a request for comment.

One week in progressive America

0
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (AP/Rich Pedroncelli, File)

By Caroline Glick, Israel Hayom via JNS

The Democrats had a lousy week. It began with former President Donald Trump’s acquittal in the Senate.

Trump’s acquittal was a major blow to the Democrats. It isn’t that anyone believed Trump would be convicted. Whether Republicans love or hate the former president, the fact is that it is unconstitutional to hold an impeachment trial for a former officeholder. And for that reason alone, there was no chance that more than a smattering of Republicans would support the move.

But once the farcical trial ended, public focus moved to the Democrats—who now control both houses of Congress and the White House. True, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is already planning to drag Trump back to center stage with her “January 6 Truth Commission.” But that won’t happen for several months. And in the meantime, for the first time in five years, the Democrats find themselves, and their actions, the focus of public attention.

The first casualties of the scrutiny have been the Democrat governors of the most populous Democrat states in the Union—Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gavin Newsom of California.

After a nearly a year of Cuomo being lavished with adulation for his leadership of the coronavirus pandemic in New York, upheld as the future of the Democratic Party, touted as a possible candidate for Attorney General and even winning an Emmy for his press conferences, the truth has caught up with “America’s governor.”

 

Last March, as the number of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in New York mounted and fears that hospitals would be overwhelmed rose, Trump ordered the Army to set up a field hospital at the Javits Center and sent the Navy’s USS Comfort floating hospital to New York harbor. Not wanting to give any credit to Trump, Cuomo ordered nursing homes to take in COVID-19 patients from hospitals. The result was disastrous. COVID-19 spread like wildfire among the most vulnerable population and thousands of elderly New Yorkers died.

Republicans and conservative journalists have long pointed out that Cuomo’s move was lethally misguided. But protected by the media, Cuomo indignantly denied the allegations. Recently, though, his ability to deny the charges was dealt a fatal blow. New York’s Democrat Attorney General Letitia Jones released a report that showed Cuomo’s data on nursing home deaths from COVID-19 were false. Whereas Cuomo claimed that 8,500 nursing home residents died of COVID-19, the real number is more than 15,000.

Cuomo, Newsom and the coronavirus fiasco

Last week, Associated Press reported that Cuomo also understated the number of COVID-19 patients that were transferred to nursing homes from hospitals by nearly 40 percent. In the face of the actual data, many Democrats have joined Republicans in calling for federal and state authorities to open criminal investigations against Cuomo.

Last December, the chorus of California business owners and parents making impassioned pleas to Governor Gavin Newsom to lift his draconian COVID-19 lockdowns that barred California children from school and shuttered most businesses, including restaurants for both indoor and outdoor dining, was becoming a groundswell. As he imperiously rejected the calls, Newsom and his wife were photographed dining with friends at a swanky French restaurant in Napa Valley.

Newsom’s mind-blowing hypocrisy reinvigorated a Republican campaign to recall him from office in special elections. This week, activists garnered the requisite one and a half million signatures—a month before the deadline—and so guaranteed that California will hold a gubernatorial election later this year. Facing an enraged public, Democrats fear that they may lose their total control over the deep-blue state for the first time in 15 years.

This then brings us to President Joe Biden. Less than a month into his presidency, Biden has managed to turn off U.S. allies and anger his own voters.

Both during the campaign and since taking office, Biden pledged to rebuild America’s standing in the world after Trump allegedly destroyed respect for America with his “America First” foreign policy. Yet, as Walter Russell Mead laid out in the Wall Street Journal last week, U.S. allies are not at all pleased with how Biden’s “return to normalcy” is shaping up.

India and Japan are ignoring Biden’s sanctions against Myanmar following its military coup. Whereas identity-politics-sopped Democrats were sure Vice President Kamala Harris’s Indian heritage would make Indians love the new administration, it turns out that progressive politics spewed by Indian Americans is not a recipe for warm relations. Mead reported that India’s Hindu media is on the warpath against the administration after Harris’s niece participated in protests against the policies of India’s Hindu-nationalist BJP ruling party.

Mead added that Canada is up in arms over Biden’s cancellation of the Keystone pipeline. Brazil is angry about the administration’s deforestation policies. And Mexico is scaling back its cooperation with the U.S. regarding cross-border drug smuggling.

Israel and the U.S.’s Arab allies completely oppose Biden’s efforts to restore the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran and otherwise appease Tehran’s ayatollahs. Netanyahu is rightly using his record of withstanding U.S. pressure under the Obama administration as an electoral asset ahead of the March 23 general elections.

