(JNS) We have lost the battle against insanity. Perhaps we never fought it. Regardless, the world has gone quite mad.
I just witnessed this on the Columbia University campus. A young white female student, draped fashionably in a keffiyeh, stood at a microphone and demanded that the administration provide food and water to the student “protesters” lest they die of dehydration or starvation.
Yes, she actually said that.
The student insisted that the administration had an “obligation” to those students who have “paid for a meal plan.” Yes, she actually said that too. She was speaking in front of Hamilton Hall, just broken into by criminal outsiders as well as students. The young jihadists barricaded themselves inside. This act of breaking and entering finally destroyed all pretense of normal student life.
Did the “starving and thirsty” student think that she and her co-conspirators are war victims and therefore entitled to food drops or a guarantee of safe passage for aid deliveries?
Some of the most privileged students on earth have decided that they are endangered sacred victims. This is beyond diagnosis but surely qualifies as some kind of psychosis.
What other conclusion can be reached about the surging mobs on American campuses and street demonstrations that, in Islamist style, are pathologically arrogant and violent? Clearly, they are engaged in some kind of delusional mimicry of religious war.
This is all the more disturbing because many educated, “good” people—including a large number of professors—honestly and earnestly believe all or most of the Big Lies about Israel that the internet and the media have fed them over the years. The professoriate insists that the crimes Israel has allegedly committed (yes, Israel) literally endanger world peace.
These “good people” are blaming the Jews for having been attacked (by a righteous “resistance”) and having dared to fight back. To them, Netanyahu—rather than the antisemites—is the reason Jewish students cannot enter campus safely and all students cannot take their exams or graduate.
Blame it on the Jews. Never on the Jew-haters or on the jihadists.
One “good” person actually said to me: “Israel did not have to go into Gaza. There must have been another, better way to respond to 10/7. An international alliance might have condemned Hamas and held them accountable in some way.”
I was speechless. I could not think of a world body that has ever condemned Hamas or any other antisemitic Islamist entity for its crimes. Would such “condemnation” bring back every last Israeli hostage safely? Would it ensure that Hamas would not strike again and again?
Putting “condemnation” aside, has any world body ever taken meaningful action against the Muslim extremists who have slaughtered Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Bahai, Armenians and more? Have they acted against communist China, which has put a million Muslims in concentration camps and jailed and tortured Buddhists?
Apparently, if a Muslim is killed, no one cares except when a Jewish person has done the killing, even if that Jewish person did it in self-defense.
The other day, a Syrian woman on television dismissed what Israel has done in Gaza as “minor, unimportant, compared to what [Syrian dictator] Bashar al-Assad did when he murdered 300,000 Syrian Muslims.”
She’s more than right.
An Iranian dissident friend of mine cannot believe the level of scrutiny Israel faces given what Iran has done to its dissidents and its women, not to mention Iran’s pivotal role in funding international terrorism.
Moreover, if one wants to blame Netanyahu for “funding” Hamas in the (misguided) hope that it would keep them “quiet” (point taken) or keep himself in power (point also taken), then what can we say about Obama and Biden’s funding of Iran, which is now about to become a nuclear power?
Afghan women are committing suicide because of the Taliban’s misogynist policies. Which international alliance has gotten the Taliban to stop?
The belief in the greater morality or effectiveness of international alliances is hopelessly naïve.
I asked one professor what else Israel could have done after Oct. 7 other than attempt to root out Hamas and its terror tunnels. He said that Netanyahu should have forged a world alliance to hold Hamas accountable.
I was absolutely speechless. After a moment, however, I asked him whether he felt the same about Ukraine. He did. He favored “realpolitik” and did not think asking Ukraine to stand down would be appeasement.
“What Ukraine should have done is give Putin what he initially wanted and then built a wall and tried to join NATO,” he said. “Ukraine is filled with Russians anyway, and so many of [the Ukrainians] are Nazis. Think of how many lives would have been saved. It would have been the more civilized thing to do.”
This man actually teaches at a university. Yet he cannot face reality: No wall would stop Putin. No wall could stop Iran and Hamas. All walls can be breached. Terrorists and tyrants are not concerned with being “civilized.” They will never stop. They can only be stopped by a stronger military power with the freedom to use that power. The world’s neighborhoods, beginning with the Middle East, are nasty and brutish places filled with tribal warfare and ferocious hatreds.
The students who are currently occupying campuses and buildings would not survive these places for a single minute. Nor would the professors or administrators who are protecting and defending those students.
Late the other night, New York City police were called in to remove the students and outside radicals who barricaded themselves inside Hamilton Hall. The police found horrendous vandalism: smashed windows and overturned or damaged furniture. Will the ensuing arrests lead to serious penalties?
Let’s find out how many of the radicals were students and how many were paid and trained outsiders. Let the lawyers begin their class action civil lawsuits on behalf of students— especially Jewish students—for the disruption of their studies and the deliberate destruction of their peace of mind.
Please remember: The 1968 student protests at Columbia were against a war. The 2024 protests are in favor of a war against Israel, America and the Jews.
I am in mourning for my beloved academia, for my country and for my civilization.
Pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas supporters set up a protest encampment on the campus of Columbia University in New York, as seen on April 22, 2024. Credit: Lev Radin/Shutterstock.
Who’s Who on the Columbia University Board of Trustees & How They Influence Campus Policy
Edited by: Fern Sidman
Columbia University has recently been at the center of a heated controversy due to its handling of the now notorious anti-Israel encampment on campus, raising significant questions about the influence of its board of trustees. According to a recently published report that appeared in the New York Post, critics, including prominent political figures, have said that the board’s composition—dominated by donors and affiliates with strong ties to the Democratic Party—has affected its decision-making processes, particularly in dealing with disruptive and blatantly anti-Semitic campus activities.
The board of trustees at Columbia University, a venerable Ivy League institution, includes several influential figures with deep connections to the Democratic Party. The information provided in the Post report indicated that this includes a billionaire from the notable Pritzker family, a hedge fund manager who has contributed over $4 million to Democratic causes, and high-profile public servants such as President Barack Obama’s former homeland security secretary and a federal judge appointed by President Bill Clinton. These affiliations have brought the board under scrutiny, with critics arguing that political biases are influencing university policies.
As Barack Obama said after winning the 2008 presidential election, the purpose of the revolution is to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.” The doctrine that stands at the heart of the revolution is critical race theory. Photo Credit: AP
According to a detailed examination by The Post, at least six of the 21 trustees have direct ties to the Democratic Party, based on voter registration and political donation records among other public documents. Noted in the Post report was that this significant Democratic representation contrasts with only two trustees registered as Republicans, suggesting an abundantly clear imbalance in political perspectives within the board. Such an imbalance, critics claim, has led to a governance approach that prioritizes political ideology over effective management of university affairs.
The situation has elicited sharp criticism from several Republican leaders. Speaking to the Post, Representative Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) has been vocal in her criticism. She stated, “It’s no surprise that the board of trustees for a university allowing woke left-wing ideology and anti-Semitism to fester is made up of Democrat operatives and donors.” This sentiment has been echoed by New York state GOP chairman Ed Cox, who expressed concerns over the board’s judgment being clouded by their political affiliations. The report in the Post said that Cox also drew parallels between the obvious politicization at Columbia and broader national political dynamics involving President Joe Biden’s administration.
The allegations suggest that the board’s political leanings may be influencing its response to campus issues, particularly the anti-Israel encampment, as per the Post report. This situation has not only disrupted academic activities but has also sparked a broader debate about the role of universities as spaces for free expression versus their duty to maintain order and protect all students’ rights. Indicated in the Post report was that critics have argued that the board’s inability or unwillingness to decisively manage the encampment is symptomatic of a deeper governance issue, where political ideologies override practical and balanced decision-making.
The Columbia controversy also focuses on its president,
Columbia University President Minouche Shafik. Photo Credit: president.columbia.edu
Amid ongoing anti-Israel protests at the Morningside Heights campus, there is growing pressure on President Shafik to resign for not taking stronger actions to address the situation, the Post reported.
