79.5 F
New York
Saturday, June 1, 2024
Home Blog Page 5

IDF Reveals Hamas Munitions May Have Caused Rafah Blaze

0
In the aftermath of an airstrike in the Rafah region of the Gaza Strip. Hamas tried to blame it on Israel. Photo Caption: YouTube.com

Edited by: Fern Sidman

As the war to obliterate all vestiges of the Hamas terrorist infrastructure in Gaza rages on, on Sunday night, a deadly fire broke out in Rafah, Gaza, following an Israeli airstrike. The Israeli military is now investigating whether this fire was caused by the secondary detonation of Hamas munitions stored nearby, as was reported by the Jewish News Syndicate on Tuesday.

The airstrike targeted a structure in Tal as-Sultan, a neighborhood in northwest Rafah, based on intelligence indicating the presence of two high-ranking Hamas officials: Yassin Rabia and Khaled Nagar. According to the information provided in the JNS report, both individuals were known for their significant roles in Hamas’s operations in Judea and Samaria, directing numerous terror attacks targeting Israeli civilians and soldiers.

Yassin Rabia, described as the commander of Hamas’s leadership in Judea and Samaria, was responsible for managing terror activities, transferring funds, and planning attacks. He had also conducted attacks himself, resulting in the deaths of IDF soldiers in the early 2000s. Indicated in the JNS report was that Khaled Nagar, a senior official in the same region, orchestrated shootings and other attacks that killed several Israeli civilians and soldiers. Both men were previously imprisoned and released as part of the 2011 Shalit prisoner exchange deal, and they were reportedly planning further attacks at the time of the strike.

An Israeli fighter jet releases flares and a drone is seen from Rafah in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, May 28th. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) employed two of the smallest types of munitions available, each carrying 17 kilograms (37.5 pounds) of explosives. According to a military official, these munitions have been used extensively throughout the conflict. JNS reported that the small size of these warheads was intended to minimize collateral damage, a crucial consideration given the densely populated nature of Gaza.

Despite these precautions, the resulting fire has raised questions about the presence of additional explosive materials in the vicinity. The military official noted that a Hamas rocket launcher was located just 47 meters from the targeted compound, suggesting that the blaze might have been exacerbated by the ignition of nearby weapons caches.

IDF spokesman Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari emphasized that the initial strike’s munitions were too small to cause such an extensive fire independently. The JNS report noted that the presence of fuel, cooking gas canisters, or other flammable materials in the area could have contributed to the rapid spread of the blaze.

The military also released satellite photos showing the proximity of the Hamas rocket launch position to the targeted area, further supporting the hypothesis that secondary explosions played a role in the fire, as per the information contained in the JNS report. These images are part of the ongoing effort to provide transparency and accountability in Israeli military operations.

Israeli soldiers move on the top of a tank near the Israeli-Gaza border, as seen from southern Israel on Tuesday, May 28th. (AP Photo/Leo Correa)

Social media reports indicate that video captured just after the attack in Rafah has provided revealing details. The Gazan narrator explicitly mentions that the target of the Israeli attack was a Hamas jeep loaded with weapons. At 21 seconds into the video, secondary explosions are visible, confirming the presence of munitions. Additionally, the narrator’s immediate reaction to these explosions is fear of an incoming rocket, indicating his belief that rockets were also present at the site and might ignite due to the fire. Also in the video, Gazans themselves proceed to say “Any moment a Hamas rocket can fly at us”.

Since the surprise attack by Hamas on October 7, which saw 1,200 Israeli civilians brutally massacred and resulted in the abduction of 250 individuals, the region has seen a significant escalation in violence.

The Israeli military’s emphasis on minimizing collateral damage is juxtaposed with the reality of Hamas’s tactics, which often involve embedding military assets within civilian infrastructure.

The IDF is currently reviewing footage captured by Gaza residents and posted on social media that ostensibly shows secondary explosions following the airstrike. This footage is a critical piece of evidence in the ongoing investigation. The JNS report affirmed that an IDF official noted that this visual evidence, combined with intelligence suggesting the presence of Hamas weapons stored in the vicinity, reinforces the suspicion that these munitions may have caught fire post-strike.

The investigation is being conducted by the IDF General Staff fact-finding mechanism, an independent professional body within the military. The focus is to determine the precise cause of the fire and to establish whether the secondary explosions from Hamas munitions were indeed the catalyst.

The IDF official emphasized that the type of munition used in the strike, which has been deployed numerous times during the conflict, is not capable of causing such a large fire on its own. According to the JNS report, Rear Admiral Hagari emphasized that the munitions used in the strike were the smallest available to the Israeli Air Force (IAF) jets, each carrying 17 kilograms (37.5 pounds) of explosives. He stated unequivocally, “Our munition alone could not have ignited a fire this size … We used the smallest munition that our jets can use.” This assertion highlights the military’s intention to minimize collateral damage during operations.

The targeted area was 1.5 kilometers away from the humanitarian evacuation zone established by the IDF, underscoring efforts to minimize civilian casualties. Despite these precautions, the fire’s aftermath has prompted a reassessment of operational protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The IDF official reiterated that the primary objective of their operations is to combat Hamas, not the people of Gaza. The investigation aims to understand the exact sequence of events that led to the tragic fire and to develop strategies to prevent such incidents from recurring.

“This is a very tragic incident that occurred. We have to understand why it occurred. And we have to understand how we prevent this kind of incident from[occurring again,” the official stated.

An Israeli Apache helicopter fires a missile towards the Gaza Strip on Ruesday, May28th. (AP Photo/Leo Correa)

The ongoing investigation into the Rafah fire is a testament to the IDF’s dedication to transparency and accountability in military operations. As evidence continues to be assessed, the findings will play a crucial role in shaping future operational protocols.

The airstrike targeted a “closed” terrorist structure situated almost a mile from the Al-Mawasi Humanitarian zone.

Hagari disclosed that signals intelligence played a crucial role in shaping the current understanding of the incident. Intercepted phone calls suggest that weapons stored in a nearby compound may have caught fire following the airstrike. “There may have been weapons in the area. Our signals intelligence intercepted phone calls reinforcing this possibility that weapons stored in a nearby compound caught fire,” Hagari explained, as was pointed out in the JNS report.

Hagari assured the public that the investigation would be swift, thorough, and transparent. The IDF’s commitment to understanding the cause of the fire is driven by a desire to prevent similar incidents in the future, the report on JNS said. “Our war is against Hamas, not the people of Gaza. This is why we convey deep sorrow over this loss of life,” Hagari stated, expressing deep regret over the incident and its tragic consequences.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the fire as a “tragic mishap,” reflecting the unforeseen and devastating nature of the incident, as was reported by the Associated Press. Rear Admiral Hagari also characterized the fire as a “devastating incident which we did not expect,” pointing to “unforeseen circumstances” as a key factor in the blaze. This hypothesis aligns with the Israeli military’s broader narrative that Hamas terrorist activities and stockpiles within civilian areas pose significant risks to both combatants and non-combatants.

In related developments, JNS also reported on Tuesday that Israeli tanks rolled into the center of Rafah, as per Palestinian reports and eyewitness accounts provided to Reuters. The Israel Defense Forces tanks were seen near the Al-Awda mosque, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing ground offensive in Gaza. The JNS report said that although the Israeli military had not immediately confirmed these movements, it indicated that a formal statement on the Rafah operation would be issued later in the day.

This development comes three weeks after Israel initiated its ground offensive targeting the last Hamas stronghold in southern Gaza. According to the information provided in the JNS report, the operation, which initially began in eastern Rafah, has since expanded to other critical areas, signaling a comprehensive approach to dismantle Hamas’s infrastructure and operational capabilities in the region.

Palestinian reports indicated that IDF infantry and tanks were advancing in the Tel Sultan neighborhood of northwestern Rafah. This marks the first ground operation in that part of the city. JNS also reported that Tel Sultan is strategically significant as it hosts one of the four Hamas battalions in Rafah. The other battalions are located in Yabna (south), Shaboura (north), and east Rafah, all of which have seen IDF activity in recent weeks.

During his remarks at the press conference early on Tuesday, Hagari announced that the Bislamach Brigade under Division 162 has joined the fighting in Rafah. This addition reinforces the three brigades already active in the area, enhancing the operational capabilities of the IDF, the JNS report revealed. The troops are conducting targeted operations along the Philadelphi Corridor, an 8.7-mile-long border area between Gaza and Egypt. This corridor is a critical zone for counter-terrorism operations, aimed at disrupting Hamas’s logistical and operational infrastructure.

JNS also reported that the area is notorious for its network of tunnels used by Hamas for smuggling weapons, supplies, and personnel. By intensifying operations in this region, the IDF aims to cut off critical supply routes and weaken Hamas’s operational capabilities.

The intensification of the ground offensive in Rafah underscores the broader strategic objectives of the IDF in its ongoing campaign against Hamas. The operation seeks to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure of Hamas, neutralize key operatives, and restore security to southern Israel.

The IDF’s efforts to minimize civilian casualties and collateral damage are evident in their strategic planning and execution of operations. Nonetheless, the complex urban environment and the embedding of terrorist assets within civilian areas present significant challenges, as was noted in the JNS report.

According to the IDF, troops from the Nahal Brigade’s combat team located tunnel shafts, seized weapons and killed many terror operatives in the Rafah area in recent days.

Last week, Nahal Brigade soldiers found a large weapons cache and a lathe for the production of rockets and grenades, as well as explosive vests, a rocket-launch complex, platforms for making rockets and more.

