“When parents don’t care about Israel, their children won’t either,” says the Zionist American philanthropist, who passed away on Jan 11.

By: Zvika Klein

On a Friday morning, slightly more than six months ago, we convened a transatlantic Zoom call. There we were, the deputy editor of Makor Rishon, Orly Goldklang from Ofra, myself from Jerusalem, and Sheldon and Dr. Miriam Adelson from their house in Malibu, Calif.

The physical distance did not prevent us from carrying on a profound, even moving conversation. It was summer, the time of the year that traditionally brought to Israel tens of thousands of Birthright Israel participants, but this June was different, as we were in between coronavirus lockdowns.

Normally every year, young Jewish adults come from all parts of the world on a free 10-day educational trip to Israel, as part of the notion that every Jew deserves to get to know the country. While Birthright Israel’s activity was suspended due to COVID-19, we wanted to author a festive article that would mark the 20th anniversary of the national-Jewish enterprise established by Israel’s government and Jewish philanthropists across the globe.

In addition to being the publishers of Makor Rishon, the Adelsons are also the largest donors of Birthright, with a donation nearing $0.5 billion. Since the article covered the founders and major donors of Birthright, we included in it only part of the interview with the Adelsons.

Sheldon Adelson passed away on Jan. 11. In his honor, we are publishing the full version of the interview, which did not include politics or economics. Rather, it focused on a topic that was inseparable from his personality: Jewish identity.

Q: How did you become involved with Birthright?

“We were looking to invest in projects that are meaningful for the Jewish people,” replied Miriam. She added that several years after the launch of Birthright, they met with Charles Bronfman, a businessman and co-founder of Birthright, who asked them to donate.

“He wanted a small amount of money. I remember Sheldon told him, ‘Of course, we will give,’ but when Bronfman left, Sheldon told me, ‘I don’t know why he hadn’t asked for more. I would have given him more!’

We later heard from one of the founders, Michael Steinhardt, that every year, there are 10,000 young Jewish adults on the waiting list and cannot go to Israel because there isn’t enough money. We felt it was inconceivable that a young Jewish adult would not be able to go to Israel, so we decided to fund the entire waiting list. The waiting list then became 20,000 people, so we subsidized them, too.”

We asked Mr. Adelson to tell us about his father, who never made it to Israel.

“My father had always dreamed of going to Israel but never realized his dream, he was born in Lithuania, where he suffered very much for being Jewish. He always thought there ought to be a place in the world where Jews can live without being beaten, whipped or shot at, but as regular citizens.”

Sheldon’s father, Arthur, was a taxi driver. He could not afford to fly to Israel.

“Years later, when the State of Israel was established, no one thought of Israel as a vacation destination,” recounted Sheldon. “Israel was perceived as a place where people live in tents. By the time I had enough money and wanted to send my father to Israel, he said he was too old and sick to go. It frustrated me. I wanted to make sure all the people on Birthright’s waiting list will not end up like my father, old and regretful they never went to Israel. I wanted Miri and me to help them and send anyone who wanted on a visit to Israel. The waiting lists were growing long, but it only made us happy. Everyone who came back from Israel told about it to their friends, with more and more young people wanting to go.”

Targeting the opponents

The Adelsons have two sons, both of whom participated in Birthright. (Sheldon also has three children from his previous marriage, including one who has passed away. Miriam has two daughters from her previous marriage).

Miriam: “Our sons visited Israel numerous times. We took them to Israel already when they were several months old. But even though they have been to Israel so many times, my son, Adam, called me when he was on Birthright to say, ‘Mommy, it’s a life-changing visit.’ I asked him how come, because he had been in Israel dozens of times and we often hired Birthright’s guides to take us on tours and have been to all the places Adam went to with Birthright. He told me that the revelation came upon him on Mount Herzl, when they visited the grave of a soldier who was killed at their age, 18 years old. The whole group cried together. Later, they went to Yad Vashem. He told me that he and his friends realized that they are Israel’s soldiers around the world. This had changed his life.”