Critics argue that her response has been insufficient to curb the disruptions caused by these protests, leading to calls for her resignation. As was detailed in the Post report, the board of trustees, including co-chairs David Greenwald and Claire Shipman have publicly supported Shafik, although their involvement became more pronounced following their recent testimony at a congressional hearing in Washington, DC.
On January 18, 2023, Columbia University’s board of trustees announced Shafik’s appointment as president of the university. She became president of Columbia University on July 1, 2023. Her inauguration occurred on October 4, 2023.
After the Israel–Hamas conflict intensified in October 2023, and an altercation concerning an Israeli student leading to legal action, Shafik issued a statement saying that if “speech is unlawful or violates University rules, it will not be tolerated”. While some, including NY Rep. Ritchie Torres, and Rep Kathy Manning, said she should have done more to protect Jewish students from anti-Semitic violence on campus; faculty and graduate workers raised concerns over her decision to suspend pro-Hamas student groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) from the campus for repeatedly violating University policies relating to on campus events.
In November 2023, Shafik was invited to attend the 2023 United States Congress hearing on anti-Semitism, but declined, citing a scheduling conflict. She later gave testimony before the United States House Committee on Education & the Workforce on April 17, 2024, along with David Greenwald and Claire Shipman. Former presidential advisors and consultants Shailagh Murray, Dana Remus, and Philippe Reines, along with lawyers, political officials, and experts on anti-Semitism prepared Shafik for the hearing for months.
As a result of campus protests and the campus occupation by pro-Hamas demonstrators that began on April 17th, Shafik called on the NYPD to clear an encampment established by protesters near the center of the university’s campus, and police arrested more than 100 students on April 22. The same day, she announced that the university had canceled in-person classes to move to hybrid learning. The demonstrations outside Columbia’s campus included pro-Hamas, anti-Semitic hate speech and threats, resulting in protesters targeting some Jewish students.
Claire Shipman, an alumnus of Columbia University, currently serves as the co-chair of its Board of Trustees, as was previously noted. With a background in journalism, authorship, and advocacy for women’s leadership, Shipman is a prominent figure in both media and educational circles.
Shipman’s journalism career is marked by her extensive experience across several major news networks. She spent 15 years at ABC News, where her reporting ranged from politics and international affairs to pivotal social issues. Prior to her tenure at ABC, Shipman was a White House correspondent for NBC News during the Clinton administration, a role that positioned her at the forefront of national political reporting.
As co-chair of Columbia University’s Board of Trustees, Shipman plays a crucial role in shaping policies and guiding the direction of the university. Her leadership position also places her at the heart of educational governance, where her experiences and perspectives can directly influence the next generation of leaders.
David J. Greenwald, another co-chair of Columbia University’s Board of Trustees is also chairman emeritus of the Fried Frank law firm. His professional journey is marked by significant achievements and service in prominent roles, from heading a major law firm to steering committees and boards in various prestigious institutions.
Beyond his professional endeavors, Greenwald has made significant contributions to academia and the community. As co-chair of the Board of Trustees at Columbia University, he plays a strategic role in guiding policies of the institution of higher learning. He is deeply involved with Columbia University Law School, serving on the Dean’s Council, and contributes his expertise to shaping the future legal minds.
Greenwald also holds positions on the boards of several major nonprofit organizations, including New York Presbyterian Hospital, the Legal Aid Society, Lenox Hill Neighborhood House, and the Lincoln Center Theater.
The Columbia board of trustees’ political leanings have become a point of contention, especially in light of the ongoing campus issues, the Post report said. Notably, Adam Pritzker, a Columbia trustee and a member of the influential Pritzker family, embodies these connections. The Pritzker family has substantial involvement in Democratic politics and philanthropy, with members holding positions such as the Governor of Illinois and former Secretary of Commerce under President Obama.
His family’s engagement in Democratic activism and significant contributions to various social causes have placed him in a notable position to influence both the business and political landscapes.
According to the information provided in the Post report, Pritzker’s cousin, Illinois Governor
JB Pritzk -er,
s a notable Democratic activist and advocate for bail reform. Another cousin, Jennifer Pritzker is a transgender billionaire and has substantially contributed to universities, medical schools, gender clinics, and nonprofits, promoting gender-affirming medical care and supporting the transgender community. Meanwhile, the Post report also indicated that Penny Pritzker, former Secretary of Commerce under President Obama and now a senior fellow at Harvard Corporation. She has played pivotal roles in both governmental and educational spheres.
These familial ties illustrate a deep-rooted engagement in social issues and Democratic politics, suggesting a shared orientation towards activism and advocacy within the Pritzker family. The report added that this orientation extends to Adam Pritzker himself, who has made substantial contributions to Democratic candidates and causes throughout his career.
Mark Gallogly, an influential figure in finance, politics, and environmental advocacy, embodies the complexities and controversies that often follow high-profile careers bridging diverse sectors. The Post report said that as a vice-chair trustee at Columbia University and a notable Democratic donor, Gallogly’s actions and affiliations paint a detailed picture of a multifaceted individual navigating the intricate worlds of high-stakes investment and political engagement.
Parallel to his financial career, Gallogly has been actively involved in politics, primarily through substantial contributions to the Democratic Party. His financial support includes $775,000 donated in the current election cycle alone, alongside significant contributions to the Biden Action Fund and the Democratic National Committee, according to the information in the Post report. Moreover, he and his wife hosted a high-profile fundraiser for President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign, highlighting his active role in political fundraising and Democratic party activities.
Columbia Trustee Jeh Johnson’s career is marked by his significant contributions to national security and law. A Columbia Law School graduate, Johnson served as the Secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama from 2013 to 2017. The Post reported that prior to this, he was the General Counsel of the Department of Defense from 2009 to 2012, where he played a critical role in shaping U.S. defense policies. Since leaving his political post, Johnson has been an active voice in national discussions on homeland security and cybersecurity, often testifying before Congress to share his insights and expertise.
Another notable Columbia University trustee, Joseph A. Greenaway Jr., was appointed as a federal judge in New Jersey by President Bill Clinton in 1996 at the young age of 38. In 2010, he ascended to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Newark, New Jersey, following an appointment by President Obama, according to the information in the Post report.
Vice chair Abigail Black Elbaum heads Ogden CAP Properties, a prominent real estate firm, and has been involved in philanthropy, particularly in political spheres. Indicated in the Post report was that her contributions include donations to key Democratic figures such as Hillary Clinton and Al Gore.
As Senior Executive Vice President of Columbia University, Gerald Rosberg is a pivotal figure in the realms of academia, legal practice, and corporate leadership.
Rosberg’s career took a significant turn when he joined The Washington Post Company, where he served for two decades as a senior executive. During his tenure, the company not only dealt with the traditional challenges of a major media conglomerate but also faced the digital transformation that reshaped the industry. His role involved strategic decision-making, long-term planning, and navigating the company through periods of substantial change, including its transition to what is now known as Graham Holdings.
In his current role, Rosberg brings his extensive experience to bear on the university’s strategic initiatives. Working closely with the president and other senior leaders, he focuses on long-term planning and strategic issues, particularly human resources and departmental coordination.
In January 2024, Columbia University welcomed Cas Holloway as its new Chief Operating Officer, a role in which he oversees several critical administrative areas including Facilities and Operations, Human Resources, Columbia University Information Technology, Columbia Health, and Columbia Technology Ventures.
Felice B. Rosan, as the General Counsel of Columbia University, holds a pivotal role where her vast legal expertise significantly impacts the governance and strategic initiatives of one of the leading educational institutions in the world. Rosan’s tenure at Columbia since March 1999 has seen her navigate complex legal terrains, emphasizing university governance, tax-exempt issues, charitable giving, executive compensation, and key developments such as the University’s expansive Manhattanville project.
The board also includes individuals such as Wanda Holland Greene, an educator with four decades of experience, and Keith Goggin, a former New York Stock Exchange market maker and specialist, according to the Post report.
Other members of the Columbia board of trustees include Duchesne Drew, a veteran journalist, and Andrew Barth, the retired chairman of a capital market company. Also on the is Kikka Hanazawa, a social entrepreneur in the fashion industry.
