52.9 F
New York
Monday, May 13, 2024

Has Victoria’s Secret Been Hijacked by the “Woke” Crowd?

Related Articles

-Advertisement-

Must read

For many years, the selling point of Victoria’s Secret (VS), the women’s sexy lingerie giant has been just that…..sex. The most glamorous of curvy, leggy, gorgeous women, adorned the pages of its brochures that teen-aged young men hid under their mattresses and men ogled between the pages of their daily newspapers while sipping their lattes at Starbucks. No more. The dopes at VS announced this week, a new initiative to attract a new breed of “woke” customers who lean to the radical, gay, lesbian, cross-dressing, transgender, queer Left. They’ve sold their souls to the wishes of the LBGTQIA+ fanatics. This new look is deemed the VS Collective which is, according to their statement, “designed to shape the future” of the company. Not necessarily, the shape of the woman. Good Luck!

The remodeled brand has brought in Megan Rapinoe as its new spokesperson to appeal to its new base of “normal” women, which includes not only supersized women but men who want to be and those who’ve surgically been transformed into women, as well. The former superstar of the U.S. Women’s national Soccer team has become a prominent voice as an LGBTQ+ activist. She also kneeled during the national anthem in support of former NFL player, Colin Kaepernick. She has also blurted out, “I’m not going to the f——-g White House” to meet President Trump, who honored her championship team. Not a nice woman, or whatever she calls herself. And she will design and sell underwear designed to sexually entice…..just whom? Stupidity!

To all intents and purposes, this corporate move is not to expand its well known, thriving business, but one meant to kiss the tuchis’ of this nation’s Progressive elite, those who seem to be calling the shots to exterminate this great nation.

According to a recent Washington Times article, Victoria’s Secret was long known for an annual fashion show — now canceled — where supermodel “Angels” would wear little more than lingerie, jewelry and feather arrangements. Martin Waters, Victoria’s Secret chief executive, told The New York Times that “right now” he did not see the Angels as being “culturally relevant.”

Have those in high corporate chairs of this organization ever entered a Victoria Secret’s emporium and took notice of those eyeing and handling its merchandise? Did they not see the boyfriends and husbands doing the purchasing in order to make their lovers more attractive, enticing and sexy? Didn’t women shop there to make themselves sexier for their male companions? Wasn’t that the image that made VS the ‘go-to store’ for retail sexy merchandise? Now they’ll be hawking their products to cross-dressers, the overweight and those who find the women’s underwear merchandise at Costco and Walmart line too revealing. Don’t they understand that sexy garments are supposed to be sexy and that it sells? We’ll enjoy watching the competitors take over that market. And we’ll look at the sad sacks who walk into the fewer and fewer Victoria Secrets shops and walk out with bland, ordinary garments that deserve to be covered up and merely used as clothing. But that’s their choice…not ours.

balance of natureDonate

Latest article

- Advertisement -