58.5 F
New York
Friday, April 26, 2024
Home Blog Page 6

Palestinian Ruling Party Admits: Hamas Steals Aid, Kills Aid Workers in Gaza

0
Palestinian mourners and gunmen wave the green Hamas flag at the funeral of a Palestinian terrorist who was killed in an Israeli military raid in Nur Shams, October 20, 2023. (Nasser Ishtayeh/Flash90

By Joel B. Pollak

Fatah, the “moderate” ruling party of the Palestinian Authority, has admitted on live television that Hamas steals humanitarian aid and kills aid workers in the Gaza Strip.

The admission, captured by Palestinian Media Watch, confirms what Israel has been saying all along — and goes further, stating that Hamas is not only responsible for endangering aid workers by hiding among them, but also asserts that Hamas has been killing aid workers directly.

Palestinian Media Watch reported (original emphasis):

In an incredible and rare admission, Fatah has corroborated what Israel has been saying all along: that Hamas is responsible for turmoil connected to distribution of the humanitarian aid sent into Gaza. A Fatah TV anchor reported that throughout the war, Hamas has been committing what is essentially a triple crime—it has attacked and killed aid workers in order to control aid distribution, stolen the food and water for itself, and caused food prices to skyrocket.

Fatah-run Awdah TV host: “Hamas’ persecution of any party who is a source for distributing the [humanitarian] aid or securing it began from the start of the war (i.e., 2023 Gaza war), as Hamas persecuted well-known figures and teams of volunteers on the ground in mid-October [2023]. It attacked them and killed some of them for two reasons: Firstly, preventing any activity by any [other] party in the Gaza Strip; and secondly, ensuring Hamas control over the aid and its storage, which of course leads to these crazy and unreal prices that no one can pay in the shadow of this destruction. After the occupation (i.e., Israel) bombed storehouses controlled by Hamas, the accumulation of tons of various food and aid products that Hamas had taken exclusivity over became clear, at a time when the Gaza Strip is suffering from hunger.”

This is a damning indictment by Fatah, exposing Hamas’ heinous actions against humanitarian aid workers and Palestinian civilians in need of food. World powers were quick to decry Israel for an inadvertent tragedy that killed several World Central Kitchen personnel. These same authorities and media outlets must now condemn Hamas with equal vigor for its intentional murder of aid workers. A failure to condemn Hamas for intentional murder by the countries and frameworks who condemned Israel for accidental killing would expose once again a glaring double standard by international bodies, and especially the media, that unfortunately has accompanied this entire war.

The Biden administration has blamed Israel for the death of aid workers, with President Joe Biden claiming this month that “Israel has not done enough to protect aid workers trying to deliver desperately needed help to civilians.”

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

 

Bklyn’s Pratt Institute Under Scrutiny for Planned Vote on Israeli Boycott During Passover 

0

Bklyn’s Pratt Institute Under Scrutiny for Planned Vote on Israeli Boycott During Passover 

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Brooklyn’s prestigious Pratt Institute has come under scrutiny for its planned vote on an “academic and cultural boycott of Israel,” sparking significant controversy and allegations of anti-Semitism, as was reported in The New York Post. The timing of the vote, scheduled during the Passover holiday, has heightened tensions and raised questions about inclusivity and fairness in the institution’s decision-making processes.

The vote by the Pratt Institute’s Academic Senate was set for Tuesday, coinciding with the first full day of Passover, an eight-day period during which observant Jews abstain from work and engage in religious observance with family and friends. According to the information provided in the Post report, this scheduling has led to accusations that the timing effectively excludes Jewish faculty and staff from participating in a decision that has direct implications for them and the broader Jewish community on campus.

Rory Lancman, senior counsel at the Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, a Jewish legal civil-rights advocacy group, has been vocal in his criticism of the proposed resolution and its timing. The Post report said that Lancman has described the scheduling of the vote during Passover as “positively obscene” and akin to condemning the historical liberation of Jews, which Passover commemorates.

The resolution, as reported, is not only controversial due to its content—calling for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel—but also in how broadly it is written. According to Lancman, the proposal could potentially lead to significant restrictions on campus, possibly affecting Jewish community groups such as Hillel and Chabad, which play crucial roles in supporting Jewish students on campus, as per the Post report. Such outcomes would likely intensify feelings of isolation and discrimination among Jewish students and faculty.

The Pratt Academic Senate, described as a “shared governance body” that represents faculty and advises the school’s board of trustees on academic matters, is at the center of this controversy. The decision to hold a vote on such a divisive issue during a significant religious holiday suggests a gap in the Senate’s consideration of the diverse religious and cultural backgrounds of its members.

In an April 19 letter addressed to Pratt’s board of trustees Chairman Garry Hattem, President Frances Bronet, and Academic Senate President Uzma Rizvi, Lancman expressed his outrage and called for reconsideration of the vote’s timing and the resolution itself, as was noted in the Post report.

Lancman also argued that the resolution, if passed, would contravene federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws, particularly affecting Jewish faculty and students who might feel targeted by such a measure.

The institution’s eventual response revealed that the scheduling conflict with the Jewish festival of Passover was unintentional. The Post reported that Pratt’s spokesman stated that the discussion initially set for April 23 was inadvertently planned on the first full day of Passover, leading to its removal from the meeting’s agenda. However, the institution did not specify when the discussion and vote would eventually take place.

The resolution, which calls for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel, has been criticized not just for its content but also for its potential violation of anti-discrimination laws.

Lancman’s communication also warned of potential legal action against Pratt, emphasizing that the law would support actions to ensure that Jewish staff and students had a fair opportunity to voice their opinions on the resolution, as was reported by the Post.  He urged the school to either withdraw the resolution or postpone the debate and vote until after Passover, to allow full participation.

The content of the Pratt resolution itself is a point of contention. It alleges that Palestinians have suffered “six months of genocide” at the hands of Israel, claiming over 33,000 deaths in Gaza—a figure that contributes to the heated nature of the debate.

This resolution also calls for comprehensive measures against Israeli institutions and has raised legal and ethical questions regarding discrimination and academic freedom, the Post reported.

The resolution put forward at Pratt seeks a complete cessation of engagement with Israeli cultural and academic institutions. Specifically, it demands that Pratt sever ties with Israeli entities such as the Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design in Jerusalem, cease participation in events or activities involving Israeli groups, and divest from Israeli companies and other entities that are perceived to benefit from the occupation of “Palestine, “ according to the Post report. This includes a broad prohibition on projects that might normalize Israel’s status in the global cultural sphere or obscure the state’s alleged violations of international law and Palestinian rights.