Also speaking to the Post was Rory Lancman, senior counsel for the Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. He emphasized the responsibility of the board in these circumstances, stating, “The buck stops with the board of trustees.” Noted in the report was that this sentiment reflects growing dissatisfaction with how the Columbia board has managed the crisis, with critics arguing that the trustees should not deflect responsibility onto the university president alone.
Others have pointed fingers at the university’s board, accusing them of liberal bias, potentially tarnishing the institution’s esteemed reputation.
Former Senator Al D’Amato of New York has been vocal in his criticism of the board, describing its members as “ultra-liberal” and blaming them for the university’s inability to control the situation. “The school is out of control. It’s a disgrace. They’ve destroyed the reputation of a great school,” D’Amato told The Post. His harsh words reflect a broader dissatisfaction among certain alumni and political observers who feel that the university’s governance is too ideologically driven, which they argue has led to ineffective decision-making in a time of crisis.
D’Amato’s frustrations culminated in a call for dramatic changes at the top levels of the university’s leadership. “It’s a horror show,” he told the Post, suggesting that the only solution would be to overhaul the university’s leadership by appointing a new president and clearing out the current board.
Adding to the chorus of disapproval is former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, head of the group “Americans Against Anti-Semitism.” Speaking to the Post, Hikind criticized the board for their prioritization of political protection over taking decisive actions. “The board of trustees at Columbia should stop trying to protect Biden,” Hikind expressed to the Post, urging the board to “Do the freakin’ right thing!”
Amidst the growing criticism, The Post reported that attempts to reach board members for comments were largely unsuccessful, with the majority declining to comment individually or not responding. This lack of direct communication from the board members has added to the frustration of critics, who view the silence as indicative of a governance body that is either unwilling or unable to address the pressing issues facing the campus.
As Columbia University continues to grapple with these challenging issues, the actions taken by its board of trustees will likely be scrutinized not just by the university community but by observers across the political and educational spectrum. The resolution of this crisis could have lasting impacts on the university’s reputation, its governance practices, and potentially, its leadership structure. For now, the university remains a battleground where the complexities of academic governance, political ideology, and social justice converge.
In recent years, George Soros, the influential billionaire known for his far-left political affiliations, has channeled over $50 million into a network of Iran-sympathizer groups. This funding has played a crucial role in shaping the narrative around US-Iran relations, particularly in advocating for the defanging of US sanctions on Tehran and pushing for a renewed nuclear deal. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak, File)
By Rachel Ehrenfeld-( published with permssion of he Blaze.com, Blaze Media)
George Soros, who for decades has been funding progressive, neo-Marxist leftist groups, also poured money into groups and individuals that reject the existence of Israel. So, it is not surprising that his son, Alexander, who now runs the ironically named Open Society Foundations, is now funding, directly and indirectly, pro-Hamas demonstrations and Hamas-supporters’ encampments on university campuses across the United States.
The campus “occupations” are reminiscent of Kyiv’s Maidan Square encampment in the winter of 2004-2005, when Soros helped fund the Orange Revolution. He also supported the 2014 demonstrations of the Maidan Revolution, for which he was awarded Ukraine’s Order of Freedom by the Ukrainian president he helped elect, Petro Poroshenko.
Soros is the prime mover behind a decades-long effort culminating with a tsunami of anti-Semitic attacks on Israel and Jews everywhere.
When Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, took over Gaza in 2007, Soros criticized Israel for refusing “to recognize the democratically elected Hamas government.” He deliberately ignored the fact that the Islamist terrorist group’s explicit and well-advertised objective is the elimination of the Jewish state of Israel.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
Soros has been funding, directly and indirectly — and apparently with the acquiescence of U.S. administrations — Israeli-Jewish and Israeli-Arab leftist groups, as well as media outlets, that oppose Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
That’s in addition to his generous funding of Palestinian-led groups, along with pro-Palestinian Jewish, Christian, and Muslim organizations that promote boycotts, divestments, and sanctions against Israel. Among the many groups Soros funds include Students for Justice in Palestine and the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, which are spearheading violent demonstrations on college and university campuses.
More than a few organizations backed by Soros’ foundations have well-documented links with the U.S.-designated terrorist groups. All support the elections and appointments of anti-Israel activists to Congress, the administration, and international nonprofit organizations. Details of his decades-long crusade against the Jewish state are spelled out in “The Soros Agenda.”
Despite the evidence, the Open Society Foundations have repeatedly denied such funding. In 2019, Soros spokesman Michael Vachon made a feeble attempt at plausible deniability. While denying the foundations’ support of BDS groups, he admitted that at times they simply don’t know how their support is used. “The foundation[s] cannot track every project connected to every organization that … [they have] supported over the decades,” he said.
The Open Society Foundations and their well-funded proxies never fail to condemn Israel for its effort to curb the activities of Palestinian terrorist groups masquerading as human rights charities. Like parrots, they repeat Hamas’ lies about Israel. Their phrasing is then used by the United Nations, the European Union, and Biden’s State Department to further criticize Israel.
Just how many millions of dollars Soros has directed to pro-Hamas, anti-Israel, and anti-American groups is unclear. These are merely guesstimates because the Open Society Foundations are notoriouslyopaque.
What is certain, however, is that Soros is not only funding the pro-Hamas and anti-American demonstrations we see on campuses today. He has also been the prime mover behind a decades-long effort culminating with a tsunami of anti-Semitic attacks on Israel and Jews everywhere.
Protesters in Los Angeles, many of them Jewish, participate in a rally to demand an immediate ceasefire in the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, as well as an end to U.S. military aid to Israel, Nov. 15, 2023. Credit: Ringo Chiu/Shutterstock.
Columbia University Responds to Campus Occupation by External Agitators
Edited by: Fern Sidman
In a significant and decisive action to maintain safety and order, Columbia University called upon the New York Police Department (NYPD) to address a serious situation on its campus late Tuesday evening. According to a report on Wednesday on the Post Millennial website, the university found itself compelled to act after a group of pro-Hamas activists, who were not affiliated with the institution, occupied, vandalized, and blockaded Hamilton Hall, leading to over 100 arrests.
The incident began to escalate when protesters took control of one of the university’s key buildings, resulting in considerable disruption and damage. According to the university’s statement, the NYPD was summoned to the campus a little after 9 PM at the request of university officials, following the discovery of the occupation and subsequent vandalism of Hamilton Hall, as was explained in the PostMillennial.com report. The university’s leadership, including the Board of Trustees and in consultation with security experts and law enforcement, determined that the situation warranted a direct response from law enforcement. They also reinforced the notion that those spurring on these violent protests were “external actors” and not student organizers.
The university’s response to the occupation and vandalism sheds light on the challenges institutions face when external groups engage in disruptive actions on campus. The involvement of individuals not affiliated with Columbia University complicates the dynamics of campus security and calls attention to the necessity for decisive actions to protect students, faculty, and staff.
Columbia University expressed regret over the protesters’ decision to escalate the situation through their actions, emphasizing the forced displacement of Columbia public safety personnel and the threats made against a member of the facilities team, according to the postmillennial.com report. The university stressed its priority was the safety of its community and the need to prevent any further escalation of the situation.
@Columbia Did you know that Lisa Fithian is on your campus instructing people to break the law? Arrest her and stop this shit now. pic.twitter.com/mezMxVfjkK
The statement highlighted that the decision to involve the NYPD was taken early in the morning after careful deliberation that this was a law enforcement matter. The report on the PostMillennial.com website indicated that the university concluded that the NYPD was best positioned to determine and execute an appropriate response to restore order and ensure the safety of the community.
The encampment on the South Lawn began construction on April 17, coincidentally the same day that Columbia’s President Minouche Shafik was responding to inquiries concerning the explosion of campus anti-Semitism before a Congressional committee. The PostMillennial.com report said that the activists, who have now been revealed to be led by outside agitators, escalated their actions by vandalizing Hamilton Hall—breaking doors and windows and blockading entrances, early on Tuesday morning. This forced the university to take decisive actions to protect its students and staff by severely curtailing the number of people on the Morningside campus and updating the community on access to campus buildings.
