75.5 F
New York
Wednesday, May 29, 2024
Home Blog Page 2275

Arabs Riot on Temple Mount to Protest Jews Ascending to Celebrate J’slm Day

0
Arabs rioted on the Temple Mount Sunday morning in reaction to permission being given for Jewish visitors to enter on Jerusalem Day, which happens to fall during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, Kan Israel News reported. Photo Credit: Flash90/Yonatan Sindel

After police dispersed the demonstrators, hundreds of Jews ascended the Mount.

Arabs rioted on the Temple Mount Sunday morning in reaction to permission being given for Jewish visitors to enter on Jerusalem Day, which happens to fall during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, Kan Israel News reported.

A police spokesperson said that as a result of the disturbances, “the commander of the Jerusalem District Major Gen. Doron Yedid ordered police to enter the Temple Mount and deal with the rioters.”

Young Muslim men threw rocks and other objects. Tear gas was shot at them in response. In one video of the scene, women are heard screaming “Allahu Akhbar” (God is great), apparently at the security forces.

Only after the rioting was quelled, with one arrest reportedly being made, were the Jewish visitors allowed to ascend the Temple Mount, the report said.

Hundreds of Jews had gathered in the early morning hours to come to the Judaism’s holiest site in celebration of the 52nd anniversary of the liberation of the city during the Six Day War.

Jerusalem Day, as it’s known, coincides every so often with the end of the Muslims’ holy month of Ramadan, when the Temple Mount is usually closed to non-Muslims due to the crush of Arab worshipers at the site and the fear by Israeli authorities that the Muslims will turn to violence, as happened today.

Indeed, Israeli police at first had said that they would not allow Jewish visitors to mark the day on the Mount “for reasons of public safety and public order.”

It would have marked the first time since 1988 that Jerusalem Day would not have been celebrated on the Temple Mount. However, Jewish activists appealed to both the Supreme Court and the Likud politicians to allow their ascent.

The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and left it up to the security forces to assess the situation. The police decided to rescind their earlier ban.

Jerusalem Day is celebrated especially by young national-religious Jews who parade in the afternoon with Israeli flags, sing and dance through the streets of the city, ending their march at the Western Wall.

Many walk specifically through the Muslim Quarter of the Old City to make a point about Israel’s sovereignty. Clashes have ensued in the past in that area between the marchers and Arab residents, with both sides claiming that the other instigated the violence.

(World Israel News)

Read more at: worldisraelnews.com

 

Alleged Victims of Harvey Weinstein Receiving Reduced Damages 

0
Photo Credit: Shutterstock

In October of last year, Harvey Weinstein, former film producer and co-founder of Miramax, a major entertainment company, became embroiled in scandal when he was accused of sexually harassing, molesting or raping numerous women over a period of 30 years. The political repercussions of the case are still being felt in the current increased awareness of sexual harassment and abuse that women face in the workplace and in society in general.  

By: Anat Ghelber

Now, his supposed victims will have to face the fact that, despite bringing their cases to court and being willing to testify, any damages they would receive are being significantly reduced by legal fees, including Harvey Weinstein’s, none of which he has to pay himself. Mr. Weinstein’s attorneys are looking to make as much as $14 million. The entire supposed settlement for those who’ve brought Mr. Weinstein past behavior to light is $44 million, with a majority of those victims apparently receiving an average of only $60,000, according to a report by the New York Post.

Among the alleged victims of Harvey Weinstein’s advances are actress Paz de La Huerta, who appeared on the HBO show “Boardwalk Empire” and Alexandra Canosa, a producer with Netflix.  They, and as many as 150 other women, are reportedly going to have to divide what will remain of the legal settlement once fees for legal services for both the defendant and plaintiff have been paid off.   As one supposed victim stated about the low settlement money that will be paid out, “It’s insulting.  It’s particularly insulting that he doesn’t even have to pay his own lawyer’s fees. He gets to walk away without any consequences.”

Harvey Weinstein will not have to pay either his legal fees nor any of the money for legal settlement, with the fees coming out of the damages settlement, and that being covered by insurance agencies who provide coverage for both the Weinstein Co. and Miramax, the entertainment company he once ran.

With $14 million of the legal settlement money being allocated to pay off defendant’s legal costs and another $8 million to plaintiff’s legal fees, the remainder of the money will have to be distributed to 150 different women who are involved in the class action lawsuit against Harvey Weinstein. 

According to an anonymous source close to the negotiations being held, “The defendants are using what could be victim funds to pay their legal fees despite many of them being billionaires.”

It’s also been revealed that women who filed single lawsuits themselves against Harvey Weinstein, as opposed to the class action lawsuit previously mentioned, will receive up to $500,000 each.  There are up to 18 of these supposed victims located in the U.S. United Kingdom, and Canada. 

The balance of the legal damages will total $9 million after all is said and done, which will have to be split up among the remaining 150 women involved in the class action lawsuit.

 

Thank You CNN for Smearing America Around the World!

0
Photo Credit: Shutterstock

CNN International (CNNI) rules the world of newscasting. CNNI is an international pay television channel that is operated by CNN and carries news-related programming worldwide. They decide what stories to headline, they format and compose the headlines, they determine just where and when we view them and they choose who evaluates the importance and significance of the events. Dangerous, as Richard Salant, the former President of CBS News put it so well: “Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.” The people behind the cameras, their directors and reporters are the chefs and waiters while we are the “in seat” consumers. This situation is not an easy one to change but we must understand the mechanics of the operation in order to avoid falling prey to the propaganda being fed us as news.

Whether you’re on a cruise in the middle of the Pacific or on a safari in the heart of Africa, your CNN news channel is with you. News is flashed to you on your TV, computer or laptop screens. You just cannot avoid being inundated by news that CNN decides is what you will watch. Recently, reporting on live video from Gaza, CNN reporter Ian Lee, wearing combat vest, dusty helmet, tearfully described the killing of 40 Palestinian civilian protesters by what he described as Israeli artillery, aircraft and small arms. This was his description without evidence other than what he was told by the Palestinian authorities with whom he was embedded..

One wonders just what his fate would be if he described in detail the goals of these protesters if they were permitted to swarm into Israel. What questions, (never asked) could he pose to Gaza’s Hamas leaders about their plans for the destruction of Israel. We never hear from any of CNN’s Gaza based reporters about the horrors of the Islamic regime which permits them to “report” with strict censorship, from their territory. How different is the attitude of their crews when issuing “news” accounts from within the democracy of Israel without fear of being beheaded? There they speak freely without any fear of retribution from the authorities.

Walter Cronkite, the former anchorman for The CBS Evening News told the scary truth about what we get to see and hear from the media. “We must decide which news items out of hundreds available we are going to expose that day. And those (news stories) available to us already have been culled and re-culled by persons far outside our control.” Read between the lines and you get it……the news we get is screened by those who have their own biases. We must become more sophisticated and aware of the powers of the vast media networks that now seem to be leaning far to the extreme Left. What is the future of the First Amendment covering free speech?

The Israeli Elections “Mess” & Trump’s Peace Plan

0
President Donald Trump with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Sept. 26, 2018. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO

The outspoken but always right to the point, President Trump weighed in on the new proposed Israeli elections with these words: “Israel is all messed up with their election. Bibi got elected. Now all of a sudden they have to go through the process all over again. That’s ridiculous. They have to get their act together.” We agree. And so does Reuven Y. Hazan, a politics professor at Hebrew University. “This is new for Israel. We’ve never tried to form a government and bring down a new parliament at the same time.” So what’s this all about? Netanyahu was re-elected as Israel’s Prime Minister in April, not with a simple American-like two party system but with about 20 angry, battling political parties weighing in and the results were that 14 of them are represented in its Knesset (Congress) that with 120 members governs the nation.

And they all have to get along. Give us a break! Confusion reigns as Bibi tries to put together a coalition government that has to make decisions. He has to deal with and form by law a coalition government that might include Muslim Arabs, Jewish orthodox and Communists. Under Israeli law, if Netanyahu can’t form a government, its president, Reuven Rivlin must appoint another candidate to do so. But Bibi’s Likud Party has presented a bill to dissolve the Knesset, and the PM gave the go-ahead for the Knesset to dissolve itself forcing new elections which will take place on September 17th.

