Anti-missile system fires interception missiles as drones and missiles fired from Iran, as it seen over Jerusalem, on April 14, 2024. (Flash90/Jamal Awad)
By Baruch Yedid, TPS
After attacking Israel directly for the first time and failing in such a high-profile way, Iran must prove to the Arab world that its appearance of power is no mirage, a prominent Saudi commentator said.
“Now we will know if Iran is really an empire, or if it is just a country like any other country. Maybe we will find out that it is just a militia like Hamas,” Abdel Aziz Al Khamis told The Press Service of Israel.
“In the Arab world and in Iran, we’re hearing words of ridicule for the poor capability of Iran’s missiles,” Khamis said.
“Some of them fell victim to electric cables in Iraq, while others fell as fragments in Jordanian territory and are already being sold at auctions via the Internet,” which he said does not convey power.
“Saturday night’s attack is much more reminiscent of the failed attack by Saddam Hussein who fired missiles at Israel,” Khamis told TPS-IL.
He was referring to the Gulf War of 1991 when Iraq fired Scud missiles at Israel. Two Israelis were killed and 28 buildings were destroyed despite fears of more widespread destruction.
The barrages failed to elicit Israeli retaliation, which Saddam hoped would break up the international coalition countering his invasion of Kuwait.
According to the Israel Defense Forces, of the approximately 320 drones and missiles launched, 99% were intercepted.
While most of the UAVs were shot down by American, Jordanian, British and French forces, the Arrow-3 system shot down the ballistic missiles at high altitudes.
Khamis said the Arab world has taken note of Israel’s multilayered missile defense system and the results it delivered.
“In the face of the Iranian failure, Israel, along with other countries, has demonstrated a very impressive ability to defend its airspace against missile attacks,” Khamis told TPS-IL, adding that this opens the door for a once-unthinkable military alliance of Israel and the moderate Arab states.
“There is no doubt that the peoples of the region, including Israel, understand that only peace is the solution, and that’s the only way to stand against extreme Islam, against the Iranians and against the Muslim Brotherhood,” he insisted.
“The time has come for the Arab peoples to realize that there is no more room for calls to throw the Jews into the sea and that regional alliances must be made.”
Veteran National Public Radio (NPR) editor and reporter Uri Berliner resigned from the broadcaster Wednesday after being suspended without pay for publishing a lengthy essay calling out the networks’ innate left-wing bias.
“I am resigning from NPR, a great American institution where I have worked for 25 years,” Berliner posted on his X social media account. “I respect the integrity of my colleagues and wish for NPR to thrive and do important journalism.”
Berliner further detailed he “cannot work in a newsroom where I am disparaged by a new CEO whose divisive views confirm the very problems at NPR I cite in my Free Press essay.”
As Breitbart News reported, the senior business editor took the broadcaster to task over its lack of diverse views and opinions bookended by left-wing bias earlier this month.
Berliner, in an op-ed published in the Free Press, wrote the rise of advocacy at taxpayer-funded NPR “took off” with the election of former President Donald Trump in 2016.
The news veteran said he could count 87 registered Democrats in editorial positions but zero Republicans in the same positions in its Washington, DC, headquarters.
NPR’s chief news executive, Edith Chapin, wrote in a memo to staff soon after the article appeared she and the news leadership team strongly reject Berliner’s assessment.
He was subsequently suspended without pay as a reprisal.
An anti-Israel "apartheid wall" on display at Columbia University during "Israeli Apartheid Week" in 2017. Source: Facebook.
Four months after a contentious congressional hearing led to the resignations of two Ivy League presidents, Columbia University’s president is set to appear before the same committee over questions of antisemitism and the school’s response to conflicts on campus over the Israel-Hamas war.
Nemat Shafik, Columbia’s leader, was originally asked to testify at the House Education and Workforce Committee’s hearing in December, but she declined, citing scheduling conflicts.
