46.7 F
New York
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Home Blog

NYC Schools Chancellor Rebukes Bklyn Parent Council Over Handling of Israel-Hamas Conflict

0
City Schools Chancellor David Banks has issued a stern reprimand directed at the Bklyn Parent Council for ineffectively conducting its business. Credir: Wikipedia.org

By: Rob Otto

In a recent development, City Schools Chancellor David Banks has issued a stern reprimand directed at the Brooklyn Parent Council for what he deems as a failure in effectively conducting its business. The controversy centers around the promotion of a citywide student walkout organized to protest the Israel-Hamas conflict, according to exclusive information obtained by NY The Post.

Chancellor Banks directly accused Tajh Sutton, President of Community Education Council 14, of violating multiple state laws, including one that could potentially result in her permanent removal from serving on any citywide board. In a scathing three-page letter addressed to Sutton, Banks criticized the council’s leadership under her direction, alleging selective representation of the district’s parent community and obstruction of attendance and participation at meetings.

The council, notably, has faced criticism for allegedly blocking Jewish parents from its meetings and social media platforms. A particular incident of concern revolves around the support provided by Sutton to James Parra, a paraprofessional at Brooklyn Arbor Elementary School. Parra’s vocal pro-Palestine, Hamas loving views sparked controversy, with his social media posts labeling Israel as a “racist” and “terrorist” state, alongside derogatory remarks about Zionism.

Banks condemned Sutton’s actions as “highly inappropriate” and lacking relevance to the duties of the Community Education Council. During a virtual meeting of CEC 14, despite orders to hold in-person sessions in compliance with state law, Parra directed a tirade towards District 14 Superintendent David Cintron, branding him a “spineless coward” and concluding with a profanity-laden declaration of solidarity with Palestine.

In response, Sutton expressed support for Parra, further escalating tensions within the council. Adding to the controversy, Sutton faced a notice of guilt for violating Chancellor’s Regulation D-210, which prohibits harassment and discrimination, due to her advocacy for a pro-Palestine student walkout in November. She now has the opportunity to participate in a conciliation process before any final action is taken.

In another development, Maud Maron, a member of the Community Education Council in District 2, found herself entangled in controversy this week. Maron was issued a notice for violating Chancellor’s Regulation D-210, which prohibits harassment and discrimination, after her comments to The Post regarding an anonymous student editorial in Stuyvesant High School’s newspaper. The editorial had sparked criticism for its perceived antisemitic content.

Maron’s remark, suggesting the byline should read “coward” instead of “anonymous” and condemning the editorial for what she termed “ignorance and Jew hatred,” led to the directive for her to refrain from making derogatory or offensive remarks about any New York City public school student.

The situation with Maron is compounded by another pending complaint, alleging disparaging remarks about the LGBTQ community made in a private chat group. Maron’s purported comments denying the existence of transgender children and dismissing the concept of transitioning have stirred outrage, prompting scrutiny of her conduct both within and outside of official council duties.

Despite facing censure, Maron remains steadfast in her convictions, asserting her right to express opinions in both private and public forums without fear of reprisal from the Department of Education. These incidents highlight the ongoing tensions surrounding respectful dialogue within educational leadership circles.

62 Story Multi-Billion Dollar Tower to Transform NYC Skyline

0
NYC is set to welcome a new architectural marvel into its iconic skyline—a multi-billion-dollar office tower at 350 Park Avenue. Credit: Foster + Partners

Edited by: TJVNews.com

New York City is set to welcome a new architectural marvel into its iconic skyline—a multi-billion-dollar office tower at 350 Park Avenue, a project that promises to reshape the urban landscape and bolster the city’s economic vitality, according to a recently published report on CNN. Announced by Mayor Eric Adams, this ambitious development is poised to add not only a stunning visual element to the cityscape but also significant commercial and public space.

The proposed tower will rise to 62 stories, integrating seamlessly with the celebrated profiles of the Chrysler Building, One World Trade Center, the Empire State Building, and the Flatiron Building. According to the information provided in the CNN report, unlike its famous predecessors, which feature Art Deco crowns, limestone, and granite facades, this new structure will be distinguished by its modern, all-glass façade, offering floor-to-ceiling windows that promise breathtaking views of the city.

The project, funded by Vornado Realty Trust, Kenneth Griffin—the founder and CEO of the global investment firm Citadel—and building and management company Rudin, is expected to generate more than 6,000 jobs, revitalizing the local job market, as per the CNN report. Furthermore, it will provide 1.8 million square feet of commercial office space, much of it destined to become the new home for Citadel and its market-making firm, Citadel Securities. This significant addition to New York’s commercial real estate market calls attention to the city’s ongoing appeal as a global business hub.

One of the standout features of the new tower at 350 Park Avenue will be its approach to public space. The design includes a grand public concourse at the building’s base, framed by striking white columns. This area will feature ample green space, seating, and art displays, transforming it into a vibrant communal area for residents and visitors alike, according to the CNN report. Above, landscaped terraces will crown each section of the building, adding a touch of greenery to the urban environment and enhancing the aesthetic and environmental quality of the midtown area.

In his announcement, Mayor Eric Adams lauded the project, emphasizing its potential to “supercharge our economy and expand New York City’s iconic skyline,” as was referenced in the report on CNN. The mayor’s vision for the tower extends beyond its architectural and economic benefits; it is seen as a cornerstone in the broader effort to energize Midtown Manhattan, reinforcing its status as a premier business address and an economic engine for the region.

The new tower, designed by Foster + Partners, is expected to bring a contemporary aesthetic to the city’s architectural landscape while harmonizing with the historical and cultural significance of its Midtown surroundings, the CNN report noted. The building’s design focuses on sustainability and modernity, aiming to set new standards in urban office space. Its strategic placement near major landmarks will further integrate it into the fabric of New York City’s rich architectural heritage.

The announcement of the new tower comes at a critical time for New York City, which is still grappling with the economic repercussions of the Covid-19 pandemic. The city’s administration, including Deputy Mayor for Operations Meera Joshi, has expressed optimism that this project will mark a significant step in Midtown Manhattan’s recovery.

NYC Nova Exhibit Honors Victims & Resilience of Oct. 7th Festival Massacre

0
Throughout the exhibit, signs and videos recount the randomness that determined life or death on that fateful day. Credit: Instagram.

By: Mario Mancini

In the heart of downtown, a solemn yet poignant exhibit has emerged, a testament to tragedy and resilience. With a haunting display of battered shoes, recovered cell phones echoing frantic messages to loved ones, and immersive video installations capturing the confusion and terror of the day, the new downtown exhibit commemorating the Oct. 7 Nova music festival massacre invokes memories akin to the solemnity of the 9/11 Memorial and the somber reflection of Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust Museum.

“It’s not an exhibition about Nova. It is Nova — we want them to feel — to feel the journey, the light in their hearts before” the attack, Feingold emphasized, highlighting the essence of the experience.

. Co-founder Ofir Amir, still bearing the physical scars of the attack, expressed the exhibition’s purpose: to honor the 370 souls lost to the violence orchestrated by Hamas.

Thousands of artifacts, ranging from burnt-out cars to bullet-pierced port-o-potties, were painstakingly assembled to recreate the harrowing scenes of the attack. Each item serves as a poignant reminder of how moments of peace were shattered by the onslaught of rockets.

“This wasn’t a terror attack. This was something much bigger – it’s biblical,” Amir remarked, underscoring the magnitude of the tragedy and the ongoing struggle for survival.

Reut Feingold, the exhibit’s creator, director, and writer, sought to transport visitors back to the festival’s joyous atmosphere before the invasion. Survivor Natalie Sanandaji and Nova Foundation Chairman Reef Peretz stand in the exhibit’s “healing room,” where the words “we will dance again” offer a beacon of hope amidst the darkness.

“It’s not an exhibition about Nova. It is Nova — we want them to feel — to feel the journey, the light in their hearts before” the attack, Feingold emphasized, highlighting the essence of the experience.

Throughout the exhibit, signs and videos recount the randomness that determined life or death on that fateful day. The violence unleashed on the music festival is depicted with unflinching honesty, as one rescue volunteer recalled the gruesome discovery of bodies burned beyond recognition.

Visitors with shell-shocked expressions traverse the dimly lit 50,000-square-foot space, culminating in a luminous healing tent and lighthouse, symbolizing the resilience and the collective determination to overcome tragedy with the rallying cry, “We will dance again.”

Tickets, starting at $1, offer access to the exhibit, with options to contribute additional donations to support survivors and their families. In this space of remembrance and reflection, the Nova music festival lives on, not just as a tragic event but as a testament to the human spirit’s enduring strength in the face of adversity.