Troops are also active elsewhere in Gaza, according to the IDF, including in Jabalia in the north, where dozens of terror sites were destroyed, including observation posts, weapons depots and a building used by Hamas.

Several terrorists were also killed by IDF troops over the past day in Jabalia, including a mortar-launching cell that was hit by a fighter jet.

In central Gaza, the IDF said that it expanded operations in the Netzarim Corridor, killing terrorists and conducting targeted raids.

Also on Tuesday, JNS reported that the US. Department of Defense has announced a temporary removal of a critical pier off the Gazan coast for at least a week to undergo necessary repairs. This decision follows a significant structural failure on Tuesday when the top of the T-shaped pier, known as the Trident pier, separated and drifted into the coast, according to the JNS report. This incident adds to the operational challenges faced by the U.S. military in the region, compounded by four U.S. Army vessels running aground between the Gaza pier and the Israeli city of Ashkelon.

Sabrina Singh, the deputy Pentagon press secretary, provided details during a press briefing on Tuesday. She explained that earlier in the day, a portion of the Trident pier detached from its anchored position and required immediate attention. “The Trident pier was damaged and sections of the pier need rebuilding and repairing,” Singh stated, as was noted in the JNS report.

The Trident pier is a crucial component of the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore (JLOTS) operation, facilitating the offloading of supplies and equipment in regions lacking fixed port facilities. As detailed in the JNS report, the damage to the pier disrupts this operation, necessitating swift and comprehensive repairs to restore its functionality.

Nikki Haley in Israel – Warns That Oct 7th Could “Absolutely Happen in America Too”

0
Former Presidential candidate Nikki Haley has written the words “finish them” on an Israeli rocket as she visits the country to show solidarity during the war against Hamas terrorism.

Edited by: Fern Sidman

On a visit on Monday to the ravaged communities in Israel following the October 7 massacre, former US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley unequivocally pointed fingers at Iran, Russia, and China for their alleged roles in the catastrophic attack executed by Hamas, according to a report that appeared on Monday in the Times of Israel. Speaking at the remains of the Sderot police station alongside Likud MK and former UN envoy Danny Danon, Haley’s statements sparked a flurry of debate and concern regarding the broader geopolitical entanglements and their implications.

Haley’s claims were direct and alarming: she contended that the attack was orchestrated by Iran, supported by Russian intelligence, and financed by Chinese money. Her assertion, “if we are arrogant enough,” such an attack “could absolutely happen in America too,” was a stark warning meant to shine a spotlight on the very real threat posed by these nations, as was reported by the TOI. Haley argued that China’s ongoing financial support to Iran facilitated the latter’s role in training Hamas operatives, while Russian intelligence allegedly provided crucial information to aid the assault.

While Haley’s accusations are severe, it’s essential to recognize the current geopolitical stances and actions of the implicated countries. To date, there is no publicly available evidence linking Russia or China directly to the planning or execution of the October 7 attack. The information contained in the TOI report indicated that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s administration has indeed been vocally critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza and has hosted Hamas officials, calling for a ceasefire through a UN Security Council resolution that notably did not mention Hamas.

China, on the other hand, has shown a strategic inclination to foster stronger ties with Arab nations. Beijing’s announcement to host Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and other Arab leaders to articulate a unified stance on the Palestinian issue further exemplifies China’s diplomatic maneuvers to assert its influence in the region, as was observed in the TOI report.

Iran’s support for terrorist groups, including Hamas, is well-documented. The Iranian regime has been a longstanding patron of various proxy groups throughout the Middle East, providing financial support, training, and weaponry, the TOI report said. Iran’s strategic objective has often been to destabilize rivals and extend its influence through asymmetric warfare. The link between Iran and Hamas fits within this broader pattern of Iranian foreign policy.

Danon confirmed Iranian involvement but was cautious about definitively linking Russia and China to the attack. “We have to look very carefully [at] who trained the Hamas terrorists. We have evidence about Iranian involvement,” he told the TOI. When pressed for credible information linking Moscow and Beijing to the attack, Danon noted, “No, we have to look at the rockets and missiles that they were using. Definitely, they came from Russia and China. You have to look deeply who brought it and who gave it to them.”

This trip to Israel which was organized by Danon, came at a time when Haley’s name is being floated as a possible vice-presidential candidate for Donald Trump, despite Trump’s public dismissal of the notion. Noted in the TOI report was that Haley’s visit to the war-torn regions of southern Israel served both to solidify her foreign policy credentials and to demonstrate her unwavering support for Israel—a key factor for many Republican voters.

Haley’s participation in the Republican primary, where she was a contender against Trump, has kept her in the political limelight. The report in the TOI added that visiting Israel, a country that holds substantial symbolic and strategic importance for many American politicians, is a common move for those looking to bolster their foreign policy experience and credentials.

Despite the conjecture, Haley has stated that Trump has explicitly communicated she will not be his running mate. Yet, the TOI also reported that Trump himself has indicated that he envisions a role for Haley within his team, reflecting the ambiguous but strategic nature of her political positioning.

MK Danny Danon, who served concurrently with Haley at the United Nations, organized her visit. He has been active in bringing international attention to the southern regions of Israel that have suffered significantly since the October 7 massacre. The TOI report pointed out that Haley’s tour included stops at Kibbutz Nir Oz and the Nova festival site in Re’im, key locations impacted by the violence. These visits allowed her to engage directly with survivors and local residents, offering a platform to express solidarity and empathy while reinforcing her image as a staunch supporter of Israel.

Throughout her visit, Haley made several pointed remarks that reflect her political ethos and the broader ideological stance she aims to project. Emphasizing her support for Trump, Haley articulated a vision of American leadership characterized by unwavering support for allies and a firm stance against adversaries.

“I want to know that we’re going to have the backs of our allies and hold our enemies to account. I want to know that we’re going to protect freedom at all costs. We’re going to protect capitalism at all costs,” she stated in Sderot, according to the report in the TOI. Haley’s remarks displayed a commitment to a strong bilateral relationship between the United States and Israel, framed within a broader agenda of promoting freedom and capitalism.

Haley’s narrative positions her support for Trump as aligned with the ideals of a “strong America” and a “strong Israel,” the report added. This messaging is designed to resonate with Republican voters who prioritize national strength, security, and the protection of economic principles.

While in Israel, Haley also articulated strong criticisms of President Biden’s Middle East policies, despite her initial statement of restraint. The TOI report affirmed that Haley’s remarks were particularly focused on the current conflict in Gaza and its implications for US domestic security, calling attention to her broader political and strategic objectives.

Haley did not mince words when addressing President Biden’s approach to the Middle East. She argued that the administration’s reluctance to provide unequivocal military support to Israel could undermine the country’s security. “The sure way to not help Israel is to withhold weapons,” Haley asserted, according to the TOI report. Her remarks emphasized that robust military aid is crucial for Israel’s defense against hostile entities.

Haley extended her critique by linking the conflict in Gaza to domestic US issues, particularly immigration and border security. She warned that the threats faced by Israel could easily extend to the United States if similar vulnerabilities are not addressed. “If you think this will only be in Israel, if we are arrogant enough, this could absolutely happen in America too and this is the moral of this story,” she stated, the TOI report said.

“First of all, an American president should do everything in his power to make sure that that border is secure,” she said, as was noted in the TOI report. Haley used the example of Hamas using bombs to breach the Gaza border fence to underscore her point, contrasting it with the US’s perceived leniency in border enforcement. “We’re not even requiring them to [use] bombs. We’re just saying: ‘Come on in. Go wherever you want,’” she argued.

IDF Probes ‘Mistake’ that Killed 45 Gazans Along with 2 Top Hamas Terrorists

0
The Israeli military has launched an internal investigation into an airstrike in southern Gaza. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Netanyahu laments ‘tragic mishap’ after 45 Gazans killed in strike targeting Hamas

By: World Israel News Staff

The Israeli military has launched an internal investigation into an airstrike in southern Gaza, late Sunday, which eliminated two senior Hamas terrorists but also reportedly resulted in the deaths of dozens of Gaza civilians, the IDF announced Monday.

The army said that the incident, which occurred in the Tel Sultan area west of Rafah, will be investigated by the General Staff Fact-Finding Assessment Mechanism.

This mechanism, an independent military body, is responsible for examining unusual incidents during wartime. The probe was ordered by the military advocate general, the IDF stated.

The IDF emphasized that the strike did not occur in the designated humanitarian zone in the al-Mawasi region on the coast, where Gazan civilians have been advised to evacuate in recent weeks.

The airstrike, which took place in the Tel Sultan area west of Rafah, successfully eliminated the commander of Hamas’ operations in Judea and Samaria.

For years, the terror group has remotely orchestrated attacks against Israel in Judea and Samaria as well as in pre-1967 Israel from its operations hub in Gaza.

Yassin Rabia, the director of this operations hub, was killed in Sunday night’s airstrike, along with another senior member of the unit, identified as Khaled Nagar.

Hamas health authorities have claimed that approximately 45 people were killed in the strike, which the Palestinian Red Crescent claimed also affected several tents and shelters housing civilians.

According to a preliminary investigation, the airstrike sparked a fire which destroyed a number of nearby tents.

“Despite our efforts not to hurt them, there was a tragic mishap,” said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday.

“We are investigating the incident. For us it’s a tragedy, for Hamas it’s a strategy.”

Speaking at an Israel Bar Association event Monday, the IDF’s advocate general, Major General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, called the incident “very grave,” while adding it is “still under investigation.”

“The IDF regrets any harm to noncombatants during the war.”

A military source mentioned that the strike utilized two missiles with a “reduced in size” warhead, specifically adapted for such targets.