Q: Your children are at university age. What are the campuses like today for young Jewish people?

Sheldon: “We’ve established the Maccabee Task Force, which fights for the Jews. We started several years ago on six campuses; today we are present in about 100, not only in the United States but also in the Sorbonne in France, Cambridge in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. We fight against anti-Semitism and BDS. We cracked the code of the right way to go about it. We send the student leaders of African, Hispanic and other minority backgrounds to a visit Israel.”

Miriam: “We identify them in advance and propose to them to join our group on a visit to Israel to see how things really are. In each university, we mobilize the people who speak about Israel in the most derogatory way. It’s a fact-checking trip. Many of them tell us afterwards, ‘We’ve been told lies the whole time.’ ”

Sheldon: “Universities where we are present have not passed laws that support banning Israel or BDS. The university in Erwin, California, is probably the most problematic in this respect in the U.S. It passed a law that endorses the ban on Israel, but modified its decision as a result of our efforts in a vote of 16 to 2 against the ban.”

Miriam: “There’s no BDS in any of the campuses on which we’re active. Had we not been there, the laws would have passed.”

Q: Why is it so important for you to invest in Jewish continuity and fight for Israel?

Sheldon: “Why not do, if we are capable of doing? If it weren’t for us, no one would have risen to the challenge. It’s important that we, as Jews, advance our causes and work for more people to join. We donate large amounts of money. We give Birthright between $20 to $30 million a year, but we do more than that. We built a medical school at Ariel University, an entrepreneurship school at IDC Herzliya and many more.”

Miriam: “We feel like partners in a family. I love my family members, which means any Jew, whether from the right or the left. At the same time, I would like to protect my private family. I would like my grandchildren and great-grandchildren to remain Jews. Had we left the campuses’ situation as it was, it would not have been good. Research shows that if you participated in Birthright, your chances of marrying a Jew are 76 percent, and the figure goes down to 42 percent if you are on the waiting list. I did not make up these figures. Brandeis University in the U.S. conducted this research.”

Miriam’s eyes sparkle when she talks about Birthright’s participants. She recites the enterprise’s figures as fluently as the director-general. “At one Birthright event, I was approached by a Brazilian guy. He asked my permission to hug me and said, ‘I never led a Jewish life or felt Jewish. Here, in Caesarea, is the first time I felt Jewish.’ So, if we can do it for our family, why not do it?”

During the call, we, the journalists, used the word “pay,” referring to covering the expenses of sending young Jewish adults to Israel. Adelson commented on our word choice: “We do not regard it as ‘money,’ but as ‘assistance to the Jewish people.’ As Miri said, we are all one family. We are philanthropists who want to give out firstly to our family. We use the money to do things that would benefit the Jewish people.”

Miriam: “When I see American Jews who are not connected to Israel speak derogatively of Israel or seek to ban Israel as part of BDS, my heart aches because they do not know the facts and are full of anger and hatred. I ache for them, but they are still Jews for me. Perhaps their children will understand more. If BDS tells people not to go to Israel, we will give out tours to the young adults and show them the other side.”

Q: Do you think Israel is doing enough to maintain the connection with the world Jewry?

Sheldon: “Israel provides about one-third of Birthright’s budget, which is something. The Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs supports a range of organizations, not ours, but others.” He adds with a wink, “The ministry says that our organizations need no funding because the Adelson family is there to support them.”

Q: What should Israelis know about American Jews or Jews worldwide?

Miriam: “In the early stage of our acquaintance—we got married after 100 days of meeting—we used to go to Jewish events. I kept feeling that the guests were giving money only to low-income families to keep their qualms at bay. With time, I was surprised to realize the amount of time that American Jews invest in Israel. They dedicate time to meetings and thinking together about how they can help Russian immigrants, for example. They invest so much time. Personally, I appreciate time more than money. Most American Jews love Israel.”