NFL Team Owner Robert Kraft Ceasing Donations to Columbia U Due to Violent Anti-Israel Protests

0
New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft has decided to cease donations to his alma mater, Columbia University, due to the violent pro-Hamas student protests on campus. Credit: Wikipedia

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots and an alumnus of Columbia University, has expressed his decision to cease donations to his alma mater amid ongoing pro-Hamas protests on the university’s campus in New York City. This decision comes as the raucous demonstrations enter their sixth consecutive day.

Kraft, who graduated in 1963, conveyed his dismay over the clearly marked increase in hostility emanating from the pro-Hamas students on the Morningside Heights campus and across the nation. “I am deeply saddened at the virulent hate that continues to grow on campus and throughout our country,” he stated. He further expressed his concerns about the university’s ability to ensure the safety of its students and staff, prompting his withdrawal of financial support until the university takes corrective measures.

The situation at Columbia University has escalated with over 100 individuals arrested since the start of the protests, which are centered around the call for a cease-fire in Gaza and demands for the university to divest its investments in Israel. Some protesters  have established tent encampments on the university grounds.

Jewish students have reported feeling unsafe, as chants from the protesters such as “Resistance is glorious”  are replete with clear anti-Semitic overtones. In response to the growing tensions, Columbia’s president, Minouche Shafik, has transitioned classes to remote learning in an effort to de-escalate the situation. Despite these measures, Kraft has exhorted the university leadership to take a firmer stance against the hateful actions by demanding an end to the protests.

At one such protest that took place on Sunday, the pro-Hamas student protesters screamed anti-Semitic epithets at Jewish students, telling them to “Go Back to Poland,” In the last few days, other pro-Hamas student protesters have threatened Jewish students with a replication of the October 7th massacre in which 1200 Israelis and others were brutally slaughtered and 250 were taken hostage. Currently, 133 Israeli hostages remain in Hamas captivity in Gaza.

Kraft’s philanthropic contributions to Columbia have been substantial. He played a pivotal role in the establishment of the Kraft Center for Jewish Student Life in 2000 and also contributed to the naming of an athletic field after him in 2007, in recognition  of his generous donations. These gestures illustrate his deep connection and gratitude to the institution that granted him a full academic scholarship, which significantly shaped his educational and professional journey.

Reflecting on his past experiences and the current climate at Columbia, Kraft remarked, “It was through the full academic scholarship Columbia gave me that I was able to attend college and get my start in life and for that, I have been tremendously grateful.  However, the school I love so much—the one that welcomed me and provided me with so much opportunity—is no longer an institution I recognize.”

He expressed hope that the Kraft Center will continue to be a haven of security and safety for all Jewish students and faculty amidst these troubling times. However, his disappointment is palpable as he grapples with the changing landscape of his beloved alma mater,

This sentiment is echoed in similar movements across Massachusetts, where tent protests inspired by the events at Columbia have sprung up at such institutions of higher learning such Emerson College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, signaling a broader unrest and concern within academic communities.

At Yale, Anti-Israel Protesters Injure Jewish Student & Tear Down American Flag

0
The Yale University campus in New Haven, Conn. Credit: f11photo/Shutterstock.

By: Aaron Sibarium

Pro-Palestinian protesters at Yale University this weekend occupied a World War II memorial, tore down an American flag that flew there, and sent a Jewish student to the hospital as administrators stood by and refused to break up the protest, which violated several university rules.

The protest on Beinecke Plaza—a quad in the center of campus dedicated to Yale students who fought in WWII—focused on the university’s investments in military contractors and included graduate students participating in a “hunger strike,” now in its second week.

The investments comprise a tiny share of Yale’s $40.7 billion endowment: The school holds just $21,000 worth of stock in military contractors.

Those minuscule holdings triggered an uprising on Friday as students occupied the plaza and camped out overnight, in violation of university policies. The students tore down an American flag flying at the memorial, according to the Yale Daily News, but were not ejected from the quad despite threats of disciplinary action from administrators.

The encampment continued throughout the weekend. By Saturday evening, a Jewish student had been injured by a flag-wielding protester with no end to the chaos in sight.

Yale police are waiting to take action, an officer told a Jewish student on Saturday, until the administration gives them the green light to disperse the protest, according to a recording of the phone call between the officer and the student reviewed by the Free Beacon. The university declined to say when, or whether, it would give that order.

The inaction comes as pro-Palestinian students—often with the support of faculty—have occupied school buildings and commandeered public spaces on campuses across the country. Tensions reached a new high this week after Columbia University arrested 100 students camped out in the middle of campus. The arrests attracted hundreds of additional protesters, both from Columbia and outside of it, who have told Jewish students to “go back to Poland” and called on Hamas to kill pro-Israel counter protesters.

At Yale, protesters erected an altar to Walid Daqqa— a Palestinian terrorist convicted for his role in the 1984 murder of an Israeli soldier—as well as tributes to Leila Kahled, the first Palestinian woman to hijack an airplane.

On Saturday afternoon, the crowd started chanting “smash the settler Zionist state,” according to footage obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. Later that evening, a Jewish student, Sahar Tartak, attempted to film the demonstrators—only for one of them to hit her in the face with a Palestinian flag, she wrote on X. Tartak was then surrounded by protesters and pinned against a wall, according to footage shared on X, formerly Twitter. She eventually made it to the hospital after a heated interaction with a protest marshal, who blocked her from pursuing the student who injured her, she said in a post.

A Yale University spokesman told the Free Beacon that university police were investigating the incident as a possible assault.

“The university does not tolerate violence, threats, harassment, or intimidation of members of our community,” Yale’s communications office said, “and is providing support to a student who made the report.”

At least a hundred students stayed put Saturday night after the university reiterated that they could face discipline if they did not vacate the plaza. So far, no arrests have been made.

Yale’s milquetoast response comes as other schools have taken a tougher line on disruptive protest in recent weeks.

          (FreeBeacon.com)

House Votes for Possible TikTok Ban in US, but App to Remain

0
TheTikTok building in Culver City, California. The House passed legislation that would ban TikTok in the US if its China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake. Credit: AP/Damian Dovarganes

By: Mary Clare Jalonick & Haleluya Hadero

The House passed legislation Saturday that would ban TikTok in the United States if the popular social media platform’s China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake within a year, but don’t expect the app to go away anytime soon.

The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a larger foreign aid package, a priority for President Joe Biden with broad congressional support for Ukraine and Israel, fast-tracked the ban after an earlier version had stalled in the Senate. A standalone bill with a shorter, six-month selling deadline passed the House in March by an overwhelming bipartisan vote as both Democrats and Republicans voiced national security concerns about the app’s owner, the Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.

The modified measure, passed by a 360-58 vote, now goes to the Senate after negotiations that lengthened the timeline for the company to sell to nine months, with a possible additional three months if a sale is in progress.

Legal challenges could extend that timeline even further. The company has indicated that it would likely go to court to try and block the law if it passes, arguing it would deprive the app’s millions of users of their First Amendment rights.

TikTok has lobbied hard against the legislation, pushing the app’s 170 million U.S. users — many of whom are young — to call Congress and voice opposition. But the ferocity of the pushback angered lawmakers on Capitol Hill, where there is broad concern about Chinese threats to the U.S. and where few members use the platform themselves.

“We will not stop fighting and advocating for you,” TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said in a video that was posted on the platform last month and directed toward the app’s users. “We will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform that we have built with you.”

The bill’s quick path through Congress is extraordinary because it targets one company and because Congress has taken a hands-off approach to tech regulation for decades. Lawmakers had failed to act despite efforts to protect children online, safeguard users’ privacy and make companies more liable for content posted on their platforms, among other measures. But the TikTok ban reflects widespread concerns from lawmakers about China.

Members of both parties, along with intelligence officials, have worried that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over American user data or direct the company to suppress or boost TikTok content favorable to its interests. TikTok has denied assertions that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government and has said it has not shared U.S. user data with Chinese authorities.

The U.S. government has not publicly provided evidence that shows TikTok shared U.S. user data with the Chinese government or tinkered with the company’s popular algorithm, which influences what Americans see.

The company has good reason to think a legal challenge could be successful, having seen some success in previous legal fights over its operations in the U.S.. In November, a federal judge blocked a Montana law that would ban TikTok use across the state after the company and five content creators who use the platform sued.

(AP)

London Police to Meet with Jewish leaders as Protests Spark Concerns About the Safety of Jews

0
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley speaks in London. London’s police commissioner will meet with senior members of the Jewish community on Monday. (James Manning/PA via AP, File)

By: Danica Kirka

London’s police commissioner will meet with senior members of the Jewish community on Monday after the force bungled its apology for suggesting an “openly Jewish’’ man’s presence along the route of a pro-Palestinian march risked provoking the demonstrators.

Amid calls for his resignation, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley is also expected to meet with London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Home Secretary James Cleverly, who together are responsible for law and order in the city.

“We remain focused on doing everything possible to ensure Jewish Londoners feel safe in this city,” the Metropolitan Police Service said in a statement Sunday. “We know recent events and some of our recent actions have contributed to concerns felt by many.”

