Facebook Co-Founder’s ‘Convenient’ Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship Draws Backlash from Politicians - The Jewish Voice
65.9 F
New York
Sunday, September 25, 2022

Facebook Co-Founder’s ‘Convenient’ Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship Draws Backlash from Politicians

- Advertisement -

Related Articles


Must read

Facebook co-founder and ex-American, Eduardo SaverinThe decision by Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin to leave America and renounce his U.S. citizenship – on the eve of the social network site’s going public – has drawn a firestorm of outrage from the public in general, and two prominent senators in particular.

Saverin, who was born in Brazil to a well-to-do Jewish family and raised in Miami, Florida, is a partial owner of Facebook. He moved to Singapore in 2009 and renounced his U.S. citizenship in September. The general perception is that – with the skyrocketing popularity of Facebook and the expectation that its net worth will reach unprecedented heights now that it is available as an IPO – Saverin is sneakily attempting to avoid having to pay at least $67 million in taxes, since Singapore, unlike the United States, has no capital gains tax.

In response to Saverin’s moves, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Bob Casey (D-PA) have unveiled a comprehensive plan that would enable the American government to re-impose taxes on expatriates like the Facebook executive even after they flee the United States and take up residence in a foreign country. Their plan would also bar individuals like Saverin from reentering the country so long as they continued to avoid paying their taxes in full.

“Mr. Saverin has decided to ‘defriend’ the United States of America just to avoid paying his taxes. We aren’t going to let him get away with it so easily,” Schumer said in a blistering public statement. “It’s infuriating to see someone sell out the country that welcomed him and kept him safe, educated him and helped him become a billionaire. This is a great American success story gone horribly wrong. We plan to put a stop to this tax avoidance scheme. There should be no financial gain from renouncing your country.”

 Joining him in the chorus of protest, Senator Casey insisted, ”We simply cannot allow the ultra-wealthy to write their own rules. Mr. Saverin has benefited greatly from being a citizen of the United States but he has chosen to cast it aside and leave U.S. taxpayers with the bill. Renouncing citizenship to simply avoid paying your fair share is an insult to middle class Americans and we will not accept it.”

Schumer and Casey’s proposal is called the Ex-PATRIOT Act (“Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy” Act). Under the proposal, any expatriate with either a net worth of $2 million or an average income tax liability of at least $148,000 over the last five years will be presumed to have renounced their citizenship for tax avoidance purposes. The individual will then have an opportunity to demonstrate otherwise to the IRS by meeting specific IRS requirements. If the individual has a legitimate reason for renouncing his or her citizenship, no penalties will apply. But if the IRS finds that an individual gave up their passport for substantial tax purposes, then it will prospectively impose a tax on the individual’s future investment gains, no matter where he or she resides. This would eliminate any tax benefit and financial incentive from renouncing one’s citizenship. The rate of this capital gains tax will be 30 percent, in keeping with the rate that is already applied on non-resident aliens for dividends and interest earnings.

According to the proposed act, so long as the individual avoids these taxes, they would be inadmissible to the United States forever. The Ex-PATRIOT Act would improve current law to ensure such an individual cannot reenter the United States after renouncing his or her citizenship. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 was intended to bar any such individual from reentering the U.S. However, this statute was written in a manner that inhibits its enforcement.

 In 2011, a record number of 1,780 people gave up their U.S. passports—a dramatic rise from the 235 persons who did so in 2008. Yet no individual has ever been barred from returning to the United States based upon a finding of renunciation of citizenship for tax purposes. Without an immigration bar of re-entry, those thousands of individuals who renounce their US citizenship can simply return to the United States for 60 days per year, without any tax responsibility. The Ex-PATRIOT Act would end this loophole, and close the doors of the U.S. forever to individuals like Saverin if they continue to avoid paying their taxes.

balance of natureDonate

Latest article

- Advertisement -
Skip to content