On Tuesday night, officers in riot gear entered Hamilton Hall and arrested the activists. Previous measures such as suspensions and threats of expulsion had failed to disperse the occupation, leading to this more forceful response, the PostMillenial.com report said. The university stated that this intervention was necessary not in response to the cause the protesters were championing but due to their actions, which disrupted campus life and violated the law.
In a broader response to the events, New York City Mayor Eric Adams commented on the situation, highlighting a concern about young people being influenced by professional radicals. As was emphasized in the PostMillennial.com report, his statement pointed to a growing worry about the radicalization of youth in the context of such protests, suggesting a deeper look into who is behind the mobilization and agenda of such activities.
Republican Mike Lawler was elected in 2023 as the U.S. representative for New York’s 17th congressional district, in a narrow win against Sean Patrick Maloney. Credit: AP
Edited by: Fern Sidman
The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act with significant bipartisan support, reflecting a national urgency to address rising anti-Semitism, particularly in academic environments. According to a report on Wednesday on the CNN web site, this legislation arrives at a critical time when pro-Hamas protests are frequent occurrences on college campuses, and tensions around definitions of anti-Semitism are increasingly influencing public discourse and policy.
The Antisemitism Awareness Act is designed to strengthen the federal government’s ability to identify and combat anti-Semitism, especially within higher education institutions. The information provided in the CNN report indicated that the bill mandates that the Department of Education, when enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws, adopt the definition of anti-Semitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).
The IHRA definition of anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, often expressed as hatred toward Jews, which includes: Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews; making dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews or the power of Jews as a collective, such as the myth of a Jewish conspiracy or Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions; Holocaust denialism; accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel than to the interests of their own nation; denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination. For example, claiming the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor (anti-Zionism); and drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
The IHRA definition has been used by the State Department over the last three administrations. By codifying this definition into law, Jewish students will be more protected from anti-Semitic discrimination, harassment, and threats. This bill will give investigators at the Department of Education a clear framework and the proper tools for identifying and evaluating anti-Semitism, helping to resolve some of the 137 active Title VI investigations and hold harassers accountable.
The House vote reflected strong bipartisan backing, passing with a tally of 320 to 91. The support crossed party lines, although the opposition included 70 Democrats and 21 Republicans, indicating a complex spectrum of concerns about the bill’s implications, as per the CNN report. New York Republican Representative Mike Lawler, who introduced the bill, emphasized its necessity in combating anti-Semitic hate in the U.S. and expressed gratitude for the widespread endorsement from various Jewish organizations.
Despite the strong support, the bill has faced significant criticism, particularly concerning free speech implications. Opponents argue that the IHRA definition, while comprehensive, is overly expansive and may potentially suppress legitimate free speech, particularly in the context of discussions and criticisms of Israeli policies, the report on CNN suggested. Critics fear that such a broad definition could lead to unintended censorship and stifle academic freedom on campuses, a place traditionally known for vibrant and often contentious political debate.
The bill, which now heads to the Senate, seeks to enforce a specific definition of anti-Semitism in educational institutions that receive federal funding, the CNN report explained. This has spurred reactions from various quarters, including civil rights groups and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle.
The push for the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act was led by a bipartisan group of representatives including Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Max Miller (R-OH), and Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), reflecting a concerted effort to address rising concerns over anti-Semitic incidents in the United States, particularly on college campuses, according to the information contained in the CNN report.
“We cannot stand idly by as protesters call for the death of Jews on college campuses and across the country,” said Congressman Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5). “When I spoke at Columbia last week, I told administrators that we need deeds, not words to protect Jewish students. This bill is a critical step to take the action we so desperately need to stand against hate.”
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has emerged as a vocal opponent of the bill. In a detailed letter to lawmakers, the ACLU argued that existing federal laws already adequately prohibit anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment by federally funded entities, the CNN report said. The organization expressed concerns that the bill, through its adoption of the IHRA definition, could stifle free speech on college campuses by conflating legitimate criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism. CNN added that the ACLU emphasized its support for combating discrimination but opposes any measure that it perceives as threatening to First Amendment-protected political speech.
The debate over the bill has not been limited to advocacy groups. On the House floor, Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler of New York articulated a critical perspective, stating that while the fight against anti-Semitism is crucial, “this legislation is not the answer.” As detailed in the CNN report, he highlighted concerns that the bill might overreach, potentially classifying criticism of Israel alone as unlawful discrimination, which he argued does not necessarily constitute anti-Semitism.
The bill’s journey through Congress has not been without its political dimensions. Rep. Lawler has dismissed criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, as he called attention to the commitment to advancing the legislation. As indicated in the CNN report, he also noted that Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) is set to introduce a companion bill in the Senate, and urged Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to expedite its consideration.
“Today, House Republicans and Speaker Johnson made it clear: violently anti-Semitic rhetoric has no place on college campuses. Anti-Semitism has spread like wildfire on college campuses and now more than ever, it is crucial that we stamp it out,” said Senator Scott. “I am urging Chuck Schumer to immediately bring my bill, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, to the floor for a vote and for every single Senator to support it. The Senate has a responsibility to stand against hatred so our Jewish brothers and sisters can live without fear.”
“Jewish Americans, and people of all faiths across our state and nation, are looking for leadership from their elected leaders. We cannot tolerate anti-Semitism, or any form of bigotry and hatred targeted at Americans because of their religious faith. I will always stand for the right of every American to practice their faith openly without fear of violence or harassment. I applaud my bipartisan colleagues for passing this critical bill and call on Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to immediately pass the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2023 and President Biden to sign it into law,” said Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03).
“What is happening at Columbia, at Yale, at UCLA, and so many other schools, is reprehensible and alarming,” said Congressman Lawler (NY-17). “When people engage in harassment or bullying of Jewish individuals where they justify the killing of Jews or use blood libel or hold Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the Israeli government – that is anti-Semitic. It’s unfortunate that needs to be clarified, but that’s why this bill is necessary.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, has placed a notable emphasis on anti-Semitism, especially in academic settings. The CNN report noted that his recent visit to Columbia University—to meet with Jewish students and hold a press conference shed light on the growing concern within federal circles about the safety and well-being of Jewish students across the nation. During his visit, Speaker Johnson called for the resignation of Columbia’s president, Minouche Shafik, pointing to her inadequate responses to anti-Semitic incidents.
Building on his actions, Speaker Johnson announced a comprehensive “House-wide effort to crack down on anti-Semitism on college campuses.” The information provided in the CNN report indicated that this initiative, detailed at a news conference, signifies a robust commitment to expanding the scope of oversight across various House committees, particularly focusing on the enforcement of existing anti-discrimination laws and potentially introducing new legislative measures.
In a related development, the CNN report affirmed that Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, chairwoman of the House Education Committee, has taken proactive steps by summoning representatives from several leading universities to appear before her panel. Institutions such as Yale, UCLA, and Michigan have been notified to discuss their handling of anti-Semitic incidents on their respective campuses, the CNN report added. Scheduled for May 23, this hearing aims to hold these institutions accountable and explores more effective strategies to prevent such incidents in the future.
The Speaker’s office further announced that the House would investigate the allocation of federal funding to universities, scrutinize the foreign student visa program, and examine the tax benefits afforded to these institutions, as was described in the CNN report. This broadened scope of oversight suggests a comprehensive approach to understanding and possibly restructuring the federal support that universities receive, aligning it more closely with their compliance with federal anti-discrimination guidelines.
Amidst legislative actions aimed at combating anti-Semitism, Johnson also faces internal threats to his leadership, highlighting the often-contentious nature of political leadership and policy advocacy in today’s polarized environment.
A small but vocal faction of conservative hardliners has expressed dissatisfaction with his leadership, culminating in GOP Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s announcement of her intent to seek a vote on Johnson’s ouster, as per the CNN report. Although Democrats are expected to oppose this motion, thus likely securing Johnson’s position, the move adds considerable pressure on him and sets the stage for a dramatic showdown on the House floor.
