58.9 F
New York
Friday, May 31, 2024
Home Blog

Mayor Eric Adams Delivers Fiery Speech at Gracie Mansion Jewish Heritage Month Celebration

0
Mayor Eric Adams
 Report and Photos By Lieba Nesis

On Wednesday May 29th 2024 more than 750 attendees gathered at Gracie Mansion from 5:30-7:30 PM to celebrate Jewish Heritage month with glatt kosher hamburgers and frankfurters, corn on the cob and a lavish dessert display. The primary agenda on the table however was decrying the rampant antisemitism that has become de rigueur in the halls of academia and politics.  Jews are confounded as social media stars akin to Dan Bilzerian tweet “Fuck Israel” and call Israel a terrorist state.  How can we relay to the formerly esteemed Columbia University that faculty that applaud Hamas’s massacre as “military action” must be terminated immediately? How do we tell CEO of IMG Ari Emanuel that accepting his Simon Wiesenthal award on May 2024 with a call to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is as traitorous as it gets? Hey Ari instead of speaking out about Bibi why not address your clients Gigi and Bella Hadid’s antisemitism as they hurl accusations of Israel unlawfully harvesting Palestinian organs while calling for the annihilation of the State of Israel-oh yeah you might lose some business if you do that.

Former hostage Shoshan Haran
Robert and Miriam Weiss in front of Gracie Mansion

Diametrically opposed to these diabolical naysayers is Mayor of New York Eric Adams who has spoken out against antisemitism in the boldest of terms; who has himself been the object of derision whether on a plane from Miami or the streets of New York as hecklers harass and harangue this defender of Israel.  Adams has always expressed gratitude for the Jewish community’s alliance with the civil rights movement and has reciprocated with audacious statements and action. Tonight the impeccably clad Adams, gave a rousing and impassioned speech as he lamented the state of our youth: as only 18% of those from the ages of 18-34 claim to love America. The current radicalization on campuses where students are taught to hate Jews and their country was concerning to the Mayor as is the silence of the masses which Adams attributed to fear “of being canceled” enrapturing the crowd as he yelled “well I say cancel me any day I’m not going to sit back and allow this to happen to the country I love.” Adams called on the country to reject the normalization of hate and antisemitism while rebutting the chants of “destroy from the river to the sea” with “build from the river to the sea- embrace from the river to sea.”  He reassured New Yorkers that the City will never devolve into a place where your yarmulke has to be removed before walking the streets.

Ari Ackerman, Mordechai Weiss
Zachary Sage, Ira and Lizzy Savetsky, Scooter Braun
“There is more of us then there is of them the loudest is not the majority”-Adams exclaimed, assuring the crowd the majority would remain victorious.  One of the most vocal proponents of Israel, honoree and music executive Scooter Braun, helped bring the Nova festival exhibit from Israel to New York along with US partners Joe Teplow and Josh Kadden.  Braun, the grandson of Holocaust survivors whose family came from Hungary to Manhattan in 1956 noted the silence of the music industry and said the Nova Festival was no different from Coachella, Stagecoach or Governor’s Ball.    He urged Jews not to hide as he said every Jew in the last 1,000 years would switch places with us as we were still in the golden era.  Kibbutz Be’eri resident Shoshan Haran might disagree with that assessment as she was kidnapped along with six family members by Hamas for 50 days.  Haran recalled that fateful October 7th morning where her husband and sister were murdered after Hamas bulldozed their door in order to kidnap and kill.
Josh Kadden, Malcolm Hoenlein, Scooter Braun
Her son-in-law Tal Shoham remains in captivity as she vowed to speak out until he was returned. While saying she was advised to keep mum about her ordeal she said she read books on how Jews survived the Nazis in order to cope.  Another honoree, social media sensation Montana Tucker who works tirelessly to combat antisemitism, thanked the Mayor for his intrepid advocacy as she vowed to honor her Holocaust grandparents memory by fighting eternally for the Jewish people.
Daniel Fine and Montana Tucker with FDNY and NYPD

The Mayor presented a special award to departing Jewish liaison Joel Eisdorfer who served the mayor with steadfast loyalty and professionalism as his right hand advisor.  Adams heralded Eisdorfer as “a great American, a great member of the Jewish community and a great member of the human race.”  The evening was replete with NYPD and FDNY officers some of whom donned yarmulkes along with a healthy smattering of Jewish influencers including Lizzy Savetsky, Malcolm Hoenlein and Mordechai Weiss.  Weiss started the organization 1000 Strong where he gathers over a thousand millennials to raise money and awareness for Israel with every penny donated to orphans, widows and soldiers in the Israeli army.  Joined by his real estate developer parents Miriam and Robert Weiss  the group posed on the Gracie Mansion steps with dozens of influencers. African American Israeli rapper Nissim Black concluded the evening with some hefty tunes-a paradigm of the pivotal nexus between the Jewish and African American communities which is often overlooked.

Debra Lea, Robert Weiss, Mickael Benichou, Mordy and Miriam Weiss, Joel Eisdorfer
Nissim Black

Here’s what you should know about Donald Trump’s conviction in his hush money trial

0
In all, his personal net worth is roughly $6.4 billion. For the first time ever, Trump will be on the world’s top 500 wealthiest people in the world, based on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Credit: AP

(AP) Donald Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts marks the end of the former president’s historic hush money trial but the fight over the case is far from over.

Now comes the sentencing and the prospect of a prison sentence. A lengthy appellate process. And all the while, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee still has to deal with three more criminal cases and a campaign that could see him return to the White House.

The Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of falsifying business records after more than nine hours of deliberations over two days in the case stemming from a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump angrily denounced the trial as a “disgrace,” telling reporters he’s an “innocent man.”

Some key takeaways from the jury’s decision:

Prison time?

The big question now is whether Trump could go to prison. The answer is uncertain. Judge Juan M. Merchan set sentencing for July 11, just days before Republicans are set to formally nominate him for president.

The charge of falsifying business records is a Class E felony in New York, the lowest tier of felony charges in the state. It is punishable by up to four years in prison, though the punishment would ultimately be up to the judge and there’s no guarantee he would give Trump time bars. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg declined to say whether prosecutors would seek prison time.

It’s unclear to what extent the judge may factor in the political and logistical complexities of jailing a former president who is running to reclaim the White House. Other punishments could include a fine or probation. And it’s possible the judge would allow Trump to avoid serving any punishment until after he exhausts his appeals.

Trump faces the threat of more serious prison time in the three other cases he’s facing, but those cases have gotten bogged down by appeals and other legal fights so it remains unclear whether any of them will go to trial before the November election.

Avenues for appeal

After Trump is sentenced, he can challenge his conviction in an appellate division of the state’s trial court and possibly, the state’s highest court. Trump’s lawyers have already been laying the groundwork for appeals with objections to the charges and rulings at trial.

The defense has accused the judge of bias, citing his daughter’s work heading a firm whose clients have included President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democrats. The judge refused the defense’s request to remove himself from the case, saying he was certain of his “ability to be fair and impartial.”

Trump’s lawyers may also raise on appeal the judge’s ruling limiting the testimony of a potential defense expert witness. The defense wanted to call Bradley Smith, a Republican law professor who served on the Federal Election Commission, to rebut the prosecution’s contention that the hush money payments amounted to campaign-finance violations.

But the defense ended up not having him testify after the judge ruled he could give general background on the FEC but can’t interpret how federal campaign finance laws apply to the facts of Trump’s case or opine on whether Trump’s alleged actions violate those laws. There are often guardrails around expert testimony on legal matters, on the basis that it’s up to a judge — not an expert hired by one side or the other — to instruct jurors on applicable laws.

 

The defense may also argue that jurors were improperly allowed to hear sometimes graphic testimony from porn actor Stormy Daniels about her alleged sexual encounter with him in 2006. The defense unsuccessfully pushed for a mistrial over the tawdry details prosecutors elicited from Daniels. Defense lawyer Todd Blanche argued Daniels’ description of a power imbalance with the older, taller Trump, was a “dog whistle for rape,” irrelevant to the charges at hand, and “the kind of testimony that makes it impossible to come back from.”

A sparse defense

The former president’s lawyers called just two witnesses in a sparse defense case, including attorney and former federal prosecutor Robert Costello. The defense sought to use Costello to discredit prosecutors’ star witness, Michael Cohen, the Trump attorney-turned-adversary who directly implicated Trump in the hush money scheme. But the move may have backfired in devastating fashion because it opened the door for prosecutors to question Costello about a purported pressure campaign aimed at keeping Cohen loyal to Trump after the FBI raided Cohen’s property in April 2018.