As for Biden’s domestic programs, rather than capitalize on the goodwill a new president generally enjoys to pass a bipartisan legislative agenda, Biden and his fellow Democrats are pushing ahead with a radical legislative agenda on Capitol Hill, and so helping Republicans still smarting and divided after their electoral defeats to unify their ranks.

This week, Biden broke his campaign promise to reopen schools in his first hundred days, after teachers unions torpedoed his efforts. Instead, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki announced that the new, “ambitious” goal is to open schools one day a week. Republicans are rightly capitalizing on parents’ anger at the prolonged school closures.

But the Democrats’ bad week portends a much worse future for Americans in general.

It isn’t just that the teachers’ unions want to keep the schools shut. The schools they don’t want to open are now becoming bastions for progressive indoctrination. Parents may be better off not sending their children to school, at least not in Democrat-controlled school districts.

This week, Fox News reported that in Oregon, teachers are being urged to use a new math curriculum, designed for middle school teachers, whose purpose is to “dismantle racism in mathematics.”

To achieve this dubious goal, teachers are supposed to stop requiring students to show their work. They are also supposed to stop demanding that they get to the right answer. Instead, teachers are encouraged to have students “come up with at least two answers that might solve this problem.”

The great culprit for woke math is objectivity, as in objective truth. Objectivity, or objective reality, Oregon teachers are being told, is racist.

The new math is called “ethnomathematics,” and ethnomath teachers are instructed to “identity and challenge the ways that math is used to uphold capitalist, imperialist, and racist views.”

Whites are the boogeymen in the progressive America. Indeed, New York City is now pushing a scale of whiteness that moves from white supremacists (bad), to white abolitionists (good). White abolitionists, New York’s Education Department claims, are whites who work to overthrow the entire social and political system that produced the evil America that must now atone for its sins.

American Jews targeted

But while whites in general are the targets, the most immediate victims of the new (re-) education system are American Jews. In the new progressive America, Jews are specific targets in two ways. First, the progressive revolutionaries seek to eliminate merit as a basis for advancement on the argument that like objective truth, merit is inherently racist.

American Jewry’s rise in American society over the past century has been based almost entirely on American meritocracy. If you eliminate merit as a basis for advancement, you doom American Jewry to second-class citizen status.

Progressive America also targets American Jews through its Israel-anchored anti-Semitism. Anti-Zionism does not simply reject the moral basis for Israel’s existence and support systemically discriminating against and eventually eliminating it. It also supports ostracizing American Jews who support Israel and barring them from expressing their views in public. That is the actual purpose of the BDS campaigns that at least two senior Biden administration officials—Maher Bitar and Reema Dodin—led in their student days.

Today, anti-Semitism is not a bar for advancement in progressive circles. To the contrary, it is an asset. Consider the big promotion that Rep. Ilhan “It’s all about the Benjamins baby” Omar just received.

When Nancy Pelosi gave Omar a seat on the prestigious House Foreign Affairs Committee in 2019, the move provoked both anger and fear among many American Jews. They were angry because Omar, with her long record of anti-Jewish pronouncements, would certainly use her position to advance her anti-Semitic positions. And they were scared because the fact that Pelosi appointed Omar over a loud chorus of objections was a sign of the power of progressive anti-Semites in the Democrat Party.

When this week Pelosi appointed Omar chair of the subcommittee for Africa, global health and human rights, outside a few conservative Jewish groups, the move met with no opposition. And there is a reason for that. Two years on, anti-Semitism is so ingrained in progressive circles that objecting to it is enough to get you tagged as a racist.

To drive this point home, last week the Jewish Democratic Council of America—the Jewish arm of the Democrat Party—hosted an online discussion of Biden’s appointment of outspoken Israel haters and Palestinian terror supporters. Barack Obama’s ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro was one of the participants. Shapiro insisted angrily that Jewish criticism of these officials is “racist.” He added, “There is unfortunately this bias, this prejudice against Arab and Muslim Americans, particularly if they’re working on issues related to the Middle East.”

In other words, like objectivity and merit, in Woke America, substantive criticism of others based on their actions and statements is now “racist.” Fighting anti-Semitism is racist. Fighting hatred is racist. Fighting ignorance is racist.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant. And scrutiny of the Democrats will likely make it difficult for them to maintain their Senate and House majorities in 2022. But the damage progressives are already causing to public health, to America’s standing in the world, to American schoolchildren and to American Jews will take more than one election to repair.