Critically, the resolution does not acknowledge the violence perpetrated by Hamas against Israeli civilians. Over 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed by Hamas during the October 7th massacre, and dozens of Israeli hostages are still being held in Gaza, the report in the Post said. The omission of these facts from the resolution’s narrative has contributed to accusations of bias and a one-sided approach to a complex international issue.

The resolution has garnered support from several faculty members at Pratt, including individuals affiliated with Faculty for Justice in Palestine and various professors across different departments. This group of academics argues that the boycott is a necessary stance against what they view as ongoing injustices facilitated by Israeli policies.

Lancman also argued that scheduling the resolution’s vote during Passover discriminately impacts Jewish students and staff, potentially violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to the Post report, This act requires that educational institutions receiving federal funding ensure their programs are free from discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. Lancman highlighted a New York state executive order, first issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo and continued by Governor Kathy Hochul, which prevents the state government from conducting business with any institution that supports the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

 

Palestinian arrested in Israeli youth’s terror murder

0
Binyamin Achimeir, 14, was killed in a Palestinian terrorist attack on April 12, 2024. Credit: Israel Police.

(JNS)
Israeli security forces arrested a Palestinian suspect in the April 12 terrorist murder of 14-year-old shepherd Binyamin Achimeir following an overnight raid in the Binyamin region of Samaria.

“Overnight, in a joint operation of the Shin Bet, the Israel Police and the IDF, Ahmed Duabsha, 21 years old, a resident of the village of Duma in the Binyamin Brigade [area of deployment], was arrested by the soldiers of the Yamam [Border Police National Counter-

Achimeir’s body was found by a drone on April 13 following a 24-hour-long search, after he went missing while working as a shepherd based in Gal Farm, located just under two miles south of Duma.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned “the heinous murder” of Achimeir, according to a rare statement released by his office on the Jewish day of rest.

“We will get the murderers and those who helped them, as we do to all who harm the citizens of the State of Israel,” the prime minister said.

The security services said on Monday that “during the past day, there was a significant development in the investigation, and during the night, the forces raided the village of Duma and arrested the suspect.”

The statement noted that Duabsha tied himself to the attack during initial questioning. He was taken into Shin Bet custody for further investigation.

According to data collected by Israeli authorities, Arab aggression and terrorism against Jewish shepherds have been on the rise in recent months.

“Jewish farmers are grazing their sheep in open areas; Arabs don’t like that, even if it happens in Area C [of Judea and Samaria, where Israeli communities are located]. They’re trying to stop them by using violence,” a Judea and Samaria local official told JNS last year.

Between Oct. 7 and Jan. 15 alone, Hatzalah Judea and Samaria recorded more than 2,600 terrorist attacks against Israelis in the area, including 760 cases of rock-throwing, 551 fire bombings, 12 attempted or successful stabbings and nine vehicular assaults.

Israel’s urban warfare experience in Gaza can benefit allies

0
F Armored Corps soldiers drill near Moshav Aniam on the Golan Heights, Feb. 14, 2023. (Michael Giladi/Flash90)

By Yaakov Lappin, JNS

The Israel Defense Forces’ experience in fighting Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip, an area described by observers as the most challenging urban warfare environment in history, likely holds important benefits for Israel’s allies.

One of the key lessons, according to Col. (res.) Dr. Eran Lerman, vice president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, is the IDF’s use of what he described as “three-dimensional warfare.”

This concept relates to creating an unprecedented capability to generate a 3D picture of the battlefield in real-time, one that shows available friendly firepower sources in the air and the ground, and the location of enemy targets.

This data is then pushed to ground forces and the Israeli Air Force, enabling new levels of cooperation.

“This means that when IDF soldiers enter an alleyway, they can see what’s behind the house because someone gives them the picture of what’s in front of them,” said Lerman.

“This is definitely the most significant and heaviest complex military campaign conducted to date under these conditions, to my understanding,” Lerman, a former deputy director for foreign policy and international affairs at the National Security Council in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office, and an ex-IDF Military Intelligence officer, told JNS.

Lerman said that the IDF and the U.S. Armed Forces have been engaged in a process of mutual learning for years, adding that “the Americans had their share of urban battles. It’s not that we invented the wheel, but it seems to me that there is one central component that was implemented in combat in Gaza by the IDF with very great effectiveness, and it is three-dimensional warfare.”

The unparalleled degree of integration between advancing ground forces and the air force accompanying them from above, all working on the basis of a common battlefield picture featuring continuous updates on enemy and friendly force positions, meant that the IDF gained a major advantage against “an enemy that under normal conditions would be invisible,” said Lerman.

IDF ground forces have visual assistance through tablet-like devices that inform their combat needs at any given moment, and work more closely than ever with fighter jets, combat helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as the navy.

The ground forces’ “control of the battlefield is exceptional,” said Lerman, “both at the tactical level and at the micro-tactical level. This compensates to a great extent for the advantage that Hamas had within its own territory, which Hamas is familiar with, and where it was hiding.”

A battle management system, made by Israeli defense company Elbit Systems and called Torch 750 (also known in the IDF as Digital Ground Army), played a central role in generating this ability.

“This battle picture also prevents many friendly fire incidents, though not entirely, to our sorrow,” said Lerman. “I think these are things that will be learned.”

Israeli combat history

A glance at the casualty ratio between the IDF and Hamas reveals that in many battles, the average was around 50 terrorist casualties to one IDF casualty.

Some operations, such as the IDF’s second raid on Shifa Hospital in Gaza City in March, saw some 200 terrorists killed versus three Israeli combat casualties.

This wouldn’t be the first time that battle lessons were shared between Israel and its allies.

While Israel is heavily dependent on American military supplies, it has also exported products developed in the wake of lessons from Israeli combat history.

In 2018, the U.S. Army purchased the Israeli-made Trophy active-protection system for four brigades of its Abrams tanks.

Trophy, which is made by Israeli defense company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, has proven to be a revolutionary system for Israel’s own Merkava 4 tanks because it can instantly detect and intercept lethal armor-penetrating threats such as anti-tank guided missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.

It can also share the location of enemy threats with others.

The system was developed out of the lessons learned by Israel’s defense establishment from the 2006 Second Lebanon War, when Israeli tanks were vulnerable to Hezbollah cells armed with anti-tank missiles.

In the realm of passive armor, Plasan Sasa, an Israeli company, has played an important role in boosting the survivability of the U.S. military’s Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles.

In 2008, Plasan was chosen to provide armor for 1,955 vehicles of the U.S. Marine Corps.