While Costello buoyed the defense by testifying that Cohen denied to him that Trump knew anything about the $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels, Costello had few answers when prosecutor Susan Hoffinger confronted him with emails he sent to Cohen in which he repeatedly dangled his close ties to Trump-ally Rudy Giuliani. In one email, Costello told Cohen: “Sleep well tonight. you have friends in high places,” and relayed that there were “some very positive comments about you from the White House.”

Cohen largely kept his cool on the witness stand in the face of heated cross-examination by the defense, who tried to paint him as a liar with a vendetta against his former boss. The curt, pugnacious Costello, on the other hand, aggravated the judge — at times in view of the jury — but continuing to speak after objections and rolling his eyes. At one point, after sending the jury out of the room, the judge became enraged when he said Costello was staring him down. Merchan then briefly cleared the courtroom of reporters and scolded Costello, warning that if he acted out again, he’d be removed from the courtroom and his testimony would be stricken.

Laying the groundwork for a loss

While projecting confidence, Trump and his campaign also spent weeks trying to undermine the case ahead of a potential conviction. He repeatedly called the whole system “rigged” — a term he used to similarly used to falsely describe the election he lost to President Joe Biden in 2020.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charge,” he said Wednesday, invoking the Catholic nun and saint as jury deliberations began.

Trump has lambasted the judge, insulted Bragg, and complained about members of the prosecution team. He has tried to paint the case as nothing more than a politically-motivated witch hunt.

Trump’s criticism also extended to choices seemingly made by his own legal team. He railed that “a lot of key witnesses were not called” by the prosecution — even though his side chose to call only two witnesses.

He has also complained about being restricted from speaking about aspects of the case by a gag order, but chose not to take the stand. Instead of testifying in the case — and subjecting himself to the inherent risks of perjury and cross examination, Trump has focused on the court of public opinion and the voters who will ultimately decide his fate.

What it means for the election

In a deeply divided America, it’s unclear whether Trump’s once-imaginable status as a person convicted of a felony will have any impact at all on the election.

Leading strategists in both parties believe that Trump still remains well-positioned to defeat Biden, even as he now faces the prospect of a prison sentence and three separate criminal cases still outstanding. In the short term, at least, there were immediate signs that the guilty verdict was helping to unify the Republican Party’s disparate factions as GOP officials across the political spectrum rallied behind their embattled presumptive presidential nominee and his campaign expected to benefit from a flood of fundraising dollars.

There has been some polling conducted on the prospect of a guilty verdict, although such hypothetical scenarios are notoriously difficult to predict. A recent ABC News/Ipsos poll found that only 4% of Trump’s supporters said they would withdraw their support if he’s convicted of a felony, though another 16% said they would reconsider it.

Melinda French Gates’ $1 Billion Pledge to Women, Families, and Abortion Rights

0

Melinda French Gates’ $1 Billion Pledge to Women, Families, and Abortion Rights

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a groundbreaking announcement, Melinda French Gates revealed her intention to donate $1 billion over the next two years to support organizations and individuals dedicated to women’s rights, family support, and abortion rights, as was reported on Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal.  This monumental pledge comes through her organization, Pivotal Ventures, and was made public shortly after her resignation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

On June 7, Melinda French Gates formally stepped down from her role at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This decision follows a strategic agreement with Bill Gates, which allocated $12.5 billion to her philanthropic endeavors specifically targeting women and girls, the WSJ reported. The timing of her departure and subsequent announcement highlights her commitment to addressing what she perceives as urgent and neglected areas of need within the global landscape.

As was reported by the WSJ, French Gates’ $1 billion pledge will be distributed through grants to more than a dozen organizations. Notable recipients include:

The Center for Reproductive Rights: This organization is at the forefront of advocating for abortion rights, especially crucial in the aftermath of the 2022 Supreme Court decision that rescinded the constitutional right to an abortion in the U.S.

The Institute for Women’s Policy Research: A think tank dedicated to producing rigorous research and policy recommendations that address issues affecting women.

Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund: This fund provides legal support to individuals who have experienced workplace harassment, emphasizing the intersection of gender equality and workplace rights.

In her op-ed published in the New York Times, French Gates articulated her reasons for this substantial financial commitment. She highlighted the chronic underfunding of organizations that fight for women’s rights, which forces them into a defensive stance against well-resourced opponents, the WSJ report said. By infusing these organizations with significant capital, she aims to level the playing field and bolster their capacity to effect change.

“For too long, a lack of money has forced organizations fighting for women’s rights into a defensive posture while the enemies of progress play offense. I want to help even the match,” she wrote, according to the WSJ report.

The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to eliminate the constitutional right to an abortion was a pivotal moment for French Gates. She expressed her profound concern over the rollback of women’s rights and emphasized the need for robust support for abortion rights in the U.S, as was detailed in the WSJ report. Her pledge is a direct response to this judicial action, reflecting her belief that women’s rights should be a paramount concern in the contemporary social and political climate.

French Gates’ advocacy for women and girls spans nearly two decades. She has consistently encountered resistance, with critics often suggesting that discussions on gender equality are ill-timed or less critical compared to other global issues.

The report in the WSJ said that In her New York Times piece, she reflected on this persistent challenge: “In nearly 20 years as an advocate for women and girls, I have learned that there will always be people who say it’s not the right time to talk about gender equality. The second the global agenda gets crowded, women and girls fall off.”

The Gates Foundation quickly became one of the largest and most impactful philanthropic organizations in the world, addressing a myriad of global health, education, and poverty issues.

The couple’s divorce in 2021 raised questions about the future direction of the foundation. Despite the personal upheaval, French Gates, 59, decided to stay with the foundation, ensuring continuity in its mission.

In 2021, French Gates published her own Giving Pledge, declaring her intention to donate the bulk of her $13.3 billion fortune to various causes rather than limiting her contributions to the Gates Foundation, the WSJ report indicated.

Pivotal Ventures, the organization she founded in 2015, plays a central role in this new phase of her philanthropy. The organization recently announced a novel initiative, distributing $20 million each to a dozen notable figures, including filmmaker Ava DuVernay, Olympian Allyson Felix, and former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, according to the information provided in the WSJ report. These funds are earmarked for charities focused on women’s health and well-being, representing an innovative approach to grant-making that French Gates hopes will unlock new funding opportunities.

In her opinion piece, French Gates expressed her profound sense of responsibility and opportunity: “As a young woman, I could never have imagined that one day I would be part of an effort like this. Because I have been given this extraordinary opportunity, I am determined to do everything I can to seize it and to set an agenda that helps other women and girls set theirs, too.”

The WSJ reported that among the recipients of French Gates’ largesse are organizations deeply engaged in gender, racial, and reproductive issues. Notable beneficiaries include:

The Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity: This organization addresses the intersections of gender, racial, and reproductive justice, working to create a more equitable society.

The Institute for Women’s Policy Research: A think tank dedicated to producing rigorous research and policy recommendations on issues affecting women, thereby informing and influencing public policy.

 

MomsRising Education Fund: This group advocates for economic security for families, addressing issues such as paid family leave, affordable childcare, and workplace equality.

The 19th: A news organization focused on women’s and LGBT people’s issues, the 19th expressed profound gratitude for French Gates’ support, stating, “Sometimes dreams do come true. We are beyond grateful for French Gates’ confidence in our team and our mission.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nearly two-thirds of Israelis think Jewish state will achieve war aims, new Pew study suggests

0
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu receives a briefing at IDF Northern Command Headquarters, May 23, 2024. Photo by Ma'ayan Toaf/GPO.

NS)
Most Israelis believe that the Israel Defense Forces military response in Gaza has been appropriate and that the Jewish state will achieve its military aims, although Jewish and Arab Israelis are disagree on how the war is going, a new Pew Research Center poll suggests.

Nearly three-quarters of Israelis say that the Jewish state’s military operations against Hamas in Gaza have been appropriate, with 39% saying they have been “about right” and 34% saying that the IDF has not gone far enough. About one-fifth (19%) say that Israel has gone too far.

Some two-thirds of Israelis polled believe that the Jewish state will either “probably” (27%) or “definitely” (40%) succeed in its military goals against the Hamas terror organization. Some 13% think that Israel will “probably fail” and 6% said it would “definitely fail.”

Pew polled 1,001 Israeli adults—both Jewish and Arab—in person between March 3 and April 4. It did so in Hebrew and Arabic. It did not interview residents of Gaza or Judea and Samaria.

The survey was conducted “before U.S. President Joe Biden took a tougher stance toward Israel in the wake of an Israeli airstrike that killed seven World Central Kitchen aid workers,” Pew notes. “And it predates Biden’s declaration that the U.S. would not provide offensive weapons to Israel in the event of a Rafah invasion as well as the subsequent Israeli strikes in Rafah.”