World Israel News also reported on Monday that an Egyptian soldier was killed after a gun battle erupted between IDF and Egyptian troops stationed on the border separating Egypt and the Gaza Strip.

It is unclear what initiated the gunfight, though Israeli military sources told Hebrew-language media outlets that the incident was sparked by Egyptian soldiers who opened fire on IDF troops, prompting the Israeli soldiers to return fire.

The Egyptian soldiers reportedly shot at an IDF engineering corps unit operating on the edge of Rafah.

The Israeli army has launched an investigation into the incident, an IDF spokesperson said.

Egypt confirmed that one soldier was killed in the gun battle, adding that Cairo has opened its own probe into the shooting.

“The Egyptian Armed Forces are conducting an investigation through the competent authorities regarding a shooting incident in the border area in Rafah, which led to the martyrdom of one of the personnel,” the Egyptian army tweeted Monday.

A report by i24NEWS claimed that two Egyptian soldiers were killed Monday, with several more wounded.

Israeli security officials contacted their Egyptian counterparts to halt the shooting.

Last year, a 22-year-old Egyptian police officer, Muhammad Salah Ibrahim, opened fire and killed three IDF soldiers.

          (WorldIsraelNews.com)

Report: Former Mossad Director Threatened ICC Prosecutor

0
Former Mossad director Yossi Cohen held secret meetings with the ICC prosecutor to dissuade her from investigating Israel for war crimes. Credit: Flash90

British media reports that former Mossad director Yossi Cohen held secret meetings with the ICC prosecutor to dissuade her from investigating Israel for war crimes.

By: A7Staff

Former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen lobbied to pressure the former prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in The Hague to refrain from opening an investigation against Israel.

According to The Guardian, Cohen initiated a plan to pressure the prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, who had already left her position, before she made the decision in 2021 to open an investigation against Israel on suspicion of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Palestinian territories.

Various sources told the newspaper that the former Mossad chief threatened the former prosecutor, allegedly, in closed meetings he held with her prior to the decision to open an investigation against Israel. The investigation was opened three years ago and was behind the current prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, Kareem Khan, requesting the issuance of arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Several sources told the newspaper that the prosecutor had shared with a small group of senior ICC officials the former Mossad chief’s attempts to prevent her from opening an investigation and had even claimed to feel threatened by his behavior. An Israeli source said that Cohen had acted with the authority and approval of the government, and had explained that the ICC had repeatedly threatened Israel with indictments of senior officials.

Last week, the Attorney General Gali Beharav-Miara and the State Prosecutor Amir Ohana responded negatively to the request of the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court in The Hague to issue arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. “The request for the issuance of arrest warrants against the Prime Minister and the Defense Minister is devoid of any basis,” they wrote in a joint statement.

The two added that, “The State of Israel is a democratic state, which is fighting terrorism and defending its security while adhering to the binding legal rules and out of a deep commitment to the law. The security forces, and the IDF in particular, are fighting with a full commitment to the rules of international law.”

“The Israeli legal system is equipped to examine any serious claim, both with regard to matters of policy and with regard to individual cases. As the State of Israel has made clear over the years, the ICC lacks any authority to conduct an investigation into the matter,” they concluded.

In other news, on Tuesday, Arutz Sheva also reported that IDF troops are continuing to operate in the northern Gaza Strip, eliminating terrorists and locating weapons in the area.

Over the past day, the troops dismantled terrorist infrastructure in the Jabaliya area, including terror tunnel shafts, observation posts, a weapons storage facility, and a military structure used by Hamas. In one operation, a terrorist cell that had fired mortar shells toward IDF troops was eliminated in an aerial strike directed by ground troops.

IDF troops also continued to operate in the Rafah area. Overnight, IDF troops operated on the Philadelphi Corridor while conducting precise operational activity based on intelligence indicating the presence of terror targets in the area. The activity is being conducted as efforts are continuing to be made in order to prevent harm to uninvolved civilians in the area. The troops are engaging with terrorists in close-quarters combat.

          (IsraelNationalNews.com)

Evacuees from Northern Israel Demand Elimination of Hezbollah Threat

0
A protest tent encampment adjacent to the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, set up by evacuees from northern Israel, May 27, 2024. Photo: Courtesy of Raphael Salve.

By: Amelie Botbol

Evacuees from Israel’s north set up a tent encampment on Tuesday outside the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem to protest their ongoing displacement due to daily attacks by the Iran-backed terrorist group Hezbollah in Lebanon.

“We’ve been unable to return to our homes for more than seven months. We won’t go back until we know we’re safe,” Raphael Salve, co-founder of Lobby 1701, a group representing displaced people from northern towns and villages, told JNS.

Lobby 1701 is named after the U.N. Security Council Resolution that ended the 2006 Second Lebanon War and mandated that Hezbollah terrorists remain north of the Litani River, around 18 miles from the Israeli border.

The Lebanese Shi’ite group has since entrenched itself along the frontier, violating the resolution.

“We don’t want there to be an agreement with Hezbollah. We want a full-fledged operation and intense military pressure,” said Salve, who has relocated from Kiryat Shmona to Jerusalem with his wife and five children.

Over 60,000 residents from more than 40 northern communities located within 6.2 miles of the Lebanon border have been internally displaced since Hezbollah joined Hamas’s war against the Jewish state following the Gaza-based terrorist group’s Oct. 7 massacre.

Hezbollah attacks have killed more than 20 Israelis and led to extensive damage to property.

Salve said that demonstrators will remain in the encampment until the Israeli government takes serious steps to eliminate the threat.

The Israeli government on Monday unveiled a 3.5 billion-shekel ($950 million) plan to rehabilitate Israel’s north. Its short-term goals include: 1) increasing security for the northern communities and population under threat; 2) providing assistance for defending and unifying those communities; and 3) offering aid for northern businesses and strengthening employment security.

Its long-term aim is to reinforce the economy of the north and enhance the well-being of its populace. One element specified in the plan is the creation of an innovation and food-tech ecosystem in the area, as well as the establishment of a university in Kiryat Shmona.

“We will scream and shout so that nobody forgets the north. It feels like everybody has forgotten us,” Rita Benyair—who together with Matan Davidian, represents the northern town of Shlomi at Lobby 1701—told JNS.

“They put us in small hotels and want us to take care of ourselves. They forgot about our kids’ education. They forgot about those who had to close their businesses. We want answers. It’s about time,” Benyair added.

After Hamas’s Oct. 7 murderous assault, Benyair relocated to the Dan Boutique Jerusalem Hotel, along with 65 families from Shlomi.

“I’m a mother of soldiers. One of them fought in Gaza for three months. My daughter is a soldier in the Israeli Air Force, and I have a 14-year-old son who’s supposed to go to school,” she said. “We don’t even know what we’ll be doing in September—whether to put him in school in Jerusalem or somewhere else. No one told us.”

During a visit to the Israel Defense Forces Northern Command headquarters last Thursday, Netanyahu said that the military had eliminated “hundreds” of Hezbollah operatives in Southern Lebanon.

“We have detailed, important and even surprising plans,” the premier told IDF troops. “But I will not share these plans … with the enemy,” he said.

          (JNS.org)

Saudi Arabia Removes Anti-Israel Material from Schoolbooks

0
Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

The move is “another step towards the transformation of a curriculum into an educational framework which encourages tolerance, peace and greater equality,” said IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff.

By: JNS.org

Saudi Arabia has removed practically all anti-Semitism and anti-Israel material from its schoolbooks, in a major shift from the past and a harbinger of a better future, a study released Tuesday found.

The study, conducted by the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACT-SE)—an international research organization—found a “marked reduction” in anti-Israel content in the Saudi curriculum, which no longer teaches that Zionism is a “racist” European movement, nor denies the historical Jewish presence in the region dating back 3,000 years.

In addition, according to the study, hostile references to Israel in the textbooks have been modified, while the word “Palestine” has been removed from maps of Israeli sites.

The study also noted that all remaining violent interpretations of jihad, which had been in place for years, were removed or altered in this year’s textbooks.

References to homosexuality as a “monstrous atrocity,” or claims that emulating the opposite sex is a “deviation from normality,” were removed, as well. While retaining a traditional approach to gender roles, there has been a notable improvement in the depiction of women, the study revealed.

“Saudi textbooks published for the 2023/24 school year constitute another step towards the transformation of a curriculum into an educational framework which encourages tolerance, peace and greater equality,” said IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff. “Having already removed anti-Semitism from the textbooks, it is particularly encouraging that Saudi curriculum designers have made further revisions which portray Israel in a more positive light. These changes bode well for the future of the region as a whole.”

The significant positive changes in the Gulf Kingdom’s educational curriculum come amid renewed reports of a United States-brokered Saudi-Israeli normalization deal. This is despite Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on the Jewish state—which some Mideast analysts assess was launched, in part, to scuttle such a deal—and the ongoing war in Gaza.

In other news, JNS reported on Tuesday that the head of Israel’s Upper Galilee Regional Council received threatening WhatsApp messages on Tuesday from a source claiming to belong to Hezbollah, according to Israeli media reports.

“To the settlers of the north, if you do not ask your government to stop the aggression against Gaza, there will be no homes left to return to,” read one message sent to Amit Sofer, according to Kan News.

Another message read, “The only equation is: stopping the aggression against Gaza = your return to the north. Hezbollah.”

Other text messages to Sofer ostensibly from the Iran-backed terror group included, “[Israeli Defense Minister Yoav] Gallant is selling you illusions. You must live with reality, we are here forever and ever.”

“Hezbollah does not scare us; the ball is not in their court but with the Israeli government and its policies,” Sofer told Kan.