The meeting comes as London police struggle to manage tensions sparked by the Israel-Hamas war, with some Jewish residents saying they feel threatened by repeated pro-Palestinian marches through the streets of the U.K. capital.

The marches have been largely peaceful. However, many demonstrators accuse Israel of genocide and a small number have shown support for Hamas, the group that led the Oct. 7 attack on Israel and which has been banned by the U.K. government as a terrorist organization.

The Metropolitan Police force has deployed thousands of officers during each of the dozen major marches as it seeks to protect the rights of the pro-Palestinian protesters and prevent clashes with counterdemonstrators and Jewish residents.

In addition to meeting with leaders of the Jewish community, senior police officers wrote to the man at the center of the latest controversy, offering to meet with him to apologize and discuss what more could be done to “ensure Jewish Londoners feel safe.″

Gideon Falter, chief executive of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, was wearing a traditional Jewish skullcap when he was stopped by police while trying to cross a street in central London as demonstrators filed past on April 13.

One officer told Falter he was worried that the man’s “quite openly Jewish” appearance could provoke a reaction from the protesters, according to video posted on social media by the campaign group. A second officer then told Falter he would be arrested if he refused to be escorted out of the area, because he would be “causing a breach of the peace.”

Metropolitan Police initially apologized for the language the officer used in describing Falter’s appearance, but said counterdemonstrators had to be aware “that their presence is provocative.”

The department later deleted that apology from its social media accounts and issued a second statement.

“In an effort to make a point about the policing of protest we caused further offense,” the force said on Friday. “This was never our intention. … Being Jewish is not a provocation. Jewish Londoners must be able to feel safe in the city.”

(AP)

Ukrainian & Western Leaders Laud US Aid Package While Kremlin Warns of ‘Further Ruin’

0
A woman holds a “Free Azov” sing during a rally. Credit: AP/Francisco Seco

By: Samya Kullab & Elise Morton

Ukrainian and Western leaders on Sunday welcomed a desperately needed aid package passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, as the Kremlin warned that passage of the bill would “further ruin” Ukraine and cause more deaths.

Ukrainian commanders and analysts say the long-awaited $61 billion military aid package — including $13.8 billion for Ukraine to buy weapons — will help slow Russia’s incremental advances in the war’s third year — but that more will likely be needed for Kyiv to regain the offensive.

The House swiftly approved $95 billion in foreign aid for Ukraine, Israel and other U.S. allies in a rare Saturday session as Democrats and Republicans banded together after months of hard-right resistance over renewed American support for repelling Russia’s full-scale invasion.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who had warned that his country would lose the war without U.S. funding, said that he was grateful for U.S. lawmaker’ decision.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Zelenskyy said that the aid package would “send the Kremlin a powerful signal that (Ukraine) will not be the second Afghanistan.”

Zelenskyy said Ukraine would prioritize long-range weapons and air defenses to “break the plans of Russia” in an expected “full-scale offensive,” for which Ukrainian forces are preparing.

The aid package will go to the U.S. Senate, which could pass it as soon as Tuesday. U.S. President Joe Biden has promised to sign it immediately.

It still could take weeks for it to reach the front line, where it is desperately needed.

“With this we can stop (Russian troops) and reduce our losses,” said infantry soldier Oleksandr. He has been fighting around Avdiivka, the city in the Donetsk region that Ukraine lost to Russia in February after months of intense combat.

Ammunition shortages linked to the aid holdup over the past six months have led Ukrainian military commanders to ration shells, a disadvantage that Russia seized on this year — taking the city of Avdiivka and currently inching towards the town of Chasiv Yar, also in Donetsk.

“The Russians come at us in waves — we become exhausted, we have to leave our positions. This is repeated many times,” Oleksandr told The Associated Press. He didn’t give his full name for security reasons. “Not having enough ammunition means we can’t cover the area that is our responsibility to hold when they are assaulting us.”

In Kyiv, many welcomed the U.S. vote as a piece of good news after a tough period that has seen Russia grind out gains along the front line, and step up attacks on Ukraine’s energy system and other infrastructure.

“I heard our president officially say that we can lose the war without this help. Thanks very much and yesterday was a great event,” said Kateryna Ruda, 43.

Tatyana Ryavchenuk, the wife of a Ukrainian soldier, noted the need for more weapons, lamenting that soldiers “have nothing to protect us.”

“They need weapons, they need gear, they need it. We always need help. Because without help, our enemy can advance further and can be in the center of our city,” the 26-year-old said.

Other Western leaders, who have been scrambling to come up with ways to fill the gap left by stalled U.S. military aid, also lauded Congress’ decision.

“Ukraine is using the weapons provided by NATO Allies to destroy Russian combat capabilities. This makes us all safer, in Europe & North America,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg posted on X.

(AP)

Columbia U’s Prez Disappears as Campus Morphs into Hotbed of Jew Hatred

0
Columbia has become the ultimate hotbed of Jewish hate as pro-Hamas students have seized the campus while intimidating Jews. Credit: AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

By: Lieba Nesis

Does it make you mad that on Sunday April 21st Columbia Chabad Rabbi Elie Buechler told the 1,500 Jewish students, over a quarter of the school, to leave campus since it was no longer a safe place to learn? Or that out of the thousands of anti-Jewish protestors spewing venom on Jewish students for the past 6 months the only two who remain suspended by Columbia through May 2025 are Jews who sprayed harmless fart spray on these protestors? Or that Columbia hasn’t fired one anti-Semitic professor since October 7th?

Or that Governor Hochul fails to call in the National Guard to arrest Columbia students protesting, throwing things and punching Jewish students on campus with more rabid anti-Semites surrounding the gate leading other college campuses to follow suit? Or that President Minouche Shafik doesn’t consider calls for the annihilation of Israel or glorifying the intifada anti-Semitic? Or that after months of Columbia professors praising Hamas’s atrocities the only professor being investigated, according to Shafik, for harassment was the lone Jewish voice fighting back Shai Davidai? Or that Jewish students, who are over a quarter of the campus, are hiding in their dorms, as chants calling for their death reverberate in their beds!

The shocking fact that Columbia and Barnard have closed their campus to non-students, resulting in hour long waits for students to scan ID’s to enter, means the thousands of radical Islamists photographed on campus holding Arab prayers and screaming “Fuck Israel” and praising Hamas martyrs are matriculated students-meaning this problem isn’t going anywhere.

Columbia’s President Minouche Shafik testified before a congressional House committee over the failed university’s response to a burgeoning Jew hatred. Credit: AP Photo/Miriam Zuhaib

Those outside the gates are even more venomous pushing and assaulting people as the NYPD helplessly watches without any directive from party hopping Mayor-Eric Adams-who talks a good game with slogans like “Never Again is Now” while “never” producing concrete results. Who exactly are the terrorists screaming and assaulting others outside the gates? They are a domestic terrorist group called “Within Our Lifetime” led by head Jew hater Nerdeen Kiswani who flouted her ban from Columbia’s campus for incitement of violence as she was pictured in the past few days lauding Hamas calling for the eradication of Israel and the takeover of universities. While the NYPD on campus is banned by Columbia: Violent Jew hater Nerdeen Kiswani is welcomed with a wedding ceremony.

Witnessing the pathetic testimony on Wednesday of Shafik along with her supercilious, incompetent supporting cast: professor David Schizer and Board of Trustees Co-chairs Claire Shipman and David Greenwald was astounding. They admitted within the last six months they had been unable to come up with a definition for anti-Semitism ultimately allowing students to scream “fuck Jews” with no repercussions.

Despite Shafik’s fake British accent her three hour performance-in the words of the Brits-was bloody awful. She lied, obfuscated, hesitated, and was completely overwhelmed by the questioning after preparing for months. When asked if Shafik was hiring more professors to combat the anti-Semitic bent of the Middle East Department or if professor’s views on Israel were being taken into account her repeated response was “no but moving forward” we will.

The phrase “moving forward” by a current president means “I stink at what I do”, “I am totally unprepared for this hearing” and “I have been derelict in all my current duties.” The congressional House committee, led by Virginia Foxx, saw right through her as they relentlessly questioned her failed response to a burgeoning Jew hatred that has become de rigueur in the halls of academia making this horror show readily predictable.

On that fateful Wednesday April 18th a five-day-protest began where unlawful Gaza solidarity encampments littered the campus requiring the NYPD to make over 108 arrests- the first time they have been called to the Columbia campus in over 50 years. All those hate spewing anti-Semites were released hours later after claiming to be emboldened by their ability to shut the campus down and receive nationwide attention. The Keffiyeh clad protestors told Jewish students October 7th would be repeated over 10,000 times while pro-Jewish Israeli Arab Yoseph Haddad was punched in the face as anti-Jewish violence becomes commonplace.