Allied and adversary military doctrine

Bradley Bowman, senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former U.S. Army officer who taught at West Point, stated, “I think there’s much to learn for foreign militaries from the experience in Gaza. I’m confident that the United States and its allies are taking copious notes.”

Bowman, a former national security adviser to members of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, added, “Unfortunately, many of our adversaries are also learning.”

These lessons will shape allied and adversary military doctrine, training, and operations, he assessed.

“The degree to which militaries learn from this experience will have direct consequences on future battlefields,” said Bowman.

“The U.S. military is the most powerful military in the world, arguably the most powerful military in human history, but we make mistakes and have shortcomings. We can learn much from our allies and partners, including our Israeli allies,” Bowman continued.

He described the ongoing war in Gaza as “one of the most significant urban warfare battles in recent history,” arguing that it would be a mistake to assume it is such an anomaly that few lessons are transferable.

“If there’s a ground warfare component, there’s very likely to be an urban warfare component. Why? Because a large portion of humanity lives in cities, and because the seats of government are in cities and many military objectives are in or near cities. And some military bases and headquarters themselves are essentially urban warfare environments,” Bowman said.

WATCH: IDF ENGAGES IN INTENSE FIREFIGHT WITH TERRORIST NEAR SHIFA HOSPITAL
He drew attention to the IDF’s impressive achievements in detecting and destroying tunnels in Gaza.

“I think part of the reason for that is because they had a running start. They’ve been working on terror tunnel detection and destruction for many years with U.S. cooperation and support, but primarily focused on tunnels designed to come underneath the borders of Israel, to infiltrate Israel, to kill men, women and children in the night.”

While such detection technology previously required the IDF to be above or near the ground where the tunnel was located, the IDF in this war was able to bring tunnel detection capabilities into enemy territory, he said.

The IDF’s ability to call up large numbers of reserve forces and send them on successful missions was also notable, Bowman added, saying that partners such as Taiwan could learn from Israel’s experience with reservists.

Hezbollah, for its part, will likely learn from the Gaza war that it needs to double down on its human-shield tactics.

An additional key lesson is the sheer magnitude of munitions required in such conflicts, Bowman said. That lesson remains relevant to Israel’s operations in Gaza, Bowman said, “but even more relevant to stockpiling the weapons Israel needs for the bigger fight that’s coming sooner or later with Hezbollah and Iran.

“And if I’m Israel, what do I do with that information? I prioritize, above all else, the stockpiling of weapons that Israel will need for a major war with Hezbollah and Iran. The weapons, the munitions—particularly the air-launched precision-guided munitions that could be cut off in the future by the U.S. Congress—as Hezbollah learns from Hamas’s use of human shields to increase civilian casualties and create concern in Washington to create political pressure to deprive Israel of the means of self-defense,” he said.

“Israel should get those weapons and munitions it needs now and stockpile them so that Israel has what it needs, when and if things get much worse,” Bowman warned.

‘Assume Hamas leaders receive UNRWA funding’

0
UNRWA employee outside the UNRWA headquarters in Gaza, Nov 17, 2020. (Majdi Fathi/TPS)

By Mike Wagenheim, JNS

Critics of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA, have long noted its unique approach among United Nations agencies in granting perpetual refugee status to Palestinians, while other U.N. agencies seek to resettle those displaced by war or violence.

A JNS investigation reveals another manner in which UNRWA is an apparent aberration at the global body: It does not revoke refugee status of Palestinian terrorists.

The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees oversees the global body’s services to all refugees worldwide, except for Palestinians, who fall under the purview of UNRWA.

The latter is being investigated following Israeli charges that some of the U.N. agency’s staff participated directly in Hamas’s Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel and that a larger number of UNRWA employees are tied to Palestinian terror organizations.

Those involved in acts of terrorism under globally-defined criteria are subject to exclusion from refugee status at UNHCR, which also may exclude refugees who belong to organizations that carry out or incite violence.

JNS sought comment several times from UNRWA and from the office of António Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, about whether the agency also excludes terrorists as refugees.

 

Hillel Neuer, executive director of the nonprofit U.N. Watch, told JNS that for many years, Suhail al-Hindi, a school principal elected to chair UNRWA’s Palestinians’ workers union, was on Hamas’s Gaza politburo with the terror group’s Gaza head Yahya Sinwar.

Al-Hindi was eventually forced out of UNRWA not due to a violation of agency policy, but because UNRWA suffered too much embarrassment, Neuer said.

“They asked him to resign, meaning he’s probably still collecting pension,” Neuer said. “He’s now in Turkey, and he’s regularly quoted endorsing the atrocities of Oct. 7. It’s not only that they don’t deny them aid, but they allow them to serve in leadership capacity.”

“To the extent that UNHCR does have this exclusion clause, with UNRWA it would be the opposite,” Neuer said of the U.N. agencies’ approach to refugee status of terrorists.

JNS sought clarity from the United Nations and UNRWA several times about whether the agency would strip the refugee status of staff members that the U.N. investigation corroborates were involved in or connected to terrorism.

When Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of UNRWA, terminated the contracts of UNRWA staff members whom Israel accused of participating in the Oct. 7 massacre, he said publicly that the reason was “to protect the agency’s ability to deliver humanitarian assistance.”

 

People can be excluded from refugee status if they violate the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, per UNHCR’s Resettlement Handbook.

More specifically, those about whom there are “serious reasons” to believe they committed a “crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity” or a “serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge” prior to being admitted to that country as a refugee or who have “been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations,” can be excluded.

Elsewhere in the handbook, the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees notes that most acts of violence commonly called “terrorism” qualify, “particularly if they indiscriminately endanger or harm civilians.”

The 1951 convention, which the handbook cites, states that “This convention shall not apply to persons who are at present receiving from organs or agencies of the United Nations other than the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees protection or assistance.”

The United Nations has come to interpret that clause very broadly to include Palestinian “refugees” as “not only persons displaced at the time of the 1948 and 1967 hostilities, but also the descendants of such persons.”

Funding terror

“If UNRWA were truly applying universal principles, they would certainly remove anyone who belongs to Hamas from their employment from their staff but, in addition, deny them refugee status,” Neuer, of U.N. Watch, told JNS. “I’m not aware that’s ever happened.”

UNRWA has only suspended or removed an employee for belonging to Hamas in very rare instances, according to Neuer.

“I’ve never heard of anyone, though, including some of the chief terrorists, who are denied refugee status or denied aid,” he said.

“We can assume that many, if not all, of the Hamas leaders are on the rolls as UNRWA refugees and are receiving funding in one form or another from UNRWA.”