Israelis had mixed reactions to Biden’s approach to the war and the role that the United States ought to play.

While most Israelis said that Washington should play either a major (72%) or minor (16%) diplomatic role in ending the war, just 46% of Israeli Jews and 12% of Israeli Arabs approve of Biden’s approach to the conflict. More than 9 in 10 Jews (91%) have a favorable opinion of the United States, compared to 29% of Israeli Arabs.

Israeli Jews and Arabs also differed on the Jewish state’s handling of the war against Hamas in Gaza, with 74% of Israeli Arabs saying that Israel has gone too far, compared to 4% of Israeli Jews, and 76% of Israeli Jews saying that the Jewish state will achieve its military aims, compared to 38% of Israeli Arabs.

Overall, Israelis polled view Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unfavorably (58%) compared to favorably (41%), with 39% having very unfavorable views and 20% having very favorable views. Some 51% of Israeli Jews had at least a somewhat favorable view of Netanyahu, compared to 7% of Israeli Arabs.

“The share of Israelis who have a somewhat or very unfavorable view of Netanyahu is the largest it has been since the center first started asking the question in 2013,” per Pew.

 

Most Israelis (57%) had confidence that Biden will do the right thing with respect to world affairs, while 42% did not. That was down from the 68% that had confidence in Biden doing the right thing when polled last year.

More than two-thirds (66%) of Israeli Jews had at least some confidence that Biden would do the right thing, while 77% of Israeli Arabs had “not too much” confidence of “none at all” that he would do the right thing.

Biden’s ‘Green’ Spending Controversy Fuels Hamas Terrorism

0
President Biden reiterated the United States’ unwavering support for Israel, stating, “Whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.” Credit: AP

Biden’s ‘Green’ Spending Controversy Fuels Hamas Terrorism

The Biden administration’s approach to addressing inflation has come under heavy criticism for its allocation of funds towards environmental justice initiatives that critics argue have little to do with economic stability. At the heart of this controversy is the $50 million grant awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Climate Justice Alliance (CJA) under the Inflation Reduction Act. This allocation is seen by some as an egregious example of misdirected spending, raising serious questions about the priorities and vetting processes within the administration.

The Climate Justice Alliance has openly linked its mission to the liberation of Palestine, an association that many find deeply troubling, especially in light of the recent violence perpetrated by Hamas. The CJA’s website and promotional materials propagate an anti-colonial framework, which they claim connects the struggle for climate justice with the fight against so-called settler colonialism and imperialism. This narrative, often intertwined with anti-Israel rhetoric, positions the organization in a controversial light, particularly given its silence on condemning the October 7 atrocities committed by Hamas.

The EPA’s grant to the CJA was made in December, well after these events, yet the CJA had already called for a ceasefire by October 20, without addressing the violence instigated by Hamas. This raises significant concerns about the ideological leanings of the organizations receiving federal funds and the potential for taxpayer money to support groups with controversial or extremist agendas. The CJA’s network includes entities like the NDN Collective, Grassroots Global Justice Alliance, and DemilitaRISE, all of which promote anti-imperialist ideologies and advocate for defunding the police and the military.

This situation begs the question: Did the EPA adequately vet the CJA and its affiliates before disbursing funds, or did it simply turn a blind eye to the potential implications? The answer to this question is critical because it speaks to the broader issue of how public funds are being utilized under the guise of promoting environmental justice.

The Biden administration’s strategy, as perceived by critics, appears to be a deliberate effort to channel resources to far-left groups under the pretext of serving the public good. This approach not only undermines the stated goal of combating inflation but also raises ethical concerns about the use of taxpayer dollars to support divisive and potentially harmful agendas. The notion that such spending is justified by its alignment with broader social justice goals is seen by many as a thinly veiled attempt to legitimize the redistribution of wealth to ideological allies.

Furthermore, this practice exacerbates the nation’s debt burden, placing an undue financial strain on future generations. The irony is palpable: while the administration accuses its opponents of threatening democracy, it simultaneously engages in fiscally irresponsible behavior that could destabilize the economy and erode public trust.

In sum, the allocation of funds to the Climate Justice Alliance under the Inflation Reduction Act exemplifies the broader concerns about the Biden administration’s fiscal policies and their ideological underpinnings. It is imperative that public funds are allocated transparently and responsibly, with a clear focus on addressing the nation’s most pressing economic challenges rather than advancing partisan agendas. Failure to do so not only jeopardizes economic stability but also risks deepening political divisions and undermining democratic institutions.

Stanley P. Goldstein: The Visionary Behind CVS’s Retail Empire

0

Stanley P. Goldstein: The Visionary Behind CVS’s Retail Empire

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Stanley P. Goldstein, a pioneering entrepreneur who co-founded Consumer Value Stores (CVS) and transformed it into the largest drugstore chain in the United States, passed away on Tuesday at his home in Providence, Rhode Island. He was 89. A New York Times report indicated that the company, headquartered in Rhode Island, confirmed his death, and family members informed The Providence Journal that the cause was cancer, diagnosed just a month ago.

Born on June 5, 1934, in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, Stanley Goldstein was one of four sons of Israel and Etta (Halpern) Goldstein. The NYT report noted that the family lived in a triple-decker, a common type of housing for working-class immigrants in New England. This upbringing instilled in Goldstein a strong work ethic and a deep understanding of the challenges faced by ordinary families.

He graduated from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 1955. Initially, he showed little interest in the retail sector, having witnessed the demanding nature of the business through his father, Israel Goldstein, as was noted in the NYT report. Instead, Stanley pursued a career as a stockbroker, seeking a different path from the family business.

The turning point came with the death of Israel Goldstein. Stanley’s brother, Sidney Goldstein, persuaded him to take over their father’s struggling enterprise. The NYT report explained that their father’s business had started by selling bags and paper products to grocery stores and had expanded to include various health and beauty aids, strategically displayed near cash registers.

In the early 1960s, Goldstein, his brother Sidney, and Ralph Hoagland, a Harvard Business School graduate with experience at Procter & Gamble, devised a novel approach, the NYT report affirmed. They envisioned a stand-alone store dedicated to discount personal care items, a concept that was both innovative and timely.

The first Consumer Value Store opened in Lowell, Massachusetts, a low-income neighborhood where residents would appreciate the opportunity to purchase essential items at reduced prices. The NYT report said that the store featured a sign encouraging customers to bag their own purchases to save even more money, an early example of the customer-centric strategies that would become a hallmark of CVS.

Following the success of the first store, a second location was opened in Haverhill, Massachusetts. To trim costs, the company soon abbreviated its name to CVS. “All those letters cost a lot of money, so we shortened it to CVS,” Stanley Goldstein explained in a 2017 interview with The Providence Journal, as was reported by the NYT.

The innovative model proved highly successful, and the chain rapidly expanded. By 1969, CVS had grown to 42 stores, including the first locations with pharmacies, marking a significant evolution in its service offerings, the report in the NYT said. That same year, the company was sold to the Melville Corporation, a retail conglomerate that included Thom McAn shoes, K-B Toys, and Marshalls discount clothing.

Under Stanley Goldstein’s leadership, CVS underwent significant expansion. In the early years, the founders made a strategic decision to shorten the company’s name to CVS, a move Goldstein attributed to the cost savings on signage, the report in the NYT pointed out. This attention to detail and operational efficiency became a hallmark of the company’s growth strategy.

The innovative model proved highly successful, and the chain rapidly expanded. By 1969, CVS had grown to 42 stores, including the first locations with pharmacies, marking a significant evolution in its service offerings. That same year, the company was sold to the Melville Corporation, a retail conglomerate that included Thom McAn shoes, K-B Toys, and Marshalls discount clothing.

The late 1960s were a period of turbulence and change for CVS. According to the information provided in the NYT report, Ralph Hoagland, whose political views were influenced by the counterculture movement of the 1960s, left the company in 1969 after an article in The Boston Globe revealed his financial support for a faction of the antiwar Students for a Democratic Society. This revelation angered some Melville directors, prompting Hoagland’s departure. Stanley Goldstein then assumed the role of CVS’s president, a position previously held by Hoagland.

“Ralph was the wild man who’d push the envelope,” Stanley later recalled. “Sid was quite conservative. And I was in the middle.”

By the time Goldstein retired as CEO in 1998, CVS had grown to over 4,000 stores nationwide. His tenure saw the company diversify its offerings and establish a robust presence in the health and beauty sector. The NYT reported that today, CVS boasts more than 9,000 outlets across the United States and its territories, with revenues surpassing those of major corporations like Exxon Mobil, Microsoft, and Ford.

Under Goldstein’s leadership, CVS continued to thrive and expand. His no-nonsense approach and focus on customer needs were reflected in the company’s growth strategy, which emphasized affordability and accessibility.