Rep. Greene has also stated that she cannot support the bill due to its definition of anti-Semitism, which includes the historical allegation that Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus—a claim she asserts is supported by Christian scripture, the report on CNN said. This interpretation is highly contentious and has been historically linked to justifications for anti-Semitic violence, making her stance particularly divisive and inflammatory within the context of efforts to combat anti-Semitism, the CNN report suggested.
The issue of anti-Semitism is not confined to the halls of Congress but extends into college campuses, notably Columbia University, which has become a focal point for debates over free speech and anti-Semitism. As was noted in the CNN report, some Democratic lawmakers have called for the university to disband pro-Palestinian encampments that have been clear sources of virulently anti-Semitic rhetoric, while others have engaged directly with student activists in an attempt to address the tensions.
The situation escalated when protestors occupied Hamilton Hall, an historic building on campus which was the site of a student takeover 56 years ago by those protesting US involvement in the Vietnam war. Those protests were led by former Columbia student Mark Rudd of the Students for a Democratic Society organization.
The CNN report also opined that former President Donald Trump has again come under scrutiny for his remarks and associations that many critics view as exacerbating tensions around Jewish identity and loyalty.
In a recent interview, Trump stated that any Jewish person who votes for Democrats “hates their religion” and “everything about Israel,” CNN reported. Many Jewish organizations who are in the forefront of support for Israel and works towards strengthening traditional Jewish identity amongst its members gave their full throated endorsement and total imprimatur to Trump’s statement.
The CNN report however said that this comment taps into the anti-Semitic trope of dual loyalty, suggesting that Jewish Americans are more loyal to Israel than to the United States, a notion that has been historically used to marginalize and discriminate against Jewish communities.
As universities across the United States witness a surge in student-led protests regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the academic landscape has become a microcosm of the broader geopolitical tensions. The protests on college campuses are largely fueled by erroneous perceptions of ongoing oppression over 70 years involving Palestinian rights, land, and culture.
Concurrently, many in the Jewish community feel an acute need for increased support for Israel, especially in the wake of heightened anti-Semitic violence and threats following Hamas’ attack on October 7, 2023. For many Jews, Israel is not only a nation but a crucial sanctuary for a historically oppressed people. Despite some criticisms of specific Israeli policies, including those under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the prevailing view among many Jews is that anti-Israel and anti-Zionist sentiments often intersect dangerously with anti-Semitism, as was revealed in the CNN report.
The ADL has noted a historic surge in violence and threats against Jewish students. The report on CNN confirmed that the situation is exacerbated when Jewish students at some rallies report threats and encounter explicitly anti-Semitic rhetoric, calling attention to the volatile intersection of free speech and hate speech in protest environments.
The Jewish Voice praised the House passage of this important legislation. “The implementation of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act aims to provide educational institutions with clear guidelines on how to recognize and address acts of anti-Semitism effectively. By codifying the IHRA definition into law, it offers administrators and policymakers a specific framework for action, potentially leading to more consistent and proactive measures across campuses nationwide. This act is seen by its proponents as a vital step in ensuring that Jewish students can pursue their educational goals in a safe and supportive environment, “ said Jewish Voice publisher, David Ben Hooren.
Ben Hooren also lauded Speaker Johnson’s efforts to address the campus anti-Semitism issue head on. “In the face of increasing anti-Semitic incidents across the United States, particularly in educational settings, the Jewish community has strongly advocated for more robust legislative measures. The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, supported by House Speaker Mike Johnson, emerges as a significant legislative effort designed to address and mitigate these concerns by providing clearer guidelines for identifying and combating anti-Semitism on college campuses,” he declared.
A New York City nonprofit that received more than $12 million from Goldman Sachs’ charitable arm encouraged anti-Israel activists to re-create the violent protests of “the summer of 2020,” just hours before rioters stormed and occupied a building on Columbia University’s campus.
More than 100 masked and keffiyeh-clad activists convened in the People’s Forum’s Manhattan office Monday evening to plan their next moves as anti-Israel protests reach a fever pitch across the country. The meeting, which was scheduled to start at 6:45 p.m., was delayed to give protesters from Columbia time to make it downtown.
Once the Columbia protesters arrived, People’s Forum executive director Manolo De Los Santos urged the group to “give Joe Biden a hot summer” and “make it untenable for the politics of usual to take place in this country.” Los Santos praised Columbia students for “decid[ing] that resistance is more important than negotiations,” and urged those assembled at the People’s Forum to “support our students so that the encampments can go for as long as they can.”
Los Santos also ranted about the “Zionist” Columbia administrators who “want to be more like their masters in Israel.”
The “Volunteer Meeting,” which the Washington Free Beacon attended via Zoom, concluded at 9:30 p.m. following “break out sessions” that focused on organizing new methods of “resistance.” A few hours later activists smashed the windows of Columbia’s Hamilton Hall and barricaded themselves inside.
No arrests were made. The People’s Forum did not respond to a request for comment over whether they were aware of any attendees who rioted at Columbia.
The People’s Forum, a registered charity that describes itself as “a movement incubator for working class and marginalized communities,” has been a mainstay at anti-Israel protests since Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack on the Jewish state. A day after the attack, the People’s Forum organized a Times Square protest where attendees celebrated Hamas and waved posters with anti-Semitic slogans and imagery. One protestor waved a picture of a Nazi flag on his cellphone.
It is not clear who was or who was not a Columbia student at the People’s Forum meeting, although several had just returned from the campus. But Los Santos encouraged attendees to head back.
“The moment the call goes out, we have to go back out,” he said. “We have to be the bodies willing to stand between the police and our students.”
Columbia president Minouche Shafik effectively shut down the campus on Tuesday, barring anyone who is not a student or staff “who provide essential services” from stepping foot on its grounds.
The People’s Forum’s operations are made possible in large part by a $12 million donation from Goldman Sachs’s charitable arm. The source of that money is likely Neville Roy Singham, a communist who has “long admired Maoism.”
Singham, an American businessman who lives in China, reportedly helps finance the Chinese Communist Party’s “propaganda worldwide,” according to the New York Times. His wife, Jodie Evans, is the leader of the activist group Code Pink. Under her leadership, the group has celebrated China as “a defender of the oppressed and a model for economic growth without slavery or war.”
“As with any donor advised fund, the prior donation was made with the client’s money, at the client’s direction,” a Goldman Sachs spokesman told the Free Beacon. “This was not firm money.”
Groups like the People’s Forum stand to lose their charity status if they are found to be party to riots and violent protests, experts told the Free Beacon. The IRS’s charity guidelines state that groups may lose their charity status if they engage in “planned activities that violate laws” or “induce the commission of crime.” That could make it harder for the group to raise money, as its donors would no longer enjoy a tax benefit on their donations. It would also require the People’s Forum to pay taxes on any donations it receives.
When asked whether the People’s Forum would bail out protesters arrested on Columbia’s campus, one woman affiliated with the group told the Free Beacon bail was not a concern, given the city’s approach to the protesters.
“There has been no need for bail for the vast majority of those who have been arrested,” the woman said, “because they’re just booked and released.”
NYPD officers remove Palestinian flag and replace the American flag at City College of NY. (Twitter Screenshot)
By Daniel Greenfield, Frontpage Magazine
I’ve written quite a bit since 9/11 about where I expected the growing battle between America and Islamic terrorists to go, but this is still a stunning moment.
NYPD RAISES OLD GLORY AT CCNY
It’s all the more stunning in contrast to what’s going on in Los Angeles at UCLA.
UCLA UPDATE 🚨: Still ZERO law enforcement present, dozens of people needing medical assistance, and this man appears to be bleeding profusely in his right arm. Security ordered to stand down, no LAPD presence. A Jewish woman said multiple men assaulted her, no security help. pic.twitter.com/32pMZqtLCa
No one in the LAPD is talking in these terms. The LAPD is refusing to answer calls from people under attack by Hamas supporters.
As bad as Mayor Eric Adams and the NYPD may be in some ways, they’re still fighting where most police forces in liberal cities have surrendered or switched sides.
We will remember moments like this in the years to come and they may well define the final outcome.