A follow-up on Judaism

Another organization “adopted” and showered with many tens of millions of dollars by the Adelson family is IAS, the Israeli-American Council, which, within a few years, has become the umbrella organization of Israeli communities in the United States. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis live across America. They were never connected via any association, with their children often reluctant to connect with their Judaism.

“IAS started as a small organization, but today is present across the U.S.,” says Miriam. “It runs programs for school children, afterschool educational programs, adult programs and more. It just keeps growing. When it became well-established, we deemed it was the right time to connect the Israelis communities living in the U.S. with the Jewish community who does not speak Hebrew. Miriam recalls, with a smile, how “Sheldon took up Hebrew with one of the IAC courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. He learned to spell Shabbat, so I’m optimistic about his Hebrew.”

She describes how the life experience of Israelis in the United States has transformed. “When I arrived in America, no one understood my jokes. To this date, I still have just a few good friends here, whom I could count with one hand. However, today we feel stronger. We’re no longer the ‘ones who fell behind.’ We’re proud of being Israelis.”

Sheldon: “American Jews were not passionate about Israel, because the Jewish organizations were dealing with other issues: the Anti-Defamation League was busy with anti-Semitism, and the federations were concerned with raising funds in the Jewish Community Centers. AIPAC was the only organization lobbying for Israel. The focus of American Jews was on their U.S. communities, not on Israel. With IAC and enterprises like Birthright, people pay more attention to being Jewish in Israel and Jewish community life in Israel.”

Q: Your generation witnessed the Six-Day War and is closer to the Holocaust. Will the younger generation of Jewish philanthropists donate to Israel? Many of them seem to prefer the tikkun olam [‘making the world a better place’] causes.

Sheldon: “They are passionate about Israel, and so are our children. When parents don’t care about Israel, their children won’t either. What makes young people passionate about Israel, in my opinion, is participating in a Birthright trip. There, they discover Jews from other parts of the U.S. and other countries.”

Q: Will your children or grandchildren make aliyah to Israel? How will you feel if it happens? Will you be happy or prefer that they continue your mission in the United States?

Miriam: “My oldest granddaughter is 20 years old now. She lives in Palo Alto in Silicon Valley. She graduated from high school and served in the military. She now wants to go to university in Israel, which makes me very happy. Our sons go to college. The older one, who studies mechanical engineering, told me he wanted to volunteer to military service and help the IDF develop weapons. Will they do it? I’ve decided I’m not going to ask them because you can never know what will happen. What if I pressure them to go to Israel and something happens while they are in the army? Will I live my entire life feeling … ‘You need to flow with the stream, as they say in Israel. We helped build a Jewish school here. Our children studied there and now my grandchildren go there. I would be happy if they decide to make aliyah to Israel, but I will never tell them to go. I will be happy with whatever decision they make.”

Q: Where do you see Birthright in 20 years?

“I hope I live that long,” smiles Miriam. “100,000 Jews are born every year worldwide. I would like to see 70,000 to 80,000 visiting Israel with Birthright every year.”

Sheldon: “I would have liked to see them doing a follow-up on the program and their Judaism. I would want them to embrace their Jewish identity and continue their love for Israel. It is no small task because when they return home, they go back to different states and cities. It’s not easy to keep in touch with your Birthright friends or organize a class reunion. It’s quite complicated.”

(JNS.org)

Zvika Klein is an award-winning journalist who covers Jewish Diaspora affairs for Makor Rishon, where an expanded version of this article first appeared in Hebrew.

By: Meyer Harroch

New York Jewish Travel Guide sat down with Rabbi Mendi Sudakevich, head of Chabad Lubavitch of Japan, Tokyo, to ask a few questions about Jewish life and Communities in Japan. The following interview was edited for clarity:

NYJTG: Rabbi, many thanks for your time. Can you tell us about yourself? How did you decide to come to Japan and how long have you been here?