Goldstein’s contributions to CVS have left an indelible mark on the retail landscape. Today, CVS stands as a testament to his vision and leadership, serving millions of customers across the United States. As the company continues to evolve, it carries forward the principles and values that Goldstein championed, ensuring that his legacy endures in the hearts of those who knew him and the countless lives he impacted through his work.

 

Maurie McInnis Named Yale University’s Next President: A Historic Appointment Amidst Higher Education Turmoil

0

 

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Yale University has announced the appointment of Maurie McInnis, the current president of Stony Brook University and a Yale trustee, as its next president. McInnis, 58, will be the first woman to hold the role on a permanent basis when she assumes the position in July.  Accordiing to a report in the Wall Street Journal, this historic appointment comes at a critical juncture for American higher education, which is grappling with multiple challenges, including skepticism about the value of a college degree, debates over universities’ roles as moral arbiters, concerns about ideological biases, and strained relationships with influential donors.

McInnis is a distinguished historian whose academic research focuses on slavery. Her scholarly work and administrative experience position her uniquely to lead Yale through these turbulent times. At Stony Brook University, McInnis has demonstrated a commitment to academic excellence and a keen understanding of the complex issues facing higher education today.

American higher education is experiencing a period of significant upheaval. Increasingly, the value of a degree is questioned as tuition costs rise and student debt becomes more burdensome. Universities are also under scrutiny for their perceived roles as moral arbiters on contentious issues. Indicated in the WSJ report was that the ideological leanings of faculty members and their influence on campus culture have sparked debates, while major donors are demanding more influence over university operations, often leading to conflicts over institutional governance.

Yale University is no exception to these trends. The campus has recently been a hotspot for anti-Israel student protests. Calls for a cease-fire in Gaza and demands for divestment from companies doing business with Israel have sparked significant campus activism, the WSJ reported.

In an interview with the WSJ in which she discussed her new role at Yale, McInnis emphasized the importance of upholding free expression while ensuring campus safety. “True freedom of expression demands that we acknowledge the rights of others to hold and express beliefs that are different from our own,” she told the WSJ. “But we also have to ensure the safety and well-being of our campus community. That’s been tested this year. It will likely be tested as we return in the fall.”

McInnis brings a wealth of experience to her new role at Yale. Since 2020, she has served as the president of Stony Brook University, a Long Island campus of the State University of New York (SUNY) system. Her leadership there has been marked by a commitment to academic excellence and innovation. Prior to her tenure at Stony Brook, McInnis served as provost at the University of Texas at Austin, where she played a critical role in overseeing the academic operations of one of the nation’s largest and most prestigious public universities, according to the WSJ report. Her administrative career began at the University of Virginia, where she spent a decade in various leadership positions.

 

McInnis’ connection to Yale runs deep. She received her Ph.D. in art history from the university and has been an active member of Yale’s board of trustees since 2022, the WSJ report added. Her academic background and governance experience provide her with a unique perspective on the challenges and opportunities facing Yale today.

McInnis will succeed Peter Salovey, who announced in August that he would step down in June after 11 years as Yale’s president. Salovey will return to the faculty, leaving behind a legacy of growth and stability at the university. McInnis’ appointment comes at a time of considerable change in the leadership of other major American universities. Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania are currently led by interim presidents, following the resignation of their leaders partly due to controversial testimony at a congressional hearing on campus anti-Semitism, as was noted in the WSJ report. Similarly, Cornell University will see an interim president starting in July, while Stanford University has recently appointed economist Jonathan Levin as its new president, also beginning in July, the WSJ report added. Dartmouth College and Columbia University have both had new leaders in place for just a year.

McInnis steps into her role at Yale amid a turbulent period for higher education. Universities across the country are grappling with questions about the value of a college degree, the role of institutions as moral arbiters, and the ideological balance of their faculties, the WSJ report observed. Furthermore, relationships with major donors have become increasingly complex, with some donors seeking greater influence over university operations.

Report:  Heir to Levi Strauss Dynasty Behind Funding of Anti-Israel College Protest Movement

0
free Palestine- BLM
screenshot

Report:  Heir to Levi Strauss Dynasty Behind Funding of Anti-Israel College Protest Movement

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In an intricate twist of political alliances and philanthropic endeavors, one of America’s wealthiest and most politically active Jewish families has emerged as a significant financial supporter of the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) movement. Known for orchestrating anti-Israel protests across U.S. college campuses, the NSJP’s financial backing and operational legitimacy have come under scrutiny following a revealing 2024 report by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP). This report, titled “National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) – Antisemitism, Anti-Americanism, Violent Extremism and the Threat to North American Universities,” sheds light on the complex web of support that sustains the NSJP and its associated activities.

The NSJP is a prominent student organization that has gained notoriety for its vocal opposition to Israeli policies and its active role in the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement. The NSJP’s activities include organizing campus protests, educational events, and advocacy campaigns aimed at raising awareness about Palestinian issues and promoting actions against what they perceive as Israeli injustices.

WESPAC, identified by the ISGAP report as the main fiscal sponsor of the NSJP, originated as a civil rights advocacy group in the 1970s. Over the years, it has evolved into a significant supporter of various pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel initiatives. The report suggests that WESPAC’s support provides the NSJP with a veneer of legitimacy, enabling it to carry out its activities under the guise of civil rights advocacy.

At the top of WESPAC’s list of grant providers is the Covina, California-based Bafrayung Fund, which has contributed a substantial $300,000. The Elias Foundation, dedicated to promoting “progressive ideas,” follows with a donation of $100,500. These financial contributions call attention to the intricate network of support that underpins WESPAC and, by extension, the NSJP.

The ISGAP report meticulously documented the connections between WESPAC and several organizations identified as virulently anti-Israel and antisemitic. These organizations include:

National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP)

US Palestinian Community Network (USPCN)

Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM)

Adalah New York

International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN)

Palestine Freedom Project (PFP)

The report contends that WESPAC’s sponsorship of these groups not only facilitates their operations but also bolsters their credibility and reach. This support network has enabled these organizations to amplify their messages and mobilize broader audiences, particularly within academic settings.

At the heart of this issue is the substantial financial support these movements receive from influential individuals and organizations.

Rachel Gelman, a 33-year-old prominent resident of the San Francisco Bay Area, is the scion of the Levi Strauss dynasty and cousin to Representative Dan Goldman (D-NY). The Bafrayung Fund, managed by Gelman, receives its financing from two primary sources: Gelman herself and the Morningstar Philanthropic Foundation, her parents’ charity. According to a report on The Daily Beast web site, this foundation that is managed by her parents who are major Democratic Party donors.

The thread connecting Rachel Gelman to the congressman from New York and the Levi Strauss empire runs through her mother, Susie Gelman. Susie, appointed by President Joe Biden to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, has a deep-rooted history in Jewish issues and American-Israeli relations. The Daily Beast reported that her grandfather, Walter Haas, transformed Levi Strauss into a global denim brand. Her father, Richard Goldman, was a major insurance mogul who made the Forbes billionaire list before selling his company in 2001. Her late brother, also named Richard, was a federal prosecutor and the father of Representative Dan Goldman.

According to a 2013 profile in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Susie Gelman’s involvement in Jewish issues began early, and she met her husband through a youth group of the Jewish Federations of North America. The couple co-owns the Mid-Atlantic Media Group, which publishes several prominent Jewish newspapers.

Susie Gelman’s attachment to Israel began in her youth, making her first trip to the Jewish state in 1970. During the Second Intifada, she volunteered at a Jerusalem hospital, driven by a profound sense of solidarity with Israelis experiencing trauma, as was indicated in The Daily Beast report. From 2016 to 2023, she served as chairwoman of the Israel Policy Forum, advocating for Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations and critiquing the policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Despite tensions with Israel’s current leadership, the Gelman family has been among the biggest supporters of the Birthright Israel Foundation, which sponsors free trips for Jewish young adults to Israel. Their financial backing of Birthright Israel and the Israel Policy Forum suggests a commitment to fostering Jewish identity and Israeli engagement among young adults. However, their substantial contributions to the Bafrayung Fund and its anti-Israel agenda undermine these efforts and contribute to an environment of hostility and division on college campuses.

The Morningstar Philanthropic Foundation has a history of supporting left-wing, progressive causes and pro-Israel initiatives. However, the Foundation’s significant financial contributions to the Bafrayung Fund, which supports anti-Israel movements, represent a stark contradiction. As per the Daily Beast report, between 2019 and 2022, the Bafrayung Fund received $3,470,000 from Morningstar Philanthropic.

The Bafrayung Fund has disbursed $60,000 to the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) through annual grants to its sponsor, the Westchester Peace Action Committee (WESPAC). PYM is known for its anti-Israel activism, which often crosses the line into promoting hostility rather than fostering constructive dialogue.