 

White House, but not president, condemns Jew-hatred at Columbia

0
The South Grounds Fountain at the White House is dyed green for St. Patrick’s Day on March 17, 2024. Credit: Carlos Fyfe/White House.

(JNS)
A White House spokesman commented on Sunday about violent anti-Jewish protests at Columbia University, although U.S. President Joe Biden has yet to issue a statement personally about the antisemitism.

“While every American has the right to peaceful protect, calls for violence and physical intimidation targeting Jewish students and the Jewish community are blatantly antisemitic, unconscionable and dangerous,” stated Andrew Bates, the White House deputy press secretary.

“They have absolutely no place on any college campus, or anywhere in the United States of America,” Bates added. “Echoing the rhetoric of terrorist organizations, especially in the wake of the worst massacre committed against the Jewish people since the Holocaust, is despicable.”

“We condemn these statements in the strongest terms,” he said.

Josh Kraushaar, editor-in-chief of Jewish Insider, noted that it was the White House’s first public statement about antisemitism since February.

Over the weekend, a campus rabbi said that Jewish students should go home until the university could guarantee their safety.

Columbia Rabbi Tells Jewish Students to Leave for Their Own Safety

0

Joel B. Pollak

An Orthodox rabbi who serves the Jewish community at Columbia University sent a message to Jewish students this weekend urging them to leave campus for their own safety in the midst of pro-terror, pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

Columbia’s Orthodox rabbi, Elie Buechler, told students that university and city police forces could not protect them, and that Jewish students “should return home as soon as possible and remain home until the reality in and around campus has dramatically improved.”

As Breitbart News reported, Columbia’s campus has been occupied by anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian students who are chanting explicitly anti-Jewish slogans. Numerous reports and videos have been shared of explicit taunts against Jews.

Columbia, long a hotbed of anti-Israel activism, has faced even more extreme protests since the Hamas terror attack of October 7. The administration has suspended some organizations, banned some students from campus, and even brought the New York Police Department onto campus last week to clear an illegal encampment, but the radical protests have continued. (Some students have only received written warnings despite defying university rules.)

The antisemitism at Columbia has drawn international condemnation, including from the president of Israel:

The White House also condemned the antisemitism at Columbia — notably, without also condemning “Islamophobia” at the same time:

 

Breitbart News has reached out to Rabbi Buechler for comment.

Columbia is on the Upper West Side of New York, long considered a heavily Jewish area. New York also experienced the worst act of radical Islamic terror in the history of the world just before most of today’s students were born.

 

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

62 Story Multi-Billion Dollar Tower to Transform NYC Skyline

0
The updated design for 350 Park Avenue. Designed by Foster + Partners for Vornado Realty Trust and Rudin Management. Rendering courtesy of DBOX.

62 Story Multi-Billion Dollar Tower to Transform NYC Skyline

Edited by: TJVNews.com

New York City is set to welcome a new architectural marvel into its iconic skyline—a multi-billion-dollar office tower at 350 Park Avenue, a project that promises to reshape the urban landscape and bolster the city’s economic vitality, according to a recently published report on CNN. Announced by Mayor Eric Adams, this ambitious development is poised to add not only a stunning visual element to the cityscape but also significant commercial and public space.

The proposed tower will rise to 62 stories, integrating seamlessly with the celebrated profiles of the Chrysler Building, One World Trade Center, the Empire State Building, and the Flatiron Building. According to the information provided in the CNN report, unlike its famous predecessors, which feature Art Deco crowns, limestone, and granite facades, this new structure will be distinguished by its modern, all-glass façade, offering floor-to-ceiling windows that promise breathtaking views of the city.

The project, funded by Vornado Realty Trust, Kenneth Griffin—the founder and CEO of the global investment firm Citadel—and building and management company Rudin, is expected to generate more than 6,000 jobs, revitalizing the local job market, as per the CNN report. Furthermore, it will provide 1.8 million square feet of commercial office space, much of it destined to become the new home for Citadel and its market-making firm, Citadel Securities. This significant addition to New York’s commercial real estate market calls attention to the city’s ongoing appeal as a global business hub.

One of the standout features of the new tower at 350 Park Avenue will be its approach to public space. The design includes a grand public concourse at the building’s base, framed by striking white columns. This area will feature ample green space, seating, and art displays, transforming it into a vibrant communal area for residents and visitors alike, according to the CNN report. Above, landscaped terraces will crown each section of the building, adding a touch of greenery to the urban environment and enhancing the aesthetic and environmental quality of the midtown area.

In his announcement, Mayor Eric Adams lauded the project, emphasizing its potential to “supercharge our economy and expand New York City’s iconic skyline,” as was referenced in the report on CNN. The mayor’s vision for the tower extends beyond its architectural and economic benefits; it is seen as a cornerstone in the broader effort to energize Midtown Manhattan, reinforcing its status as a premier business address and an economic engine for the region.

The new tower, designed by Foster + Partners, is expected to bring a contemporary aesthetic to the city’s architectural landscape while harmonizing with the historical and cultural significance of its Midtown surroundings, the CNN report noted. The building’s design focuses on sustainability and modernity, aiming to set new standards in urban office space. Its strategic placement near major landmarks will further integrate it into the fabric of New York City’s rich architectural heritage.

The announcement of the new tower comes at a critical time for New York City, which is still grappling with the economic repercussions of the Covid-19 pandemic. The city’s administration, including Deputy Mayor for Operations Meera Joshi, has expressed optimism that this project will mark a significant step in Midtown Manhattan’s recovery. As was pointed out in the CNN report,  Joshi highlighted the initiative as a rebuttal to those who had foreseen the decline of Midtown, emphasizing the role of such developments in revitalizing urban areas.

Midtown Manhattan’s revitalization is being strategically approached through enhancements to its public realm. Investments are being directed towards improving Fifth Avenue, with the iconic Central Park and Bryant Park enhancing its appeal. CNN reported that the goal is to create a vibrant, multifunctional neighborhood that attracts a dynamic mix of professional and recreational activities, reinventing Fifth Avenue as a global destination for a new era.

The construction of the new tower addresses several challenges currently facing the commercial real estate market. The pandemic has drastically altered the landscape, with many companies shifting to remote work, leaving a significant amount of office space vacant and underused. According to the information contained in the CNN report, this trend has depressed property values and compounded the challenges posed by high interest rates, making it difficult for developers to finance new projects.

The project is slated to begin the city’s public review process early next year, with completion targeted for 2032. The report on CNN also noted that this timeline allows for extensive planning and engagement with community stakeholders to ensure that the development not only meets economic and aesthetic goals but also integrates smoothly into the existing urban environment.