Rabbi Sudakevich: My name is Mendi Sudakevich. I am originally from Israel. When I did my rabbinical study in New York, there were lots of Israelis working in Japan those days and I’m talking about 1997. One of them contacted Chabad in New York saying that many Israelis are working in Japan and that they don’t have a place to make the Passover Seder. So, Chabad sent two boys from Australia to conduct the seder in Japan. They thought that when they called them that there are… probably 20 to 30 people, but when they came here they realized there were a few hundred and they only brought enough matzah for 20, 30 people.

They called me at the Chabad office in New York at 6 o’clock in the morning. They woke me up and at that time there was no cell phone. They asked me if I am willing to go to Japan to help them with the Passover Seder. I said to them that I just woke up, but it sounds nice and why not! I knew they had planned it two weeks before Pesach. I went to the synagogue to pray as it was 9 o’clock and as I was praying for someone came to me and said, here is your ticket for Tokyo for the 5 p.m. flight…. I agreed to this as I had already a ticket and I had 15 extra pieces of luggage to take with me, with food, matzah, chicken, and wine. You name it and I had it there.

I came to Japan for the first time for the Passover Seder. We had an amazing Seder with over 500 people. There were many miracles. The next day after the Seder there was no minyan and we were wondering how it is possible that last night we had 500 people, and today nobody. I started to look around to see where the Jewish people are living in Japan. One person told me that his son will have a bar mitzvah soon. When I came back to New York, I got on the phone and started teaching Bar Mitzvah lessons to the boy.

I then came back to Japan and that’s how I started to be involved with Jewish life here. Then three years later, when I got married, Chabad called me and told me maybe we will open Chabad here. That’s how we started and Chabad in Japan opened in 2000. I refer to the five people I mentioned earlier whom we had for Passover Seder because in those days many Israelis after the army would come to Japan for three months.

NYJTG: In the beginning, was it difficult to adjust?

Rabbi Sudakevich: It’s still difficult to adjust. I think if you live in Japan, you have to like Japan and you have to appreciate Japan because if you don’t it is very difficult to live here as they do things differently than we are used to in the West. They behave differently, they think differently and they do everything differently. Every time we encounter this challenge – but, on the other hand, everything is very organized and very planned. If you agree with someone on something, you know that’s how it’s going to be exactly like you agreed with him. It will be difficult until you can agree. But once you pass that stage then you know that [the Japanese] they are going to do it better than anyone else.

I met once a CEO from a big Israeli company, one of the biggest Israeli companies, and he told me they have an office in Japan that loses money every year. So I told him so why do you keep the office? He replied that the best feedback on their machines comes from the Japanese office. If a Japanese customer buys it and says it is good then we know it’s good. If he says they have problems, he will tell me exactly what the problems are like nobody else. To sell to the Japanese is the best R&D investment in the world. It is instant feedback and the Japanese evaluation is a real and authentic one.

NYJTG: Can you describe the Jewish life and the community in Tokyo? Who makes up this community: Israelis, Americans, and French?

Rabbi Sudakevich: So, the community in Japan is a transient community. Nobody is here forever. If you are not Japanese usually you know you are going to leave one day. It is a very transient community. Most people come here because they have a job or they like Japanese culture and they want to study Japanese or they want to get to know and explore Japan a bit more. But most of them are going to leave after three to five years, as that’s usually the length of people staying in Japan. Then you have the other group that stays for 20 and 30 years, and then they leave to go back to usually where they came from. I would say probably that what we see now in our community is that we have about 30 percent Israelis, maybe another 40 percent Americans, and the rest from all over the world including France and Australia– really from all over.

We have a regular community for minyan but it’s difficult to describe a regular community because this summer, for example, we had two families that are left. Every summer we have people come and go. We don’t know the new people yet but they are going to come here and we will meet them, but that’s our life. Thank God, every Shabbat we have a minyan now. For years we didn’t have a minyan but we now have enough people living here that even if we don’t have any visitors, we can have a minyan. I don’t think it’s ever happened that we don’t have a visitor. Some weeks we have only 10 visitors. Like this week it was quiet. Other weeks we have hundreds of visitors. As I mentioned earlier, there are many Israeli companies here – I would say about 30 companies with an office in Japan.