Another beneficiary of the Bafrayung Fund is the Arab Resource and Organizing Center (AROC), which received $40,000. The report in The Daily Beast said that AROC has a history of engaging in activities that disrupt public order, such as protests that temporarily shut down major infrastructure like San Francisco Airport, the Bay Bridge, and the Port of Oakland. These actions, while aimed at raising awareness, often alienate broader public support and perpetuate divisive rhetoric.

Critical Resistance, a prison abolition organization, has received $298,000 from the Bafrayung Fund. While its primary focus is on dismantling the prison-industrial complex, it has increasingly aligned itself with pro-Palestinian events, working alongside PYM and AROC. The intersection of these movements at various protests further amplifies anti-Israel sentiments under the guise of broader social justice causes.

The Daily Beast reached out to more than a dozen members of the Gelman, Goldman, and Haas families, including Representative Dan Goldman, but received no response. Rachel Gelman herself did not respond to repeated inquiries, citing maternity leave. This silence from a family with such a significant public and philanthropic profile raises questions about their accountability and transparency regarding their financial support for anti-Israel movements.

 

Harvard University’s New Stance on Public Statements: A Shift Towards Neutrality

0
A smartphone showing the logo of Harvard University. Credit: g0d4ather/Shutterstock.

Harvard University’s New Stance on Public Statements: A Shift Towards Neutrality

Edited by: Fern Sidman

Harvard University, one of the world’s most prestigious institutions, has announced a significant shift in its approach to public statements on global events and political issues. According to a report in The New York Post, this decision comes in the wake of intense controversy surrounding the university’s previous comments on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

On Tuesday, Harvard University revealed that it would stay silent on public matters that fall outside its primary mission. This decision follows recommendations from Harvard’s Institutional Voice Working Group, which highlighted the risks associated with the university taking stances on wide-ranging global issues. The Post report indicated that the working group’s report emphasized that Harvard “runs the risk of appearing to care more about some places and events than others” and that making public statements could unintentionally alienate parts of its diverse community.

The catalyst for this policy shift was the backlash Harvard faced following its statements on the Israel-Hamas conflict. As per The Post report, former President Claudine Gay condemned the “barbaric atrocities perpetrated by Hamas” but was criticized for not addressing a letter from 30 Harvard student groups that blamed Israel for the October 7 attack by Hamas. This incident highlighted the challenges and potential pitfalls of the university issuing statements on contentious global events.

This decision follows months of internal debate and controversy, including the resignation of its former president, testimony before Congress, and allegations of plagiarism, the report in The Post said. The new policy aims to protect the integrity and credibility of the institution by avoiding public stances on far-reaching global issues.

In response to these challenges, Harvard established the Institutional Voice Working Group in April to explore the extent and circumstances under which the university should comment on matters beyond its jurisdiction. The working group’s findings were clear: “The integrity and credibility of the institution are compromised when the university speaks officially on matters outside its institutional area of expertise,” as was noted in The Post report. The report emphasized that public statements on such issues could lead to intense internal and external pressures, distracting from the university’s primary mission.

The Institutional Voice Working Group’s report outlined several key recommendations that Harvard has accepted:

Limitation of Official Statements: The university will no longer issue official statements on public matters unless they directly affect its core educational and research functions.

Risk of Alienation: The report noted that official empathy statements could alienate parts of the community by implicitly showing solidarity with some groups over others.

Focus on Core Functions: Harvard’s primary mission of education and research will remain the focus, without delving into global political statements that could detract from this mission.

Interim President Alan Garber acknowledged that implementing these new principles would require careful consideration and adaptation. “The process of translating these principles into concrete practice will, of course, require time and experience, and we look forward to the work ahead,” Garber said in a statement, according to The Post report. This approach marks a move towards neutrality, intending to maintain unity and focus within the university community.

The new policy suggests that rather than issuing public statements, Harvard should encourage discussions on these topics within the classroom, where open debate can occur without the need for a permanent institutional stance, the report added. This approach aligns with the university’s educational mission and avoids the pitfalls of appearing partial or politically motivated.

The policy announcement comes on the heels of further controversy during Harvard’s recent commencement ceremony. Shruthi Kumar, the senior selected to deliver the English address, criticized the university for not allowing more than a dozen students to receive their diplomas. These students had participated in an anti-Israel campus encampment, leading to their disqualification. The Post reported that Kumar accused Harvard of displaying an “intolerance for freedom of speech,” which sparked a walkout by over 1,000 people chanting “let them walk.”

Former President Trump Convicted on 34 Felony Charges

0
The first of Donald Trump’s four criminal trials will begin April 15, a Manhattan judge ruled Monday.

(TJV) A New York jury found former President Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony charges related to falsifying business records connected to a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels by his then-personal lawyer before the 2016 election.

Trump is now the first former U.S. president to be convicted of a crime.

His sentencing is set for July 11 at 10 a.m. ET, just five days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, where Trump is expected to be confirmed as the GOP’s presidential nominee.

Trump faces a maximum sentence of four years in prison for each count.

During the reading of the verdict, Trump remained stoic, while his son Eric appeared visibly angry as each “guilty” verdict was read.

The jury, composed of 12 members, deliberated for less than 10 hours over two days before reaching their decision. They sent a note to Judge Juan Merchan indicating they had a verdict, surprising many who anticipated a dismissal for the day.

Trump, appearing resigned, sat with his arms crossed in the courtroom when the verdict was announced. The jury, after taking time to fill out the verdict form, was brought back into the courtroom about half an hour later.

Trump, aged 77, faced 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in relation to a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels made by his then-lawyer Michael Cohen before the 2016 election.

Judge Merchan thanked the jurors for their service, acknowledging the personal sacrifices they made during the trial.

The verdict came after the jury heard readbacks of testimony from Michael Cohen and former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, along with legal instructions provided by Judge Merchan the previous day.

This marks the first time a former U.S. president has been charged with a crime.

The case revolved around reimbursements made by Trump and the Trump Organization to Cohen for the payment to Daniels, intended to prevent her from disclosing an alleged affair with Trump in 2006. Cohen testified that Trump directed him to make the payment to avoid damaging his presidential campaign.

More on Trump’s Legal Challenges

  • Truth Social Struggles: New data shows challenges in growing the U.S. user base of Trump’s media app.
  • Conservative Populism: An overview of the leaders shaping the new conservative economic populism of the Trump era.
  • Crypto Campaign: Trump’s campaign has started accepting cryptocurrency donations, aiming to build a “crypto army.”
  • Campaign Fundraising: Trump’s campaign reports higher fundraising totals than Biden’s in April, though Democrats maintain a cash advantage.

Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, faces three other pending criminal cases:

  1. Efforts to Overturn 2020 Election: Two cases, one in federal court in Washington, D.C., and another in Georgia state court in Atlanta, involve Trump’s actions to overturn his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden.
  2. Classified Documents: In Florida, Trump is charged with crimes related to his retention of classified government documents after leaving the White House in January 2021 and attempts to prevent their recovery by federal officials.

Civil Judgments Against Trump

Trump also faces significant civil judgments:

  • Business Fraud: A Manhattan Supreme Court ruling orders Trump to pay over $450 million in damages for business fraud related to the Trump Organization’s real estate valuations.
  • Defamation Cases: Federal juries awarded nearly $90 million in damages to writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of rape in the mid-1990s. Trump is appealing these verdicts.

Israeli Legislation Targets UNRWA Amid Accusations of Terrorist Links

0
A Palestinian woman is seen outside the UNRWA's Gaza Headquarters in Gaza City in 2015 | Photo: AP / Khalil Hamra

Israeli Legislation Targets UNRWA Amid Accusations of Terrorist Links

Edited by: Fern Sidman

On Wednesday, the Israeli Knesset passed a preliminary reading of a bill with profound implications for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). Proposed by Yulia Malinovsky of the Israel Beytenu party, the bill designates UNRWA as a terrorist organization and aims to abolish the immunities and privileges enjoyed by its employees, according to a report in The Jerusalem Post.  The bill passed its preliminary reading with a 42-6 majority.

The “Bill to Abolish the Immunity and Privileges of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)” seeks to integrate UNRWA under the purview of Israel’s Anti-Terrorism Law. Indicated in the JPost report was that this integration would nullify the organization’s diplomatic immunities, severing Israel’s ties with UNRWA and leading to the closure of its assets within Israeli territory. Foreign Minister Israel Katz will be responsible for enacting the decree that officially revokes UNRWA’s diplomatic immunity.