The origins of these hearings began December 5th 2023 when Harvard, University of Pennsylvania and MIT failed to answer Rep. Elise Stefanik’s simple question as to whether calling for the genocide of Jews violated their code of conduct- ultimately resulting in the removal of both Harvard and U of Penn’s Presidents Claudine Gay and Elizabeth Magill. Minouche Shafik’s absence in December was due to “a scheduling conflict” biding herself a much needed four months to prepare her testimony and implement phony safeguards for Jewish students.

Unfortunately for Shafik, being the sole focus of a three hour inquiry proved detrimental as she revealed she was feckless and uninformed as the beleaguered administrator failed to check if anti-Semitic professor Joseph Massad was still teaching and admitted she was lax in combating anti-Semitism. Acknowledging she prepared hundreds of hours with dozens of lawyers for this inquiry made Shafik’s admissions more reprehensible and attested to her unsuitability for the presidency.

Shafik, newly appointed as of July 2023, manifested at Wednesday’s hearing that the school’s out-of-control pervasively violent anti-Semitism during the past six months is no accident; House members were in concurrence that at best Shafik was clueless and weak as her campus was overrun by Hamas supporters. At worst she is a covert anti-Semite allowing claims of freedom of speech to outweigh Jewish students concerns over personal safety as she fails to close down the campus and throw out unlawful protestors. Since when is 24-hour trespassing and sleeping on University property allowed? The newly signed petition of 100 Jewish students requesting to learn remotely, means the school is no longer safe for alternative pro-Jewish political views and as such Columbia University must close its doors immediately.

Who is Minouche Shafik and how did she become President of Columbia after an unimpressive stint as President of the London School of Economics for 6 years? An acolyte of Bill and Melinda Gates who serves on their foundation Board the 62-year-old Minouche is Egyptian born and counts arabic as one of her first languages. Born in Alexandria to a wealthy landowning family she fled Egypt when she was 4 after the Egyptian government seized her father’s property forcing her family to move to Savannah, Georgia in the mid-1960’s. Despite a recent New York Times profile and dozens of articles written about Minouche her parents names are nowhere to be found and so we are left with the quandary as to why her family remains so enigmatic and what their true identities are. Her parents are referred to as educators on Wikipedia and yet where and what they have taught remain a mystery. Shafik’s prominent position at Columbia University can be attributed to her close connection to Bill and Melinda Gates who have donated more than $70 million to Columbia since 1999.

Over the past nine months Shafik’s tenure at Columbia has been unremarkable-that was until October 7th when Columbia University became Ground Zero for dangerous demonstrations with keffiyeh wearing students overtaking the campus as chants of “fuck the Jews”, “long live the intifada”, “we will honor all the martyrs”, “there is no safe place death to the Zionist state”, “we will distract you in the streets and turn your life into nightmares” have become typical intimidating jargon greeting Jewish students on campus while Shafik remains missing in action.

Rep. Elise Stefanik questioned Columbia President Minouche Shafik during the House Committee on Education and the Workforce on “Columbia in Crisis: Columbia University’s Response to Anti-Semitism on Capitol Hill. Credit: House.gov

Since the October 7th massacre where Hamas raped, murdered and beheaded thousands of Israelis a blatantly naked anti-Semitism has emerged resulting in the tearing down of hostage posters depicting infants and teenagers tortured by Hamas. Columbia has become the ultimate hotbed of Jewish hate as pro-Palestinian students who signed an October 9th letter empathizing with Hamas’s “military action” were subsequently backed up by 170 Columbia faculty members on October 30th urging Columbia’s leadership to protect Jew hating students while themselves labeling Israel an apartheid state.

It wasn’t until top Columbia donors such as Leon Cooperman threatened to boycott that Shafik outlawed Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) on November 10th after weekly demonstrations on Columbia’s campus supporting Hamas and calling for the violent elimination of the Jewish people and Israel made the campus unlivable. In March, Columbia considered reinstating these dangerous organizations while tacitly permitting them to endure as they held weekly unauthorized demonstrations threatening Jewish students.

Student bodies never exist in a vacuum as dozens of Columbia teachers promulgate and encourage rabid Jew hatred. The most glaring is Joseph Massad a tenured professor of modern Arab politics and history who has been teaching at the Ivy League School for the past 25 years and has called Israel a racist state while praising Hamas’s October 7th attack as “awesome” “astounding” and a “stunning victory for the Palestinian resistance”.

He also chairs the Academic Review Committee and when asked by House Committee Members Tim Walberg and Elise Stefanik if he was still chair Minouche falsely responded no and claimed he was reprimanded while conceding she was unsure if he still teaches. Massad refuted these claims in a written statement to CNN by saying he is not under any Columbia investigation, has never been reprimanded nor removed as chair of the Academic Review Committee. In fact his chair, Gil Hochberg, told Massad she and her Israeli 14-year-old son applauded his descriptive anti-Israel article.

This is just one of many lies told by Shafik who claimed the University had suspended 15 students in relation to antisemitism when in fact according to Chairwoman of the House Committee Virginia Foxx only three students were given interim suspensions between October and March all of which had been lifted. Seeing there are no consequences to pay has made Columbia the ultimate breeding ground for Jew hatred.

Other Jew hating professors include Mohamed Abdou who was brought on as a visiting Columbia scholar for the Spring 2024 semester to teach a weekly class on “Decolonial-Queerness and Abolition” after having posted immediately after October 7th “Yes I’m with Hamas and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad.”

When asked by House member Kevin Kiley if he had been fired Shafik could not respond adequately instead saying he had been asked to leave and that she was unsure when but placed it a couple of weeks ago-coincidentally close to the hearing. He has recently been seen on campus participating in “fuck Israel” protests. As a visiting professor he was asked not to come back and never actively fired despite his reprehensible remarks. Shafik waited until April 7th to denounce the horrific “Hamas terrorist attack in Israel” right before the hearings producing snarks from a weary student body.

The list of Shafik’s transgressions are endless: Professor Rashid Khalidi a former PLO spokesman who said in 2016 that the pro-Israel Trump team members had “infested the government” and called Israel a “colonial power engaging in ethnic cleansing and legalized lawlessness” continues to teach. Current Iranian studies and literature professor Hamid Dabashi continues unscathed despite a Facebook post in 2018 calling Israel a “key actor in every dirty treacherous ugly and pernicious act happening in the world” and said “these laughing hyenas-the Zionists the Saudis and the US neocons are fucking with the wrong country.” Shafik said none of these professors had been spoken to since there were no complaints against them.

This festering anti-Semitism has gone unchecked for decades as Shafik told representative Kevin Kiley she was unsure if chants of “free Palestine from the River to the Sea” “long live the intifada” or calls for BDS-boycott, divestment and sanctioning-were anti-Semitic. Paradoxically, Columbia’s own Anti-Semitism Task Force established in March refuses to say what anti-Semitism is revealing it encourages pro-Palestinian hate speech.

Despite the threats of violence and intimidation and the storming of classrooms the only students that remain suspended until May 2025 under Shafik are Jewish students who sprayed a harmless fart spray on anti-Israel protestors in January which Israel hating Ilhan Omar, whose net worth is $83 million, incorrectly referred to as a “noxious chemical substance” that required student hospitalization. Predictably, Shafik did not dispute Omar’s faulty characterization. In fact, Omar’s Barnard attending daughter “whom she was enormously proud of” was temporarily suspended at the protests-as the Jew hating apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

The only teacher out of the 3700 faculty members to stand up to Columbia’s pro-Hamas bullies is Shai Davidai, an assistant professor at Columbia Business School who was quickly thrown under the bus by Minouche who claimed under questioning from Omar that Davidai, who called Minouche a “lying coward”, was being investigated for 50 harassment complaints by students.

As students overrun an already frightening campus anti-Semites such as 77-year-old actress Susan Sarandon and machete carrying ex Cooper Union professor Shellyne Rodriguez run to the Columbia campus to enjoy the Jew hating fun fest. After calling the NYPD after over ten hours of Jew Hating chants on Thursday April 18th because Shafik said “extraordinary circumstances require extraordinary steps” all 108 arrested students were released from custody that evening and the Gaza encampment was moved to the opposite lawn.

Columbia U has become “Ground Zero” for dangerous demonstrations with keffiyeh wearing students overtaking the campus with chants of “fuck the Jews”, “long live the intifada” and “we will honor all the martyrs.” Credit: AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

The fact that Shafik considered the removal of violent threatening students “an extraordinary step” is noteworthy, as the following day their protests continued unfettered with an escalation in aggression. With only Columbia and Barnard students permitted on campus half hour lines to enter the University continue to make the situation untenable as hate group “Within Our Lifetime” (WOL) berates students outside.