“We have already said several times: We have patience, but the government should not interpret our patience as consent to a situation where the economy is collapsing and the north is losing its residents. I expect the government to bring back security to the north and take actions that will improve the quality of life in every aspect,” he added.

Hezbollah has carried out near-daily attacks on northern Israel since Oct. 7, killing 20 Israelis and an Indian worker and inflicting considerable damage.

(JNS.org)

In Knesset Speech, Netanyahu Decries False Accusations, Vows Victory

0
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to attacks against the IDF operation in Rafah. Photo Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

“I will not end the war before achieving all our goals. Our fallen heroes will not have died in vain,” declared the Israeli prime minister.

By: JNS.org

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday responded to attacks against the Israel Defense Forces operation in Hamas’s last stronghold in Gaza.

“In Rafah, we have evacuated about one million civilians. Tragically, despite our immense efforts to avoid harming non-combatants, an incident occurred yesterday,” Netanyahu said in reference to a mass-casualty event in the city that caused international outcry.

“For us, any noncombatant hurt is a tragedy; for Hamas, it is a strategy. That is the core difference,” he added, during a speech from the Knesset rostrum.

Israeli officials have told the Biden administration that shrapnel from the strike in Rafah may have ignited a fuel tank, starting a fire that engulfed tents housing displaced Gazans and leading to dozens of noncombatant deaths.

The targets of the strike were named as Yassin Rabia, head of Hamas’s Judea and Samaria headquarters, and Khaled Nagar, a senior official in the terrorist group’s Judea and Samaria wing.

The IDF spokesperson said earlier that the strike, based on intelligence and executed using precision weaponry, was carried out in accordance with international law.

In his speech, Netanyahu also pushed back against allegations that he is preventing a deal that would see the return to Israel of the 125 Israeli and other nationals—dead and alive—in exchange for a pause in fighting.

“The repeated false claims that we are the obstacle are not only harmful to the families—that much is obvious, and I sympathize with them,” he said. “But it goes beyond that: It delays the release of the hostages and undermines negotiations. Instead of focusing pressure on [Hamas chief in Gaza Yahya] Sinwar, who holds the hostages in his dungeons, the pressure is misdirected at the Israeli government.”

Netanyahu continued, “Israel is constantly asked to make concession after concession. So why would Sinwar feel any pressure? He sits in his bunker, rubbing his hands in satisfaction, delighted that others are doing the work for him.”

Hostage-release talks have been stalled since Hamas demanded that Israel implement an immediate ceasefire and withdraw all forces from Gaza, a demand that Netanyahu has refused to accept. On Sunday, it was announced that negotiations in Egypt may restart this week.

Israel’s prime minister said, however, that he would not give into unreasonable demands and fight until the end.

“Let me be clear: I will not yield or surrender. I will not end the war before achieving all our goals. Our fallen heroes will not have died in vain,” he said.

Surrender means more Oct. 7 attacks, rapes, the failure to return the hostages and a win for Iran and its proxies, he declared.

“I will continue the fight until we raise the flag of victory,” he said.

In other news, JNS also reported on Tuesday that around 100 students participated in an anti-Israel protest at the Hebrew University’s Mount Scopus campus in Jerusalem, waving PLO flags and chanting inflammatory slogans, according to Hebrew media reports.

Kan News shared video of the demonstration to its X account, quoting some of the slogans being chanted, such as “there is no solution but to expel the occupier” and “Al Aqsa has been redeemed in spirit and blood.”

(JNS.org)

Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) Opens First Visitor Center in Washington

0
Cutting the ribbon as Israel Aerospace Industries inaugurates its first visitor’s center in in Washington, D.C. Photo Credit: IAI.

A Strategic Expansion into the US Defense Market

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a strategic move aimed at bolstering its presence in the United States, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has inaugurated its first visitor center in Washington, D.C. As was reported by The Jerusalem Post, this milestone event, announced on Thursday, marks a significant step for IAI, a state-owned Israeli defense company renowned for its cutting-edge aerospace technologies.

Israel Aerospace Industries has long been a cornerstone of Israel’s defense and aerospace sectors. The company is at the forefront of designing, developing, producing, and maintaining a broad spectrum of aerospace tools. According to the information provided in the JPost report, these range from advanced drones and civilian and military aircraft to sophisticated missile systems and space-based technologies. IAI’s contributions are integral to Israel’s national security and its technological prowess in aerospace.

IAI’s technologies have proven critical in real-world defense scenarios. Notably, two of its systems played pivotal roles in defending Israel against an Iranian attack in April. The information contained in the JPost report affirmed that the Arrow anti-ballistic missile system and IAI’s radar technologies, which are integral components of the Iron Dome defense system, were instrumental in neutralizing the threat. These systems exemplify the advanced defensive capabilities that IAI brings to the table, reinforcing its reputation as a leader in aerospace and defense innovation.

Moreover, IAI reported remarkable financial performance in 2023, with a 49% increase in profits and a 7% growth in sales, as detailed by Calcalist. This robust growth illustrates the company’s successful strategies and its strong market position. The JPost also reported that significant contracts, such as Germany’s $4 billion purchase of Arrow-3 defense systems, have played a pivotal role in bolstering IAI’s financial standing.

Despite the positive financial outcomes, IAI remains cautious about the future. The company has flagged potential challenges arising from recent changes in Israel’s political landscape. These geopolitical shifts have led to a suspension of purchases from European defense clients, impacting IAI’s export prospects, according to the JPost report. Additionally, foreign insurance companies have started raising rates for IAI, reflecting heightened security concerns and the associated risks.

The new visitor center in Washington, D.C., is a testament to IAI’s commitment to deepening its relationships with US-based clients and expanding its footprint in the US defense market. As per the JPost report, the choice of location is strategic, providing direct access to key government officials, the US military, and local defense contractors. This proximity is expected to facilitate stronger collaborations and partnerships, enhancing IAI’s influence and operational capacity within the US.

The visitor center is designed to offer a comprehensive showcase of IAI’s state-of-the-art technologies. Among the highlights are virtual reality simulators, which allow visitors to experience IAI’s products and their capabilities firsthand. Indicated in the JPost report was that this immersive experience is intended to provide a deeper understanding of the technological innovations that underpin IAI’s offerings and their practical applications in both civilian and military contexts.

The opening of the visitor center was a high-profile event, attended by a host of distinguished Israeli and American officials. The JPost report said that among the attendees were Michael Herzog, Israel’s ambassador to the US; Gilad Erdan, Israel’s ambassador to the UN; and General Hedi Zilberman, the IDF Defense Attaché to the US. Their presence called attention to the importance of this initiative.

Ireland Joins Spain and Norway in Recognizing Palestinian State

0
Norway’s FM Espen Barth Eide, Spain’s FM, Jose Manuel Albares Bueno, & Ireland’s FM, Micheal Martin. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert)

Dublin’s announcement comes on the heels of similar official moves by Madrid and Oslo.

By: Troy Osher Fritzhand

Ireland joined Spain and Norway on Tuesday in officially recognizing a “sovereign and independent” Palestinian state, agreeing to “establish full diplomatic relations between Dublin and Ramallah.”

According to the Irish government, “an Ambassador of Ireland to the State of Palestine will be appointed along with a full Embassy of Ireland in Ramallah.”

Dublin also reiterated its call “for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of Israeli hostages and unhindered access for humanitarian aid.”

Ireland’s announcement came on the heels of Spain’s formal recognition of a “State of Palestine” within the 1967 lines, with eastern Jerusalem as its capital and including the Gaza Strip.

“With this decision, Spain joins the more than 140 countries that already recognize Palestine,” said Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez at an event marking the announcement. “This is a historic decision that has a single goal: to contribute to achieving peace between Israelis and [Palestinians].”

For the Palestinian state to be viable, he continued, Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip must be connected via a corridor; eastern Jerusalem must be its capital; and it must be unified under the “legitimate government” of the Palestinian Authority.

Oslo also announced its formal recognition of Palestine on Tuesday.

“For more than 30 years, Norway has been one of the strongest advocates for a Palestinian state,” said Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide ahead of the move.

“Today, when Norway officially recognizes Palestine as a state, is a milestone in the relationship between Norway and Palestine,” he said.

Oslo’s top diplomat then turned to Jerusalem, saying, “It is regrettable that the Israeli government shows no signs of engaging constructively.”

Speaking in Brussels on Sunday, P.A. Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa told Eide, “Recognition means a lot to us. It is the most important thing that anybody can do for the Palestinian people. It is a great deal for us.”

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Denmark on Tuesday rejected a bill to recognize “Palestine,” after Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said the prerequisites for an independent state were lacking.

The bill was first proposed in late February by the country’s Red-Green Alliance, the Social Liberals, the Alternative and Socialist People’s Party.

“We cannot recognize an independent Palestinian state for the sole reason that the preconditions are not really there,” Rasmussen had noted when the legislation was first debated in parliament in April.

          (JNS.org)

Letters to the Editor

0

Our Dangerously Insane President

Dear Editor:

Just a few, short words on the current mental state of our leader. Sad to say, but necessary to understand: President Biden is insane. Anyone with a clear sense of unbiased judgment can easily determine the signs of human deterioration by just viewing his walking, body rigidity, vacant, blank, unblinking stare, confusion and listening to his muted, mutilated, mumbled and incoherent speech. Not a decision made based on political enmity or personal dislike of the man. Just stating reality.

And throwing into this pile, the fact that he is the most powerful person in today’s world, more people should show their unbiased concern for the danger in which he places us, our nation and the planet. But only a brave few are bringing the subject up. Why are not those caring, friendly, world leaders who visit with, sit down beside him, confer with him and frighteningly, make decisions together with him, speak up and tell us of his condition?