These new elections will surely delay both the White House’s long-awaited Middle East peace plan. This has irritated Trump whose emissaries, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, his senior advisor and son-in-law,Jared Kushner, together with negotiator, Jason Greenblatt toured the Middle East last week to build support for peace in the region. But they can’t do it without the firm, solid support of Israel. And the Israelis need a leader that can count on the backing of Knesset. At this point, the Israelis are all screwed up politically. We, the United States, cannot continue to wait for the Israelis to “get off the pot,” to finally mature politically and to transform their government into a working one with fewer opposing political parties. We, American citizens, weep and wail every two years about foolish electioneering, debates and candidate posturing but when we look at the Israelis and their circus, we should be happy to go to the polls knowing that the candidates we elect will serve out fully, their terms without fear of having to run every few months as in Israel.

Letters to the Editor

0

 

Dismayed on Carl Laemmle Omission by USHMM

(The following open letter to Sara Bloomfield, of the United States Holocaust Museum was received by the Jewish Voice)

Sara Bloomfield, Executive Director

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Dear Ms. Bloomfield,

We are writing to express our dismay at the omission of Carl Laemmle from the “Americans and the Holocaust” exhibit at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Laemmle helped rescue of hundreds of German Jews in the 1930s. Other Americans who aided far fewer refugees are included in the exhibition.

According to curators Daniel Greene and Rebecca Erbelding, Laemmle was left out because they “were limited by a lack of artifacts or visual material related to Laemmle.” Yet the New York Times and other news outlets had no trouble finding visual materials about Laemmle when they published articles about him in recent years.

We urge you to correct this omission as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Sanford C. Einstein
Walnut Creek, Ca.
Prof. Irving Abella
York University
Dr. IIya Altman
Co-Chairman,
The Russian Holocaust Center
Prof. Omer Bartov
Brown University
Prof. Daniel Bitran
College of the Holy Cross
Prof. Paul Bookbinder
University of Massachusetts
Eric Cohen, Chairperson
Investors Against Genocide
Prof. Zev Garber (emer.)
Los Angeles Valley College
Prof. Jay Geller
Vanderbilt University
Prof. David Golinkin
The Schechter Institute
Dr. Elvira Groezinger
Scholars for Peace in the Middle East
Prof. Susannah Heschel
Dartmouth College
Prof. Ron Hollender (emer.)
Montclair State University
Prof. Brian Horowitz
Tulane University
Prof. Steven L. Jacobs
University of Alabama
Prof. Irene Kacondes
Dartmouth College
Hon. David Kilgour, J.D
Member of Parliament, Canada (1979–2006)
Prof. Gerd Korman (emer.)
Cornell University
Dr. Neil Kressel
William Patterson University
Prof. Thomas Kuhne
Clark University
Dr. Vincent A. Lapomarda, S.J.,S.T.L.
Coordinator of the Hiatt Holocaust Collection
College of the Holy Cross
Prof. Laurel Leff
Northeastern University
Dr. Rafael Medoff
The David S.Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies
Prof. Robert Melson (emer.)
Purdue University
Prof. Stephen H. Norwood
University of Oklahoma
Martin Ostrow
Filmmaker – “America and the Holocaust” (PBS)
Rabbi Prof. Allen Podet
State University College At Buffalo
Dr. Eunice G. Pollack
Co-Editor, Encyclopedia of American Jewish History
Dr.Carol Rittner (emer.)
Stockton University
Prof. Victoria Sanford
Lehman College, City University of New York
Pierre Sauvage
Varian Fry Institute
Greg Stanton
Founding President, Genocide Watch
Prof. Peter Tarjan (emer.)
University of Miami
Dr. Ann Weiss
Founder and Director
Eyes from the Ashes Educational Foundation
Prof. John H. Weiss
Cornell University
Prof. John C. Zimmerman
University of Nevada Las Vegas
Prof. Bat-Am Zucker
Bar IIan University


“To All Who ‘Woke Up’…Please Go Back to Sleep”

Dear Editor:

The new ‘intersectional’ coalitions of perpetual victims need a bogeyman to blame for their woes and surprise, surprise, they picked the Jews whom they now label as privileged Whites who are keeping “woke” Muslims, Blacks, Latinos, LGBT, people of color and so called Palestinian Arabs down.

White Jewish privilege? Yes. So glad you ‘woke up’ and pointed that out to all of us. We had the ‘privilege’ of being persecuted for centuries.

If ‘woke up’ means to have one’s consciousness raised, then I might suggest a new definition. Wake up, take a long hard look in the mirror and instead of blaming the Jews or Israel, blame yourselves for not taking advantage of the many privileges open to all in our country to achieve your goals. Wake up, thank Jews who gave so much back to the African American community and still do so. Wake up and realize there is only your own false victimization that is truly keeping you down.

Sincerely

Ginette Weiner,
Scottsdale, AZ


Praising the Jewish Voice!

Dear Editor:

Just wanted to express my thanks and appreciation to the Jewish Voice for presenting such a comprehensive publication each and every week. I know it is not easy and you folks deserve tremendous praise. Your cover story articles are always compelling and capture the events of the day like no other outlet.

Sincerely

Jerry Yudetzky

Thank You CNN for Smearing America Around the World!

0
. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Richard Salant, the former President of CBS News put it so well: “Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”

CNN International (CNNI) rules the world of newscasting. CNNI is an international pay television channel that is operated by CNN and carries news-related programming worldwide. They decide what stories to headline, they format and compose the headlines, they determine just where and when we view them and they choose who evaluates the importance and significance of the events. Dangerous, as Richard Salant, the former President of CBS News put it so well: “Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.” The people behind the cameras, their directors and reporters are the chefs and waiters while we are the “in seat” consumers. This situation is not an easy one to change but we must understand the mechanics of the operation in order to avoid falling prey to the propaganda being fed us as news.

Whether you’re on a cruise in the middle of the Pacific or on a safari in the heart of Africa, your CNN news channel is with you. News is flashed to you on your TV, computer or laptop screens. You just cannot avoid being inundated by news that CNN decides is what you will watch. Recently, reporting on live video from Gaza, CNN reporter Ian Lee, wearing combat vest, dusty helmet, tearfully described the killing of 40 Palestinian civilian protesters by what he described as Israeli artillery, aircraft and small arms. This was his description without evidence other than what he was told by the Palestinian authorities with whom he was embedded..

One wonders just what his fate would be if he described in detail the goals of these protesters if they were permitted to swarm into Israel. What questions, (never asked) could he pose to Gaza’s Hamas leaders about their plans for the destruction of Israel. We never hear from any of CNN’s Gaza based reporters about the horrors of the Islamic regime which permits them to “report” with strict censorship, from their territory. How different is the attitude of their crews when issuing “news” accounts from within the democracy of Israel without fear of being beheaded? There they speak freely without any fear of retribution from the authorities.

Walter Cronkite, the former anchorman for The CBS Evening News told the scary truth about what we get to see and hear from the media. “We must decide which news items out of hundreds available we are going to expose that day. And those (news stories) available to us already have been culled and re-culled by persons far outside our control.” Read between the lines and you get it……the news we get is screened by those who have their own biases. We must become more sophisticated and aware of the powers of the vast media networks that now seem to be leaning far to the extreme Left. What is the future of the First Amendment covering free speech?

Elite Contempt: The Common Denominator in Populist Victories

0
From left to right - Bunny Ben Hooren, the owner of Coquette Kids children's wear shop & Nigel Farage, the leader of the Brexit movement.

Brexit Party victory ends a political monopoly

The triumph of Nigel Farage and his Brexit party in Britain’s European parliamentary elections tells us two stories at the same time.

The first story is a local British story. The Brexit Party’s victory effectively ends the Conservative party’s monopoly on Britain’s political right for the first time in two hundred years. The Conservatives will respond to the trouncing in one of two ways. They can disintegrate completely by doubling down on outgoing Prime Minister Theresa May’s soft Brexit – with or without a second referendum — or they can start listening to their voters.