 

 

 

Netanyahu: Hamas to face ‘painful blows’ in the coming days

0
Make no mistake about it, there is a vicious media assault that is targeting Netanyahu for standing firm and not buckling under to nefarious forces that could care less about Israel’s survival. Photo Credit: AP

(JNS)  Israel will inflict “painful blows” on Hamas in the coming days in an attempt to free the remaining 133 hostages held by the terrorist group in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday.

“Why is this night different, citizens of Israel? That on this night, 133 of our dear brothers and sisters are not at the seder table and are still held captive in the inferno of Hamas,” he said in his Passover remarks.

“We have already freed 124 of our hostages and we are committed to returning them all home—the living and the fallen,” continued the premier.

“And what is not different about this night? In every generation, they rise up to destroy us, but the Holy One, Blessed be He, delivers us from their hands,” he said, adding: “This time, too, we will overcome those who seek our lives, thanks to our faith, the courage of our soldiers and our unity.”

Comparing Hamas to the biblical villain Pharaoh, Netanyahu noted that Hamas is the only obstacle to reaching a ceasefire-for-hostages deal. “It hardens its heart and refuses to let our people go; therefore, we will bring it more painful blows—and it will happen soon,” he said.

The premier vowed to “increase the military and diplomatic pressure on Hamas, as this is the only way to free our hostages and achieve victory.”

“Together we will fight, and with God’s help, we will win. A kosher Passover to all of the Jewish people,” concluded Netanyahu’s remarks.

Preparing for operations in Rafah

Israel’s War Cabinet was set to convene on Sunday evening to discuss the deadlock in hostage release negotiations following the response by Hamas to a proposal from the United States.

The meeting was supposed to take place last week but was postponed due to the Iranian attack on Israel. It is being held at the behest of Ministers-without-Portfolio Benny Gantz and Gadi Eizenkot.

Also on Sunday, Arab media reported significant airstrikes in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where Hamas’s final terror battalions are holed up and where the senior leadership and remaining hostages are believed to be. The Israel Defense Forces did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Last week, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant held a briefing to discuss “a series of measures to be taken in preparation for operations in Rafah, with an emphasis on the evacuation of civilians and the expansion of activities related to the delivery of food and medical equipment,” his office said.

Jewish Yale student stabbed in eye with PLO flag

0
shutterstock

A Jewish student at Yale University was stabbed in the eye with a PLO flag during an anti-Israel demonstration at the school’s New Haven, Conn., campus on Saturday night.

“Tonight at Yale, I was assaulted by a student today at an anti-Israel protest. He stabbed me in the eye with a Palestinian flag. Now I’m in the hospital. This is what happens when visibly Jewish students try to attend and document these rallies,” Sahar Tartak, a sophomore, tweeted after the incident.

artak, who is studying history and is the editor-in-chief of the independent Yale Free Press college newspaper, was attempting to film the pro-Palestinian encampment set when she and a friend were confronted by five activists who formed a wall and would not let them pass.

“One of them takes their Palestinian flag and waves it in my face and then jabs it in the face,” Tartak told The Jerusalem Post.

Tartak reported the incident to the campus police who called her an ambulance. She went to the hospital and was discharged without suffering permanent damage.

She said that protesters pushed her and her friend repeatedly. Earlier documentation Tartak posted to X showed the demonstrators commemorating the recently deceased Walid Daqqa, a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine terrorist who was convicted of murdering an Israeli soldier in 1984.

Tartak also posted video she took of protesters at Yale yelling, “Viva via Palestina” as they pull down an American flag, cheering when it hits the ground. She noted that the university police and administration did nothing in response.

According to Tartak, she asked the police to disband the encampment but they said they needed “authorization.” She also noted that they were outnumbered by the pro-Palestinian mob of thousands of activists to only seven police officers.

No arrests were made during the protests, according to two groups involved—Yalies for Palestine and American Muslims for Palestine Connecticut. They said the protest started on Friday night in response to attempts to break up a similar encampment on the Columbia University campus.

“These students are violating every policy in the books, they should have been disbanded immediately,” Tartak told the Post. “These students have taken over campus, and it’s an intimidation tactic.”

In her tweet and Post interview, Tartak did not identify the assailant who stabbed her with the flag or say if she will press charges.

 

Columbia Students Call on President Shafik To Restore Order on Campus

0

Meghan Blonder

Columbia University students are calling on the school’s president, Minouche Shafik, to restore order as chaotic protests and violent clashes near campus plague the Ivy League institution.

Columbia students wrote in a Friday letter that they do not feel safe amid ongoing protests that began Wednesday, when Shafik testified to Congress on her response to campus anti-Semitism. Protesters have refused to leave a “Gaza Solidarity” tent encampment, prompting suspensions and arrests, and violent confrontations have taken place just outside the school.

“We, students at Columbia University, feel categorically threatened by unaffiliated protesters on and off campus,” the students wrote. “Further, the large, unrelenting protests surrounding campus obfuscate and limit access to campus. We do not feel safe walking to nor around campus as a result.”

The students said masked protesters unaffiliated with the school have been let into buildings on campus without showing identification cards, prompting safety concerns.

“Yet despite campus access being limited to CU ID holders, these masked protesters have been seen entering campus through various entry points. One non-affiliate was recorded saying ‘honestly a lot of people who are here aren’t even students,’” the students wrote.

“Those of us living on and off campus cannot come and go from our homes to campus as we please without fear of being threatened, harassed, or assaulted. As such, we urge the administration to allow us to attend classes virtually until the situation has entirely de-escalated.”

The disarray began on Columbia’s campus as the school’s president, Minouche Shafik, testified before the House Education Committee.

In one case, protesters assaulted Yoseph Haddad, an Arab-Israeli journalist, who was forced to cancel his Thursday speech after he was pushed, punched in the face, and told to kill himself. Another protester, who wore a keffiyeh to obscure his identity, held a Hamas logo, according to a post from Eden Yadegar, a Columbia student and the first signatory on the student letter.

One female protester, who covered her face and head with a keffiyeh, yelled, “We are Hamas,” “We’re all Hamas,” and “Long live Hamas” at passersby as she banged a pot against a security fence. Another protester told Jewish students that Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on Israel will repeat “every day.”

“Never forget the 7th of October,” the protester yelled to two Jewish students standing near the entrance to Columbia’s campus.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R., N.C.), chair of the Education and Workforce Committee, on Thursday responded to the anti-Semitic protests “engulfing” Columbia.

“For nearly two days, the pro-Hamas Gaza Solidarity Encampment has plunged Columbia’s campus into chaos and endangered its students. I am glad President Shafik has taken the long overdue step of inviting the New York Police Department to clear this radical, unauthorized encampment,” Foxx wrote.