Most recently, when hosting the president of Kenya at the White House, Biden had to ask a reporter to repeat her long question to him. He then shamelessly responded by actually rapidly reading a complicated, well rehearsed answer to the obviously (by his staff) prepared question. Without his notes he is a goner in front of the camera. One only wonders how the leaders of our enemies, China and Russia, view him when they confer with him at their private meetings. Scary scenario for all of us under his protective wing. And if you’re a Democrat, you should lose sleep worrying how he will handle Trump during the planned debates. As well, if you’re a betting person, please call me to wager if he will make it to the first one. Name your amount.

Sincerely
Alan Bergstein
Boca Raton, Fla


 

Experts Weigh in On ICC’s Arrest Warrants

Dear Editor:

Surely by now we are all convinced the United Nations and its myriad agencies are corrupt and destructive.

The latest outrage is the International Criminal Court bringing charges against both Israel and Hamas. By what perverted logic has the ICC equated Israel, a thriving liberal democracy with a robust judiciary, the 10th most powerful country in the world and the 6th happiest, with Hamas, an internationally recognized terrorist entity which has brutally occupied Gaza since killing and driving out its PA opponents in 2006.

As a sop to fairness, Karim A.A. Khan, chief prosecutor of the court issued arrest warrants for PM Benjamin Netanyahu, MK Yaov Gallant and three top Hamas leaders.

Where are the warrants for Iranian and Hezbollah leaders and military commanders who planned and directed the October 7, 2023 bloody massacre of innocent Israeli civilians?

Where is the warrant for PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas, whose government pays Palestinian terrorists and their families for murdering Jews?

The UN has 193 members; 56 are Islamic and one is Jewish. Only 33 states are true democracies. The dictatorships use their majority to bully and to suck money out of the 33 free nations.

The 33 generate wealth because they respect the individual and his ability to succeed or fail as talent and circumstances allow. The autocracies, some blessed with oil, govern by force; wealth flows to the few in power. Abbas, for example, lives in a $30,000,000 home on Palace Row in Ramallah. Hamas’s Mohammed Al-Masri and Ismail Haniya are billionaires who divide their time between Turkey and the beaches of Doha in Qatar.

The UN is dominated by three blocks: the Russians, the Chinese and the Islamic states.

The Russians, whose Soviet KGB created the PLO and the Palestinian people in 1964, have a dedicated following.

China, with its vast economic ties around the globe, is the up-and-coming dominant super-power.

The Islamist states dream of replacing the Infidels with a Caliphate. To this end they are flooding the 33 with immigrants who have no intention of adapting to their new homes and who work tirelessly to dominate academia and indoctrinate our soft, pliable, immature youth. Islamists will quicky dominate institutions at the local level.

The crowning glory of the UN is UNRWA, the fraud that provides cover for Hamas, Islamic Jihad and others. They perform Gaza’s municipal services, freeing up the terrorists to be terrorists.

They run all Palestinian ‘refugee’ schools, teaching children that killing Jews and wiping Israel off the map is their highest calling.

It is UNWRA who rejects the 2-state solution touted by the West and offered by Israel several times since 1947. UNRWA demands, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. It means, free of Jews.

UNRWA has transformed from a temporary organization, tasked with finding new homes for the 700,000 Arabs who fled during the 1948 war, into a 30,000-man conglomerate which considers everyone in the world, rich or poor, who had a relative who once lived in the British Mandate for Palestine, to be a refugee. Even those living in Israel, who never moved are considered refugees.

So long as Israel exists, these 5,000,000 so-called refugees will still be refugees.

The rest of us have been conned into going along with this madness.

The 20th century saw millions of refugees. They were resettled and got on with their lives. Only the Palestinians are treated as perennial beggars.

Is the problem the United Nations or the 33 democracies who fund it?

Sincerely
Len Bennett, Author of ‘Unfinished Work’
Deerfield Beach, Fl


 

Stop Brainwashing Our Kids!

Dear Editor,

I agree with the reader who said that parents should stop sending their children to the major American universities, and send them to Jewish-majority colleges, whether in the U.S. or Israel. Even if these crazy protests subside, America’s colleges are filled with faculty members who teach anti-Israel hatred. We don’t need them brainwashing our kids!

Sincerely
Menachem Cohen
Boro Park


 

Jewish Orgs Should Take On Blinken

Dear Editor:

Here’s an idea for one of our Zionist organizations to undertake. They should count how many times Secretary of State Blinken has complained about Israel accidentally killing civilians, and then count how many times he has criticized Hamas for using those civilians as human shields. I think we can all predict the results of such a tally, but we need to know the exact numbers. One of our many pro-Israel organizations, with their big staffs and plentiful resources, should be able to do that without too much trouble.

Sincerely
Larry Berman
Flatbush


 

Saudi Arabia in Not a “Moderate” Arab Country

Dear Editor:

Thanks for your May 28 article about the Saudis once again trying to bully Israel into accepting a Palestinian state. I think it’s about time we all discarded this idea that Saudi Arabia is “moderate,” once and for all. They’re just as extreme and anti-Israel as all the rest of the Arab regimes; they just sometimes tone down the rhetoric a bit for the sake of some temporary diplomatic advantage. But at the end of the day, they are fanatical Muslims who pursue a fanatical Muslim agenda that has no room for a permanent Jewish state, anywhere.

Sincerely
Amanda Norkelheim
Brooklyn

Public Apathy and the Specter of Continued Oppression in Iran

0
As the curtain falls on Ebrahim Raisi’s turbulent tenure, his administration, marked not only by its ineffectiveness but also by its unwavering brutality, prepares to exit within the next 3-4 weeks. Credit: AP

Tragically, the future president of Iran will not be a true representative of the Iranian people, but a figure trusted by Khamenei and the IRGC—repressive, anti-America, and anti-Israel

By: Erfan Fard

As the curtain falls on Ebrahim Raisi’s turbulent tenure, his administration, marked not only by its ineffectiveness but also by its unwavering brutality, prepares to exit within the next 3-4 weeks.

Over these last three years, Raisi’s government, alongside its entire cabinet, has showcased a profound capacity for oppression but little else, leaving behind a legacy tarnished by the violent suppression of numerous groups including every form of domestic dissent including retirees, workers, students, farmers, teachers, and those defrauded by various schemes. This oppression has also exacerbated national crises.

The past two years have particularly highlighted the regime’s draconian response to nationwide protests against both religious tyranny and a myriad of economic issues, with actions from the government and its military and security institutions intensifying—resulting in an alarming escalation of summons, interrogations, arrests, and a spate of executions.

Moreover, the regime has not confined its atrocities to domestic matters but has extended its reach abroad, collaborating with Russian forces in Ukraine and inciting Islamic terrorist groups against Israel, further cementing its reputation for savagery on the international stage.

Yet the prospect of change remains bleak. Any hope for reform or deviation from this path of brutality under the upcoming 14th government of the Islamic regime seems futile. The regime continues to turn the pages of a playbook filled with oppression and disregard for civil liberties, operating under a theocratic framework where the president serves merely as a figurehead, a puppet to the overarching authority of regime’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The electoral voice and opinion of the populace are systematically ignored, highlighting a stark disconnect between the government’s actions and the will of its people.

The imminent departure of Raisi has stirred little more than speculative debates on his successor, with the real contenders likely being maneuvered behind the scenes by Khamenei through the influential Guardian Council. Early assessments suggest a continuation of the status quo, with no genuine competition or public engagement in the farcical electoral process. This orchestrated approach to governance has led to widespread public disillusionment, prompting a significant portion of society to lean towards boycotting what they dismiss as a mere electoral charade.

Over these last three years, Raisi’s government, alongside its entire cabinet, has showcased a profound capacity for oppression but little else, leaving behind a legacy tarnished by the violent suppression of numerous groups including every form of domestic dissent including retirees, workers, students, farmers, teachers, and those defrauded by various schemesThe electoral landscape is cluttered with candidates from various factions of the regime, yet none command genuine public credibility or respect. Traditional conservatives may rally behind figures like Saeed Jalili and Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, although their impact and appeal remain uncertain. The IRGC are poised to endorse their own candidates, such as Hossein Dehghan and Parviz Fattah, both known for their hardline stances and loyalty to military doctrines and closeness to intelligence circles.

Furthermore, controversial figures like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Mohsen Rezaei are also in the fray, each bearing the burden of a problematic past that significantly undermines their appeal. The former, once disgraced and ostracized from the political elite, seeks a return, while the latter, known for his repeated and unsuccessful bids, faces ridicule both from within the government and the public at large. It symbolizes the regime’s cyclic redundancy.

Reformists, tangled in their own web of corruption and closely tied to the existing power structure, express a desire to perpetuate the regime’s longevity while masquerading as agents of change. Yet, they receive little support from Khamenei, who shows a clear reluctance to involve them meaningfully in the electoral process. This faction remains marginalized, with scant hope of gaining traction or investing in a viable candidate.

As for the mullahs like Alireza Arafi and Mohseni Ejei, their potential candidacies are anticipated yet predictably aligned with the regime’s conservative ideologies.

The ultimate lineup for the elections will depend heavily on Khamenei’s endorsements and the Guardian Council’s strategic selections, underscoring the orchestrated nature of Iranian elections.

As registration for candidates begins on May 30, the Guardian Council, under Khamenei’s watchful eye, will dictate the final slate of candidates, reinforcing the predetermined nature of the elections. Campaigning is set to commence on June 12, leading up to the vote on June 28. Yet, the outcome is all but certain—another display of manipulated electoral integrity where the true sentiments of the Iranian populace are likely to be overshadowed by fabricated voter turnout and state-sanctioned candidates.