NYJTG: What is the Jewish population in Japan and where is the largest concentration?

Rabbi Sudakevich: Like all the foreigners, the largest number is in Tokyo. Kyoto has more tourists than in Tokyo. I think Kyoto tourists tend to stay longer in Kyoto than in Tokyo. I read an article that said that most tourists stay only two nights in Tokyo and three nights in Kyoto. I think they use Kyoto like a start, as a hub, and then they go from Kyoto to Hiroshima and come back. They go from Kyoto to Nara and then from Kyoto to Osaka, and then from Kyoto to many different places and come back.

My guess’s about 1,500. Let me tell you why — the Japanese are very organized people. They have a list of every foreigner (not by name) who lives in Japan. From that list, I can see how many Israelis living in Japan and how many Americans living in Japan. I can see their age and type of visa they have and other information. By the end of 2017, there were 521 Israelis living in Japan who were over 18 years old. There are 521 Israeli citizens. I know about 1/3 of the people that I know are Israelis … so I guess if that number is 500, then that makes it 1,500 total here. For the majority, most of them are in Tokyo. I would say about 2/3 are in Kyoto and Kobe. Kyoto does have a very big international population. There are lots of tourists but not so many foreigners living in Kyoto, mostly in Kobe, Osaka, Tokyo, Yokohama areas.

(New York Jewish Travel Guide)

“I would urge college and university stakeholders to pay special attention to the way in which schools handle the harassment of Jewish and pro-Israel students, and whether it’s consistent with how they treat all other students on campus,” Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, co-founder and director of the AMCHA Initiative, told JNS.

By: Sean Savage

Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the fallout from the 2020 election, anti-Semitism continued to morph and grow during 2020.

While the school year for many students consisted of online or hybrid learning, anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist attacks on Jewish and pro-Israel students increased precisely because of more Internet usage, albeit in new forms.

The switch to remote learning brought new challenges for individuals, social groups and organizations of all kinds as instances of “Zoombombing” emerged. At the same time, universities saw a continued uptick in faculty engaging in anti-Zionist activity, attempts to link Zionism to racism and uncoupled Zionism from Judaism on campus.

To learn more about the challenges from the past year and look ahead to 2021, JNS spoke with Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, co-founder and director of the AMCHA Initiative, a nonprofit organization that investigates, documents and combats anti-Semitism at institutions of higher education in America.

The interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Q: Looking back on 2020 and all the challenges it brought with COVID-19, what are some of the major issues regarding anti-Semitism that you saw emerge?

A: We witnessed three main concerning trends in 2020.

The first is faculty abuse, specifically, anti-Zionist faculty misusing their university positions and funding to promote anti-Semitic propaganda and advance anti-Zionist political agendas. Faculty are flagrantly promoting BDS in their classrooms as well as on university social-media sites and using university funding to host departmental events with anti-Zionist, BDS-promoting speakers.

The second trend is an increase in the reliance of anti-Zionist student groups, particularly Students for Justice in Palestine, on the concept of “intersectionality,” where the grievances of one group are opportunistically linked to the grievances of other groups. In a year of extraordinary social upheaval around issues of race and policing, anti-Zionist groups have forged alliances with other minority groups on campus to make sure that their anti-Israel propaganda is promoted as part of more high-profile anti-racism campaigns.

And the third trend involves attempts to uncouple Zionism from Judaism. It’s common for the perpetrators of anti-Semitism on campus to attempt to separate Zionism from Judaism, so they can claim they are not anti-Semitic, just anti-Zionist. And since the Trump administration signed the Executive Order regarding anti-Semitism, we are seeing more and more of this in the form of activity intending to undermine and discredit the global acceptance of anti-Zionism as a form of anti-Semitism. Expression challenging the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition’s identification of anti-Zionism as a form of anti-Semitism—the definition relied on in the Executive Order—increased by 300 percent in 2019, and that trend continued in 2020.