The Embassy of Israel in India said on Wednesday it conducted a security drill in collaboration with Indian security forces in New Delhi last week.
The announcement came as Israeli diplomatic missions are bracing for a surge of antisemitism amid reports that the International Court of Justice may issue arrest warrants for Israel’s top leaders.
Foreign Minister Israel Katz instructed the country’s embassies to “immediately prepare for the outbreak of a severe anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli anti-Semitic wave in the world.”
Due to what the Foreign Ministry said is the “seriousness of the threat,” Katz also instructed Israeli representatives to impress on local Jewish communities the need to boost security for their institutions.
In recent days, reports have multiplied that the ICC chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, may soon issue warrants for the arrest of senior Israeli officials for war crimes, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Chief of the Israel Defense Forces Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi.
It is also speculated that Khan will ask for warrants to be issued against Hamas leaders.
BIDEN’S SLOW MOTION BETRAYAL OF ISRAEL
Israel is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which founded the ICC.
According to the Israeli embassy in New Delhi, the drill’s primary objective was “to assess and synchronize the readiness of security forces to counter potential future threats effectively.”
Involved in the day and night simulations were India’s Ministry of Home Affairs, the Delhi Police, the National Security Guard, and local emergency services such as the fire department and traffic police.
The embassy said the exercise enabled the embassy staff and Indian forces to refine their coordination, communication, and operational procedures.
“These collaborative exercises strengthen our nations’ cooperation in security and defense and reinforce our shared commitment to global stability.
We remain steadfast in our determination to foster continued collaboration for a safer world,” said Israeli Ambassador to India Naor Gilon.
In February 2012, bombings targeting Israeli embassy personnel in New Delhi and Bangkok injured four, while another bomb was discovered and safely defused in Tbilisi. The attacks were attributed to Iran.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken, left, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Ronaldo Schemidt/Pool via AP)
(DCNF) Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister met in Tel Aviv on Wednesday to discuss the ongoing Israel-Hamas war — and disagreements over the next phase of conflict.
The Biden administration is backing an effort to reach a deal between Israel and Hamas for a temporary ceasefire and the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza in exchange for the release of hostages. During their meeting on Wednesday, Blinken discussed the ceasefire deal with Netanyahu and “the need to avoid further expansion of the conflict,” underscoring the Biden administration’s “clear position” on opposing an Israeli invasion of Rafah, the southernmost region of Gaza, according to a readout of the meeting.
But Netanyahu reportedly told Blinken that he would not accept a deal in which Israel permanently ends its war efforts, which Hamas is demanding as a term of the deal, according to two Israeli and U.S. officials who spoke to Axios. Netanyahu said that if Hamas doesn’t make concessions on that demand, the deal will be scrapped and Israel will push forward with an invasion into Rafah.
The expanded meeting between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, has concluded. pic.twitter.com/s3D6fEEHU6
— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) May 1, 2024
A day prior to his meeting with Blinken, Netanyahu said that Israel would invade Rafah “with or without” a ceasefire deal to free the hostages. The Israeli government sees Rafah as the endgame to the war after waging a campaign through north and central Gaza that has largely eradicated Hamas.
When asked about Netanyahu’s comments on Tuesday, Blinken said the Biden administration’s focus was on a ceasefire deal and the release of hostages, according to The New York Times. Netanyahu and Blinken discussed the current proposed deal for roughly three hours on Wednesday.
President Joe Biden has said that an Israeli assault in Rafah would be crossing a “red line,” as the Biden administration fears it will pose a significant risk for the roughly 1.5 million refugees and civilians in the region. The Biden administration has asked Israel to provide a credible plan for an invasion that guarantees civilian safety and doesn’t have a disproportionate impact on the region.
But Israel has yet to provide that plan, according to the State Department.
“It continues to be the case that we have not seen a credible plan that would address the varying areas of concerns,” State Department deputy spokesman Vedant Patel told reporters on Tuesday. “Any kind of military operation into Rafah that does not address these concerns would be unacceptable to the United States.”
The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
It was unusual, but hardly surprising, that Turkish national Hassan Saklanan tried to stab an Israeli police officer in Jerusalem on Tuesday.
Saklanan was shot and killed by responding officers in Jerusalem’s Old City.
According to Turkish media reports, the 34-year-old Saklanan was an imam from the southern Turkish city of Sanliurfa and was part of an official Religious Affairs delegation.
Turkish reports added that Saklanan did not participate in the delegation’s tour that day, saying he wasn’t feeling well.
Terror attacks by foreign nationals in Israel are not common, but the stabbing draws attention to efforts to quietly expand Turkish influence in eastern Jerusalem — particularly in the Old City — over the past decade.
This includes a surge in reports of Turks participating in disturbances on the Temple Mount.
It is widely believed that these individuals are backed by the Turkish government and institutions.
In eastern Jerusalem, Palestinians refer to the practice as “Jihad Tourism.”
Turkish associations have undertaken significant renovation projects, revitalizing numerous houses and mosques in the Old City.
TURKISH TOURIST SHOT DEAD AFTER STABBING ISRAELI OFFICER, POLICEWOMAN INJURED IN SAMARIA CAR RAMMING
Moreover, Turkish-financed guest accommodations have sprung up, offering free lodging to Turkish visitors.
The streets of the Old City are now adorned with Turkish goods, while signs of Turkish aid agencies, such as the Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA) are prominently displayed.
Israeli officials accuse TIKA of undermining Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem.
As The Press Service of Israel reported in May 2023, TIKA says it seeks to “strengthen the Palestinian steadfastness in Jerusalem.”
The agency stopped its activities in the city in 2019 when Israeli officials threatened to revoke the diplomatic status of the heads of the TIKA’s Jerusalem office.
Then-Foreign Minister Israel Katz accused TIKA of supporting the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas and of trying to change the status quo on the Temple Mount.
But as Israel and Turkey restored full diplomatic ties in January 2023, TIKA returned to Jerusalem.
Other Turkish institutions include the Turkish Heritage Association, also known as Miratna, which has vowed to actively prevent Israel’s “Judaization of Jerusalem.”
Miratna provides food packages and financial assistance to needy families, renovates houses, offers educational programs, and works to preserve Islamic heritage sites.
One other organization is Kutad, an Istanbul-based charity organization that is run by Hamas, raising concerns about potential links between Turkish interests and other extremist groups.
Kutad’s self-described role “is to protect the Islamic historical heritage in Jerusalem and to be a cultural bridge between Turkey and Palestine and Jerusalem.”
Hamas doesn’t normally frame its Jerusalem rhetoric by referencing the Ottoman Empire, but such references play well to the terror group’s Turkish hosts.
Kutad also finances construction projects in eastern Jerusalem, primarily homes and mosques.
According to Kutad, by building homes in eastern Jerusalem, Muslims create what is called in Arabic, ribat, which literally means a “battle line,” but refers to a tangible claim on the land.
The Press Service of Israel also reported that both Miratna and Kutad have supported Ramadan violence by paying people to stay on the Temple Mount to maintain a 24-hour Muslim presence on the holy site.
It isn’t known if Saklanan was in contact with any of those Turkish groups before carrying out his attack.
The best encouragement the students received was from President Joe Biden, who, when asked about anti-Semitism on college campuses, condemned it but then added that he was just as concerned about “those who don’t understand what’s going on with the Palestinians.” It was, as Alan Dershowitz and Andrew Stein wrote in The Wall Street Journal, a “very fine people” moment for the president. Photo Credit: AP
Marking Jewish American Heritage Month, Biden unveiled a proposal to update the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include protection for Jews.
After discussing the history and contribution of Jews in America, Biden focused on the pressing problem of antisemitism, and emphasized Hamas atrocities of October 7th as signaling the need to protect Jews.
He said, “Hamas’ brutal terrorist attack on October 7th against Israel marked the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, resurfacing, including here in the United States, painful scars from millennia of antisemitism and genocide of Jewish people.”
Biden declared that the US’s commitment to supporting the Jewish State is “ironclad,” and said that Iran’s massive attack against Israel last month, “reminds us of the existential threats that Israel faces by adversaries that want nothing less than to wipe it off the map.”