“This brazen and hateful defiance of Columbia’s rules was the product of months of the University’s stark failure to enforce its rules and address anti-Semitism in a serious manner. Jewish Columbia students have reported to the committee that they are terrified things will get worse and are angry the administration allowed the situation to deteriorate to this point,” Foxx added. “For Columbia to correct course, the events of the past 36 hours must become a turning point.”

Columbia did not return a request for comment.

Rabbi to Imams: Islam recognizes Jewish right to Israel

0
An Israeli flag, with the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem's Old City in the background, as seen from the Mount of Olives observatory, April 24, 2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

By World Israel News Staff

The Quran recognizes the Jewish people’s right to Israel and observant Muslims are obliged to do the same, an Orthodox rabbi from Israel argues in a letter penned to Islamic scholars.

Rabbi Oury Cherki, an Algerian-born lecturer at the Machon Meir yeshiva in Jerusalem and chairman of the Brit Olam – Noahide World Center, penned the letter, the third in a series of missives under the title “A Bridge between Faiths,” to a group of Islamic scholars to elucidate the Jewish perspective on the Islamic faith and to improve relations between Jews and Muslims worldwide.

In his third letter, released last week, Rabbi Cherki argued that Jewish control over the historic Land of Israel does not fall under the category of Dar al-Harb (literally the “House of War”), referring to land held by the enemies of Islam or land conquered from Islamic countries that must be recaptured.

“One of the fundamental obstacles to constructive dialogue between Judaism and Islam is the Muslim claim that Judaism is a religion but not a nation. However, from the perspective of Judaism, the Jewish nation is, first and foremost – a nation.”

“Therefore, all of Jacob’s descendants are part of the Jewish nation, whether they believe in the Torah or not, and thus, they are included among the inheritors of the land of Israel.”

“The Jewish state should be recognized as the manifestation of the divine promise to return the nation of Israel to its land, as mentioned multiple times in Islamic sources: Sura 5,20: ‘Bear in mind the words of Moses to his people. He said: ‘Remember, my people, the favor God has bestowed upon you. He has raised prophets among you, made you kings, and given you what He has given to no other nation. Enter, my people, the holy land God has assigned for you. Do not turn back, or you shall be ruined’.”

Instead, the Quran recognizes Israel as the historic homeland of the Jewish nation, Rabbi Cherki wrote.

“Therefore, the State of Israel should not be regarded as a foreign entity imposing itself on the Muslim world (Dar al-Islam). On the contrary, it should be seen as the realization of divine justice as found in the Quran and the Torah: the return of the land to its rightful owners.”

Rabbi Cherki also cited the January 1919 Faisal-Weizmann Agreement, under which Emir Faisal – later king of Iraq – endorsed the Balfour Declaration, Britain’s pledge of support for a Jewish national homeland in the historic Land of ISrael.

“We must note that in 1918, a meeting was had between the Emir Faisal, the son of Hussein, king of the Hijaz, and Chaim Weizmann, the representative of the Zionist Organization, which led to the 1919 London Agreement regarding cooperation between the Arab national movement and the Zionist movement.”

“On the basis of the brotherhood between the sons of Abraham, a happy period of peace and advancement of the world towards its correction can open.”

The correspondence between Rabbi Cherki and several dozen Islamic scholars across the Muslim world, was initiated following the Hamas invasion of Israel on October 7th.

After penning the first letter, Rabbi Cherki was invited to the United Arab Emirates, where he met with Sheikh Muhammad Talib al-Shahi, Director of the Preaching Department at the General Authority for Islamic Affairs and Endowments, and Dr. Ali Rashid Al Nuaimi, Chairman of the Defense Affairs, Interior and Foreign Affairs Committee at the UAE Federal National Council.

During the February meeting, Al Nuaimi endorsed Rabbi Cherki’s argument that the State of Israel should not be defined in Islam as Dar al-Harb.

It is “a lie, fabricated only in the past 100 years,” Al Nuaimi said.

“Stop trying to justify your existence; you are an established fact, and Jews are part of the Middle East.”

WATCH: Anti-Israel Protesters at Yale Tear Down American Flag

0

Joel B. Pollak

Anti-Israel protesters at Yale University tore down an American flag on Friday night as they occupied the campus in what Jewish students have called an act of intimidation against them and against the university.

The video circulated on social media on Saturday and Sunday, with kaffiyeh-clad activists whooping and cheering as they tore down the Stars and Stripes.

Many anti-Israel protesters also hold anti-American views, and have also targeted Christian symbols.

The Yale Daily News reported:

On Saturday night, more than 500 protesters gathered in Beinecke Plaza, and at 12:18 a.m., protesters announced that no arrests would be made that night.
There were also pro-Israel counter-protesters present from around 11:32 p.m. to around 12:50 a.m. time, largely remaining on Beinecke Plaza in front of Woodbridge Hall. At peak, about 25 counter-protesters were present.
An organizer of the encampment, who requested anonymity due to safety concerns,  told the News that the group will be staying on Beinecke Plaza overnight and reiterated that they would continue their encampment on the Plaza until Yale meets their demands for disclosure and divestment [from Israel].

The Jerusalem Post reported that a Jewish student had been jabbed in the eye with a flagpole and that the Yale protesters were holding signs honoring a dead Palestinian terrorist who had kidnapped and murdered an Israeli.

Anti-Israel protesters at Columbia University, another Ivy League school, have also occupied campus illegally. According to video captured by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the Columbia demonstrators have shouted pro-terror slogans.

Other demonstrations for “ceasefire” have also advocated terror against Israelis.

A march in Ottawa, Canada, featured protesters hailing the October 7 terror attack that killed 1,200 innocent Israelis.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Enough of Nicholas Kristof’s anti-Semitic slobbery, New York Times. Fire the jerk!