Q: Naturally, the pandemic also greatly impacted college campuses, sending many students into remote learning and reducing in-person events. Given this, how would you assess the situation on campus for Jewish and pro-Israel students?

A: There’s both good and bad news here. The good news is that we saw a substantial decrease in anti-Semitic incidents this past year. And this is due to two reasons. The first is that with students remote and off-campus, the physical harassment and the intensity of coordinated harassment of Jewish students by other students was cut back considerably.

However, the bad news is that given the pandemonium around the pandemic, university administrators’ attention was also elsewhere, which afforded motivated anti-Zionist student groups and faculty the opportunity to run amok. For example, San Francisco State University Professor Rabab Abdulhadi inappropriately inserted herself and her hateful anti-Zionist incitement into a student government debate on a BDS resolution. Professor Abdulhadi’s involvement, as well as activists from outside SFSU, who were able to “helicopter” in via Zoom to shout “Death to Israel” and “Long Live the Intifada,” caused student representatives to feel so intimidated that they decided to vote by secret ballot. This was not an isolated occurrence.

Q: What are some of the biggest challenges that you have seen emerge on campus for students, especially as a result of the pandemic?

A: I would say that cyberbullying has been the biggest challenge for Jewish and pro-Israel students, many of whom were, and continue to be, on virtual rather than physical campuses since the start of the pandemic.

If all that students have are interactions with their peers and professors on videoconferencing platforms like Zoom, or via social media, emails, etc., then all of “campus life” is effectively reduced to written and verbal expression. So when students experience online anti-Semitic harassment or cyberbullying—in a Zoom classroom, student or faculty speaker event or student government meeting, in a social-media post or an op-ed in the online student newspaper—if it’s not properly addressed by school administrators, that harassment has the potential to drastically curtail a student’s ability or desire to fully participate in campus life.

And while school administrators have in general responded promptly and vigorously to instances of online classical anti-Semitic harassment, such as high-profile cases of neo-Nazi “Zoombombing” of online events at a few universities early in the pandemic, when the online harassment of Jewish and pro-Israel students is Israel-related, administrators are much less likely to respond promptly and vigorously, or at all.

Q: What campus trends do you see continuing into 2021 and beyond, even when campuses return to normal?

A: I believe the trends we saw in 2020—faculty abuse, the exploitation of “intersectionality” to push anti-Zionist activism and attempts to uncouple Zionism from Judaism—will all continue this year.

Q: One issue that has emerged from California is the ethnic-studies curriculum, which has been accused of anti-Semitism. Could you provide an update on where this stands and what the broader implications are?

A: The third draft curriculum is now being reviewed by the State Board of Education and is likely to be approved, with few changes, in March.

On the surface, the second and third revised drafts seem much improved over the rejected first draft: the overtly anti-Zionist material has been removed, some of the more highly politicized language has been deleted or watered down, and material on Jewish Americans and anti-Semitism has been added.

However, what has not changed is the curricular framework of the drafts, which remains firmly rooted in the principles of Critical Ethnic Studies, with its division of society into oppressed and oppressor based on race and class, its commitment to challenging “forms of power and oppression” as defined by neo-Marxist ideologies, and its encouragement of “transformative resistance.” In addition, and most profoundly concerning for the Jewish community, is that while both revised versions include lessons on Jewish Americans, the portrayal of Jews, filtered through the lens of Critical Ethnic Studies, is as “white” and “privileged” – clearly on the oppressor side of the race-class divide. At a time when anti-Jewish sentiment, hostility and violence has reached truly alarming levels, indoctrinating students to view Jews as “white” and “racially privileged” is tantamount to putting an even larger target on the back of every Jewish student.