The second story encapsulated in Brexit’s victory — and that of Marine Le Pen’s triumph in France and Matteo Salvini’s in Italy — is the now familiar tale of the rise of the populist/nationalist/ideological right throughout the Western world against the conventional wisdom of the traditional progressive and center-right elitist establishment, and more often than not, in defiance of the polls.

In Britain itself, the rise of Brexit is a fitting bookend to Prime Minister Theresa May’s stunning betrayal of her voters. May came to power after her predecessor David Cameron resigned office in response to the Brexit vote. As she entered office, May pledged to embrace the will of the voters and shepherd Britain out of the European Union.

Instead of doing so, May managed to negotiate a Brexit deal with the European Union that left Britain with the costs of EU membership but without its benefits. Despite the fact that her deal was repeatedly voted down in Parliament, she refused to resign. And now, her premiership that began because of Brexit is ending because she betrayed Brexit.

As for the wider West, to be sure, the proximate issues pushing voters in separate countries to cast their ballots for anti-elitist parties in favor of populist, nationalist leaders with strong visions of national restoration and pride are local. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s victory earlier this month over his challenger, Labor Party leader Bill Shorten, has largely been attributed to Shorten’s radical economic agenda. Shorten’s proposed tax hikes would have harmed young families and retirees. His carbon emissions legislation would have crippled Australia’s mining industry.

Farage’s rise owes to May’s bad faith with her own voters regarding her commitment to honoring their vote to withdraw Britain from the European Union.

In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu won a fifth term in office last month by running on a record of diplomatic and economic success that the leftist parties were unable to discredit.

Trump’s victory is widely attributed to Hillary Clinton’s failure to rally the Democratic base in the Rust Belt and to counter Trump’s message of industrial renewal.

But one underlying issue is common in all of the elections. And until the progressive left and the establishment center right reconcile themselves to it, and find a respectful means to contend with it, they will continue to see populist forces grow stronger and win elections.

That issue is contempt. Throughout the Western world, beyond the economic issues and even beyond specific social issues like gay marriage or abortion rights, voters are motivated to vote for the populist, nationalist right in part due to their anger at the left and center-right’s undisguised contempt for them.

In the United States, the left’s snobbery reached its height with Hillary Clinton’s castigation of Trump’s supporters as “deplorables.” But her assertion wasn’t made in isolation. It was made in the midst of a general atmosphere in which Democratic politicians from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi and establishment Republicans felt comfortable putting down Americans who aren’t part of their club. Obama infamously referred to Clinton’s “deplorables” as “bitter” people in small towns who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

The media, which serves as an extension of the Democratic Party and embraces NeverTrump Republicans as a means to attack Trump and his voters, continuously broadcasts contempt for both.

Likewise, according to Australian professor and media analyst Stan Grant, one of the decisive factors in Australia’s election was religion. A large swathe of the public developed a sense that Labor leader Shorten held them and their religious convictions in contempt.

Grant recalls that in the weeks before the election, a national rugby star — who, like Morrison, is an evangelical Christian — wrote a disparaging post about homosexuals on his Facebook page. Whereas Morrison responded by drawing a line between his political actions and his religious beliefs to neutralize the issue, Shorten’s response was to castigate Morrison.

According to Grant, “Shorten’s move raised red flags in the minds of many voters. Just what did he stand for? Did he value the rights of the LGBTQ community not to be offended over the rights of someone to publicly profess their religious beliefs?

Grant added that Shorten’s response came the same week he “had given a rousing speech pledging to ‘change the nation forever.’”

It works out that while Australians do not oppose gay marriage, they don’t want their country to be fundamentally transformed. However they come down on social issues, they want Australia to stay Australia.

By adopting an attitude of contempt for them, Shorten, like Clinton and Obama and May and French President Emmanuel Macron insulted the voters.

Since the 1990s, we have been told that globalization is a progressive, post-nationalist movement. And it is true that many of the radical agendas the left has adopted in the past twenty years have been initiated in one country and spread worldwide through various connectors, most notably, social media.

On the left, the international academic community and the transnational business elite have embraced similar values and agendas. These values and agendas have become the calling cards of members of the international ruling elite. And these values and agendas have drifted farther and farther away from those of the denizens of the elitists’ home countries and societies.

The rise of the populist/nationalist/ideological right throughout the West demonstrates that globalization cuts both ways. Members of the global progressive and center-right elite embrace the same post-nationalist, post-industrial, and post-Christian values and agendas at elite conferences in Brussels and New York, at the United Nations, on network news and online. But back in their home countries, those they disregard are also online and also talking. The disregarded majorities are also listening to one another.

The most potent message that crosses the world each day and empowers populists and nationalist conservatives is one of exasperation and anger at the transnational elites’ solidarity in their contempt for their people. From Jerusalem to Budapest to Birmingham to Cincinnati, the spurned citizens have understood that the only way to force their contemptuous elites to heel is to vote them out of power.

For European Unionists and British Remainers, for the Israeli elite and the American establishment, the globalization of their values and agendas has brought them to believe that democracy means fixing the rules of the game. Through judicial activism and bureaucratic regulations, through intellectual terror and public shaming, these elites seek to render election results inconsequential. Ballot boxes, in their view, are no match for the combined forces of the elite media and academia and the bureaucracy. They determine norms. They determine policies – in the name of Democracy.

But throughout the West, the “deplorables” are listening to one another and rediscovering their power and voices at the ballot boxes. They realize that democracy is a means for the people to determine their course in the world. The elite may control the discourse, but the people decide who will run their countries.

True, specific voting issues vary from country to country. But the voters’ refusal to accept the contempt with which their elites’ treat them unifies voters throughout the Western world. And so long as the elites refuse to accept that the traditional values and agendas of their societies are not fascist and racist, but conventional and even commendable, they will continue to misread polling data. They will continue to ignore voters. And they will continue to be blindsided by electoral defeats that they never expected.

            (Front Page Mag)

Caroline Glick is the Director of the David Horowitz Freedom Center’s Israel Security Project and the Senior Contributing Editor of The Jerusalem Post. For more information on Ms. Glick’s work, visit carolineglick.com 

The Implications of Trump’s Visit to Britain and Ireland

0
President Donald Trump is pictured here last year with UK Prime Minister Theresa May. While Trump may have gone on record as being quite critical of how May dealt with the failed Brexit campaign, he has told the media that he likes her, considers her a friend and feels badly that she has tendered her resignation. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

This week, President is visiting the United Kingdom for a state visit and was welcomed by the Queen ahead of the commemorations of the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings. Many commentators and politicians are not only apoplectic, they are organizing various forms of protests. The mainstream media, notably the BBC, are giving continuous coverage to those elements wishing to facilitate, contribute to and participate in the anti-Trump frenzy.

The repeated howls of exasperation from these protagonists all center around their perception of Trump’s values, which they describe as “racist.”

Irrespective of his record — in which Trump has reached out to China and North Korea, and initiated economic policies that resulted in record-low minority unemployment — many, predominately on the political “left,” remain critical.

Paradoxically, there were not such frenzied protests in the UK during the visits there of Xi Jinping of China, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Bashar Assad of Syria.

President Trump is coming over to commemorate the D-Day landings, when thousands of American troops were killed.

All people who are working to ensure that the free world remains free will welcome Trump’s visit, which is presumably intended to cement even further the exceptional connection between the United Kingdom and the United States.

After his visit to Britain, Trump is scheduled to travel for a two-day visit to the Republic of Ireland to meet with the Taoiseach (Prime Minister), Leo Varadkar and various other Irish parliamentarians.

Perhaps President Trump might ask his hosts about the issue of memorials to Nazi collaborators — such as Frank Ryan, Charlie Kerins, Tom Barry, Sean MacBride and the memorial commemorating Sean Russell in Dublin’s Fairview Park, which are still on display throughout Ireland.

Given that hundreds of thousands of American troops lost their lives freeing Europe from Nazism, how is it that Ireland finds the audacity to be so contemptuous of the leader of the country of those who paid the ultimate price so that the Irish population could be free to enjoy liberal democracy?

Many Irish consider their country as having been neutral during World War II; however, just a little research reveals their behavior as having been questionable at best. Ireland was one of the first countries to accept the Nazi annexation of Austria during Ireland’s sorry history before, during and after the war. Although that history seems to be something they tried to conceal, it has resurfaced once more under the guise of being anti-Israel.

