|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Art World Intrigue Unveiled: Russian Oligarch’s Legal Battle Challenges Sotheby’s Integrity
Edited by: TJVNews.com
In 2013, the art world witnessed a staggering transaction when Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev delved into a buying spree, amassing an art collection worth $2 billion. As was reported in the New York Times, among his acquisitions was Modigliani’s sculpture “Tête,” purchased for a whopping $83 million. Little did Rybolovlev know that the intricate dance of art dealings would soon turn into a legal battleground, with accusations of fraud, deception, and a tangled web of conflicting loyalties.
#AuctionUpdate: Modigliani’s ‘Tête’ achieves #AuctionRecord for the artist selling for $70.7m pic.twitter.com/zuKsoXk2C0
— Sotheby’s (@Sothebys) November 5, 2014
Rybolovlev, identified as an oligarch by the U.S. Treasury Department and congressional reports, accumulated his fortune in potash fertilizer following the Soviet Union’s collapse, the NYT report said. His vast holdings include a Greek island, Monaco’s soccer team, and global real estate, including a Florida oceanfront home previously owned by Donald Trump.
Picked two oligarch Luxury Yacht out there, just to keep in mind.
1st – Anna 2018 110m Price: $250M located in Dubai owned by Dmitry Rybolovlev Net Worth $6.4B
2nd – Cloudbreak 2016 75meter Price: $120M located in Koh Lipe s. Thailand owned by Alexander Swetakow Net Worth $2B
1/2 pic.twitter.com/hPEpmITolB— 🇺🇦Alphonse aka Fonsi Fella (@rinoatkackle) January 2, 2024
At the center of this art world saga is Yves Bouvier, a man tasked with handling Rybolovlev’s art transactions. However, court documents reveal a startling revelation – Bouvier had secretly acquired “Tête” only months before the sale at half the price, according to the NYT report. Rybolovlev alleged that Bouvier, posing as an art adviser, deceived him in numerous transactions, clandestinely acting as an art dealer and inflating prices by tens of millions of dollars. Bouvier staunchly denies these allegations.
Bouvier, not directly implicated in the case, played a significant role in the art world’s expansion of free ports, creating tax-free storage havens for masterpieces. The NYT reported that The Geneva Free Port, once dominated by Bouvier, attests to his influence in this realm. Legal battles between Bouvier and Rybolovlev in Europe and Asia concluded with a confidential settlement in Geneva last year.
“Violet, Green and Red” painted by Mark Rothko was purchased by Dmitry Rybolovlev for $186 million. pic.twitter.com/ddDQEqebaN
— Donna Downs Kawasaki, PhD, EMBA, MBA, B. (@DonnaDM8) January 6, 2024
The saga now takes a new turn as Rybolovlev points his legal crosshairs at Sotheby’s, the renowned auction house intricately involved in many of these disputed transactions. As was indicated in the NYT report, Rybolovlev’s legal team contends that Sotheby’s played a role in facilitating Bouvier’s deceit, asserting that the auction house provided inflated valuations, masking Bouvier’s substantial markups. Sotheby’s, in its defense, vehemently denies any wrongdoing, maintaining that it adhered to industry best practices.
As the dispute enters a Manhattan courtroom, a protracted legal battle is expected to unfold. The report in the NYT said that Marcus Asner, a lawyer representing Sotheby’s has challenged Rybolovlev to prove the auction house’s complicity, and emphasized the lack of evidence indicating Sotheby’s awareness of Bouvier’s deceptive practices. The trial is poised to offer a rare glimpse into the enigmatic world of art dealings, where transparency is often eclipsed by secrecy.
| LES RECORDS DU MARCHÉ DE L’ART 07/31 |
Mark Rothko, No. 6 (Violet, Green and Red), 1951.
Vendue pour 186 millions de dollars dans le cadre d’une transaction privée en 2014. 💵
L’œuvre fut acquise par Dmitry Rybolovlev.▪️ D’après les informations connues à ce jour ▪️ pic.twitter.com/kjKWCR02xI
— ART FLAW (@ART_FLAW) January 7, 2024
Nicholas O’Donnell, an art market lawyer, characterizes this case as the “granddaddy of them all” in navigating conflicting loyalties and transparency in the art market, according to information provided in the NYT report. The trial promises to be the most high-profile art market dispute since the 2011 collapse of Knoedler & Co. gallery, where $80 million worth of fake Abstract Expressionist paintings deceived art enthusiasts worldwide. It is also seen as a cautionary tale, shedding light on the perils of proceeding without clear expectations of everyone’s roles in high-stakes art transactions.