0
DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 30JAN10 – Nicholas D. Kristof, Columnist, The New York Times, USA is captured during the session ‘Redesign Your Cause’ of the Annual Meeting 2010 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, January 30, 2010.

by Lev Tsitrin ( New English Review)

The New York Times has a useful feature that tells how long it will take to read a given piece; a typical op-ed takes about 5 minutes of a reader’s time.
Google Chrome Browser – Easy To Use Web BrowserAutomatic protection from security issues like phishing and dangerous sites. Download now. Sync your browser across devices to access boo…>

But on occasion, op-eds run longer. Nicholas Kristof’s recent cry of his bleeding, afflicted heart, “What Happened to the Joe Biden I Knew?” requires a greater commitment from a reader — 16 minutes, or three times the average.
Google Chrome Browser – Use Chrome for Faster BrowsingSync your browser across devices to access bookmarks and saved passwords. Install Chrome. Automatic protection from security issues like …>

This is because Mr. Kristof talks of many things to prove his thesis that Biden’s support of Israel’s war effort must end — he talks of the goodness of Biden’s heart and of the badness of Netanyahu’s; he quotes from former ambassadors, advisors, and analysts, as well as from some currently-serving senators; he invokes the history of Vietnam protests and of political disasters they brought upon the Democrats, and warns of potential repeat in 2024; he cites European politicians who see Israel’s war on Hamas as equivalent to Russia’s war on Ukraine. And of course, Mr. Kristof quotes statistics about the terrible, blood-thirsty Israelis (“53 percent of Israeli Jews favor … an all-out attack on Hezbollah;” “more than two-thirds of Jewish Israelis oppose allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza”).

Yet, amidst so many words spent on expressing the sympathy for the poor, much-suffering (and innocent — of course they are innocent, for can the burning hate of Israel and Jews be a sin when it is such a natural emotion, as Mr. Kristof undoubtedly knows from looking in the mirror — can a genuine “progressive” be without it?) Gaza Palestinians whom, in the midst of war on Hamas with whom those innocents heartily sympathize, and whom they faithfully support by acting as human shields — yet whom the cruel Israelis routinely forget to treat to coffee, buns and butter in the morning, to whom they neglect to send a sandwich at lunchtime, and whom they fail to provide a three-course-dinner served on the best china at night, and for whom Mr. Kristof sheds so many impassioned tears, Mr. Kristof forgets to mention one word. This word is — “hostages.”

I kid you not. I excuse you for not believing me, so check it yourself. The text is huge, yet the test is simple: press Ctrl+F to invoke the search function, and put in the word “hostage” into the little search window that will appear above or below Mr. Kristof’s opus, and type in the word “hostage” — and you will see the number of occurrences of that word: “0/0”. Bizarre as it will sound to anyone who ever heard of the Gaza war, the word just isn’t there.

Given its key importance in what’s going on in Gaza, the natural question become, “why is it missing”?

I have a theory. If Mr. Kristof used that word, it would have ruined his entire argument, by giving a simple and natural (rather than malignantly scary) explanation for Israeli attitudes that manifest themselves in Netanyahu’s policies — and for that matter, in Biden’s. A word of truth — “it’s about the hostages” — would wreck Mr. Kristof’s carefully-constructed 16 minutes of lies.

But was it just the need to provide a submission by the deadline so he could get paid, that drove Mr. Kristof to disingenuously paint Israelis as monsters, and Biden as Netanyahu’s clueless puppet? Or is there something more to it — namely, the hate towards Israel and Jews that animates Mr. Kristof, just as it does Hamas and its supporters?

I am strongly inclined to believe the latter explanation. Mr. Kristof’s fabricated argument is soaked in antisemitism, all complete with an unspoken assertion that Israel is guilty, that it should not be allowed to defend itself and utterly defeat its terrorist enemies, and that Israelis are just crafty manipulators of the public opinion and of the kind-hearted and simple-minded President Biden, but they have no genuine cause — each, a classic anti-Semitic trope. So if you talk like an anti-Semite, and if you hide facts to support your antisemitic argument (as any anti-Semitic scribbler would do) — than the simplest explanation for such behavior is, that you are yourself are an anti-Semite, Mr. Kristof.

Which poses yet another question — this time, a question for the New York Times: why do you guys hire anti-Semites like Mr. Kristof? Why do you publish their lying screeds? Is your op-ed editor asleep? Or is your editor Mr. Kristof’s fellow-traveler?

One former New York Times’ opinion editor, James Bennet, famously had to resign in 2020 after publishing Senator Tom Cotton’s op-ed on rioting that engulfed American cities following the death of George Floyd — an op-ed that was not to “progressives’” liking. Should Mr. Kristof’s anti-Semitic concoction get a pass? I don’t think so.

Fire him, New York Times. Don’t maintain a double-standard. No anti-Semite should be on your payroll to spew his hate, and his lies — even if they are lies of omission — like not telling the reader of the the deepest bleeding wound in Israeli psyche, that of hostages cruelly taken, and held by Hamas. Cut Mr. Kristof loose, New York Times. Let him weave his lies on the pages of Der Sturmer — where his anti-Semitic rants rightly belong.

The Jewish Voice Reflects on American Jewry’s Response to Rising Anti-Semitism

0
Yellow Star of David with shadow on black background. Credit: Ausra Barysiene/Shutterstock.

The Jewish Voice Reflects on American Jewry’s Response to Rising Anti-Semitism

From the mid-20th century to the year 2000, American Jews experienced what could be described as a golden era. This period was marked by significant integration and acceptance within broader American society, alongside a flourishing of Jewish cultural and religious life. However, as we moved into the new millennium, this golden era has starkly dimmed, giving way to a disturbing escalation in anti-Semitism, which has not been adequately countered by those positioned to do so.

Fox News talk show host Mark Levin does a deep dive into the precise source of funding for the Marxist revolution that we are seeing play out on America’s streets and college campuses. Offering meticulous research, Levin tells us of dark money being infused into the deep state from George Soros’ foundations, the Democratic Party, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Tides Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and others that that inextricably tied to corporate interests. 

For over a quarter-century, voices such as those from the Jewish Voice newspaper and various prominent commentators, both from within the United States and Israel, have sounded alarms about the burgeoning storm of anti-Semitism. These warnings have particularly highlighted the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, stressing its primary threat to American Jewry rather than solely to Israel. Unfortunately, these prescient warnings were largely ignored or even shunned by the mainstream Jewish American organizations.

The lack of support for these early warnings by significant entities such as the United Jewish Appeal (UJA-Federation of New York), the Jewish National Fund (JNF), the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the Orthodox Union (OU), and notably, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), represents a troubling oversight. These organizations, designed to foster and protect Jewish life and culture, failed to respond effectively when signs of escalating hatred began to surface. Their silence and inaction have contributed to the current precarious situation facing American Jews.

The role of political bias in addressing or ignoring anti-Semitism cannot be overstated. The ADL, under the leadership of Jonathan Greenblatt, has been vocal in condemning right-wing anti-Semitism, often spotlighted on various cable news channels. However, there has been a conspicuous lack of equivalent condemnation for anti-Semitism emanating from the radical left. This selective denunciation has not only skewed the public’s understanding of the sources and nature of anti-Semitism but has also hindered effective countermeasures against all forms of hate, regardless of their origin.