Ireland is the only democracy currently authorizing legislation which would criminalize those who purchase or sell goods or services from areas within the only Jewish state in the world.

It took Ireland nearly 70 years to apologize for its pre-war antisemitism and for the way the country treated some of the approximately 70,000 citizens of Ireland who served in the British armed forces during WWII, only to be treated abhorrently after their return home by their fellow countrymen. Some “5,000 Irish soldiers who deserted their own neutral army to join the war” against the Nazis were, on their return home, denied pensions and not permitted to work for government offices, suppliers or contractors for seven years — all because they fought against Nazism.

If further proof of Ireland’s dalliance with WWII Nazism is necessary, it can be easily evidenced not only by the welcome Ireland gave to notorious Nazis but also by the help they gave to wanted Nazi war criminals to escape and the carefree attitude they apparently had toward other Nazis, in permitting them to live quite openly within Irish society.

Other facts have emerged which would shock those who thought Ireland was an irrelevance during the fight against Nazism. Jewish children from France were not permitted to come into Ireland in 1943. Oliver Flanagan — who was promoted to become Minister of Defense in the 1970s’ Charles Haughey government and was one of the longest-ever serving members of parliament — seems to have been the MP mainly responsible for Irish Jew-hatred.

Immediately after Hitler’s death, Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Éamon de Valera “called on [German] ambassador Eduard Hempel to express his condolences” on the death of Hitler.

In the course of time, such behavior has been forgotten. President Trump — as the representative of the American fallen, maimed, and the families of veterans, and of those currently serving to maintain Judeo-Christian values in Western democracies — should be outraged at the ingratitude to such a guest, especially while memorials to Nazi collaborators are still on display throughout Ireland.

How would those American servicemen who lost their lives on Omaha Beach to free Europe, feel in the knowledge that one of the countries they fought for were mocking them with memorials to those collaborating with the enemies they fought?

(Gatestone Institute)

Peter Baum, Vice Chair at New Fair reporting, is based in Great Britain.

Jews & Jewish Anti-Semites Collide in California

0
Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, whose courageous response to a Neo-Nazi shooting at his synagogue in Poway won the hearts of a nation, headed off to appear at a Jerusalem Day event. Jerusalem Day or Yom Yerushalayim is a popular celebration in Israel commemorating the liberation of Jerusalem from its Islamic conquerors. (Chabad.org)

A tale of two very different peoples

On the last weekend of May, two very different responses to anti-Semitism came out of California.

Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, whose courageous response to a Neo-Nazi shooting at his synagogue in Poway won the hearts of a nation, headed off to appear at a Jerusalem Day event. Jerusalem Day or Yom Yerushalayim is a popular celebration in Israel commemorating the liberation of Jerusalem from its Islamic conquerors. “In the face of hatred and terror by our enemies in east Jerusalem, we continue to grow and thrive, despite the physical threat of violence and psychological danger that face our families every day, “Ateret Cohanim, the Jerusalem development organization, said in a statement.

In a very different response, California Democrats struggled with a hateful resolution put forward by David Mandel, a convention delegate, and a chapter leader in the hate group Jewish Voice for Peace. The hateful resolution falsely shifted blame to Israel and Jews for the synagogue massacre in Pittsburgh. It also defended Muslim anti-Semitism and condemned attempts to reject terrorism against Jews.

Jewish Voice for Peace is neither Jewish nor peaceful. This is its latest episode of promoting blood libels, dating back to its association with an anti-Semitic bigot who claimed that Jews drank blood. Mandel, a chapter leader in a hate group that promoted an anti-Israel activist who appeared on white supremacist radio, cynically accuses Israel and Jews of collaborating with white supremacists.

Mandel is a contributor to Mondoweiss: a hate site which claimed that a previous anti-Semitic attack by a white supremacist was really an Israeli plot.

The work of another Mondoweiss contributor had been cited by that same anti-Semitic shooter.

One Mondoweiss editor has said, “I do not consider myself an anti-Semite, but I can understand why some are.”

The vast chasm between Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein and David Mandel, between Jews who stand up to hate and radical activists with Jewish last names who collaborate with hate, also appeared in the AJC survey.

The American Jewish Congress, a liberal group that, despite its name, represents Jews no more than any of the other alphabet soup non-profits with a ‘J’ thrown in there do, has released its annual survey. The AJC’s survey of American Jews and Israeli Jews features its own profound chasm between two peoples.

43% of American Jews answered that being Jewish was very important in their lives. 35% allowed how it might be somewhat important. The other 24% deemed it unimportant.

Meanwhile 51% of Israelis believed that being Jewish was most important, 29% thought that it was very important, and 11% downgraded it to somewhat important.

Only 8% of Israeli Jews thought that being Jewish wasn’t a significant part of their lives.

35% of American Jews disagreed and 62% agreed that caring about Israel was very important. 25% did not think that Israel is important to the future of the Jewish people. 49% identified as Democrats.

Only 18% identified as Republicans.

91% of Israeli Jews believed that Israel was vital to the future of the Jewish people. 79% of Israeli Jews supported President Trump’s handling of the relationship between America and Israel.

45% of American Jews strongly disapproved of President Trump’s handling of relations with Israel. 36% listed Russia as the greatest threat to America. Only 14% put down Iran.

50% backed Trump’s recognition of the Golan Heights. 39% opposed the move.

88% of Israeli Jews were in favor of recognition.

Since last year, the number of American Jews caring about Jews dropped from 70% to 62%. Among 18-29 year old American Jews, the number stands at 44%.

Less than half.

These numbers are consistent with a previous Pew survey in which 42% of American Jews complained that President Trump was favoring Israel too much. To put those numbers into perspective, historically black churches were less likely to complain that Trump was too pro-Israel than American Jews.

Pew’s mistake was contrasting members of religious groups with a dissipating ethnic identity.

The AJC’s numbers show that support for Israel is linked to a strong Jewish identity. When respondents were asked about the importance of being Jewish, the responses, ranging from 100% among the Orthodox to 63% among Conservative Jews to 35% among Reform Jews to 15% among secular Jews, reflected the overlap between traditionalism, religiosity and support for Israel.

That’s also what the split between Rabbi Goldstein and David Mandel reflects.

A Gallup poll in 2015 found that among Jews who attended synagogue services at least once a week, 60% disapproved of Obama. Among those who didn’t, 58% supported Obama.

The split was equally obvious in New York City where the left-wing Forward tabloid noted that, “Nearly every election district that Trump won in Brooklyn was in a Jewish neighborhood.”

Some of the most left-wing and right-wing neighborhoods in the Big Apple in 2016 were Jewish areas.

Like the rest of America, Jews are coming apart into two very different groups.

At the end of May, California faced the same split, with Rabbi Goldstein celebrating the liberation of Jerusalem, while David Mandel tried to find a way to blame murdered Jews for their own deaths.

Rabbi Goldstein and Mandel are both perfect examples of a particular type. The Chabad Rabbi who lost several fingers in the Poway attack, embodies the Jewish tradition of faith. Mandel, a JVP leader who is active with the National Lawyers Guild, a radical group with historical ties to the Communist Party, represents the traditional animus of leftists for everything Jewish. Israel is just one example.

Mandel and Rabbi Goldstein believe in two very different sets of ideas.

At the White House, Rabbi Goldstein, in a quote, urged introducing a moment of silence in public schools, “So that children, from early childhood on, could recognize that there’s more good to the world, that they are valuable, that there is accountability, and every human being is created in God’s image.”

While Rabbi Goldstein quoted the Lubavitcher Rebbe, a key religious leader in his movement, Mandel quoted Bernie Sanders in his hateful resolution. Bernie is also the avatar that the anti-Israel activist uses. While the leaders of Rabbi Goldstein’s Lubavitch Chassidic movement faced persecution by Communists, Mandel boasts of a “Progressive-Labor Alliance comrades” and a “post-capitalist world”.

And, while all this was going on, I was burying my mother, who had spent her life fighting Communism, in a dusty grave in the hills of Jerusalem.

Thousands of miles and a century later, the struggle between Jews and the anti-Jewish Left goes on.