After Columbia University’s successful protests Anti-Israel Non Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) have been emboldened to seize campuses across the USA to force BDS with Yale, Harvard, Brown and Princeton following suit. This unchecked takeover is reminiscent of the 1940’s where hateful rhetoric ultimately led to the death of 6 million Jews. Jewish students are currently being forced out of institutions they helped build. This weekend has become a watershed moment in the takeover of hate speech as Jewish students flags are torched, while Jewish students are pushed and threatened with death-a triumph for Hamas and all its terrorist spewing acolytes.

‘Assume Hamas Leaders Receive UNRWA Funding’

0
UNRWA employee outside the UNRWA headquarters in Gaza, Nov 17, 2020. (Majdi Fathi/TPS)

This is because UNRWA doesn’t revoke refugee status for Palestinian terrorists.

By: Mike Wagenheim

Critics of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA, have long noted its unique approach among United Nations agencies in granting perpetual refugee status to Palestinians, while other U.N. agencies seek to resettle those displaced by war or violence.

A JNS investigation reveals another manner in which UNRWA is an apparent aberration at the global body: It does not revoke refugee status of Palestinian terrorists.

The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees oversees the global body’s services to all refugees worldwide, except for Palestinians, who fall under the purview of UNRWA.

The latter is being investigated following Israeli charges that some of the U.N. agency’s staff participated directly in Hamas’s Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel and that a larger number of UNRWA employees are tied to Palestinian terror organizations.

Those involved in acts of terrorism under globally-defined criteria are subject to exclusion from refugee status at UNHCR, which also may exclude refugees who belong to organizations that carry out or incite violence.

JNS sought comment several times from UNRWA and from the office of António Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, about whether the agency also excludes terrorists as refugees.

Hillel Neuer, executive director of the nonprofit U.N. Watch, told JNS that for many years, Suhail al-Hindi, a school principal elected to chair UNRWA’s Palestinians’ workers union, was on Hamas’s Gaza politburo with the terror group’s Gaza head Yahya Sinwar.

Al-Hindi was eventually forced out of UNRWA not due to a violation of agency policy, but because UNRWA suffered too much embarrassment, Neuer said.

“They asked him to resign, meaning he’s probably still collecting pension,” Neuer said. “He’s now in Turkey, and he’s regularly quoted endorsing the atrocities of Oct. 7. It’s not only that they don’t deny them aid, but they allow them to serve in leadership capacity.”

“To the extent that UNHCR does have this exclusion clause, with UNRWA it would be the opposite,” Neuer said of the U.N. agencies’ approach to refugee status of terrorists.

JNS sought clarity from the United Nations and UNRWA several times about whether the agency would strip the refugee status of staff members that the U.N. investigation corroborates were involved in or connected to terrorism.

When Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of UNRWA, terminated the contracts of UNRWA staff members whom Israel accused of participating in the Oct. 7 massacre, he said publicly that the reason was “to protect the agency’s ability to deliver humanitarian assistance.”


Loose interpretation

People can be excluded from refugee status if they violate the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, per UNHCR’s Resettlement Handbook.

More specifically, those about whom there are “serious reasons” to believe they committed a “crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity” or a “serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge” prior to being admitted to that country as a refugee or who have “been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations,” can be excluded.

Elsewhere in the handbook, the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees notes that most acts of violence commonly called “terrorism” qualify, “particularly if they indiscriminately endanger or harm civilians.”

The 1951 convention, which the handbook cites, states that “This convention shall not apply to persons who are at present receiving from organs or agencies of the United Nations other than the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees protection or assistance.”

          (JNS.org)

Netanyahu Vows ‘Painful Blows’ to Hamas, Compares Terror Group to Pharaoh

0
Israel is preparing to escalate its military campaign against the Hamas organization in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Credit: AP

“In every generation they rise up to destroy us”

By: David Rosenberg – worldisraelnews.com

Israel is preparing to escalate its military campaign against the Hamas organization in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday, just weeks after the IDF withdrew most of its ground forces from southern Gaza.

The prime minister issued a video message in Hebrew Sunday, highlighting the upcoming Passover festival, which begins Monday at sundown, and announcing plans for increased military and diplomatic “pressure” on Hamas to return the 133 Israeli captives remaining in Gaza.

“On this night, 133 of our dear brothers and sisters are not around the Seder table, and they are still held hostage by Hamas in hellish conditions,” Netanyahu said.

“We have already freed 124 of our hostages and we are committed to returning them all home – the living and the deceased alike. And why is this night not different?”

“That in every generation they rise up to destroy us, and the Holy One, blessed be He, saves us from them.”

Netanyahu blamed Hamas for the stalled hostage talks in Cairo, highlighting comments by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken accusing the Gaza terror group of not negotiating in good faith.

“Unfortunately, until now, all proposals for releasing the hostages have been rejected outright by Hamas. Therefore, the American Secretary of State rightly said that Hamas has refused every proposal that it has been presented with. In his words, the only thing preventing a hostage release deal is Hamas.”

The Israeli premier compared Hamas to the biblical Pharaoh, and pledged that the IDF would strike “painful blows” to the terror group in the near future.

“Instead of withdrawing from its extreme positions, Hamas is counting on a rift among us. It draws encouragement from the pressure being directed at the Government of Israel.”

“As a result of this, it has only hardened its conditions for the release of our hostages. It is hardening its heart and refusing to let our people go. Therefore, we will strike it with additional painful blows – and this will happen soon.”

“In the coming days, we will increase the military and diplomatic pressure on Hamas because this is the only way to free our hostages and achieve our victory.”

Responding to reports over the weekend that the Biden administration plans to blacklist the IDF’s ultra-Orthodox Netzah Yehuda battalion, Netanyahu said his government would do everything possible to defy the sanctions.

“I will strongly defend the IDF, our army and our fighters. If somebody thinks they can impose sanctions on a unit in the IDF – I will fight this with all my powers.”

“As our soldiers are united in defending us on the battlefield, we are united in defending them in the diplomatic arena.”

           (WorldIsraelNews.com)

Israel Shoots Down Report Only 40 Hostages Still Alive

0
Families of hostages held in Gaza meet with NY Mayor Eric Adams (Photo: Screenshot via YouTube)

The IDF has confirmed that 34 of those taken to Gaza on Oct. 7 are dead, and others are feared to be no longer alive.

By: JNS.org

The Shin Bet denied a report on Sunday by the British Daily Mail that intelligence gathered by Israel’s internal security service is leading to fears that only 40 hostages out of the 133 being held by Hamas in Gaza are alive.

According to the report from the London-based tabloid, a dwindling number of captives have survived after 253 were kidnapped during the Hamas-led rampage across the northwestern Negev on Oct. 7.

The report cites the Shin Bet and anonymous sources to make the claim.

“The publication in question is not true and does not represent the opinion of the Shin Bet,” the agency said.

“The numbers mentioned in the article are based on the writer’s opinion only and are not based on information from the Shin Bet.”

The IDF has confirmed that 34 of those taken to Gaza on Oct. 7 are dead, and others are feared to be no longer alive.

A total of 1,200 mostly civilians were murdered and thousands of others were wounded during the attack, which included widespread atrocities.

A truce reached last November saw 105 captives released, with three other hostages freed in military rescue operations and four freed separately.

The bodies of 12 hostages have been recovered, including three mistakenly killed by the Israeli military.

Negotiations to release the rest of the hostages have been going on for months.

They have been mediated by the Americans, Egyptians and Qataris with the involvement of the Israelis and the Hamas terrorist group and have taken place in Cairo, Doha and Paris.

“Negotiating is a lost cause. We cannot possibly negotiate dead bodies for the release of hundreds or thousands more terrorists,” a security source told the Daily Mail.

Meanwhile, Israel’s War Cabinet will convene on Sunday evening to discuss the deadlock in hostage release negotiations following the response by Hamas to a U.S. proposal.

The meeting was supposed to take place last week but was postponed due to the Iranian attack on Israel.

The meeting is being held at the behest of Ministers-without-Portfolio Benny Gantz and Gadi Eizenkot.

JNS also reported on Sunday that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan should be “ashamed” after he met at his office in Istanbul with Hamas terror leader Ismail Haniyeh on Saturday, Israel’s foreign minister said.

“Muslim Brotherhood: Rape, massacre, desecration of corpses, burning babies. @RTErdogan, you should be ashamed!” Israel Katz tweeted in Turkish alongside a picture of Erdoğan and Haniyeh shaking hands during their hours-long meeting. He tweeted the same message in Hebrew.

Ankara has given full-throated support to Hamas after its Oct. 7 massacre and during the ensuing war in Gaza.

The NATO member has also started a trade war with Jerusalem over the ongoing war to defeat Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, European Union and other governments.

According to Erdoğan’s office, the president, whose party recently suffered a historic defeat in nationwide local elections, urged Palestinians during the meeting to unite for “victory” against the Jewish state.

Also discussed were efforts to achieve a ceasefire and increase the delivery of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip.