The President also discussed the pressing need to secure the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza, and added, “I have said to their families, we will not rest until we bring them home.”
To deal with these problems, Biden announced several proposals, including updating civil rights legislation to include Jews, investigating antisemitism at colleges and universities and increasing funding to heighten security at synagogues and Jewish Centers.
He said, “That is why I released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism and clarified the civil rights protections for Jews under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”
“In addition, the Department of Education has launched investigations into antisemitism on college campuses, the Department of Justice is investigating and prosecuting hate crimes, and the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are focused on enhancing security in Jewish communities,” he added.
“We also secured the largest increase in funding ever for the physical security of nonprofits like synagogues, Jewish Community Centers, and Jewish schools,” Biden explained.
“I appointed Deborah Lipstadt, a Holocaust expert, as the first-ever Ambassador-level Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.”
‘Together, we are sending the message that, in America, evil will not win. Hate will not prevail. The venom and violence of antisemitism will not be the story of our time.”
California — Roughly 100 pro-Israel vigilantes stormed the “Palestine Solidarity Encampment” at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) late Tuesday night and early Wednesday morning, sparking battles with activists.
NOW at UCLA: Pro-Israel protesters just tore down the metal barricades and began ripping flags off the encampment. They trying to break in the encampment to fight people. pic.twitter.com/C5uVAEZuoh
UCLA CHAOS 🚨: Fights breaking out, dozens more sprayed, assaults happening on both sides, crowds growing larger, ZERO law enforcement present. A woman was just struck in the head. Utter Chaos and lawlessness. pic.twitter.com/ubpSqxxLP8
UCLA 🚨: FIGHTS continue through the night. Dozens injured , multiple bleeding, still ZERO law enforcement present. Both sides drag their wounded and fresh protestors replace them on the front. Total Anarchy. pic.twitter.com/Fl6T35zJRc
The raid occurred after nearly a week in which UCLA not only allowed the encampment to occupy the main plaza on campus, but also allowed pro-Palestinian activists to run their own security, barring access to students and the public.
The Daily Bruin, the student newspaper, reported the clashes:
Fireworks, tear gas and fights broke out just after 10:50 p.m. Tuesday night and continued early Wednesday morning as around 100 pro-Israel counter-protesters attempted to seize the barricade around and storm the ongoing Palestine solidarity encampment in Dickson Plaza.
…
After the barricades came down, counter-protesters and protesters inside the encampment began to fight. Counter-protesters shot fireworks into the encampment just after 11 p.m., and irritant gasses were released from both sides. A Daily Bruin reporter was indirectly sprayed in the face.
…
In another statement released at 3:30 a.m., protesters inside the encampment said the university has not done enough to protect students, and they repeated earlier calls for the university to meet their demands.
The Daily Bruin reported “multiple events of counter-protesters antagonizing the encampment” in recent days, but failed to note violence by the members of the encampment.
P
Videos had circulated for days of students, including but not limited to visibly Jewish students, being denied access to classes and walkways by masked pro-Palestinian activists excluding all but those who could show a special wristband.
Parent @UCLA gave permission to release this audio of her phone call with @UCLAPD as they describe the school’s directive to allow protestors to restrict the movement of Jewish students.
“Are the protestors allowed to block students who are paying tuition from classes? No, but… pic.twitter.com/qBo9TKci3v
On Sunday, Breitbart News was told by a UCLA security contractor that the university had delegated security to the activists. (Two days before, activists had used force to assault this journalist and exclude me from the encampment.)
UCLA is a taxpayer-funded public university and the area in front of Royce Hall is considered a public space.
Many in the Jewish community were shocked at the presence of the “Palestine Solidarity Encampment” and the apparent deference of university authorities toward it.
The area around UCLA is one of the most pro-Israel in the country. Beverly Hills, Brentwood, and Bel Air include a large number of Jewish families, especially Persian Jews, many of whom escaped the Islamic revolution in Iran.
Los Angeles is also home to a large number of Israeli expatriates.
Counter-protesters and activists had clashed from the start last Thursday, and tensions had built up for days. One prankster woke up the activists on Friday by playing Robin Williams’s monologue from Good Morning, Vietnam.
After confrontations at a pro-Israel counter-demonstration on Sunday, a pro-Israel group set up a large video screen opposite the encampment, showing video of Hamas atrocities in a continuous loop.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — who \had done nothing to protect the safety of students on campus as the activists used violence to patrol the perimeter of the encampment — issued a statement on X that he was monitoring the situation:
Photos of the California Highway Patrol in riot gear appeared on news wires, suggesting that the state had, finally, intervened after Newsom and UC President Michael Drake had been invisible on the issue of encampments for weeks.
lton Hall at Columbia University to remove pro-Palestinian activists who had smashed their way into the building early on Tuesday morning.
UCLA’s administration finally issued a statement on Tuesday, warning that the encampment was unlawful and that it had “requested law enforcement investigations into allegations of violence” by the activists at the encampment.
But it was only after the pro-Israel group arrived and began storming the barricades that law enforcement moved in, separating the two sides. It remains to be seen what happens to the surviving part of the encampment going forward.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
HILCO REAL ESTATE ANNOUNCES TWO COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUMS AVAILABLE THROUGH A BANKRUPTCY SALE IN GREENWICH VILLAGE
Hilco Real Estate, LLC, announces May 17, 2024 as the bid deadline for the Chapter 11 bankruptcy sale of two commercial condominiums in New York City’s historic Greenwich Village. These condominiums occupy the first and second floor of the building located at 350-354 Avenue of the Americas. With 176 feet of prime, wraparound frontage on the corner of 6th Avenue and Washington Place, these offerings promise high visibility and heavy foot traffic.
The ground-floor retail space, totaling over 7,850± square feet and zoned C1, boasts 15-foot ceilings, exceptional location and can accommodate single or multiple tenants. While currently not built out, the versatile layout can be retrofitted, taking advantage of three separate entry points, which present a unique opportunity for various uses.
The second-floor space, spanning 8,942± square feet and zoned C2, offers ample flexibility for community-oriented endeavors. Previously occupied by a daycare, the space retains its built-out infrastructure, providing a turnkey solution for a new operator. This setup can also offer potential investors the ability to combine both floors and potentially increase the value for a prospective tenant.
The condominiums sit just one block from Washington Square Park and four blocks from NYU, ideally positioned to take advantage of excellent foot traffic. Additionally, eight subway lines, including the A, C, E, B, D, F, M and 1, and the PATH train are within walking distance, ensuring easy accessibility for both employees and customers.
Greenwich Village, on the west side of Lower Manhattan, is known for its history of fostering art and creativity, with notable former residents including Edgar Allen Poe, Jackson Pollack and Bob Dylan. The neighborhood also features multiple attractions, including Washington Square Park, the Village Vanguard jazz club, the Comedy Cellar, the historic Jefferson Market Library and several historic districts dedicated to preserving the Village’s character and charm. In addition to being lauded for its creative culture, Greenwich Village is home to New York University (NYU), The New School and Cooper Union, with over 64,000 students in attendance between the three universities. Despite the pandemic, the neighborhood also saw a 1.85% population increase from 2020 to 2021 and a 4.29% increase in median household income.
The sale of 350-354 Avenue of the Americas is being conducted by Order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of the Southern District of New York (Manhattan), Bankruptcy Petition No. 23-10068-JPM, In re: Nuovo Ciao-Di LLC. Bids must be received on or before the deadline of May 17 at 5 p.m. (ET) and must be submitted on the Purchase and Sale Agreement available for review and download from Hilco Real Estate’s website.
Interested buyers should review the requirements in order to participate in the bankruptcy sale process available on Hilco Real Estate’s website. For further information, please contact Jonathan Cuticelli at (203) 561-8737 or [email protected].
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) of New York has marked June 30th as the commencement date for its much-debated congestion pricing plan. According to a recently published report in the New York Post, this initiative mandates a $15 daily fee for drivers entering Manhattan south of 61st Street, with higher charges imposed on larger vehicles. The plan aims to alleviate traffic congestion in the heart of Manhattan and generate substantial revenue for the MTA’s deteriorating infrastructure, potentially exceeding a billion dollars annually, as was noted in the Post report.