At the core of the legal dispute are four artworks universally recognized as masterpieces. According to the NYT report, apart from the Modigliani sculpture and the da Vinci painting, the collection includes works by Gustav Klimt and René Magritte. Rybolovlev, assisted by Bouvier, amassed this impressive collection between 2002 and 2014. However, their partnership soured in 2014 when Rybolovlev discovered Bouvier’s monetary maneuvering at the Eden Rock hotel on St. Barts, the report in the NYT added.
Trump bought the house for $41 million and then sold the house to Russian Oligarch and billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev for nearly $100 million.
This deal came under investigation for money laundering during the Russian election intervention investigations. pic.twitter.com/7hgciqQAI8
— Hungry Pawns (@hungrypawns) January 6, 2024
Rybolovlev serendipitously encountered an art adviser representing the owner of a Modigliani painting recently purchased through Bouvier. Shockingly, the adviser revealed that Rybolovlev had paid millions more than the price agreed upon with the adviser’s client, according to the NYT report. Bouvier, it seemed, had pocketed the difference.
Russian Oligarch Takes Sotheby’s to Court as Art World Watches – https://t.co/lDPpTPF5A3 Oligarch Takes Sotheby’s to Court as Art World Watches
In 2013, when Dmitry Rybolovlev, a Russian oligarch, was…
— Minesh Verma (@Verma_MineshK) January 4, 2024
Rybolovlev’s accusations against Yves Bouvier, a key figure in his art acquisitions, are far-reaching. As was indicated in the NYT report, court documents reveal claims of defrauding Rybolovlev in the purchase of 38 works, with 12 acquisitions orchestrated through private sales arranged by Sotheby’s. In a surprising twist, the company Rybolovlev utilized to purchase art has accused Sotheby’s of complicity, suggesting that the auction house had a vested interest in aiding Bouvier due to his perceived value as a valuable client.
As the trial unfolds, it will serve as a riveting spectacle, exploring the intricacies of the art market and revealing the extent of Bouvier’s alleged deception and Sotheby’s purported complicity.
Daniel J. Kornstein, Rybolovlev’s lawyer, emphasizes that the judge has restricted the use of the term ‘oligarch’ during the trial, arguing that it is a pejorative slur without legal significance, according to the NYT report.
In a pretrial decision last year, U.S. District Court Judge Jesse M. Furman denied several of Rybolovlev’s claims against Sotheby’s, citing time constraints or a lack of evidence, the report in the NYT said. However, the judge allowed the jury trial to proceed specifically concerning four significant works at the heart of the dispute.
The Modigliani sculpture, purchased for $83 million, serves as a focal point in the legal skirmish. Judge Furman’s decision references a 2012 email from Sotheby’s representative Samuel Valette to Bouvier, initially valuing the sculpture at €70 million to €90 million and later revising it to €80 million to €100 million within a span of 12 hours, as was reported by the NYT. This rapid adjustment raised suspicions, leading the judge to opine that a jury could infer communication between Valette and Bouvier during that period, indicating a potential collaboration.
Throughout the legal saga, Bouvier has consistently maintained that he operated not solely as an adviser but also as an independent dealer. The NYT report indicated that he pointed to sales contracts for Rybolovlev’s initial purchases, asserting they demonstrate his transparency in openly operating as a dealer who charged prices Rybolovlev was willing to pay. However, Rybolovlev contests this narrative, presenting emails where Bouvier describes negotiations with sellers that Rybolovlev claims never occurred.
Amelia Brankov, an art market lawyer and chair of the art market committee of the New York City Bar Association, notes the rarity of transparency in art market transactions usually shrouded in privacy, the NYT report said. The legal proceedings provide a unique opportunity for the public to witness the inner workings of an industry where multimillion-dollar deals often unfold behind closed doors.