Hamas still holds more than 100 Israeli hostages in Gaza taken during the Oct. 7 rampage in the northwestern Negev, with many feared to be dead.

(JNS.org)

What is Israel’s Innovative Air Defense System?

0
Perhaps the most famous component of Israel’s air defense system, the Iron Dome protects against short-range missiles and other airborne attacks, and has been extremely active in the past six months, bringing down airstrikes launched by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Photo Credit: YouTube.com

By: NoCamels Team

The world watched on its screens and Israelis watched live in the skies above them. Almost every single one of the hundreds of drones and missiles that Iran’s fundamentalist regime fired at Israel on Saturday night were intercepted, thanks to Israel’s allies and the innovation for which the country has been renowned for decades.

Israel’s air defenses today are multi-tiered – providing layers of protection that are an overwhelmingly successful answer to the threat from terror groups, enemy states and their proxies in the region.

So how does it work?

 

Iron Dome (Hebrew: Kipat Barzel)

Perhaps the most famous component of Israel’s air defense system, the Iron Dome protects against short-range missiles and other airborne attacks, and has been extremely active in the past six months, bringing down airstrikes launched by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

https://twitter.com/StarshipAlves/status/1779270446942138781

Iron Dome batteries are mobile and placed within civilian areas (the “whoosh” of the system deploying can be heard during attacks by those in the vicinity) and activated when an attack begins.

The system, which was first brought into operation in 2011, uses radar to detect a missile attack on Israel, sending to a command center all information about the trajectory and speed of the projectiles that were fired.

The computers in the command center then calculate where the incoming missile is expected to strike, and personnel decide whether to intercept based on the threat to areas that are populated or of strategic importance.

The David’s Sling missiles (called stunners) are launched almost vertically and have a steering system at the front and the rear, as well as an onboard radar system and multiple sensors to track the attacking missile. The stunners also use radar on the ground to help guide them. Each David’s Sling battery consists of 12 stunners. The batteries are stationary, but are believed to be able to defend the entirety of the State of Israel, with a range of 250 km. Photo Credit: YouTube.com

If the missile is predicted to land in an open area, no interception is required. However, if the missile is expected to strike a populated area, the warhead-laden interceptors are launched to neutralize the threat in the air.

The system has a successful interception rate of around 90 percent.

The defense system was developed jointly by the state-owned Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries, with assistance from the United States.

The system reportedly costs around $50,000 per interception from a launcher’s battery of 20, although the complete system (radar, computer and three or four launchers) is believed to run to $100 million apiece.

 

David’s Sling (Hebrew: Kela David)

This medium-to-long range missile defense system first became operational in 2017, jointly developed by Rafael and the privately owned US defense contractor Raytheon (RTX).

Formerly known as Magic Wand (Sharvit Ksamim), the system is designed to intercept projectiles such as cruise and ballistic missiles as well as drones.

Unlike Iron Dome, the system has no warhead, instead striking its target directly to intercept it. The defense system works in two stages, first identifying and tracking the incoming strike and then targeting it.

The David’s Sling missiles (called stunners) are launched almost vertically and have a steering system at the front and the rear, as well as an onboard radar system and multiple sensors to track the attacking missile. The stunners also use radar on the ground to help guide them.

Each David’s Sling battery consists of 12 stunners. The batteries are stationary, but are believed to be able to defend the entirety of the State of Israel, with a range of 250 km.

Each stunner costs a reported $1 million to produce. Like Iron Dome, its success rate is said to be over 90 percent.

 

Arrow (Hebrew: Hetz)

The Arrow (versions 2 and 3) anti-ballistic missiles are Israel’s long-range defense mechanism, and considered among the most effective missile defense systems in the world.

Both versions of the Arrow use hypersonic speed (more than five times the speed of sound) – although the Arrow 3 is lighter, allowing it to travel faster and higher and for a longer range.

The Arrow 2 destroys its targets in the upper atmosphere while the Arrow 3 can intercept missiles beyond the Earth’s atmosphere, but both are designed to strike an incoming projectile before it begins to descend.

The Arrow works by identifying, tracking and intercepting long-range missiles by directly colliding with them. The Arrow 2 also uses fragmentation warheads, which splinter as they explode, sending fragments in multiple directions.

The system, which unlike the David’s Sling is mobile and can be launched from the back of a truck, became operational in 2000, and was developed by Israel Aerospace Industries alongside the US Missile Defense Agency.

Each Arrow missile is said to cost $3.5 million.

 

Iron Beam (Hebrew: Keren Barzel)

An experimental technology that is still officially in development although it is expected to be operational in the near future.

The mobile system consists of two pivoting laser guns, a surveillance system to track the incoming projectile and a control center staffed by personnel who issue commands to the system.

The laser gun creates a high-energy beam that can bring down missiles, mortars and drones at a reported maximum range of 10 km. The laser heats its target to incredibly high temperatures very quickly, rendering it obsolete.

While the system is still not operational, Israel says it will be massively less expensive than the existing costly tiers in Israel’s missile defense system, with unlimited interceptions and requiring less operators and maintenance.

The Arrow works by identifying, tracking and intercepting long-range missiles by directly colliding with them. The Arrow 2 also uses fragmentation warheads, which splinter as they explode, sending fragments in multiple directions. Photo Credit: Wikipedia.org

However, its critics say that the system would struggle to function in cloudy weather, and because the beam requires several seconds to heat the target, it would struggle to stay locked on a fast-moving object. Furthermore, a heat-resistant coating could also thwart its effectiveness.

The system was also created by Rafael, and, according to Israel, an interception by Iron Beam would cost just $2, compared to the tens of thousands of dollars spent on each Iron Dome launch.

          (NoCamels.com)

For the Sake of NPR’s Integrity, Katherine Maher Should Step Down

0
For the sake of NPR’s integrity and its role in upholding the highest standards of journalism, Katherine Maher should step down. This action would serve as a commitment to NPR’s foundational principles and as a signal to the public that it remains a stalwart of unbiased reporting in an increasingly polarized media landscape. Credit: Armando Franca/AP

In the arena of public trust, the credibility of news organizations hinges profoundly on the perceived impartiality and integrity of their leadership. A recent revelation concerning National Public Radio (NPR) brings this delicate balance into stark relief, casting shadows of doubt over the impartiality that is sacrosanct in journalism.

Katherine Maher, who has recently taken the helm as CEO of NPR, was discovered to have donated $500 to Fair Fight, a political action committee led by Stacey Abrams, known for its staunch stance on election integrity issues, particularly following the contentious 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race. It is essential to scrutinize the implications of such a donation made by someone who now leads a major, taxpayer-funded national news organization.

The essence of this concern lies not in the mere act of donating — as private citizens undoubtedly have the right to support political causes of their choosing — but in the particular alignment of this donation with a group that has actively challenged the legitimacy of an election outcome. Stacey Abrams, after her defeat in the 2018 race, vehemently contested the results, levied serious accusations against the integrity of voting systems, and engaged in legal battles that were ultimately dismissed, with her organization bearing the cost of legal fees for what was determined to be a baseless challenge.

Now consider a hypothetical yet analogous scenario where a high-ranking executive at ABC News had made donations to a fund supporting Donald Trump post-January 6, amidst swirling controversies and debunked claims of a stolen election. The uproar from the journalism community and the public would be swift and unforgiving, likely culminating in a forced resignation due to the untenable position of appearing to endorse alleged falsehoods about democratic processes.

This isn’t just about individual rights or partisan affiliations; it’s about the broader implications for journalistic integrity. NPR, funded by public dollars, occupies a unique position of trust. It is expected to deliver news and analysis that is not only factual but also free from the taint of partisan bias. This expectation is not merely idealistic but foundational to the role of the press in a democracy.

The revelation of Maher’s donation to an organization that has been at the forefront of contesting electoral outcomes without substantive evidence raises serious questions. It unavoidably colors perceptions of NPR’s neutrality and undermines its credibility, especially in the run-up to another election cycle. If the leader of such an organization has financially supported efforts that many consider to be undermining the democratic process, how can the public be assured that the coverage provided by her organization remains unbiased?

The role of a CEO in any organization, especially a journalistic one, carries the burden of not just managing operations and strategy but also embodying the ethical and professional standards that the organization espouses. In the case of NPR, Maher’s past donation, though legally and ethically her right as a private citizen, becomes a point of contention in her role as a leader of a national news organization.

This issue is further compounded by Maher’s history of controversial public statements and the broader accusations of pervasive progressive bias at NPR, highlighted by the departure of a long-serving veteran of the organization. The situation calls for a deeper examination of both the standards applied to media executives and the implications of their personal political activities on their professional responsibilities.

Furthermore, Maher’s public statements, such as the controversial tweet likening modern-day looting to a historical response against a system of oppression, reflect a personal ideology that seems to align closely with the type of progressive groupthink that some critics argue has overtaken NPR. Such views, when expressed by the leader of a news organization, can cast doubts on the fairness and balance of its reporting. This is particularly problematic in an era where the public’s trust in media is already dangerously low.