            (Front Page Mag)

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

How Safe is the Ice Cream You are Eating This Summer?

0
According to the findings of a recent Food & Drug Administration study of ice cream production facilities, the chances of contracting bacteria that can lead to food-borne illness is higher than we could possibly imagine. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

As Memorial Day weekend of 2019 fades into glorious memories of welcoming the official start of summer with traditional barb-b-ques, picnics and the compulsory trip to the beach, we often look forward to increasing our intake of America’s favorite summer treat. You guessed it folks!! We all scream for ice cream in practically every flavor the mind can conjure up, but now it appears that we may be screaming for reasons other than joy.

According to the findings of a recent Food & Drug Administration study of ice cream production facilities, the chances of contracting bacteria that can lead to food-borne illness is higher than we could possibly imagine. According to a Miami Herald report in April, the FDA study indicated that 21.3 percent of ice cream plants has listeria and 50.6 percent had “objectionable conditions or practices.”

Listeria monocytogenes is a disease-causing bacteria that can be found in moist environments, soil, water, decaying vegetation and animals, and can survive and even grow under refrigeration and other food preservation measures, according to the FDA. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

The FDA was prompted to initiate this study, according to the Miami Herald report in the aftermath of the recall of16 ice cream products from 2013 to 2016. According to the report, pathogens were discovered and three people lost their lives in the 2015 outbreak of listeria in Blue Bell Ice Cream. Subsequently, during the years of 2016 and 2017 the FDA sent out inspectors to take environmental samples from 89 ice cream production plants in 32 states, according to the Miami Herald report.

According to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) approximately 1600 people are adversely affected by listeria each year and about 260 die of this food borne illness.

The CDC reports that people who are most vulnerable to the inherent dangers of listeria are those with already weakened immune systems. It was reported that listeria can cause stillbirths and miscarriages in pregnant women and can be harmful for babies and senior citizens. Symptoms include headaches, stiff necks, fever, muscle aches and convulsions. The symptoms usually emerge anywhere between one to four weeks after eating contaminated food.

One particular ice cream production plant known as Working Cow Homemade in St. Petersburg had its registration as a food facility suspended by the FDA. According to the Miami Herald report, the company shuttered its doors but then reopened for ice cream storage and distribution purposes.

In a statement, the FDA said, “In selecting facilities for inclusion in the assignment, the agency sought to ensure representation from throughout the country and favored larger establishments whose product would be expected to reach greater numbers of consumers. They added that, “At the time the assignment was conducted, the 89 ice cream production facilities inspected accounted for about 16 percent of the domestic ice cream manufacturers in the FDA’s inventory.”

On May 29, the Newark Advocate reported that according to a letter from FDA Division Director Steven Barber, federal inspectors found “serious violations” at Velvet Ice Cream’s manufacturing center in Utica, Ohio including the presence of Listeria.

In the letter, which was addressed to Velvet President Luconda Dager, Barber states that samples taken from the processing facility between Jan. 23 and Feb. 14 found the presence of Listeria monocytogenes.

Listeria monocytogenes is a disease-causing bacteria that can be found in moist environments, soil, water, decaying vegetation and animals, and can survive and even grow under refrigeration and other food preservation measures, according to the FDA.

According to a report on the Food Safety News web site, based on the FDA’s inspectional findings, and the analytical results for the environmental samples, the FDA determined that the ice cream manufactured in the firm’s facility is adulterated, in that it was prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health.

“It is essential to identify the areas of the food processing plant where this organism is able to survive and grow to take such corrective actions as necessary to eradicate the organism by rendering these areas unable to support the survival and growth of the organism and prevent the organism from being re-established in such sites,” said the FDA.

“You should take prompt action to correct the violations noted in this letter,” the FDA advised, “Failure to do so may result in regulatory action by the FDA without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction.”

Companies are allowed 15 working days to respond to FDA warning letters. Failure to promptly correct violations can result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction.

According to the Newark Advocate report, Dager said she has no concerns about the safety of the company’s product and that steps were taken to ensure that none of the ice cream was contaminated.

“We have addressed all the issues,” she said on Wednesday. “We’re still continuing to make a very safe, quality product.”

Dager said the Listeria was found in some drains in the plant. Since that time the company has replaced numerous drains and much of the brick floor in the production area. She said the company regularly tests its ice cream for listeria, according to the report in the Newark Advocate.

“At no time has there been any food contact area with this listeria,” she said.

Buddy Bolden, The Blues and the Jews

0
Buddy Bolden, back, second from left. This is the only known photo.

Bolden, which focuses on the legendary Buddy Bolden, long considered the founder of modern jazz, is a remarkable film. Its subject is African-Americans and African-American music in the early decades of the 20th century in New Orleans, but Bolden is really a searing, psychological portrait about the descendants of slaves—and of slave owners. It may be the most powerful, painful, artful, phantasmagoric, and appropriately surreal film on this theme that I have ever seen.

The characters and scenes are stereotypes, caricatures, but they nevertheless boldly capture the nature of the experienced and perceived realities of Southern blacks and whites. And the music—oh, the music is divine and provided by Wynton Marsalis. Although Bolden’s music has not survived, he has long haunted the imagination and memory of blues and jazz greats. Jelly Roll Morton sings “Buddy Bolden’s Blues.” Nina Simone sings a soulful “Hey, Buddy Bolden.”

At the risk of being savaged for daring to “appropriate” the topic which belongs to another race, let me argue that I have some “skin” in this game.

In 1952, when I was twelve years old, I began to haunt Birdland, the jazz club on Broadway near West 52nd Street which was founded and run by three Jews: Irving Levy, Morris Levy, and Oscar Goodstein who managed the place. The greatest jazz musicians performed there: Charlie “Yardbird” Parker, Stan Getz, Maxie Kaminsky, Count Basie, Thelonious Monk, Miles Davis. No man ever harassed me. They were either high, already with a lady friend, engrossed in the spellbinding music, or not looking for trouble; as a result, they did not bother underage “ofay” chicks. Birdland even boasted an area for teenagers where no alcohol was served.

I was once a girl singer and I sang with bands all through High School and studied and loved music, all kinds of music—but enough about this road not taken. Suffice it to say that to this very day, I listen to blues, jazz, ragtime, doo-wop, Gospel, Broadway show tunes, cabaret, rock ‘n roll, classical music, and opera, beloved opera. I rarely forget a lyric and I still sing along.

Bolden was directed by Daniel (Dan) Pritzker, also a Jew. I am not sure what the Jewish relationship to African-American music or to the African-American experience is, but clearly there is one other than Jewish involvement in the NAACP or in the Civil Rights Movement. Sometimes I think that Jews understand that in America, African-Americans occupy the place that Jews have always occupied throughout the world; that to some extent, white Jews who did not look visibly Jewish could “pass” in America—whereas blacks could not. Relief, guilt, identification, the very Jewish mission to help those less fortunate than oneself may all have animated the Jewish-black relationship, at least before The Troubles challenged, even fractured, this blessed relationship.

Despite Spike Lee’s negative presentation of two exploitative Jewish nightclub owners “Moe and Josh Flatbush” in Mo’ Better Blues, Jewish-Americans have played an important role in supporting African-American jazz and blues musicians. Jews got African-American music out to a world that was unwilling and not ready to hear it.

In 2017, Michael Kaminer wrote a piece titled “When Jazz Sounds Jewish.” He cites the work of Charles Hersh the author of Jews and Jazz: Improvising Ethnicity, Jews weren’t considered white or Americans and, “in the early 20th century they were shut out of many professions. They went into entertainment . . . they used music to play with, express, and explore Jewish identities.” In the 1930s and 1940s, they sponsored and worked with African American musicians “at a time when such interactions were taboo.” A Baroness, (Nina de Koenigswarter), who was born and raised a Rothschild, was Thelonious Monk’s patron. Blue Note records was founded by German Jewish refugees in 1939 and was committed to recording “the best jazz (musicians) that have stood the test of time.”

Benny Goodman and Artie Shaw hired black musicians—not to make a political statement but because they viewed them as the “best musicians.” Eventually, Goodman hired Lionel Hampton; doing so cost him dearly in financial terms.