Three years ago, Raisi purportedly secured 18 million votes against a backdrop of 4 million spoiled ballots—a statistic that today, amidst heightened public disillusionment, seems implausible at best. The regime, fearful of the true strength of public dissent, continues to rely on propaganda, number fabrication, and outright deceit to maintain its grip on power.

In conclusion, as Iran stands on the precipice of another orchestrated electoral exercise, the contrast between the democratic processes observed in more open societies and the theatrical displays within Iran could not be starker. The global community, particularly the international media, must strive to penetrate beyond the regime’s narrative, shedding light on the genuine struggles and aspirations of the Iranian people who yearn for authentic change and democratic governance. As the regime prepares to stage yet another show of electoral compliance, the people of Iran continue their gradual but resolute march towards awakening, challenging the foundations of a theocracy that has long overstayed its welcome.

It must be noted that elections are not actually held in Iran; rather, what transpires is a farcical spectacle full of sophistry. These are neither free nor competitive events. Khamenei and the IRGC perceive America as vulnerable, having attacked American forces 175 times without any significant response from the United States. The White House, particularly under Democratic leadership, seems primarily interested in maintaining the status quo- or worse.

The main candidates in the upcoming U.S. elections, occurring five months after Iran’s early elections, understand that the policies of the Islamic Republic will not change with the mere alteration of the president’s name. They are aware that over 70% of the candidates participating in Iran’s elections are high-ranking commanders of the IRGC.

The future president of Iran will not be a true representative of the Iranian people, but a figure trusted by Khamenei and the IRGC—a repressor, anti-American, and anti-Israeli. Undoubtedly, U.S. intelligence and security agencies are aware that the Iranian people do not trust Khamenei’s appointees and desire a regime change in Tehran.

           (IsraelNationalNews.com)

Fact-Checking the IJC: Omissions and Deceptions

0
Members of the South Africa delegation at the International Court of Justice on May 24, 2024. Credit: Bastiaan Musscher/U.N. Photo/ICJ-CIJ.

By: David M. Litman

Unsurprisingly, the International Court of Justice played along with the cynical attempt by Hamas’s ally South Africa to halt the Israeli military operation launched to destroy the terrorist organization after its horrific Oct. 7 massacre.

Equally unsurprising is that the ICJ justified its ruling by relying on a thin, distorted and inaccurate set of “facts.” In its May 24 ruling, the court relied on a handful of dubious, generalized and misleading claims made by various United Nations figures.

As justice ad hoc Aharon Barak points out:

“The Court relies primarily on statements made by United Nations officials on social media and on press releases issued by relevant organizations (see Order, paragraphs 44-46). It relies on these statements and press releases without even inquiring into what kind of evidence they draw upon. The Court’s approach is in stark contrast with its previous jurisprudence, in which it has stated that ‘United Nations reports [are] reliable evidence only ‘to the extent that they are of probative value and are corroborated, if necessary, by other credible sources.’”

Indeed, as has been pointed out many times before, the United Nations reports on Israel, on which the ICJ relies, are replete with dubious claims and outright lies.

Below are four claims on which the ICJ based its decision, followed by the facts disproving the narrative crafted by the court in an effort to deprive the Jewish state of its right to self-defense.

ICJ Claim 1: “For instance, on 8 May 2024, the Director-General of the World Health Organization stated that the Al Najjar Hospital, one of the last remaining medical facilities in the Rafah Governorate, was no longer functional due to the ongoing hostilities in its vicinity.”

The Facts: Omitted is that Al Najjar Hospital had limited capacity—only 63 beds—which has been more than made up for by the establishment of field hospitals in Rafah Governorate.

For example, there is an International Medical Corps field hospital in al-Mawasi with 140 beds and a Palestinian Red Crescent field hospital with another 50 beds in the Tal as-Sultan area. Israel has also facilitated the establishment of six other field hospitals, many of them located in areas to which those in Rafah have been instructed to evacuate. These include the Jordanian, United Arab Emirates and IMC field hospitals, with a combined capacity of nearly 400 beds in the Khan Yunis and Deir al-Balah areas, as well as several floating hospitals with a combined 168 bed capacity. Several of these were specifically constructed in order to support the evacuations from Rafah.

In a manner typical of the rest of the ICJ’s ruling, the responsibility of other parties for the situation is omitted. It is well-established that many of Gaza’s hospitals have been exploited by Palestinian terrorist organizations like Hamas, forcing Israel to attack these medical facilities.

Indeed, it is worth noting that the “ongoing hostilities” in the area of Al Najjar Hospital that the ICJ claims forced the hospital’s closure on May 8 included the barrage of rockets fired from inside Rafah—including the area of Al Najjar Hospital—by Palestinian terrorists just the day before, on May 7.

Under the ICJ’s logic, the IDF must stand and take it as Hamas launches rockets from Rafah.

ICJ Claim 2: “On 17 May 2024, the World Food Programme (WFP) warned that it had been unable to access its warehouse in Rafah for over a week and observed that ‘[t]he incursion into Rafah is a significant setback to recent modest progress on access.’”

The Facts: Once again, the ICJ is deceiving the public by omitting the responsibility of parties other than Israel for the situation. Much, if not all, of the responsibility for the aid situation in Rafah lies with Palestinian terrorists, looters and Egypt.

One of the main reasons the WFP has been unable to access its warehouses has little to do with the Israel Defense Forces. In many cases, mobs of Palestinians are stopping aid convoys and looting the supplies destined for WFP warehouses.

Another party responsible for this situation is Egypt. The May 17 WFP report the ICJ cites does indeed claim, “We’ve not been able to access our warehouse in Rafah for more than a week,” but in the very next sentence it goes on to explain: “We have very little food and fuel coming through the border crossings in the south.”

There are two main crossings in the south, both of which have been disrupted by the actions not of Israel, but of Palestinian terrorists and Egypt. The Rafah Crossing, between Gaza and Egypt, was shut down not by Israel but by Egyptian authorities on May 7. As a consequence, much of the food aid meant for Gaza has sat on the Egyptian side of the border with much of it either rotting or being offloaded and sold in Egyptian markets.

The other crossing in the south is the Kerem Shalom Crossing, which has been repeatedly disrupted and shut down due to its deliberate targeting by Palestinian terrorist organizations. Four Israeli soldiers were killed on May 5 by one such barrage.

All of this has occurred while Israeli forces have worked to facilitate the delivery of aid into Gaza. Just yesterday, “50 trucks containing flour for the World Food Program” were transferred through the Kerem Shalom and Erez West crossings. Earlier this week, another 62 trucks containing flour for the WFP were also transferred from the Ashdod Port through the crossings. Last week, 204 trucks of flour were transferred for the WFP through the crossings.

But it’s not just the Egyptians and Palestinians causing these problems. The United Nations itself is demonstrating an inability to do its job in the Gaza Strip. As has been repeatedly documented, hundreds of truckloads of humanitarian aid are consistently left waiting for collection and distribution by aid agencies like the WFP because they lack “logistical capabilities” and have “manpower gaps.” When pressed as to why U.N. agencies like the WFP are failing to deliver the aid while private organizations succeed, U.N. spokespersons have themselves admitted to these failures.

In short, the ICJ is casting blame solely on Israel despite the well-documented acts and failures of others, even as Israelis are killed while protecting aid crossings into Gaza.

ICJ Claim 3: “On the basis of the information before it, the Court is not convinced that the evacuation efforts and related measures that Israel affirms to have undertaken to enhance the security of civilians in the Gaza Strip, and in particular those recently displaced from the Rafah Governorate, are sufficient to alleviate the immense risk to which the Palestinian population is exposed as a result of the military offensive in Rafah…. On 6 May 2024, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) indicated that about half of the approximately 1.2 million Palestinians sheltering in Rafah were children, and warned that military operations therein would result in ‘the few remaining basic services and infrastructure they need to survive being totally destroyed.’”

The Facts: The ICJ is, in short, denying reality. The court can only claim to be unconvinced that the Israeli efforts are not “sufficient to alleviate the immense risk” if it has completely ignored the fact that the IDF has already safely evacuated the vast majority of Gazans from Rafah. In fact, the IDF “moved somewhere between two-thirds to 80% of the Palestinian civilian population out of Rafah—with a minimal number of casualties—in under two weeks,” despite even “U.S. predictions that the civilian population could not be evacuated without a huge death count or without leaving around four months to do so.”

(JNS.org)

Originally published by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis.

David M. Litman is a media and education research analyst at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis

(CAMERA).

Jewish 19th-Century ‘Rembrandt’ Still Relevant 200 Years After His Birth

0
The Jewish painter Jozef Israëls on the beach in 1911 in Scheveningen, the Netherlands, shortly before his death. Source: Wikipedia.

Jozef Israëls’s works, which were shown at the Fifth Zionist Congress, appear at top Dutch museums, the Metropolitan Museum, Art Institute of Chicago and Philadelphia Museum.

By: Menachem Wecker

More than a century before John Goodman’s character Walter Sobchak announced in the 1998 film “The Big Lebowski” that “I don’t roll on Shabbos,” Dutch painter Jozef Israëls, known as the 19th-century “Jewish Rembrandt,” did not paint on Shabbat.

“Do come to my atelier one of these days, and I will show you my latest creations. But on the Sabbath my studio is closed,” Israëls (1824-1911), who had a strong Jewish education including studying the Talmud, told one visitor. He was said to have promised his dying father that he would observe the Sabbath.

The Jewish painter Jozef Israëls on the beach in 1911 in Scheveningen, the Netherlands, shortly before his death. Source: Wikipedia.