The roots of the current legislation trace back to 1947, when the United Nations Privileges and Immunities Ordinance was established. This ordinance granted the UN and its officials various legal protections, including immunity from legal action, tax exemptions, and import/export privileges, as was explained in the JPost report. These immunities were designed to facilitate the UN’s humanitarian and diplomatic activities worldwide. However, the new bill, if passed in its final reading, will dismantle these protections for UNRWA within Israel.

The legislative push against UNRWA comes amidst mounting allegations of the agency’s involvement with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization by Israel and other countries. Israeli authorities have presented substantial evidence implicating UNRWA in activities that compromise its humanitarian mission. The JPost reported that among the accusations are the discovery of Hamas tunnels beneath UNRWA schools and the collaboration of UNRWA employees with Hamas operatives, particularly highlighted by the events of October 7.

One of the most damning pieces of evidence was uncovered on February 10, when a 700-meter-long, 18-meter-deep tunnel leading to an underground shelter used by Hamas’s military intelligence was found beneath UNRWA’s central headquarters in Gaza, the report in the JPost noted. According to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), this tunnel was supplied with electricity from UNRWA facilities, indicating a direct link between the agency’s infrastructure and Hamas’s military operations. This discovery highlighted the agency’s complicity and raised serious concerns about the misuse of UNRWA facilities for terrorist activities.

In a subsequent raid on UNRWA headquarters, the IDF found large quantities of weapons, including rifles, ammunition, grenades, and explosives. The JPost reported that this raid was prompted by intelligence suggesting that the facilities were being used by Hamas terrorists. Documents and other intelligence discovered during the raid further confirmed that UNRWA offices had been utilized by Hamas operatives.

According to estimates published by the Wall Street Journal on January 29, 2024, approximately 10% of UNRWA’s 12,000 employees are believed to have connections to Hamas and Islamic Jihad. This estimate underscores the deep infiltration of these militant groups within the organization. The Wall Street Journal reported that six UNRWA workers were directly involved in a wave of Palestinian militant attacks that resulted in the deaths of 1,200 people, marking the deadliest assault on Jews since the Holocaust, the JPost report said. Among these employees, two were involved in kidnapping Israelis, while others participated in or coordinated logistics for the assault, including the procurement of weapons.

In response to these grave allegations, a UN inquiry was launched in April to investigate the specific allegations against 12 UNRWA employees implicated in the October 7 massacre. Revealed in the JPost report was that the inquiry led to the identification and termination of contracts for 10 of these employees, while two were confirmed dead, as reported on the UN’s official website. This swift action highlights the severity of the charges and the international community’s concern over the integrity of UNRWA’s operations.

Concurrently, the UN opened additional investigations in March and April into seven more UNRWA employees. The report in the JPost indicated that these inquiries aim to determine the extent of involvement, if any, of UNRWA personnel in terrorist activities and to assess the overall integrity of the agency’s operations.

One of the most significant areas of concern regarding UNRWA is its education system. The JPost reported that according to its official website, UNRWA is responsible for the education of 291,100 students in Gaza and employs 9,443 staff members in its schools. Education constitutes 58 percent of the organization’s budget, reflecting its critical role in the agency’s mission.

However, a joint report presented to the US Congress in March by UN Watch and The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACT-se) has raised serious allegations about the content and conduct within UNRWA schools. The report provides “compelling evidence of UNRWA’s gross and systematic violations of neutrality and other UN rules in their hiring of teachers and in their use of curricula,” as was noted in the JPost report. Specifically, it documents instances of incitement to hatred, anti-Semitism, and terrorism within UNRWA educational materials and teaching practices.

The joint report highlights numerous concerning findings about the behavior of UNRWA educators and the content taught in its schools. It documents cases where UNRWA teachers have used social media platforms such as Twitter to glorify Hamas and incite violence against Jews, the JPost report said. Furthermore, the report details how UNRWA school textbooks and educational materials contain content that promotes terrorism, glorifies martyrdom, and denies the existence of Israel.

 

These findings suggest a systemic issue within the UNRWA education system, where materials and personnel are contributing to an environment of intolerance and Jew hatred. Additionally, the JPost report indicated that the allegations point to a failure to adhere to the principles of neutrality and peace, which are foundational to the UN’s mission.

One particularly troubling example comes from a 9th-grade reading-comprehension exercise in Arabic. The exercise features a story about a Palestinian firebombing attack on a Jewish bus near the city of Ramallah in the Judea and Samaria region of Israel. The JPost reported that the text describes the attack in a celebratory tone, referring to it as a “barbecue party.” Such language not only glorifies violence but also desensitizes students to the brutality of terrorist attacks, presenting them as festive events rather than acts of violence and terror.

Another example from a 9th-grade social studies question perpetuates harmful and false narratives about the causes of health issues in the Gaza Strip and in Judea and Samaria. The question asks, “Why do Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank suffer from numerous deadly diseases such as cancer?” The provided answer claims, “because the Occupation turns vast areas of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank into landfills for its toxic wastes,” as was revealed in the JPost report. This response promotes a baseless conspiracy theory that blames Israel for health crises in Palestinian territories, fostering animosity and mistrust.

UNRWA Commissioner Philippe Lazzarini has consistently defended the organization against these allegations. On June 30, 2021, Lazzarini addressed reports by UN Watch and IMPACT-se, dismissing the accusations of incitement to violence and anti-Semitism as irrational, as was detailed in the JPost report.  He argued that such allegations were politically motivated attacks aimed at undermining UNRWA’s legitimacy and eroding the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Established in 1949, UNRWA has been a critical lifeline for Palestinian refugees across the Middle East, including in the Gaza Strip, where it serves approximately two million people. The agency provides essential services such as education, healthcare, and social support, aiming to improve the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and promote regional stability.

However, Israel’s allegations challenge the integrity of UNRWA’s operations, suggesting that the agency’s resources and infrastructure have been exploited for terrorist purposes, as was revealed in the JPost report. This narrative has fueled the legislative momentum to reclassify UNRWA under anti-terrorism laws, fundamentally altering its operational landscape in the region.

Should the bill pass its final reading, the implications will be far-reaching. UNRWA will lose its operational privileges in Israel, severely restricting its ability to function within Israeli-controlled territories. The agency’s employees will no longer enjoy immunity from legal proceedings, exposing them to potential prosecution under Israeli law, the report in the JPost said. This legislative move could also set a precedent, influencing other countries’ policies towards UNRWA and potentially leading to a broader reevaluation of the agency’s role and operations.

The international community’s response to Israel’s legislative action against UNRWA will be pivotal. Countries and organizations that back UNRWA may express strong opposition, advocating for the protection of its humanitarian mandate. Conversely, Israel’s allies may support the bill, viewing it as a necessary step to curb terrorism.

 

Steve Cohen’s $8B Casino Complex Plans for Queens Face Major Setback

0
Billionaire Steven A. Cohen is quite possibly in the process of buying a huge stake in the New York Mets. (Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Steve Cohen’s $8B Casino Complex Plans for Queens Face Major Setback

Edited by:  Fern Sidman

Steve Cohen, the billionaire owner of the New York Mets, is facing a significant obstacle in his ambitious plan to develop an $8 billion casino-entertainment complex near Citi Field. According to the information provided in a report in The New York Post, despite his high-profile partnership with Hard Rock, the project has hit a critical roadblock as State Senator Jessica Ramos, who represents the Flushing-Corona area where the casino is proposed, has announced her opposition to the necessary legislative changes.

Nearly a dozen bidders are competing for three state casino licenses to operate in or around New York City.

Steve Cohen’s vision for the “Metropolitan Park” is an expansive casino-entertainment complex aimed at transforming the area around Citi Field into a premier destination. As was reported by The Post, the proposed $8 billion project, in partnership with Hard Rock, seeks to redesignate lots currently zoned as parkland for entertainment use. This redesignation is essential for the project to proceed, as it would allow Cohen and his partners to apply for the required permits and clear regulatory hurdles.

Senator Ramos has taken a firm stand against the project, citing the needs and desires of her constituents. The report in the Post also indicated that Ramos, who represents the district encompassing the proposed site, stated unequivocally that she will not introduce legislation to change the zoning of the parkland.

“I will not introduce legislation to alienate parkland in Corona for the purposes of a casino,” Ramos said in a statement on Tuesday, according to The Post report. She emphasized that her community is in dire need of green space and recreational facilities for families, not gambling establishments.

Ramos articulated the broader concerns of her constituents, many of whom feel that accepting a casino as a trade-off for economic development is not in their best interest. “We disagree on the premise that we have to accept a casino in our backyard as the trade-off. I resent the conditions and the generations of neglect that have made many of us so desperate that we would be willing to settle,” she added, The Post report noted.

This opposition underscores a fundamental clash between the promise of economic development and the preservation of community resources and quality of life.