The December hearing instead featured the presidents of Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, whose lawyerly responses drew fierce backlash and fueled weeks of controversy. The presidents of Penn and Harvard have since resigned.
During a heated line of questioning at the December hearing, Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., asked the university leaders to answer whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” would
Liz Magill, the then-president of Penn, and Claudine Gay, then-president of Harvard, both said it would depend on the details of the situation. MIT president Sally Kornbluth said that she had not heard a calling for the genocide of Jews on MIT’s campus, and that speech “targeted at individuals, not making public statements,” would be considered harassment.
Some fear University of Michigan proposed policy on protests could quell free speech efforts
Almost immediately, the careful responses from the university presidents drew criticism from donors, alumni and politicians. Magill resigned shortly after the hearing. Gay stepped down in January, following an extended campaign that accused her of plagiarism.
Shafik is expected to testify Wednesday along with Columbia University board members. Tensions and accusations of hate and bias have roiled Columbia, like at its sibling colleges, but Shafik has the benefit of hindsight in preparing her remarks. In an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal Tuesday, Shafik emphasized the delicate balance between protecting free speech and fostering a safe environment for students on campus.
“Calling for the genocide of a people — whether they are Israelis or Palestinians, Jews, Muslims or anyone else — has no place in a university community,” Shafik wrote. “Such words are outside the bounds of legitimate debate and unimaginably harmful.”
Since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, tensions have run high on university campuses. Jewish students have said that their schools are not doing enough to address instances of antisemitism. Meanwhile, students who have organized in support of Palestinian rights say they have been disproportionately targeted and censored by campus administrations.
Columbia, along with many other colleges and school districts, is the subject of a series of Department of Education investigations into antisemitism and Islamophobia on campuses. It has also been targeted by lawsuits from both sides. The New York Civil Liberties Union sued over whether the university singled out two pro-Palestinian student organizations when it suspended them from campus over protests in the fall. Groups of Jewish students have also filed suit, saying antisemitism on campus violates their civil rights.
Malcolm Hoenlein, the Vice Chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations holds a highly influential role in Jewish governmental affairs. Photo Credit: israelnationalnews.com
Edited by: Fern Sidman
The Jewish community in New York City was left shaken and deeply concerned following Iran’s missile attack on Israel over the weekend, igniting fears for the safety and well-being of loved ones in the besieged Jewish state.
Chaim Goldstein, like many others, expressed his fear and worry for his family’s safety as news of the attack spread. “Of course, I’m scared for my family and their well-being,” Goldstein shared with The New York Post as he left Chabad-Lubavitch World Headquarters in Crown Heights.
The shocking news of the invasion was broken to worshippers at the synagogue, many of whom had not been aware of the situation due to Sabbath restrictions. According to the report in the Post, the revelation prompted immediate reactions, with one man sprinting across Eastern Parkway to check on his family in Israel.
Amidst the heightened tension, a police presence was stationed outside the synagogue as a precautionary measure, calling attention to the gravity of the situation and the need for heightened security measures.
Rabbi David Sholom Pape, 79, expressed his concerns about Iran’s attack, describing it as a “suicide mission.” “I just pray that Hashem should take care of the Jewish people and that the hostages should be allowed to return to their home,” Rabbi Pape told the Post, as he reflected on the seriousness of the situation and the potential global implications.
The news of Iran deploying hundreds of suicide drones, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and rockets in the attack came as a shock to many, although some expressed a lack of surprise given Iran’s history of hostility towards Israel, according to the information provided in the Post report. The strike, which involved approximately 200 drones, marks Iran’s first-ever direct attack on Israel and comes in the wake of heightened hostilities between the two nations. As per the Post report, the attack follows Israel’s airstrike in Damascus, Lebanon on April 1, which resulted in the killing of top Iranian generals.