Caroline Glick is an award-winning columnist and author of “The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East.”

Trump snubs Haley, relationship appears finished after critical interview

0
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with outgoing U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, Oct. 9, 2018. (AP/Evan Vucci)
By Paul Shindman, World Israel News

Former President Donald Trump has ignored a request from former U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley to meet with him to do damage control after dissing Trump in a recent interview, the news website Politico reported Thursday.

Haley apparently contacted Trump last week to request a sit-down meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, but a source familiar with the details told Politico that Trump turned her down.

The two Republicans have not spoken since Trump supporters stormed the Capitol building on Jan. 6, when Haley condemned Trump for inciting his supporters.

The breakdown between the two came after Politico published an in-depth interview with Haley on Feb. 12 in which she said the Republican Party should not have followed Trump over his unproven allegations of election fraud.

“We need to acknowledge he let us down,” Haley said in the interview. “He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.”

Haley, who is widely believed to be building up for a run at the presidency in 2024, had backed Trump’s complaints over the election outcome, saying: “I understand the president. I understand that genuinely, to his core, he believes he was wronged.”

However, that position changed after Trump supporters tried to stop Senate certification of Joe Biden as the new president and senators – both Democrat and Republican – were evacuated from the building.

“He was badly wrong with his words yesterday,” Haley said after the Capitol incident. “And it wasn’t just his words. His actions since Election Day will be judged harshly by history.”

Haley also said that in her eyes Trump was finished with politics.

“I don’t think he’s going to be in the picture. I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far,” Haley said.

In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Haley painted a rosier picture of Trump, saying the “liberal media… wants to stoke a nonstop Republican civil war” and had used her comments to do so.

“The moment anyone on the right offers the slightest criticism of the 45th president, the media goes berserk,” Haley wrote, apparently trying to distance herself from her harsh criticism of Trump by also praising his achievements in foreign policy and Trump’s lightning campaign that successfully produced coronavirus vaccines in record time.

Known for cutting off anybody who does not display 100% loyalty to him, Trump did not respond to Haley’s request for a meeting to patch up their relationship.

Mystery ship suspected in 100-mile Israeli coastline contamination

0
Israelis standing around a 17-meter long fin whale washed ashore near the city of Ashkelon, Feb. 19, 2021. (Flash90/Yossi Aloni)

By Lauren Marcus, World Israel News

Israel is facing its worst ecological disaster in decades as an apparent tar dump from a vessel off the coastline has wreaked havoc upon the country’s sea life and beaches.

From Israel’s northernmost beach at Rosh HaNikra to the southern port city of Ashkelon, Israeli shores stretching 100 miles have been blackened by tar.

“What we are seeing today is one of the worst pollution disasters we have ever known in Israel, said Shaul Goldstein, head of the Nature and Parks Authority.

Dead marine animals, including turtles and a 17 meter (55 foot) baby whale, have washed ashore, indicating a serious disaster.

“The greatest fear is that there is a lot more tar in the sea right now that is poisoning wildlife and still hasn’t reached us,” Dr. Dor Adelist, a marine scientist, told Walla News.

Scores of volunteers turned up on Israel’s beaches over the weekend to help clear the tar, but the Israel Nature and Parks Authority warned the public to stop clean-up efforts after several people fell ill and were hospitalized after breathing in toxic fumes.

The Chief of the General Staff, Lt. Gen. Aviv Kohavi agreed on Sunday to send thousands of IDF soldiers to assist the Nature and Parks Authority in mapping the areas which were affected by the tar contamination, cleaning the beaches, and disposing of the garbage in a designated area.

Environmental Protection Minister Gila Gamliel in a statement, “This is a hazard of a magnitude we have not seen in years.”

“We are doing everything in order to find those responsible for the destruction, and are preparing for the difficult and long task of rehabilitating the beaches and preventing further injury to animals.”

Gamliel said the Environmental Protection Ministry was in contact with international bodies to identify and hold the ship responsible for the spill accountable.

Adding that the incident is “heartbreaking” and a “crime against the environment and ecosystem,” Gamliel explained that Israel is using AI-driven models of sea movement and satellite imaging to track the source of the spill.

The Environmental Protection Ministry has identified 10 vessels that sailed through the Mediterranean Sea during the time frame and location at which the spill is believed to have happened.

The agency is in contact with its international counterparts to audit the ships and determine which one is the culprit.

“Justice will be done,” said Gamliel.