Legal experts closely follow the case to see how Rybolovlev reconciles his pursuit of claims against Sotheby’s with the outcomes of his legal battles against Bouvier in various jurisdictions. Despite Rybolovlev’s allegations of fraud, Bouvier’s Swiss lawyers, David Bitton and Yves Klein, strongly object to any wrongdoing, citing the favorable outcomes in legal actions across Monaco, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Geneva.
A recent development in Geneva saw the prosecutor’s office closing its case against Bouvier after Rybolovlev’s lawyers withdrew a criminal complaint. While the terms of the settlement remain undisclosed, both parties state that there will be no further claims against each other, according to the NYT report. The prosecutor’s office stated that multiple hearings did not provide sufficient evidence to raise suspicions against Bouvier, though he was ordered to pay procedural costs.
“This is the most expensive painting ever sold in the history of the art world.”
THE LOST LEONARDO (2021)
Starring: George Adam . Warren Adelson . Evan Beard . Yves Bouvier . Alexandra Bregman
Director: Andreas Koefoed
My Rating: 7 out of 10pic.twitter.com/UNRarufMJW
— We Love Movies !!! 🎬 (@MoviePolls4U) August 27, 2022
Similarly, in Monaco, a criminal investigation into Bouvier was dismissed on the grounds that it had been conducted in a biased and unfair manner, further complicating the narrative surrounding Bouvier’s alleged misconduct.
Judge Furman, in a decision last March, highlighted the plaintiff’s argument that Sotheby’s valuations were close or identical to the amounts paid for the artworks, hindering the discovery of Sotheby’s alleged role in aiding and abetting Bouvier’s breach of trust, the NYT report added.
One of the artworks central to the legal battle is the “Salvator Mundi,” a painting attributed to da Vinci and purchased by Rybolovlev in 2013. According to the NYT report, Sotheby’s representative, Samuel Valette, reportedly met with Bouvier and Rybolovlev at a Central Park West apartment owned by a Rybolovlev family trust, where the trio inspected the painting.
“Salvator Mundi” was sold for 45 British Pounds at an auction in 1958. It was later discovered to be a lost work by Leonardo da Vinci and was sold again at a Christie’s auction in 2017 for a staggering $450.3 million. pic.twitter.com/8m7aGlbpE2
— Link Daniel (@linkd) January 2, 2024
Valette suggested an initial valuation of $125 million, but faced with resistance from a colleague, the figure was eventually adjusted to 100 million euros, approximately $114 million. Notably, the cover letter underwent edits, erasing any reference to Bouvier’s prior purchase of the artwork.
Subsequent negotiations, as reported by Bouvier to Rybolovlev’s aide, detailed rejected offers of $90 million, $100 million, $120 million, and $125 million before the final acceptance of $127.5 million, as was noted in the report. However, Judge Furman later concluded that these negotiations never took place, raising further questions about the transparency and authenticity of the art market transactions.
On May 2, 2013, Yves Bouvier, not Dmitry Rybolovlev, acquired the “Mundi” through Sotheby’s, utilizing a combination of a painting and cash valued at $83 million. The NYT report said that a mere day later, Bouvier orchestrated a swift resale of the masterpiece to Rybolovlev for an astonishing $127.5 million, as detailed in court papers.
In early 2015, as Rybolovlev grew increasingly suspicious of Bouvier’s dealings, the latter sought a valuation for the “Mundi” from Sotheby’s.
While U.S. District Court Judge Jesse M. Furman acknowledged these alterations, he ruled that the valuation itself did not constitute evidence of Sotheby’s complicity in the alleged fraud according to the NYT report. This revelation, however, remains a critical aspect of the upcoming jury trial, offering insights into the behind-the-scenes machinations of art valuations and sales.
In a subsequent turn of events, Rybolovlev sold the “Mundi” at Christie’s to a Saudi prince for an astonishing $450 million, setting a record as the highest amount ever paid for an artwork at auction, as per the NYT report. The immense value of the sale only amplifies the stakes of the ongoing legal battle, raising questions about the roles played by Bouvier and Sotheby’s in shaping the art market landscape.
As the case heads to trial, art experts anticipate that the proceedings may establish new guidelines for transparency within the art market. The NYT also reported that Leila A. Amineddoleh, an art and cultural heritage lawyer, emphasized the pervasive secrecy in the art world, asserting that this case could clarify the responsibilities and fiduciary duties owed to clients by dealers and auction houses.