“Mr. Cohen and Hard Rock would still make a profit, albeit less,” Ramos acknowledged to The Post. She suggested that finding a compromise would demonstrate Cohen’s genuine commitment to the community. “Mr. Cohen and his team have often declared their love for our community and said they recognize our potential. Finding a path forward would be a good way to show it.”

Without the rezoning legislation, Cohen’s project cannot move forward for consideration by state regulators who are evaluating various casino bids for New York City. The Post report also indicated that although it is theoretically possible for another state senator to introduce the bill, such a move would be politically challenging. Lawmakers are generally reluctant to override the opposition of a colleague on issues directly impacting their district.

Currently, a redesignation bill has been introduced in the state assembly but must also pass through the state senate to proceed. Given Ramos’ firm stance, the path to legislative approval appears fraught with difficulty.

The New York State Gaming Commission is expected to award three casino licenses by the end of 2025. This timeline gives Cohen and other bidders some time to improve their odds, but the competition is fierce, The Post report said. The selection process will consider various factors, including community impact, economic benefits, and support from local and state officials.

Cohen’s casino project has garnered support from other key Queens politicians, including Borough President Donovan Richards and City Councilman Francisco Moya, who also represents the area, The Post report affirmed.

Borough President Donovan Richards argued that no single elected official should have the power to block such a significant investment. “No one elected official should be the sole arbiter of this $8 billion investment, so I strongly urge Governor Hochul and the State Senate to explore other avenues to bring the Metropolitan Park proposal to life and ensure that Queens continues to get the money we deserve,” Richards stated, as was reported by The Post.

Cohen’s team remains steadfast in its commitment to the Metropolitan Park project, emphasizing that gaming is the essential economic driver needed to realize the proposed 23,000 jobs, $8 billion investment, and substantial community benefits. Cohen’s representative reiterated this point to The Post: “Our team remains committed to bringing Metropolitan Park to life, with gaming as the only viable economic engine to make the 23,000 jobs, $8 billion investment, and substantial community benefits possible.”

Karl Rickett, a spokesman for Metropolitan Park/Cohen, expressed confidence in the project’s prospects. “While we respect Senator Ramos’s point of view, the state never intended any one person to have the ability to single-handedly stop or approve a gaming project,” Rickett said in an email to The Post. He highlighted the widespread support for the project from elected officials, unions, and the local community, asserting, “We have over a year and multiple pathways to secure the required approvals.”

For his part, Steve Cohen has invested heavily in lobbying and building support for his casino bid. The Post report revealed that his efforts include a notable $116 million donation from his foundation to CUNY’s LaGuardia Community College, a move seen as part of a broader strategy to win community favor.

With the casino project facing significant hurdles, Cohen might need to consider alternative plans. Senator Ramos’ proposal for a convention center and hotel, coupled with increased green space, offers a viable alternative that could still provide economic benefits while addressing community needs.

The Post also reported that a Democratic colleague criticized Ramos, saying, “Much like her fake run for mayor that everyone knows isn’t happening, her yearlong, pre-determined ‘decision’ on the local casino was nothing more than a self-absorbed play for attention.”

Ramos’ position echoes the actions of Queens State Senator Michael Gianaris, who in 2019 unilaterally blocked Amazon from opening a $3 billion East Coast headquarters in Long Island City. Ramos has expressed confidence that her stance will be respected by her legislative peers. When asked by The Post if she could be thwarted, Ramos replied, “I would be very surprised. I think that would be a disservice to our legislative body if members’ wishes were not respected. I’m in a position to defend the will of my constituents, and I would be shocked actually, I would be very surprised, if the state senate would allow for someone else to introduce such legislation.”

Cohen’s aggressive approach has not gone unnoticed by rival bidders for the state’s casino licenses. A source from a competing bid remarked to The Post, “His entire approach has been to outspend and intimidate with his wallet. And that kinda sucks. I’m glad the system is working.” This sentiment underscores the competitive and contentious nature of the casino licensing process.

Interestingly, Cohen’s difficulties in Albany could have broader implications. Another bidder, Bally’s, which acquired the lease for the former Trump golf course at Ferry Point in The Bronx, also needs legislation to convert parkland for casino use, the Post report revealed.  Cohen’s challenges may signal potential hurdles for other projects requiring similar legislative changes.

 

 

Yom Yerushalayim Sameach?

0
Credit: AP

Yom Yerushalayim Sameach?

By: Rabbi Leo Dee

On April 5,2023, IDF troops stormed the Al Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, to stop armed terrorists bombarding the Kotel below. Two days later, my wife Lucy and two daughters, Maia and Rina, were murdered by Palestinian terrorists on their way to a Pesach vacation. The war named the “Al Aqsa Storm” by Hamas had begun. Six months later, it exploded into the cruellest terror attack in modern Jewish history.

The Temple Mount is Judaism’s holiest site and Islam’s third holiest site. Technically, the Al Aqsa Mosque is not within the boundaries of our historic Temples, only the Dome of the Rock, which is historically only a monument and not a mosque. Due to the current political situation, Jerusalem has sadly become a place of conflict between Jews and Muslims.

Yom Yerushalayim is a holiday commemorating the reunification of Jerusalem following the victory in the 1967 “Six Day War”. We wish each other “Yom Yerushalayim Sameach”, but is it so “Sameach” (happy)?

The Mishnah (Keilim 1:6) mentions ten levels of holiness within the Land of Israel in ascending order: the walled cities, the city of Jerusalem, Mount Moriah, the area within the surrounding rampart, the Women’s Courtyard, the Courtyard of the Israelites, the Priestly Courtyard, the area between the Altar and the Entrance Hall to the Sanctuary, the building of the Sanctuary, and the Holy of Holies. The attentive reader will notice that eight of these levels are within the Temple compound, currently occupied by the Dome of the Rock and under Jordanian jurisdiction. Despite the fact that we now have sovereignty over 99% or more of Jerusalem by area, since the level of holiness does not rise linearly as we zoom into the Holy of Holies, but rather exponentially, we have less than 1% sovereignty of Jerusalem by holiness.

Yom Yerushalayim is, therefore, not such a happy day.

The last king of a united Israel (i.e. before it split into separate regions) was King Solomon, who reigned for forty years – the most peaceful years in Middle Eastern history – at the beginning of the First Temple period. When Israel was disunited, or occupied by other nations, there was no such peace in our region. When the Christians occupied Jerusalem in the 11th and 12th centuries there were Crusades. Since the Muslim occupation of the Temple Mount in 1187, there have been countless wars and, today, Jihad abounds.

Rashi (on Gemara Rosh Hashanah 18a) writes that there will be peace when the Temple is rebuilt, and this is the clear position of all of our prophets (see for example Zecharia chapter 8).

Three times a day, Jews recite the Amidah prayer. Its latter half spells out the destiny of our nation: returning to Israel, building a judiciary, fighting our enemies, constructing our religious institutions, uniting Jerusalem, and ushering in the Messianic era. It then continues with a prayer “Hear our voices” and follows with the petition to rebuild the Temple. There’s clearly an odd-one-out. What is the destiny in “hearing our voices”?

Perhaps that is the message. Only if we hearken to OUR own voices, expressing our desire to rebuild the Temple, can we get to that stage. Perhaps the blockage is us.

Our brave soldiers are fighting in Gaza and in Northern Israel, but perhaps the secret to Shalom in the world is a 20-acre plot of land lying right in the middle of our capital city. What if our Rabbis, the Prophets and God knew something that we do not? What if the freeing of the Dome of the Rock from its 850-year occupation is the key to peace for us and our region? What if we can partition the Temple Mount fairly between the Al Aqsa Mosque (the Muslim holy space) and the Dome of the Rock (our Temple location)? What if we just need to heed our own prayers and rebuild the Temple to bring peace?

Until such time as we are able to listen to our own pleas to bring back the holiest part of Jerusalem to its Torah-stated purpose, and thereby bring peace to the world, let me wish you a muted “Yom 1% Yerushalayim Sameach”

Real Estate Exec Charles Cohen Faces Legal Battle with Fortress Investment Group Over Massive Debt

0
Pixabay

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Charles Cohen, a prominent real estate executive and owner of Cohen Brothers Realty, is embroiled in a high-stakes legal battle with Fortress Investment Group. The dispute centers around a $544 million lawsuit filed by Fortress, alleging that Cohen defaulted on debt tied to seven properties, including the Design Center of the Americas (DCOTA) in Dania Beach, Florida, according to an April 27th report on the businessofhome.com web site. This lawsuit comes on the heels of Cohen Brothers’ delinquency on $635 million in loans backed by its New York properties, including the renowned Decoration & Design Building (D&D Building), pushing the company’s total debt to at least $966 million. The report also indicated that Cohen, however, is fighting back with a new affidavit seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming an agreement with Fortress to defer payments and extend the loan term.