NPR’s silence in response to inquiries about its awareness of Maher’s donation and whether it believes a person with her background is suitable for the role of CEO only adds to the concerns. Transparency and accountability are crucial in maintaining public trust, especially when it involves a publicly funded entity.

Maher’s controversial TED Talk, in which she questioned the primacy of truth by suggesting that “our reverence for the truth might be a distraction” and promoting the idea that “we all have different truths,” strikes at the heart of journalistic ethics. Such statements, which have drawn widespread criticism from both journalists and public intellectuals, are antithetical to the foundational beliefs of journalism as a profession dedicated to truth-seeking. For journalists at NPR, who pride themselves on rigorous fact-checking and unbiased reporting, such a philosophical stance from their leader is not just confusing but deeply concerning.

Additionally, Maher’s expressed views on the First Amendment and misinformation are troubling. Labeling Senator Tom Cotton’s op-ed as “misinformation” and implying that such expressions of differing opinions should not be published is a stark departure from the traditional journalistic values of free speech and open debate. This stance undermines the role of journalism in fostering a well-informed public discourse and stands in contrast to the values upheld by previous generations of journalists who championed press freedom as fundamental to democracy.

Given these concerns, it becomes increasingly clear that Maher’s position as the leader of NPR is untenable. Her controversial views and actions have not only damaged her reputation for nonpartisanship but have also potentially jeopardized the credibility of NPR itself. In an era where public trust in media is both fragile and paramount, the leader of a taxpayer-funded organization must not only be free of bias but must also be perceived to be free of bias.

The leadership of NPR faces a decisive moment. They must consider whether continuing under Maher’s leadership is in the best interest of the organization and its mandate to serve the public with news that can be trusted. For the sake of NPR’s integrity and its role in upholding the highest standards of journalism, Katherine Maher should step down. This action would serve as a commitment to NPR’s foundational principles and as a signal to the public that it remains a stalwart of unbiased reporting in an increasingly polarized media landscape.

Letters to the Editor

0

Arab-Israeli Conflict May Ignite WWIII

Dear Editor:

The Arab-Israeli conflict may be the precursor to WWIII.

Based on international law, Israelis have the right to live anywhere in the British Mandate for Palestine, their ancestral homeland.

Muslims see the conflict as a religious war. Non-Muslims are Dhimmi. They are to be dominated and humiliated. The Arab term for blacks is Abeed, meaning slave.

The first Arab-Jewish conflict occurred in Medina. In 622, the Prophet Mohammed found shelter among the Quraysh Jews after being rejected in Mecca. The Jews operated camel caravans and were prosperous. They signed the Constitution of Medina, ensuring co-operation and laying the foundation for a Muslim community.

However, in 629, the Prophet abrogated his agreement, beheaded the Jewish men and boys and took the women captive.

The principal of lying to the Infidel to gain an advantage is called Taqiyya and is enshrined in the Koran.

The Arabs spread out of Arabia, conquering and colonizing much of the known world, from Asia through southern Euro and North Africa. They believe any land, once Muslim, is Muslim forever.

In World War One the allies defeated Germany and the Ottoman Empire. The San Remo Accords established mandates for Palestine, Transjordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq.

The 1920s saw the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the rise of Nazism in Europe. The Brotherhood’s aim is to spread the Caliphate world-wide.

The leader of the mandates’ Arabs was Nazi war criminal Haj Amin al-Husseini, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He instigated pogroms against Middle East Jews from the 1920s. In Germany during WWII, he formed the Bosnian Muslim 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar.

Following the defeat of Germany and its Arab partners in World War Two, the United Nations suggested splitting the British mandate, promised the Jews by the League of Nations and Article 80 of the UN Charter, into Arab and Jewish states. The Jews agreed. The Arabs did not and launched the Nakba to ‘drive the Jews into the sea’.

Before 1964, only Jews were called Palestinians. In 1964, the Soviet KGB created the Palestine Liberation Army to thwart America influence. They called Israel, ‘Palestine’ and non-Jews, ‘Palestinians’. Terrorism was their tool to focus attention on the ‘Palestine’ narrative.

Seventy-five years after the establishment of the state, Islamo-fascists still have not accepted Israel as a permanent part of the Middle East.

Israel is the 10th most powerful country in the world and the 5th happiest. It is a liberal democracy with robust political parties. Its per-capita GDP exceeds that of Canada, New Zealand, Australia or the UK. Its hospitals have Jewish and Arab staffs and patients.

It’s time for Islamists and the useful idiots who support them, to face reality and to solve the horrible refugee problem created by corrupt Arabs and the United Nations.

Sincerely
Len Bennett,
Author of ‘Unfinished Work’


 

Ideas on Presidential Debates

Dear Editor:

Why host a series of debates on Sunday night alternating between both Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates after Labor Day up to the last Sunday prior to Election Day? Each debate should deal with a specific topic, questions and answers from the candidates. They should be allowed to comment on each other’s responses. Issues to be covered under each debate could be general domestic, general foreign affairs, economy and inflation, border security, urban crime and dealing with solving our long term national debt. Any candidate who refuses to show up, should have an empty chair representing them on the dais.

Sincerely,
Larry Penner Great Neck


 

Unfair Sanctions on Israeli Army Unit

Dear Editor:

I was outraged to read, in your April 20 issue, that the Biden administration has imposed sanctions on an Israeli army unit consisting of Orthodox Jews. Meanwhile, numerous members of the Palestinian police and security forces are actually involved in acts of terrorism, yet Biden has never sanctioned them. In fact, he won’t even criticize them. And he calls himself a friend of Israel?

Sincerely,
Fred Bergman
Flatbush


 

John Fetterman Speaks Up for the Hostages

Dear Editor:

Thank you, Senator John Fetterman, for promising to keep speaking out publicly about the hostages in Gaza (article in your April 20 edition). I notice Sen. Chuck “Shomer” never speaks about them. And, of course, neither do groups like J Street or even our own State Department. Could you imagine if Israelis were holding a bunch of Gazans hostage? All these so-called humanitarians would be screaming day and night. But when Jews are held hostage, well, I guess that gets in the way of their particular political agenda. What a tragedy!

Sincerely,
Del Goren
Brooklyn


 

Netanyahu Rising in Popularity

Dear Editor:

Senator Charles Schumer must be horrified by the news (as reported in your April 20 edition) that the latest polls show Prime Minister Netanyahu continuing to rise in popularity among the Israeli public. Schumer’s recent demand that Netanyahu resign was a gross violation of Israel’s internal affairs and disregard for the views of Israeli voters. The new polls are another reminder of how un-democratic this so-called Democratic senator really is.

Sincerely,
Ethel Brogen
Boro Park


 

The Silence of Jewish Faculty Members

Dear Editor:

So the dean of students at Northwestern University, Mona Dugo attended an anti-Israel protest outside the campus Hillel building last week. She claimed she was doing it “to protect the right to free speech” (according to your April 20 article). Well, I for one don’t believe her. Why? Because if white supremacists were demonstrating outside a campus building where African-American students were meeting, do you think Dugo would be out there, marching with them? Not a chance.

So why are the Jewish faculty members at Northwestern silent? Why aren’t they raising their voices to protest what their dean is doing? Dugo ought to be fired, and the Jewish professors at Northwestern should have the courage to say so.

Sincerely,
Nancy Candenstein
Brooklyn

The Illiberal Crusade to Defend Anti-Semitic Mobs

0
Columbia president Minouche Shafik and two other officials were questioned by the same committee that has been investigating the surge in anti-Semitism at American universities and that had grilled the presidents of Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in December. Photo Credit: AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The strength of America’s commitment not to tolerate hate is being tested by liberals who are supporting pro-Hamas protesters spewing Jew-hatred.

By: Jonathan S. Tobin

Any doubt about whether Columbia University understood the anger that its toleration of routine Jew-hatred on its campus had generated was removed this week on the day after school officials testified before the U.S. House of Representatives. And what followed represented a rare effort to enforce some consequences against the anti-Semitic mobs that have become a regular feature of American urban and college life in the last six months. But while the sight of police arresting illegal demonstrators howling bigotry against Jews was a relief to those who worried about the free pass such people seem to have gotten from authorities, the willingness of so many liberal pundits in the corporate press to defend the mobs is a sign of just how dangerous this moment in history has become.

Columbia president Minouche Shafik and two other officials were questioned by the same committee that has been investigating the surge in anti-Semitism at American universities and that had grilled the presidents of Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in December.