Their music owes everything to Louisiana-based Buddy Bolden. Or so it is believed.

Director Pritzker says that “I saw this as an opportunity to make an allegorical story about the soul of America.” And he has done just that.

In the film, we are shown how slavery and post-slavery persecution has destroyed the soul of far too many African-Americans, so much so that they turn on each other. They are meant to do so. We are subjected to graphic, agonizing scenes of slave-like brothels and bloody black-on-black boxing matches with ecstatic white, betting voyeurs. We also see wildly orgiastic African-American dancing to Bolden’s music, possibly as the only Saturday night respite to marrow-deep poverty and no-exit lives. While some African-Americans in the film also lead righteous lives and are portrayed as deeply Christian, (Bolden’s mother-in-law for example), they are also shown as contemptuous of Bolden’s music. It does not pay for food. It does not fund a caravan North. It does not elevate their suffering people but rather, leads them down to the Devil, or to promiscuous paganism.

Bolden is imagined as an innocent Piped Piper—but he is no Saint. Bolden drinks, takes drugs, visits whore-houses, cheats on his “good girl” wife, even while she is pregnant, even while she is in labor. He keeps abandoning her. And finally, she leaves for Chicago.

Bolden is also or mainly about talent, raw, great talent—and how it can be, and in this instance, was perhaps destroyed by extreme racist cruelty and misfortune; perhaps also by genetics or fate. Bolden is viewed as fragile and when someone newer and younger seems to possess a similarly seductive talent, Bolden cannot take it. An imagined savage beating in response to Bolden’s increasingly “mad” behavior is the final blow. At thirty, Bolden descends into madness (“schizophrenia”) and spends the last quarter-century of his life in a Louisiana insane asylum.

The film opens with Buddy in that asylum—and it is a scene I know and have written about many times. Tormented souls shriek, howl, and babble from dawn to dawn, and destroy what may be left of any other inmate’s peace of mind. Such asylums are far worse than any prison.

Nineteenth and early twentieth century American asylums were hell-holes. Dr. Walter Freeman performed lobotomies mainly on African-American women who were, in his opinion, too angry. He performed these mutilating surgeries all through the 1940s and 1950s, all over the South, including at Tuskegee, in Alabama. Although men outnumbered women in state asylums, Freeman performed at least 60% of his lobotomies on “boisterous, agitated” African-American women.

Some white American women wrote lucid, brilliant, heartbreaking accounts of their asylum confinements. Incredibly, these heroic women were not broken or silenced by their lengthy sojourns in Hell. They bore witness to what was done to them—and to those less fortunate than themselves, who did not survive the brutal beatings, near-drownings, and force-feedings, the body-restraints, the long periods in their own filth and in solitary confinement, the absence of kindness or reason—which passed for “treatment.” These historical accounts brought tears to my eyes.

For example, Elizabeth T. Stone (1842), of Massachusetts, described the mental asylum as “a system that is worse than slavery”; Adriana Brinckle (1857), of Pennsylvania, described the asylum as a “living death,” filled with “shackles,” “darkness,” “handcuffs, straight-jackets, balls and chains, iron rings and . . . other such relics of barbarism”; Tirzah Shedd (1862), wrote: “This is a wholesale slaughter house . . . more a place of punishment than a place of cure”; Clarissa Caldwell Lathrop (1880), of New York, wrote: “We could not read the invisible inscription over the entrance, written in the heart’s blood of the unfortunate inmates, ‘Who enters here must leave all hope behind.’”

White female patients were routinely beaten, deprived of sleep, food, exercise, sunlight, and all contact with the outside world, and were sometimes even murdered. Such asylums drove all but the strongest to madness. Sometimes, the women tried to kill themselves as a way of ending their torture.

I do not believe that asylum life for white men was any better. One cannot bear to imagine how it might have been for African-American men and women.

In Pritzker’s film, we see Bolden (Gary Carr) sitting alone, bowed and despondent, in the dark, utterly silent—until he hears an actor (Reno Wilson) playing his music and naming Bolden as the composer. Wilson plays Louis Armstrong in a historic New Orleans concert on the radio—the first time that an African-American musician was allowed to speak and play music on the radio. Then, for a brief moment, Buddy urgently hurries through asylum hallways and dormitories seeking the source of his music—a radio, in a nurse’s locked office.

The actors are superb: Nora, Bolden’s “good girl” wife (Yahya DaCosta); Bolden’s Satanic manager (Erik LaRay Harvey), the smugly racist white men (Ian McShane, Michael Rooker). Gary Carr plays Pritzker’s Bolden brilliantly. Winton Marsalis’s trumpet or coronet is assured and smooth, capable of heating the blood.

This film reminds me of Gayl Jones’ extraordinary and under-appreciated novel Corregidora, which is equally phantasmagorical and painful. Her hero is Ursa Corregidora whose great grandmother, grandmother, and mother were all raped by the same Portuguese slave owner. Ursa is a blues singer and her relationships with black boyfriends and black husbands depicts dangerously violent and woman-hating men. Ursa is ultimately out for revenge. Jones was criticized for the way in which she painted such “politically incorrect” portraits. However, Kirkus described the book as “raw, harsh, hypnotic.” It is that.

Jones also lived a life on the run and a life with a dangerous and violent man. Like Bolden, her life caught up with her—but she also outraced it through her Art.

As I was researching this piece, I found a history totally unknown to me, one that concerns the extent to which African-American singers recorded Jewish cantorial and Yiddish melodies. We know that Matisyahu adopted black musical style. But I did not know that the Idelsohn Society of Music Preservation created a CD and an exhibit at San Francisco’s Contemporary Jewish Museum: “Black Sabbath.” Billie Holiday sings “My Yiddish Momme;” Johnny Mathis sings “Kol Nidre;” Blues singer Alberta Hunter (whom I used to listen to at the Cookery in Greenwich Village) sings “Ich Hob Dich Tzufil Lieba”; Nina Simone sings “Eretz ZavatChalav”; Eartha Kitt sings “Shalom Alecheim”

This was all discovered and compiled by the Idelsohn Society. Their website is now permanently closed.

Go and see Bolden. Go and listen to jazz. Go and buy Black Sabbath. Read Corregidora.

            (New English Review)

Restaurants May Not Always Be Up Front About Gluten Free Foods

0
According to a new study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, thirty-two percent of restaurant foods labeled gluten-free contain some degree of gluten. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

As health-related concerns continue to be a top priority for most Americans, the option of exclusively adhering to a gluten free diet seems more popular than ever. As was reported in an April article that appeared in USA Today, however, those who choose to dine in restaurants and order what they are led to believe are gluten free menu items had better check again.

New research points to the fact that even if a menu item proclaims its gluten free status, there is a higher than average chance that the item you are eating will have some gluten in it. According to a new study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, thirty-two percent of restaurant foods labeled gluten-free contain some degree of gluten.

Gluten is a protein found in some grains that can be injurious to the health of certain people. For others who suffer from gluten intolerance, such gastroenterological issues as abdominal bloating, chronic diarrhea, constipation, vomiting, fatigue and gas plague them on a daily basis.

According to USA Today article, while no restaurants in particular have been cited by name, the results of the study indicate that the worst offenders were pizza and pasta restaurants, with gluten found in 53.2% of pizza samples and 50.8% of the pasta tested.

From a geographic standpoint, the study’s results have indicated that restaurants in the Western part of the United States were less likely to test positive for gluten as was compared to restaurants in the Northeast part of the country.

The biggest offenders were found to be fast food restaurants where the quality of the food is considered subpar from a nutritional standpoint.

According to the USA Today article, the portable tester Nima was used in the study. A Nima device uses a pea-sized sample of food to test if gluten is present. It detects gluten at levels below 20 parts per million.

A company co-founder, Dr. Benjamin Lerner, who is also a lead author of the research study said, “We want all people to be vigilant, but not too worried. If you have celiac disease or it’s harmful for you to ingest gluten, you should feel comfortable asking the waitress how things are prepared.”

Under a 2014 FDA regulation, a food must contain less than 20 parts per million of gluten if the manufacturer wants to label it gluten-free.