The primary objective of the congestion pricing plan is to reduce vehicular traffic in one of the most densely populated areas of New York City, thereby mitigating environmental impact and improving air quality, the Post report explained. Additionally, the fees collected would provide a crucial financial lifeline for the MTA, which has long struggled with budget deficits and infrastructure issues.
However, the initiative has encountered significant opposition. Critics argue that it disproportionately affects certain groups, particularly suburban commuters and those who rely on vehicle transportation due to the lack of viable public transit options in their areas, as was indicated in the Post report. The imposition of a daily fee is seen by these critics as an unfair tax on drivers who might not have other transportation alternatives.
The rollout of the congestion pricing plan is not yet guaranteed on the slated date due to ongoing legal challenges. New Jersey has filed a lawsuit in federal court, claiming that the MTA’s evaluation of the toll’s impact inadequately considered the effects on drivers from the Garden State and failed to address certain environmental consequences, ccording to the information provided in the Post report. This legal action spotlights the inter-state friction that the plan has exacerbated, given the significant number of New Jersey residents who commute to Manhattan for work.
In addition to the lawsuit from New Jersey, local opposition has been robust. The United Federation of Teachers (UFT), a prominent teachers’ union in New York, and Vito Fossela, the Staten Island Borough President, are actively challenging the plan in court. The Post reported that the UFT filed a lawsuit set for arguments in mid-May and its involvement calls attention to the widespread concern over the plan’s impact, extending beyond logistical and financial issues to encompass broader social justice and equity considerations.
The report in the Post noted that their efforts highlight concerns that the congestion pricing could have unintended negative impacts on specific communities, including potential health effects on residents of areas such as Staten Island, who may see increased traffic and pollution as drivers seek alternative routes to avoid the tolls.
State Senator Jessica Scarcella-Spanton of Staten Island and State Senator Jim Skoufis of Orange County have also voiced their strong opposition to the plan. Scarcella-Spanton labeled the MTA’s oversight of the potential health impacts on Staten Islanders as “abhorrent,” the Post report said.
Scarcella-Spanton also emphasized the dual burden of financial strain and health risks posed by the plan, condemning what she sees as a “blatant disregard for the health and well-being” of her constituents, the Post report added.
Senator Skoufis raised issues regarding the lack of reliable public transportation alternatives for his constituents in Orange County. According to the Post, he pointed out the impracticality of the current transit options, where train schedules can have gaps as long as six hours, making it difficult for everyday workers to maintain their schedules without relying on personal vehicles.
“As we have seen over the last half a year since October 7, campus anti-Semitism is at an all-time high, and American universities are not capable of handling it when left to their own devices. My office and I have spoken with countless Jewish students from campuses across America who feel deeply unsafe ,” Ritchie Torres said in the release. (AP/Mariam Zuhaib)
By: Robert McGreevy
Republican New York Rep. Mike Lawler and Democratic New York Rep. Ritchie Torres are planning to introduce legislation to send anti-Semitism monitors to college campuses and revoke federal funds from schools that don’t comply, the GOP lawmaker announced in a Friday press release.
The College Oversight and Legal Updates Mandating Bias Investigations and Accountability Act, or the COLUMBIA Act, would empower the Department of Education to install a third-party monitor to any school that accepts federal funding, according to the press release.
The monitor would be responsible for releasing quarterly public reports on schools’ progress in their efforts to combat anti-Semitism. Though the Department of Education would appoint the monitors, the schools would pay for them, the press release reads.
The Representatives highlighted protests across the country, particularly at Columbia University, as a major reason why they’re introducing the bill.
“Rising anti-Semitism on our college campuses is a major concern and we must act to ensure the safety of students,” Lawler wrote. “I’m proud to work with my friend and colleague Ritchie Torres on legislation that will impose a third-party anti-Semitism monitor on college campuses to ensure protections are in place and oversee any troubling action by college administrators. If colleges will not step up to protect their students, Congress must act.”
“As we have seen over the last half a year since October 7, campus anti-Semitism is at an all-time high, and American universities are not capable of handling it when left to their own devices. My office and I have spoken with countless Jewish students from campuses across America who feel deeply unsafe, purely as a result of their religious and ethnic identity,” Torres said in the release.
“This is a blatant violation of Title VI and the federal government cannot allow this to continue unchecked. This past week’s crisis at Columbia is not an isolated incident — it is the straw that has broken the camel’s back — and I am prepared to do something about it. That’s why I am introducing the COLUMBIA Act today, and I urge all of my colleagues in the House, from both parties, to join me in this crucial action. Jewish students have told my office that they feel completely abandoned by their university administrators and they view Congress as the only avenue for accountability and safety. Let’s honor our word to them and get this done,” Torres concluded.
Besides the protests in Columbia, Pro-Palestine demonstrations have erupted on campuses across the country.
The University of Southern California cancelled their main graduation ceremony due to rampant protests.
Atlanta’s Emory University was rife with agitators Thursday as police struggled to contain the chaos. Police arrested Chair of the Philosophy Department Noelle McAfee and economics professor Caroline Fohlin on camera.
The University of Texas at Austin was also the setting for some clashes between police and protestors Wednesday, with law enforcement arresting 10.
Students at Harvard took over the school’s iconic Harvard Yard park Wednesday.
Additional protests occurred at Yale, the University of Michigan, UCLA and George Washington University and others throughout the nation.
In a notable development in the legal saga surrounding former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, the New York Court of Appeals recently overturned his 2018 rape conviction. As was noted in a recently published report in the New York Post, this decision, which has been described as both “disheartening” and unsurprising by observers, was driven by what the court identified as significant judicial errors during the trial.
The court highlighted several missteps by trial Judge James Burke that, they argued, compromised Weinstein’s right to a fair trial. Revealed in the Post report was that key among these was the decision to allow testimony from three women who were not included in the charges against Weinstein. Additionally, the court took issue with Judge Burke’s ruling that permitted the prosecution to question Weinstein about 28 other “prior bad acts” that were not part of the case, the report in the Post added.
These factors, the court concluded, could have prejudiced the jury against Weinstein, thereby undermining the fairness of the trial. As a result of these findings, Weinstein’s conviction and the accompanying 23-year sentence were overturned. As per the information in the Post report, the case has been remanded to the lower court for a possible retrial, a move that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has indicated it plans to pursue aggressively.
While the reversal in New York has raised questions and concerns, it appears to have had little impact on Weinstein’s legal troubles in California. Los Angeles prosecutors, buoyed by a separate conviction and a 16-year prison sentence against Weinstein, have stated that their case remains secure. Indicated in the Post report was that they have argued that the legal missteps identified in the New York trial do not apply in California, suggesting that a similar appeal based on these grounds would likely not succeed in overturning the Los Angeles conviction.
This confidence stems from differences in state laws and procedural rules that govern how testimony and evidence related to “prior bad acts” can be introduced in court. The information contained in the Post report said that according to Los Angeles legal authorities, the standards that led to the overturning of Weinstein’s New York conviction are not applicable in their jurisdiction, providing a firmer foundation for their case to withstand appeals.
While disheartening to many, the decision by New York’s Court of Appeals to overturn Weinstein’s 23-year sentence on legal grounds has been deemed necessary by some legal experts to uphold the standards of fair trial proceedings.
The crux of the appellate court’s decision rested on a series of rulings by Judge James Burke, which were found to potentially prejudice the jury against Weinstein. Noted in the Post report was that central to these rulings was the admission of testimony from witnesses not directly involved in the charges against Weinstein, as well as allowing a broad inquiry into Weinstein’s past conduct that was not part of the current case.
Speaking to the Post, Tre Lovell, a Los Angeles-based attorney, emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, stating, “Although overturning the conviction is very disheartening to many, it stands on firm legal grounds.” He further noted to the Post that “As much as it hurts, it is incumbent on the justice system to ensure a person is tried in a manner that exhaustively protects him from evidence that detracts from the specific crime and can unfairly sway a jury.”