The challenge before us is not merely to combat anti-Semitism but to do so in a manner that recognizes and quashes this hatred wherever it exists, be it on the political right or left. American Jewish organizations must adopt a more balanced approach, acknowledging that the threat of anti-Semitism is not monopolized by any single political ideology. They must support and amplify voices within the community that have long warned of these dangers, regardless of their political affiliations or perspectives.

The Jewish Voice, a newspaper with a clear mission to highlight the perils of rising anti-Israel sentiment and its implications for Jews globally, stands as a prime example of a critical voice that has been largely marginalized.

For years, The Jewish Voice has been at the forefront of exposing the complexities and dangers associated with the peace process in the Middle East, especially the nuances of the “two-state solution.” The publication has argued vehemently that this solution, far from being a pathway to peace, serves as a vehicle for further demonization and ostracism of pro-Israel Jews. This narrative challenges the more conventional dialogues embraced by mainstream Jewish organizations and has led to the newspaper being labeled as extremist.

The repercussions of this oversight are palpable within elite institutions of higher learning—universities such as Columbia, Harvard, Rutgers, UPenn, and MIT—where anti-Semitism has not only found a foothold but has also been allowed to flourish, often unchecked. The normalization of anti-Semitic rhetoric, cloaked in criticism of Israel, has reached mainstream culture, pointing to a significant societal shift that Jewish organizations should have been prepared to address.

The scenario illustrates a critical need for a strategic realignment within American Jewish leadership. The demonization of messengers such as The Jewish Voice, which have anticipated and articulated the rising threats, should be reassessed. Acknowledging and integrating these cautionary voices could strengthen the community’s overall strategy against all forms of anti-Semitism.

It should also be noted that The Jewish Voice has been at the forefront, sounding an early warning about these rising dangers, which have now burgeoned into a broader, more alarming societal issue. This publication has bravely highlighted the stark realities of Jew-hatred, a sentiment that has insidiously woven itself into the fabric of the so-called woke, progressive, radical left wing movements that claim to champion social justice.

The discourse propagated by these movements often portrays Israel as a “colonialist, settler” state—a narrative that dangerously simplifies complex historical and geopolitical realities. By casting Israel in such a light and equating Zionism with racism, these ideologies not only skew public perception but also foster a hostile environment ripe for anti-Semitic sentiments to flourish. This narrative dangerously mirrors the propaganda mechanisms that historically have led to racial and ethnic persecutions, echoing the darkest chapters of human history.

The calls for a Marxist revolution, celebrated by some under the banners of anti-capitalism, freedom, and democracy, have increasingly become intertwined with anti-Semitic rhetoric. In this volatile mix, Israel—and by extension, the Jewish people—are painted as embodiments of world evils, responsible for societal inequalities and injustices. This scapegoating of the Jews as the world’s malefactors is not a new phenomenon but one deeply rooted in history’s most tragic events, including the Holocaust.

This is a critical moment for all factions within the American Jewish community and beyond to unify and address the root causes and manifestations of modern anti-Semitism. It is not enough to condemn hatred in all its forms. The community must actively engage in educating, advocating, and pushing back against the narratives that seek to undermine the Jewish people and the nation of Israel. Silence and inaction will only embolden those who wish to do us harm.

It is profoundly concerning that amid this ominous threat, prominent American Jewish organizations have largely remained on the sidelines. Instead of rallying support or offering solidarity to those media outlets such as The Jewish Voice that dare to expose these uncomfortable truths, these bodies have distanced themselves, even going so far as to alienate and stigmatize this publication as a pariah. This reluctance to confront the harsh realities presented by The Jewish Voice reflects a broader issue within these organizations—a hesitancy to challenge the growing anti-Semitism embedded within certain political ideologies, for fear of disrupting allied networks or broader social agendas.

As we stand at this crossroads, it is imperative that we heed the clarion call issued by The Jewish Voice. We must rally as a community, reclaim our narrative, and ensure that our efforts to combat anti-Semitism are inclusive, vigorous, and unyielding. Let us not be the generation that stands by as the shadows of the past gather force. Instead, let us be the bearers of light, truth, and justice in a world that desperately needs clarity and purpose. To do any less would be to forsake our legacy, our future, and the moral foundations upon which we stand.

As we reflect on the trajectory of Jewish life in America from its mid-century zenith to the challenges it faces today, it is clear that a recalibration of strategy and support is desperately needed. American Jewish organizations must rise to this occasion by fostering a vigilant, unbiased, and inclusive approach to combating anti-Semitism. This will ensure the safety and vitality of the Jewish community in America, honoring the legacy of past generations while securing a vibrant future for those to come. Failure to do so is not just an oversight—it is a disservice to the very principles upon which these organizations were founded.

‘Squad’ Dems say Israel aid is ‘death warrant’ for Palestinians

0
The Squad

By World Israel News Staff

A member of the so-called “Squad” of far-left Democratic lawmakers castigated the passage of a bill providing military aid to Israel and humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, stating that the measure was akin to signing a “death warrant” for Palestinians.

Reps. Cori Bush (D-MO) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) had presented a last-minute amendment to the bill, which would freeze the funding unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in the coastal enclave and Hamas releases the hostages.

 

Notably, the amendment – which failed to be considered by the House Rules Committee – also called on Israel to release “arbitrarily detained Palestinians,” equating the arrest of those suspected of terror crimes with kidnapped Israeli civilians.

Hamas has repeatedly refused to accept the release of the hostages as a condition for a ceasefire.

“This bill that passed today is a death warrant. It’s a death warrant on Palestinians,” Bush said during a pro-Palestinian rally in Washington D.C. shortly after the bill passed.

“It’s a death warrant that says it means that. Apparently, it means that Palestinians are not as valued, that their lives are not as valuable as Israeli lives. And I have to say this. For those that feel that way, shame on you.”

 

 

During her remarks, Bush did not mention the context in which the war began, instead berating Israel for its military actions in the Strip.

On October 7th, 2023, Hamas terrorists invaded southern Israel, murdering at least 1,200 people. Gazan civilians unaffiliated with Hamas also seized the opportunity to loot victims’ homes and kidnap Israelis on that day, with some later selling captives to the terror group.

“We won’t stop fighting for humanity. We won’t stop fighting for every single Palestinian,” Bush continued.

“For every single person in the region. Because they’re taking it even further than Gaza.”

It’s unclear to whom Bush was referring when she said “they’re” causing the fighting to spread, but the remark appeared to be a reference to Israel’s recent retaliatory strike on Iran after an unprecedented aerial assault was launched by Tehran last week.