Despite his Orthodox upbringing, Israels didn’t turn in earnest to Jewish subjects until his upper 60s.

His nearly square-sized 1903 painting “Jewish Wedding,” in the collection of Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum, shows a groom in a top hat placing a ring on a bride’s finger—both of them draped in a tallit.

He depicted a peddler in Amsterdam’s Jewish quarter in his “A Son of the Ancient Race” (c. 1889), one version of which can be found at the Jewish Museum in New York. The subject is “a humble member of his own religion,” the museum notes.

In his 1898 painting “Saul and David,” in the collection of Amsterdam’s Stedelijk, Israels suggested the landscape of Jerusalem in a view in the background between an open curtain, as the future Jewish king plays the harp to calm the incumbent royal.

Abby Schwartz, curatorial consultant and director emerita at the Skirball Museum in Cincinnati, wrote her master’s thesis on Israels.

“One way to describe him is as the 19th-century Rembrandt. He was a master of light, and one of the few artists of his generation to focus on people rather than landscape,” Schwartz told JNS. “His scenes of everyday life were masterful—elevating the mundane to the spiritual.”

Israels was one of the founders of the late 19th-century Hague School, which focused on everyday people and landscapes. After living in Amsterdam and Paris, Israels settled in the Dutch fishing village of Zandvoort, drawn to the sea and fishermen.

“Jozef Israëls” (1860s) by Willem Frederik Vinkenbos, albumen silver print, 1860s. Credit: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

“He was learned as a Jew, and his domestic scenes reflect a reverence for traditional women’s work—sewing, mending, spinning, caring for children,” Schwartz said. “I believe his legacy survives as a painter, who was famous in his own time and whose works were widely known in the form of prints of many of his important paintings.”

Schwartz noted that Israels painted several pictures of Jewish scholars studying, including one of a Jewish scribe that she called “deeply evocative.”

“He’s complicated,” she said. “He was careful to describe himself as a Dutch artist, not a Jewish artist.”

Ori Soltes, a Georgetown University professor, author and former director of the B’nai B’rith Klutznick National Jewish Museum, told JNS that artwork by Israels “will always be aesthetically relevant and relevant with regard to his Jewish and other subjects and to the ongoing and delightful complication of defining ‘Jewish art.’”

 

‘Complex tangle’

By age 16, Israels—who grew up studying the Torah and Talmud—was training in Amsterdam with the portrait painter Jan Kruseman.

“He commented on how Rembrandt’s work enveloped him—in particular, Rembrandt’s Jewish beggars—and he was also drawn to the Judenstraat with its gray-bearded Jews, barrels of fish, piles of fruit and its sky,” said Soltes, referring to “Jew Street.”

“Israels carried localized anecdote to universal human statement,” Soltes said. “He lived among the fishing folk of Zandvoort in the late 1850s, where he became more conscious of nature, of the luminescence of the sky reflecting the sea, of the unadorned drama of life that is intimate with severity, sacred and spiritual in its simplicity.”

Jozef Israëls. “Jewish Scribe” (1902). Oil on canvas. Credit: Collection Kröller-Müller Museum, Otterlo, the Netherlands.

The artist’s peers praised “Son of the Ancient Race”—“not its Judaism, but its humanity, and yet the subject is clearly Jewish and was recognized at the time as such,” Soltes said. “His 1903 ‘Jewish Wedding’ carries a genre subject into the dappled, sketch-like style of Impressionism that pushes us into the 20th century.”

It is possible that “a specifically Jewish sensibility” propelled Israels toward Impressionism and made him tower over his contemporaries in Holland, and “that the works Israels created would not have been what they became without a Jewish element in his consciousness,” Soltes told JNS. “But we cannot be certain of this.”

But he noted that Rembrandt, who was not Jewish, painted many Jewish subjects, including prominent Jews, a “Jewish bride” and Dutch synagogues, two centuries earlier.

“Would we term such works ‘Jewish’—but only in terms of subject and not in terms of the artist’s identity—and would we term Jewish subjects by Israels more ‘Jewish’ because the artist was a Jew?” Soltes said. “What then of his works for which the subject is not Jewish? He leaves us caught in a complex tangle of definitional threads.”

 

Great ‘rabbi of painting’

The artist’s connection to Zionism was also complicated, as Gilya Gerda Schmidt, professor emerita of religious studies and director emerita of the Judaic studies program at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, wrote in a chapter devoted to Israels in her 2003 book, The Art and Artists of the Fifth Zionist Congress, 1901.

Six of Israels’ works were included in the exhibition, which Martin Buber organized, at the 1901 congress in Basel, Switzerland.

In a chapter devoted to Israels, Gerda Schmidt variously refers to the artist as the “great ‘rabbi’ of painting,” the “Altmeister of Dutch art” (old master) and “the Jewish Rembrandt.”

In 1898, Theodor Herzl visited Israels and tried to interest him in the Zionist movement, according to the book. However, according to some scholars, a Zionist publication that stated that Israels had contributed financially to the cause had to issue a correction.

Gerda Schmidt records a memory of Israels’ during a visit to Tangiers in Morocco, during which he entered a home on a whim.

After climbing a staircase, the then septuagenarian artist saw a curtain moving back and forth and froze “indecisively and in thought,” fearing that if he entered a room, he wouldn’t know what would happen next.

“I heard, to my great surprise, a voice ask in Hebrew, ‘Mamevakeshecha?’ (What do you want?),” Israels said. “I entered and said, ‘Shalom Adoni, shalom aleichem. Anochi Yehudi mi eretz Hollandi’ (Hello sir, I am a Jew from Holland).”

Entering the dark room, Israels saw a “long table with crooked legs,” upon which lay a long piece of parchment that hung over both edges. “Behind the table sat the Torah scribe, with both arms on the parchment, and turned his regal countenance towards me,” Israels recalled.

“The head seemed much too large for the body that was hidden behind the long table,” he added. “It was a magnificent face, fine and transparent, pale like alabaster; wrinkles, small and large, surrounded his small eyes and his large, crooked hawk’s nose.”

That sofer, with his “black cap” and “large, yellowish-white beard” that flowed over the parchment, inspired one of Israels’s great paintings, “Jewish Scribe” (1902), in the collection of the Kröller-Müller Museum in Otterlo in the Netherlands.

          (JNS.org)

Jewish-American Tunesmith Behind Disney Classics Dies at 95

0
Arlene Silver, her husband, Dick Van Dyke, and Richard M. Sherman at the AFI FEST “Mary Poppins” 50th Anniversary Screening at TCL Chinese Theater in Los Angeles, Nov. 9, 2013. Photo by Kathy Hutchins/Shutterstock.

Richard Sherman wrote songs for “Mary Poppins,” “The Jungle Book,” “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” and “Bedknobs and Broomsticks.”

By: JNS.org

Acclaimed songwriter Richard M. Sherman, who along with his late brother Robert crafted the iconic melodies for Disney cinematic gems such as “Mary Poppins,” “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” and “The Jungle Book,” died on Saturday aged 95 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Beverly Hills due to age-related illness.

One of the most prolific composer-lyricists in the history of family entertainment and a key member of Walt Disney’s inner circle of creative talents, Richard garnered nine Academy Award nominations (winning two Oscars for his work on the 1964 classic Mary Poppins), won three Grammy Awards and received 24 gold and platinum albums over the course of his 65-year career.

The Sherman brothers produced more motion picture song scores than any other team.

“Richard Sherman was the embodiment of what it means to be a Disney Legend, creating along with his brother Robert the beloved classics that have become a cherished part of the soundtrack of our lives,” said Bob Iger, CEO of The Walt Disney Company.

“From films like Mary Poppins and The Jungle Book to [theme park] attractions like ‘it’s a small world,’ the music of the Sherman Brothers has captured the hearts of generations of audiences. We are forever grateful for the mark Richard left on the world, and we extend our deepest condolences to his family,” added Iger.

Born on June 12, 1928, in New York City, Richard and his brother followed in their Tin Pan Alley songwriter father Al’s footsteps. The Sherman family relocated to Beverly Hills in 1937 after years of cross-country moves. Richard attended Beverly Hills High School before he majored in music at Bard College. Drafted into the United States Army, he served as conductor for the Army band and glee club from 1953 to 1955.

In 1951, Gene Autry was the first to record a Sherman brothers song, “Gold Can Buy You Anything But Love.” But the songwriters’ big break wouldn’t come until seven years later, when Mouseketeer (and fellow future Disney Legend) Annette Funicello recorded their song “Tall Paul.” That tune peaked at No. 7 on the charts, selling more than 700,000 singles.

The success of such songs caught the attention of Walt Disney, who hired the Sherman brothers as staff songwriters for The Walt Disney Studios. Their first assignment: write a song for the made-for-television movie “The Horsemasters” (1961) starring Funicello.

Soon, they would contribute to such feature films as “The Absent-Minded Professor” (1961), “The Parent Trap” (1961), “Summer Magic” (1963), “The Sword in the Stone” (1963), “Mary Poppins” (1964), “That Darn Cat!” (1965), “Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree” (1966), “The Jungle Book” (1967), “The Happiest Millionaire” (1967), “The Aristocats” (1970) and “Bedknobs and Broomsticks” (1971).

They would ultimately write more than 200 songs for some 27 films and 24 television productions.

They also contributed music for a number of theme park attractions around the world, including “There’s a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow,” “The Tiki, Tiki, Tiki Room” and “It’s a Small World”—the latter of which Richard once described as “a prayer for peace.”

In the early 1970s, the Sherman brothers left The Walt Disney Studios to pursue other film projects.