As historian Niall Ferguson has written in his seminal Free Press essay, “The Treason of the Intellectuals,” what is happening on American campuses today is a frightening replay of what was going on in European universities in the 1920s and ’30s. Just like a century ago, the intellectual fashion of the day has made the Jews the scapegoats for everything the educated and credentialed classes don’t like. Photo Credit: Wikipedia.org

That trio shocked the country when they told the committee that it depended on “the context” as to whether advocacy for the genocide of Jews was against the rules of their respective institutions. Shafik didn’t commit the same mistake. Still, she had no good answer when asked why she has not only been tolerating a hostile atmosphere for Jews on campus in the aftermath of Hamas’s massacres in southern Israel on Oct. 7 but also refusing to enforce the school’s rules against unauthorized demonstrations. At the time she testified, one such “pro-Palestinian” encampment on the university’s South Lawn in front of the iconic Butler Library remained, despite the fact that those involved were told to remove it. There, the students were—as they have done for months—not only spouting the same lies about Israel committing “genocide” in Gaza but calling for the destruction of the one Jewish state on the planet (“from the river to the sea”) and in favor of terrorism against Jews (“globalize the intifada”).

 

Calling in the cops

Shafik’s decision to ask the New York City Police Department to enter the campus on Manhattan’s Upper West Side was surprising to many who know the university. Normally, the NYPD does not enter the Morningside Heights campus since it has its own Public Safety Department. Shafik rightly understood that removing the demonstrators was beyond the school’s capacity. So she called in the police to evict the tent dwellers though, as the Times reported the next day, they were soon back in place with no sign of law enforcement following up.

Those who watch the videos of the police action will be struck by both their restraint and professionalism, as well as by the vicious nature of the students, who were angered by the decision of the university to rein them in. The spectacle of entitled Ivy League students—many of whom come from privileged backgrounds—venting their contempt and calling police officers, who generally come from the working class, “pigs,” as well as expressing hatred for America itself, is as shocking as it is illustrative of the divisions in contemporary society.

Other videos from that day’s actions shared on X by witnesses were equally appalling as they recorded for posterity the way Columbia students—many of them wearing masks to conceal their identity for the same reason that members of the Ku Klux Klan wore white hoods—chanted their support for Hamas and their intolerance for the presence of “Zionists” on campus and said that they looked forward to more Oct. 7 massacres of Jews. Photo: Joshua Briz/AP

Other videos from that day’s actions shared on X by witnesses were equally appalling as they recorded for posterity the way Columbia students—many of them wearing masks to conceal their identity for the same reason that members of the Ku Klux Klan wore white hoods—chanted their support for Hamas and their intolerance for the presence of “Zionists” on campus and said that they looked forward to more Oct. 7 massacres of Jews. Indeed, nothing could better illustrate how critical race theory and intersectionality, which falsely label Jews and Israel as “white” oppressors, grant a permission slip for the kind of open hatred that was long thought to be confined to the margins of American life where only right-wing extremists dwell.

As historian Niall Ferguson has written in his seminal Free Press essay, “The Treason of the Intellectuals,” what is happening on American campuses today is a frightening replay of what was going on in European universities in the 1920s and ’30s. Just like a century ago, the intellectual fashion of the day has made the Jews the scapegoats for everything the educated and credentialed classes don’t like.

Scenes like these have been playing out all over the country this week as pre-planned pro-Hamas demonstrations were held on April 15, featuring masked thugs spouting propaganda about Jews committing genocide and shouting their support for Hamas as they blocked key highways, bridges, tunnels and transportation hubs.

 

Uncivil disobedience

We have come to expect such stunts and other acts of intimidation by left-wing activists in what can only be termed an epidemic of uncivil disobedience. But as the president of Columbia learned, many Americans are sick and tired of seeing public spaces commandeered by extremists engaging in hate speech and want to see authorities take action to see to it that these people are not allowed to engage in this sort of behavior without consequences. Students who transgress their school’s rules about hate speech and who seek to turn their campuses into no-go zones for Jews and supporters of Israel need to be punished, suspended or expelled. Citizens also expect to see city governments similarly protect the public by having such persons not only arrested but charged and prosecuted for violating the law.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) spoke for many when he posted on X that he believed that citizens who are being obstructed by pro-Hamas demonstrators should “take matters into your own hands to get them out of the way.” He then added another post with a video of someone roughly hauling leftists out of a street where they had laid down to halt traffic to show their sympathy for “Palestine.”

Cotton was attacked by the left for a 2020 New York Times op–ed demanding that the National Guard be called out to halt the “mostly peaceful” Black Lives Matter riots that were tearing America’s cities in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis at the hands of police. That essay prompted a revolt in the Times newsroom by woke staffers who didn’t believe that the paper should publish anything that contradicted their ideological orthodoxies, which led the newspaper to purge the editors that had approved its publication.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) spoke for many when he posted on X that he believed that citizens who are being obstructed by pro-Hamas demonstrators should “take matters into your own hands to get them out of the way.” He then added another post with a video of someone roughly hauling leftists out of a street where they had laid down to halt traffic to show their sympathy for “Palestine.” Credit: AP

This time, Sen. Cotton was again widely lambasted for what his critics said was advocating violence, though that seems pretty rich when you consider that the demonstrators are there to show their support for the survival of a genocidal terrorist movement. A better suggestion would be for the police to do the job rather than for ordinary citizens to take matters into their own hands. But even the police aren’t always able to cope with this problem. Departments are short of personnel after years of “defund the police” activism from BLM advocates and their liberal fellow travelers. Many urban prosecutors—elected as part of billionaire George Soros’s campaign to make America’s criminal justice system more criminal-friendly—are also refusing to charge those who break the law in this manner even when violence is involved.

As a result, the public is often held hostage by leftist antisemitic thugs.

 

Defending hate

Just as troubling is the willingness of many in the chattering classes to defend the protesters and pretend that expressions of anti-Semitism are a matter of free speech rather than hate. The Guardian’s Moira Donegan attacked Shafik in a column for what she described as “colluding with the far right” by calling in the police to enforce the university’s rules. She treated the entire idea that anti-Semitism was present as a right-wing talking point rather than an awful reality for Jewish students, whose plight interested her not at all.

The Times’ Michelle Goldberg sounded a similar theme in her denunciation of both the House committee investigating anti-Semitism and Shafik.

Both quoted comments by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a committee member whose questions were aimed at denying the anti-Semitic nature of the mobs that had transformed Columbia into a hotbed of Jew-hatred. That someone who has been censured by the House for her own repeated anti-Semitic rhetoric should sit on such a committee (or in Congress itself) is an irony completely lost on leftists. Both Donegan and Goldberg thought it was an outrage that Omar’s daughter—a junior at Barnard College—was among those participating in the pro-Hamas demonstration and rightly suspended from the school, though that piece of information was not generally known when Omar was trying to sabotage the hearing.

As with the rest of the debate about whether the antisemitism being vented on college campuses in the six months since Oct. 7 should be protected free speech, most of the arguments in defense of these mobs are disingenuous. The notion that the pro-Hamas activists are defending free speech is risible considering that most of their efforts are focused on silencing defenders of Israel and the Jews. These are not idealists acting out their sympathy for Palestinian victims but, rather, ideologues who have embraced the cause of a terrorist war to destroy the Jewish state.

What must also be acknowledged is that the crusade on the part of much of the liberal commentariat to defend or rationalize this epidemic of anti-Semitism is profoundly illiberal. This applies to those who, like the Times’ foreign-policy columnist Nicholas Kristof, have sought to mainstream blood libels against Israel. Their goal is to change the conversation about the war against Hamas from a necessary campaign to eradicate terrorists to an effort to legitimize a genocidal movement and its Western apologists.

The saddest aspect of this debate is the way it has been politicized by the left to make it appear that the fight against anti-Semitism is a Republican issue. It is deeply unfortunate that much of the liberal activist base of the Democratic Party that has been captured by advocates for critical race theory and intersectionality has taken sides against Israel in the war against Hamas. It’s also true that—as the daily drumbeat of incitement against Israel and its Jewish supporters in the Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC show—left-wing journalists are doing their utmost to legitimize anti-Jewish hate.

Both quoted comments by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a committee member whose questions were aimed at denying the anti-Semitic nature of the mobs that had transformed Columbia into a hotbed of Jew-hatred. That someone who has been censured by the House for her own repeated anti-Semitic rhetoric should sit on such a committee (or in Congress itself) is an irony completely lost on leftists. Credit: AP

The effort to curb the surge of anti-Semitism in this country should not be conducted along party lines. Democrats and Republicans, liberals as well as conservatives, should be lining up against those who agree with Omar and her cheering section that anti-Semitic mobs are principled idealists rather than self-entitled hate-mongers. All decent Americans should—if not agreeing with Cotton about roughly preventing illegal protesters from taking over our public squares—be actively seeking to treat these antisemitic agitators with the disdain and punishment they deserve. If the defenders of the mobs prevail, the alternative is a nation where anti-Semitism is mainstreamed and Jewish safety a thing of the past.

            (JNS.org)

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). Follow him: @jonathans_tobin.