According to Crain’s New York Business, Cohen claims that an agreement was reached with Fortress Investment Group in December, which included deferring payments and extending the loan term through the third quarter of 2025, the businessofhome.com reported. As part of this alleged agreement, Cohen agreed to put up 49 percent of his interest in the D&D Building and the Manhattan office building at 3 Park Avenue as collateral.

The purported agreement with Fortress Investment Group is crucial to Cohen’s defense. Cohen asserts that the terms of this agreement should nullify the basis of Fortress’s lawsuit. The report on the businessofhome.com said that the agreement, as described by Cohen, involves:

Deferred Payments: Fortress agreed to defer the loan payments, providing Cohen Brothers Realty with temporary financial relief.

Extended Loan Term: The loan term was extended to the third quarter of 2025, allowing more time for Cohen Brothers to stabilize its finances and meet its obligations.

Collateral Commitment: Cohen pledged 49 percent of his interest in the D&D Building and 3 Park Avenue as collateral, demonstrating a commitment to secure the loan extension and deferral agreement.

Cohen alleges that Fortress’s abrupt withdrawal from the agreement and subsequent demands were made in bad faith. According to the information provided on the businessofhome.com web site, he has argued that the lender’s actions were designed to manufacture a default, enabling Fortress to sue him personally, given that he had guaranteed the loan. Cohen described Fortress’s behavior as a strategic move to create a default scenario, thus justifying the lawsuit.

In his affidavit, Cohen asserts that Fortress’s actions provide sufficient grounds for dismissing the lawsuit and denying the firm’s motion for summary judgment. He argued that the last-minute change in terms and the demand for immediate payment were clear indications of bad faith. The report added that by allegedly orchestrating a default, Fortress aimed to leverage Cohen’s personal guarantee of the loan, putting his financial interests at significant risk.

Cohen further accuses Fortress of attempting to inflict additional harm on his business. According to the information contained in the businessofhome.com report, he claims that Fortress filed unredacted copies of the loan agreement with its lawsuit, disclosing sensitive information about tenants in Cohen Brothers buildings.

Cohen contends that the disclosure of this confidential information will likely cause more than $1 billion in damages to his company’s real estate portfolio. Indicated in the report was that he views Fortress’s actions as a deliberate attempt to undermine his business by creating opportunities for competitors to lure away tenants, thereby destabilizing his property holdings.

The legal battle between Cohen and Fortress highlights several critical issues within the real estate industry, particularly concerning the dynamics between large-scale borrowers and lenders. If Cohen’s allegations of bad faith and business sabotage hold, it could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future. The case underscores the importance of clear, enforceable agreements and the potential consequences of breaching such agreements.

Moreover, the situation raises questions about the ethical responsibilities of investment firms when handling sensitive information. The alleged disclosure of tenant details by Fortress could have far-reaching implications for how confidential information is managed and protected in legal disputes.

 

Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘Meta’ Faces Shareholder Revolt Over Child Safety Concerns

0
A car passes Facebook's new Meta logo on a sign at the company headquarters on Oct. 28, 2021, in Menlo Park, Calif. Facebook parent Meta is laying off 13% of its employees as it contends with faltering revenue and broader tech industry woes. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)

Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘Meta’ Faces Shareholder Revolt Over Child Safety Concerns

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Meta, the tech giant helmed by Mark Zuckerberg, braced for a significant shareholder revolt at its annual meeting on Wednesday. The central issue is a push for greater transparency regarding Meta’s efforts to protect children online, a matter that has garnered increasing scrutiny amid rising legal and regulatory challenges.

A group led by Lisette Cooper, vice chair of Fiduciary Trust International (a subsidiary of Franklin Templeton), is spearheading the charge. According to a report in The New York Post, Cooper, who is also the parent of a child sex abuse survivor, is backing a non-binding resolution that urges Meta’s board to publish an annual report detailing the company’s performance in safeguarding children on its platforms. The report added that the proposed report would require quantitative metrics to assess whether Meta has improved its performance globally in terms of child safety and actual harm reduction to young users.

“If they want to reassure advertisers, parents, legislators, shareholders on whether they’re making a difference on dealing with this problem of harm to children, they need to have transparency,” Cooper stated in an interview with The Post. “They need better metrics.”

“Children are going to be the users of the future. If they have a bad experience on the platform, they are not going to keep coming back. This makes a huge difference to us as investors,” Cooper added.

This push for transparency comes at a tumultuous time for Meta, which faces legal challenges both in the United States and abroad. The Post report indicated that internationally, Meta is under scrutiny by the European Commission, which is investigating potential violations of the Digital Service Act (DSA). The Post report indicated that this new law mandates that large tech firms such as Meta actively police content on their platforms. European regulators are concerned that Facebook and Instagram may contribute to behavioral addictions in children and the so-called “rabbit-hole effects,” where children remain engaged with harmful content for extended periods. If found in violation, Meta could face fines amounting to 6% of its annual revenue.

Meta’s board of directors has expressed opposition to the proposed resolution. In an April proxy statement, the board argued that the “requested report is unnecessary and would not provide additional benefit to our shareholders,” as per The Post report. This stance has drawn further criticism from child safety advocates and shareholders who argue that the lack of transparency undermines trust and accountability.

Cooper and her allies cite a growing body of litigation against Meta related to child safety issues. In October of last year, Meta was sued by dozens of states alleging that the company had “ignored the sweeping damage these platforms have caused to the mental and physical health” of young users, the report in The Post said. The lawsuits highlight issues such as poor sleep, disruption to schoolwork, anxiety, and depression, all allegedly exacerbated by Meta’s platforms.

One notable lawsuit, filed by New Mexico’s attorney general, alleges that Meta has exposed underage users to potential sex predators. This lawsuit is part of a broader wave of litigation that criticizes Meta’s handling of child safety.

In addition to these legal challenges, Meta is actively lobbying against two bills in New York designed to protect children online, as was revealed in The Post report. These bills aim to impose stricter regulations on tech companies to safeguard young users, a move that Meta is reportedly trying to weaken or kill through extensive lobbying efforts.

Two of the largest proxy advisory firms, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis & Co., have recommended that shareholders vote in favor of the resolution. Glass Lewis stated that the requested report would provide shareholders with valuable information, helping them understand Meta’s efforts to minimize harmful content, according to the information provided in The Post report. ISS echoed this sentiment, noting that shareholders would benefit from additional information on how the company is managing risks related to child safety.

Despite the support from proxy advisory firms and a significant portion of the shareholder base, the resolution faces an uphill battle. The Post report indicated that Mark Zuckerberg controls 61% of Meta’s voting power through his ownership of super voting Class B shares. This concentration of voting power effectively allows Zuckerberg to block any resolution he opposes.

However, Proxy Impact, which filed the resolution on Cooper’s behalf, highlighted in a filing that a similar proposal at last year’s annual meeting received nearly 54% support from shares not controlled by Meta management, The Post report said. This indicates a strong level of concern among independent shareholders about the company’s handling of child safety issues.

Michael Passoff, CEO of Proxy Impact, emphasized to The Post that the fundamental business principle that “what gets measured gets managed.” This mantra underscores the need for Meta to collect and disclose data on its child safety initiatives.  Speaking to The Post, Passoff criticized Meta for not providing accessible information on their efforts, stating, “This is like a basic first step for any business plan – get the data. What gets measured gets managed, and they’re not doing that. Or if they are, they just aren’t making it available to anyone.”

In response to growing concerns, Meta’s proxy filing outlines several steps the company has taken to enhance online child safety. These measures include the development of over 30 tools designed to support teens and families across Meta’s suite of apps. Additionally, Meta maintains policies that prohibit harmful content aimed at exploiting children.

“We want people, especially young people, to foster their online relationships in a safe, positive, and supportive environment, and we work closely with a broad range of stakeholders to inform our approach to safety,” the company stated, as was reported by The Post.

Lipstadt: Social media giants aren’t tackling antisemitism

0
Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and national director of the Anti-Defamation League, and Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. special envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism, at the Anti-Defamation League's "Never Is Now" conference, held in New York on March 6-7, 2024. Credit: ADL.

Lipstadt, the State Department’s special envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism, met earlier in the day with top technology companies to discuss steps to combat online antisemitism. Among the options discussed were the creation of special teams to focus on the issue and training programs to teach employees how to identify Jew-hatred.

In attendance at the meeting were representatives from Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok and X.

“There’s good reasons to beat up on them [tech giants] in terms of antisemitism online,” Lipstadt told Bloomberg News.

“But too many people have done that and nothing has changed, and we were hoping that we could look for best practices,” she added.