The Sherman Brothers went on to provide an array of music, songs and occasional screenplays to such memorable family films as “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” (1968), “Snoopy Come Home” (1972), “Charlotte’s Web” (1973), “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer” (1973), “Huckleberry Finn” (1974), and “The Slipper and the Rose” (1976).

Richard and his brother were inducted as Disney Legends in 1990. In 2005, they were inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame. Three years later, the brothers were awarded the National Medal of the Arts, “for unforgettable songs and optimistic lyrics that have brought magic to the screen and stage.”

Richard is survived by his wife of 66 years, Elizabeth; son Gregory and grandsons William and Matthew; daughter Victoria Wolf, son-in-law Doug Wolf, and grandchildren Mandy and Anthony. He is also survived by his daughter from a previous marriage, Lynda Rothstein, as well as her two children and three grandchildren.

His brother Robert died in London in 2012, aged 86.

A private funeral is scheduled to take place Friday, May 31, at Hillside Memorial Park and Mortuary in Los Angeles. Plans for a celebration of life will be announced at a later date.

           (JNS.org)

AP Mum on Egypt’s Closure of Crossing, Faulting Israel for Rafah Food Shortages

0
Palestinians with European passports who were evacuated from Gaza cross at the Rafah border crossing into Egypt, November 15, 2023. Photo credit: AP Photo

By: Tamar Sternthal

In the wake of the International Criminal Court’s factually bogus, politically motivated, and morally bankrupt move Monday seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the Associated Press fed the corrupt court’s fallacious accusation that Israel is starving Gaza’s civilians. In a 1300-word article holding Israel responsible for the reported food shortage in Rafah, the Associated Press today conceals that it is Egypt — not Israel — which has forced the shut down of the border crossing next to the southern Gaza Strip city, thereby stopping the flow of aid through that point.

In the very first sentence of their article today, the robust team of three Associated Press reporters explains that Israel’s military operation is at fault for the United Nations’ cessation of food distribution in Rafah (“UN halts all food distribution in Rafah after running out of supplies in the southern Gaza city“): The reason, explain AP’s Samy Magdy, Lee Keath and Tia Goldenberg in the very first paragraph, is Israel’s military operation:

The United Nations suspended food distribution in the southern Gaza city of Rafah on Tuesday due to a lack of supplies and an untenable security situation caused by Israel’s expanding military operation. (Emphasis added.)

Further down, AP egregiously covers up Egypt’s closure of the Rafah crossing:

The humanitarian crisis deepened after Israeli forces pushed into Rafah on May 6. Tanks and troops seized the vital Rafah crossing into Egypt, and it’s been closed ever since.

The trio’s omission of the fact that Egypt closed its side of the crossing — therefore preventing the entrance of food into the territory from that point — stinks to the high pyramids of Giza.

In fact, since Egypt’s decision to halt the transfer of humanitarian aid following the launch of Israel’s military operation earlier this month, at no point did AP clearly report that Egypt took this draconian step at the expense of Palestinian civilians.

Instead, in a May 16 item, the Associated Press danced around the fact that Egypt closed the border, casting the affair as a jumble of mutual Egyptian-Israeli recriminations of undetermined veracity (“The Latest: Palestinians Mark 76 years of their dispossession as more catastrophe unfolds in Gaza”):

EGYPT SLAMS ISRAEL’S TOP DIPLOMAT FOR BLAMING THE CLOSING OF GAZA’S RAFAH CROSSING ON CAIRO

CAIRO — Egypt has blasted comments by Israel’s top diplomat in which he blamed the Arab country for the closure of the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip.

Egypt has expressed mounting frustration with Israel’s seizure of the Palestinian side of the crossing last week, saying it threatens the two countries’ decades-old peace treaty.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry said Israel “is responsible for the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip.”

“We reject the policy of distorting the facts,” Shoukry said in a statement on Tuesday, denouncing Israel’s “desperate attempts” to blame Egypt.

He said Israel’s incursion into Rafah was the main reason aid cannot enter through the crossing and called for Israel to allow more aid through its own crossings.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said Tuesday that there was a “need to persuade Egypt to reopen the Rafah crossing to allow the continued delivery of international humanitarian aid to Gaza.”

“The world places the responsibility for the humanitarian situation on Israel, but the key to preventing a humanitarian crisis in Gaza is now in the hands of our Egyptian friends,” Katz said.

State-controlled Egyptian television itself reported that Egypt refused to coordinate with Israel on the transfer of aid, a fact which AP goes to great lengths to conceal.

Reuters, on the other hand, provided straightforward coverage of the Egyptian refusal to transfer aid — a policy which obviously creating serious implications for the U.N.’s food distribution program in the city. Reuters stated clearly May 11 (“Egypt refuses to coordinate with Israel on entry of aid from Rafah crossing, Alqahera News reports“):

Egypt has refused to coordinate with Israel on the entry of aid into Gaza from the Rafah crossing due to Israel’s “unacceptable escalation”, Egypt’s state affiliated Alqahera News satellite TV reported on Saturday, citing a senior official.

“Misreporting happens in a context where anti-Israel extremists are trying, and sometimes succeeding, at hijacking the conversation, and the media’s misinformation serves as fodder for these activists and their message,” observed CAMERA’s Gilead Ini in a fascinating webinar last week entitled “Tampered Evidence.”

In concealing the fact that Egypt — not Israel — is preventing aid from flowing through the Rafah crossing, the Associated Press piles on to the tampered evidence upon which the ICC has built its whole rotten case.

(CAMERA.org)

Tamar Sternthal is director of CAMERA’s Israel Office. She monitors both U.S. publications and English-language Israeli publications, and heads up CAMERA’s “Haaretz, Lost in Translation” project. Her columns have appeared in numerous American and Israeli publications, including the Times of Israel, Jerusalem Post, Ynet, Algemeiner, Philadelphia Daily News, St. Petersburg Times, and the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Sternthal is interviewed on radio about the media’s coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict and regularly participates in panels about the media, hosted by universities and think tanks in Israel. Twitter handle: http://twitter.com/TamarSternthal

The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA) is an international media-monitoring and educational organization founded in 1982 to promote accurate and unbiased coverage of Israel and the Middle East. CAMERA is a non-profit, tax-exempt, and non-partisan organization under section 501 (c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. To learn more or receive our newsletters please visit CAMERA.org.

Raisi’s Death Won’t Change Much for Iran

0
Iranian President Raisi (right) meets with the Azeri President shortly before the helicopter crash that killed him and 7 others. Photo credit: The Presidential Press and Information Office of Azerbaijan

By: Sean Durns

The president of Iran, Ebrahim Raisi, died in a helicopter crash on Sunday. Several others, including Tehran’s foreign minister, Hossein Amirabdollahian, were also on board and perished in the rugged northern Iranian wilderness.

Raisi’s death has greater implications for the future than the present.

Raisi, 63, had served as president since 2021. A longtime regime apparatchik, he was nicknamed “the Hangman” and “the Butcher” for his role in the execution of thousands of political prisoners in the late 1980s. He spent subsequent decades serving in a variety of roles, steadily earning the confidence of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Raisi was believed to be one of a handful of men being considered to replace Khamenei, who has ruled the Islamic Republic since 1989. Khamenei is 85 and has reportedly been in ill health for several years. Raisi’s death will bring uncertainty, but it is unlikely to destabilize the regime.

The Islamic Republic is a theocracy ruled by its supreme leader and his mullahs. The position of president is largely ceremonial. Indeed, the supreme leader chooses members of the Guardian Council, which, among other things, approves potential candidates for the presidency. Under Iran’s byzantine system, it is the supreme leader, not the president, who rules. No one becomes president, and no major policy is enacted, without the supreme leader’s blessing.

According to the regime’s constitution, when a president dies, his successor is “chosen” by the supreme leader. There is no requirement that a new election be held. Instead, the first vice president, the speaker of the parliament, and the chief justice form a council to choose the succession mechanism. As Shay Khatiri, an Iranian-born senior fellow at the Yorktown Institute, noted: “in effect this means that Khamenei will decide.”

Khamenei could call for a new election. Or the council that he chooses could simply pick someone. It is at his discretion. This highlights an important fact: Raisi’s death won’t change much, if anything, either in Iran or in the broader Middle East. Raisi didn’t call the shots anyway.

When Raisi first ran for president, he lost the 2017 election to Hassan Rouhani, who was widely hailed in the West as a “moderate.” But a system such as the Islamic Republic produces murderers, not “moderates” as the West understands the term. Those who ascend due so because they’re deemed acceptable by the powers that be.

To be sure, Raisi’s death injects some uncertainty; we don’t know who his replacement will be or when or how they’ll be chosen. It’s possible, but unlikely, that in naming a successor, the regime could alienate key constituencies or appear vulnerable enough to encourage protests or mass demonstrations.

Raisi’s death also comes at a pivotal moment in the Middle East. Tehran’s extensive proxy network, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, among others, are at war with Israel. And Iran is reportedly making considerable progress in its illegal nuclear weapons program — fueling concerns of an even broader war. Yet these are concerns for the supreme leader, his close advisers, and the repressive apparatus that allows them to maintain power.

But ultimately even a supreme leader can’t cheat death. Raisi’s own death eliminates the man that some felt was destined to succeed Khamenei, potentially altering Iran’s future. However, someone, perhaps even Khamenei’s own son, Mojtaba, will likely become supreme leader. The system will endure — bringing more misfortune and tragedy to both the Iranian people and the broader Middle East.

The writer is a senior research analyst for CAMERA, the 65,000-member, Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis.

          (WashingtonExaminer.com)