In a statement about the study, the Celiac Disease Foundation said, “Nima users may have been more likely to test foods they suspected were contaminated, potentially resulting in a larger proportion of foods testing positive. However, these results are compelling evidence of the challenges of maintaining a strict, gluten-free diet.”

The National Institutes for Health reported that an estimated 1 out of 100 people worldwide has celiac disease. In 2017, Mayo Clinic research indicated at 3.1 million Americans choose to avoid gluten, even though they were not diagnosed with celiac disease. The number has tripled between 2009 and 2014.

Son of WWII Diplomat Recalls Father’s Heroism in Saving Jews During the Holocaust

0
“An Evening with Nobuki Sugihara” was held in conjunction with the Museum’s current exhibition, Auschwitz. Not long ago. Not far away. The exhibition was produced in partnership with the international exhibition firm Musealia and the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Poland.

The Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust welcomed Nobuki Sugihara for an evening in conversation with journalist Ann Curry on May 22, 2019. Sugihara’s father, Chiune Sugihara, was a Japanese diplomat serving in Lithuania when it became clear that he could – at great risk to himself and his family – grant life-saving transit visas to desperate Jews trying to flee Nazi-occupied Europe during several frantic weeks in 1940. Of the 6,000 Jews he helped rescue, he said, “They were human beings and they needed help.”

In front of an overflowing audience, Nobuki recounted his father’s extraordinary story and met with 170 “Sugihara visa” survivors and their descendants, who are alive thanks to his selfless acts.

“An Evening with Nobuki Sugihara” was held in conjunction with the Museum’s current exhibition, Auschwitz. Not long ago. Not far away. The exhibition was produced in partnership with the international exhibition firm Musealia and the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Poland. It includes more than 700 original objects and 400 photographs, on view for the first time in the North America, including hundreds of personal items—such as suitcases, eyeglasses, and shoes—that belonged to survivors and victims of Auschwitz. An original transit visa issued by Chiune Sugihara is on display.

Among those who attended the talk was Nathan Lewin, 83, who was only four years old when Chiune Sugihara issued a transit visa to his family. His family was permitted safe transit through Russia. Mr. Lewin brought the aged and yellowed visa that allowed his family to escape the Holocaust to show to Mr. Sugihara.

During their conversation, Ann Curry described the disgrace Chiune Sugihara faced by disobeying orders that were given to him by the Japanese government. She asked Mr. Sugihara, “So the question is why? Why does a human being risk so much?”

“In 1969, I asked my father, ‘why did you decide to issue the visas?’ I thought he would say something great. He just said ‘I pitied them. I knew the situation, how dangerous it was in Europe.’ But he hoped two or three people would succeed to get through those dark days, those terrible days. He never thought 100 people or 200 people would make it. Surprisingly, it’s tens of thousands. Some people say it is 250,000 with their descendants.”

Jack Kliger, President & CEO of the Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust, said, “It’s our great honor tonight to celebrate the legacy of Chiune Sugihara with his son. In the Museum’s new exhibition Auschwitz. Not long ago. Not far away. we have on display the transit visa issued for the Goldin family by Sugihara in 1940. It’s in an extraordinary section of the exhibition that highlights Sugihara’s bravery, and his decisive response to the desperation of thousands.”

The conversation with Nobuki Sugihara and Ann Curry is available for viewing on the Museum of Jewish Heritage’s YouTube channel, https://youtu.be/z6Iwf-i80LU.

 

One Trillion Dollars Arrives in Hamptons for Memorial Day Weekend

0
The East Hampton Beach. (Credit for all photos: Lieba Nesis)
Ice Cream store in East Hampton

The Hamptons started off Memorial Day swinging as thousands gathered for the beginning of what is sure to be the most crowded and exciting season yet. If you didn’t book the $35 Jitney a week in advance you were out of luck as nearly every bus on Thursday and Friday was occupied from morning until night. There are other ways to get to the Hamptons including chartering a private helicopter which takes 45 minutes to East Hampton with prices starting at $795 a seat. If you are too harried to carry your bags there is a courier service entitled “Tote Taxi” that will pick up and drop off your bags for the reasonable price of $39 for weekend bags and $49 for suitcases. Danielle Candela founded the company in 2016 with $15,000 seed money awarded on Shark Tank and has continued to expand at a record pace as guests participating in weddings, and bachelorette parties are able to get wares to their destination with minimal bother. I took the Friday afternoon Jitney and arrived in East Hampton four-hours-and-fifteen minutes later.

Fishel’s beautiful home in Bridgehampton

My first stop was to ice cream store Scoop Du Jour open from 7 AM to 11 PM on weekends with crowds down the block patiently waiting on line during the three-day-weekend. The flavors include Vanilla Peanut Butter, S’mores and Butter Pecan with an equally delicious option of fat-free yogurts such as Coffee Chip, and Heath Bar. While Scoop has started serving burgers and food how can you order a sandwich when you have dozens of magnificent flavors staring you in the eye. There are other new places opening with full course meals including Blu Mar and Silver Lining Diner in Southampton, Armin and Judy in Bridgehampton, Coche Comedor in Amagansett, Bostwick’s on the Harbor in East Hampton and Showfish in Montauk. Unfortunately a few of these restaurants including Blu Mar and Paola’s were unable to get their liquor licenses in time for Memorial Day Weekend which led to a loss of close to $125,000 according to owner of Blu Mar Zach Erdem. Since the rents have soared over the past year many eateries have emptied out allowing others to grab the spots at discounted prices during an eleven-day period in April. However, this was an insufficient amount of time to get licenses with Erdem acknowledging he is fearful he will be unable to recoup his $450,000 in annual rent.

Gin Lane in Southampton

Thankfully, the Great Rose Shortage of 2014 won’t be repeated this year as California wineries have amped up their production for the summer. Hamptonites still discuss in hushed tones the weeks before Labor Day in 2014 where empty shelves in multiple wine stores abounded. Rose sales increased 50% globally last year and the Wolffer Estate has taken advantage of this trend by marking up a $31 bottle of Grandioso to $54 as cars line up every Friday afternoon to guzzle the delicacy. The best place to imbibe your rose is a difficult choice as exorbitantly priced inns such as The Baker House 1650, The Maidstone and Baron’s Cove start at $800 with a three-day minimum. Enter “glamping”, which offers roomy tents with a full-service concierge at various locations. Along with 30 sleeping tents available at $300 on TerraGlamping.com, lounge tents, a dining tent and a fire pit for s’mores and grilling will be accessible along with bathrooms located in luxury trailers.

Sag Harbor town

People frequently ponder why the wealthiest people in the world choose to plop down in Long Island during the most coveted part of the year-when an array of options exist. Speaking with Southampton broker Joe Piccininni was enlightening as he remarked that more than $1 trillion in wealth had settled into the Hamptons for Memorial Day weekend. After carefully contemplating the answer to why the wealthiest flock to this hotspot I have concluded the appeal of the Hamptons is largely due to its close proximity to New York, the unrivaled variety of restaurants and stores in East and Southampton along with Montauk and Sag Harbor, the magnificent and impeccably kept beaches and towns, and finally and most importantly the highly sophisticated and urbane clientele that continues to come year after year to this oasis located on the East End of Long Island.

The Watermill Center Benefit in the Hamptons

Bklyn Residents May Get Reduced Toll on Verrazano Bridge if Bill Passes in NYS Assembly

0
According to a NY1 report, Brooklyn residents who regularly drive across the Verrazano Bridge into Staten Island may soon get a discounted toll. Photo Credit: Shutterstock

According to a NY1 report, Brooklyn residents who regularly drive across the Verrazano Bridge into Staten Island may soon get a discounted toll.

By: Andrew Jones

Under a bill passed by the State Senate this week, Brooklynites who make more than 10 trips a month and use EZ Pass would pay $6.88 to cross the bridge.

NY1 reported that that’s the same amount Staten Islanders pay. The current toll for EZ Pass users who don’t live on Staten Island is $12.

The bill still needs to be approved by the Assembly before going to Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Back in April, the Jewish Voice reported that a $2 rate hike went into effect on the Verrazano. The non-E-ZPass toll to travel on the storied bridge is now the most expensive in the country, at $19.