But there’s another twist in the ethnic-studies curriculum story that’s important to be aware of. While the state educational offices have been busy revising the rejected first version of the curriculum, the original authors of that draft have been on a crusade to promote their highly politicized curriculum, including the anti-Zionist and BDS-promoting lessons, throughout the state. Immediately after their draft was rejected, they started an organization called Save CA Ethnic Studies and launched a petition demanding that the State Board of Education adopt their draft.

After that they lobbied individual school districts throughout the state to vote on a resolution in support of their curriculum, and to date, at least 20 districts have adopted it. More recently, members of the original drafters established the Liberated Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum coalition to further promote the rejected first draft as well as to offer school districts their educational expertise in implementing the curriculum in their schools.

Meanwhile, the recent revival of a state bill making a course in ethnic studies a graduation requirement in every California public and charter high school raises the stakes of the curriculum debate enormously. That bill, AB 101, recommends that school districts use the state’s model curriculum as the basis for the required courses, though it allows school districts to use any curriculum their board approves, even the original rejected draft being vigorously promoted by activists throughout the state.

Last year, realizing that coercing all high school students to take a highly politicized, divisive course in Critical Ethnic Studies would be a disaster for California students, especially Jewish students, AMCHA led a successful coalition effort urging the governor to veto AB 331, the precursor of the recently introduced AB 101. In light of the near certainty that the state’s model curriculum will be rooted in Critical Ethnic Studies, as well as the aggressive and successful campaign by a group of educator-activists to promote the adoption and implementation of an even more radical curriculum in hundreds of school districts statewide, we will be opposing AB 101 as well.

Q: Trump’s executive order on anti-Semitism was seen as a watershed moment in efforts to combat anti-Semitism on campus. What do you hope to see from the incoming Biden administration in this area?

A: Although Jewish students have been considered a protected minority under Title VI for several years, their complaints of Israel-related harassment have regularly been dismissed by the Department of Education and ignored by university administrators. It was therefore hoped that the use of the IHRA definition would allow government officials and university administrators to recognize and adequately address Israel-related harassment as antisemitism.

Unfortunately what we’ve documented over the past year is a dramatic and alarming uptick in challenges to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism.

This is a deliberate campaign on the part of anti-Zionist groups to decouple Zionism from Judaism. And it is likely a response to recent federal, state and student efforts, as well as the Trump administration’s Executive Order, to get government agencies and universities to use the IHRA definition to ensure that Jewish students are adequately protected from antisemitic harassment under anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and university harassment policies based on them. And this is highly concerning to us.

We believe a more long-term approach that involves ensuring all students are afforded equal protection and equal redress from behaviors that deny their right to self-expression, regardless of the motivation of the perpetrator or the identity of the victim, can provide Jewish students with permanent protection from anti-Semitic behavior that has previously been denied to them.

And since this is accomplished on the university level, it is not dependent on who holds elected office at any moment in time.

Q: Moving forward, what should people be paying attention to when it comes to anti-Semitism?

A: Although the alarming increase in classical anti-Semitic expression, including acts of lethal violence from neo-Nazis and white supremacists, constitutes a clear and present danger not only to Jews but to civil society as a whole, on U.S. campuses we have not seen a comparable rise in such classical anti-Semitic expression. I don’t expect that we will, given the political leanings of the majority of students and faculty on campuses where most Jewish students find themselves.

Rather, the growing ideological attack on Israel and Zionism, along with the perception of Jews as being racially privileged and part of the “white supremacist, patriarchal, heteronormative, capitalist system”—an idea that comes out of neo-Marxist academic theories popular at many colleges and universities—will both be prominent sources of campus anti-Semitism that the Jewish community should be paying attention to.

But no less important than these sources of anti-Semitism are university administrators’ responses to them. I would urge college and university stakeholders, including parents or grandparents, alums, donors or taxpayers, to pay special attention to the way in which schools handle the harassment of Jewish and pro-Israel students, and whether it’s consistent with how they treat all other students on campus. Every time stakeholders communicate with schools regarding the harassment of Jewish or pro-Israel students, they need to state this message—equal protection for all students—loudly and clearly.

            (www.JNS.org)