The toll to travel along the two-and-a-half mile bridge is $1 more than to travel across the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel in Virginia, which is 23 miles long.

“My God — $19 without E-ZPass! I mean, you’re going to Staten Island! It doesn’t seem worth it,” Bay Ridge resident Gloria Padron told The New York Post.

The E-ZPass toll under the new rate hike is $12.24.

Staten Island residents won’t be subject to the rate hike, however, and will only pay $5.50 as part of a rebate program put in place by New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Gov. Cuomo and the state legislature decided to put up $6,000,000 per year in a bid to keep tolls low for Staten Island residents.

“My boyfriend lives on Staten Island and pays like $5 with E-ZPass. When I go to Staten Island now, it’s over $12,” 21-year-old Caitlyn Kelly, who lives in Bay Ridge, told The Post. “It is too much and unfair to Brooklyn residents. My boyfriend will have to come to Brooklyn if he wants to see me.”

Democratic Councilman Justin Brannan fumed at the fact that the reduced rate isn’t offered to Brooklyn residents.

“Last time I checked, a bridge has two sides. It is RIDICULOUS that the discounts offered to Staten Island residents have NEVER been offered to Brooklyn residents,” Mr. Brannan, who lives in Bay Ridge, said Sunday on Twitter.

State Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis (R) hit back against Mr. Brannan defending the special rate for one side of the bridge.

“That bridge is our only way to connect. Staten Island is absolutely deserving of the credit. It’s part of what government should be doing,” she said, according to The Post. “I’m also advocating for Brooklyn residents, because no one should be paying $19 to drive over a bridge to go to work.”

Other borough bridges and tunnels have also seen rate hikes, including the Queens Midtown Tunnel, the Throgs Neck Bridge, and the Robert F. Kennedy bridge.

“It’s getting crazy. The tolls just keep going up and up. The service doesn’t get any better,” New York resident Karen Sklar told The Post on Sunday as she prepared to go through the Queens Midtown Tunnel. “The entrances are constantly closed or overcrowded.”

New York state police officers along with two bystanders saved an elderly man this weekend after he attempted to jump off the Verrazano-Narrows bridge. The man was eventually taken to a nearby hospital to be evaluated.

Nazi Germany and the Farhud in Iraq

0
Group of young Jews who fled Iraq for Eretz Israel following the 1941 Farhud pogrom in Baghdad. They reached Eretz Israel after considerable difficulties, including arrest, trial and imprisonment by the British authorities as well as deportation. Photo: Moshe Baruch, Ramat Hasharon. Beit Hatfutsot, the Oster Visual Documentation Center, courtesy of Moshe Baruch.

The most traumatic event in the collective memory of Iraqi Jews — the Farhud — took place during Shavuot 1941. During these violent riots in Baghdad thousands were raped and/or wounded, Jewish shops and synagogues were plundered and destroyed, and a staggering 180 people were brutally murdered. This unprecedented attack on the theretofore flourishing, peaceful Jewish community of Baghdad is generally thought of as triggering Iraqi Jewry’s Aliyah to Israel.

Platoon of soldiers in the compulsory military service that was imposed on high school students by the Iraqi army, Baghdad 1940. 25 percent of these conscripts were Jewish. Beit Hatfutsot, the Oster Visual Documentation Center, courtesy of the Sehayek family, Israel.

Seldom do we ask how such a pogrom could have occurred in a place where Jews had lived quietly for centuries, in a country that had not, up until that moment, been known for anti-Semitism.

A closer look at the historical background of the Farhud reveals a complicated web of factors that led to the pogroms — the opposing interests of the Iraqi government and the British Empire; Nazi Germany’s underlying influence; varying Arab movements; and internal struggles between groups of Iraqi intellectuals. The unfortunate Jews were caught in the middle of this growing conflict.

In his research on Iraqi Jewry, historian Nissim Kazzaz puts the Farhud in historical context. Until the 1920s there were no significant recorded demonstrations of anti-Semitism in Iraq. In fact, in the early 20th century, restrictions from the Ottoman era were abolished, and, following World War I, the establishment of the British mandate improved the situation of Iraqi Jews.

The war, however, had other consequences. The Iraqi elite was introduced to the protocols of the Elders of Zion, texts that had been partially translated from Russian into Arabic. New and conflicting movements were rising in Iraq. Some believed that, as long as the Jews did not hold national aspirations, they were a part of the Iraqi nation. Others, such as the Al Istiklal, felt differently. Perceiving the Iraqi nationality to be Muslim Arab, they refused to accept religious minorities. Formally, after Iraq became independent from Britain in 1932, Jews were citizens of Iraq. There were voices, however, that spoke out against their integration.

Otniel Margalit collection, photo archive, Yad Ben Zvi

At the same time, the world was experiencing profound changes. Fascist leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini were on the rise in Europe and had significant supporters among the Iraqi elite. The British expected certain privileges following Iraqi independence, such as the ability to transport goods through Iraq, which Iraqi nationalists would not concede. The nationalists insisted that Iraq establish close ties with Germany rather than be exploited by Britain.

The Germans encouraged Iraq’s support. “Mein Kampf” and Hitler’s speeches were translated into Arabic, and German educators came to Iraq to spread anti-Semitic propaganda. Iraqi newspapers became vocally pro-Germany, especially post-1939. They asserted that Iraqi Jews and Zionists were one and the same, that the world’s Jewry was scheming to ruin the glorious nation of Iraq and that Iraqi Jews must be banished from public life. With help from the Germans, and inspired by the Hitler–Jugend movement, the extremist Al-Fatwa movement was founded, calling for strict Islamic adherence by all Iraqi citizens. Eventually all students and teachers were forced to join the movement, including Jews. In 1939 the mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, settled in Iraq and began promoting a pro-German agenda while spreading damaging anti-Semitic propaganda.

The tension broke on April 1, 1941. Until that day Iraq had refrained from assisting the British, but also from directly assisting Germany. But Iraq’s Prime Minister, Rashid Ali, had decided it was time to change alliances. He led a coup and overthrew all pro-British officials. He then announced that Iraq would no longer provide Britain with airplane fuel, and even set Iraqi forces loose on British bases in Iraq. By the end of April the British attacked the Iraqi army. By then the Iraqi air force was manned by German Luftwaffe pilots.

In May, with help from the Irgun in Palestine, among others, the British fought the German-Iraqis forces. Finally, with support from India’s army, the British were able to defeat their foes, and on May 30th all pro-German Iraqi officials escaped to Iran. Their successors signed a surrender agreement.

Jews lining up at the synagogue waiting to waive their Iraqi citizenship in order to emigrate to Israel, Baghdad, Iraq, March 1950. Beit Hatfutsot, the Oster Visual Documentation Center, courtesy of David Petel, Tel Aviv.

From that moment, the Jews were in imminent danger. The surrender agreement stated that the British would enter Baghdad within two days. The Al Fatwa saw a window of opportunity to incite the masses and take their anger at losing to the British out on the Jews. They marked Jewish houses in red, and on June 1st an angry mob rioted against the Jews for the first time in Iraqi history. From the newly born to the elderly, no Jew was safe. The rioters used all manner of weapons, including running people over with their vehicles. Some Jews were rescued by Muslim neighbors who refused to join the mob. These Muslim resisters hid Jews, at great risk to their own safety. The massacre only ceased when the British entered the city and stopped it. Sadly, the British knew about the pogrom a day prior, but made no attempt to prevent it. Just like the local authorities, they preferred to let the masses take their rage out upon the Jews.

After the Farhud, the Iraqi authorities held an investigation, blaming nationalistic elements and even executing a few army officers who were involved in the incitement. Haj Amin al-Husseini was named in the investigation, and Germany’s involvement was eventually recognized. Despite the erecting of a monument in Baghdad in honor of the victims, the Farhud triggered mass Jewish emigration from Iraq. Ten years later, as part of Operations Ezra and Nehemiah (1950-1952), some 120,000 Jews — 90% of Iraqi’s Jewry — chose to leave Iraq for the young state of Israel.

             (Beit Hatfutsot)

Further reading: Nissim Kazzaz, “The Influence of Nazism in Iraq and Anti-Jewish Activity, 1933–1941″ (In Hebrew)