For many Jewish New Yorkers, the news of the attack hits close to home, as they have family and loved ones residing in Israel. Samson, a 26-year-old who declined to provide his last name to the Post, expressed concern for his family’s safety and emphasized the daily rituals of prayer and communication with relatives in Israel. “We call every day to find out how they’re doing. We pray every day for our brothers and sisters in their holy land,” Samson shared with the Post, highlighting the deep connection and sense of solidarity within the Jewish community.
However, amidst the concern, there is also condemnation for the scenes of celebration in Tehran following the destruction caused by the attack. As was reported by the Post, Samson chastised the Iranians who were seen celebrating, denouncing their actions as “horrible” and emphasizing the cruelty celebrating violence and destruction. “War is terrible. War is cruel. We want the war to stop. Anyone dancing anywhere for missiles dropping is cruel,” he asserted, during an interview with the Post. His remarks echoed sentiments shared by many within the community.
Moshe Frank, 38, told the Post that he attributed the celebrations to a culture of hatred towards Israel perpetuated by the Iranian government. “The Iranian people have been brainwashed to hate Israel,” Frank declared as he expressed hope for de-escalation and a return to peace in the region.
In the heart of Crown Heights, 18-year-old Goldstein finds himself caught in the midst of the turmoil, having moved from Israel to New York City just one month before the Hamas led October 7th surprise attack, as was indicated in the Post report. On that day, 1200 Israelis and others were brutally massacred and 250 were taken into Hamas captivity in Gaza.
Despite the physical distance separating him from his family back in Israel, Goldstein remains deeply connected to the ongoing conflict, pushing for peace and an end to the violence that has plagued the region. “We should live in peace together, just like the Arabs and Jews lived in peace,” he exclaimed to the Post.
Meanwhile, Rabbi Shimmy Weinbaum, a pillar of the Crown Heights community, draws strength from his faith amidst the chaos. Reflecting on past trials, Rabbi Weinbaum recalls Iraq’s missile campaign against Israel in 1991 and the divine protection that guided the nation through those dark times. “The same God who protected us then is still around. He didn’t go anywhere and he will protect us,” Rabbi Weinbaum affirmed when speaking to the Post.
In a poignant twist of fate, Rabbi Weinbaum’s 18-year-old daughter, having traveled from Israel to Crown Heights to celebrate Passover with her father, finds herself in the midst of uncertainty, the Post report added. Yet, Rabbi Weinbaum remains unwavering in his belief that she is safer in Israel than in New York City, a testament to the resilience and fortitude of the Israeli people amidst ongoing threats.
As tensions escalate, Mayor Eric Adams reassured New Yorkers of the city’s unwavering support for the State of Israel. “New York City unequivocally stands with the State of Israel,” Mayor Adams said, as was pointed out in the Post report.
Acknowledging the significance of the assault for Jewish New Yorkers, especially with Passover fast approaching, Mayor Adams emphasized the city’s commitment to ensuring the safety of its Jewish residents, the report in the Post noted. In response to the heightened tensions, additional NYPD resources have been deployed to Jewish communities and places of worship across the city as a precautionary measure.
Jewish leaders in New York City have joined Mayor Adams in condemning the attack, with Senator Majority Leader Chuck Schumer reaffirming the United States’ unwavering support for Israel’s defense against Iran. Also mentioned in the Post report was Mark Treyger, a former Democratic city councilmember representing south Brooklyn and a member of the Jewish caucus. He echoed these sentiments, describing the attack as a “sobering reminder” of Israel’s ongoing struggles since the outbreak of the conflict on October 7th. Treyger described the relentless nature of Iran’s aggression towards Israel, highlighting the regime’s support for Hamas terrorism and its direct assault on a key ally and democracy in the region.
As the world watches closely, the actions taken by New York City and its leaders send a clear message of support and solidarity to Israel during this challenging time. With Passover on the horizon, the Jewish community in New York City remains steadfast in its resolve to stand with Israel and ensure the safety and security of its people, both at home and abroad.
Jewish students from Columbia University are set to confront President Minouche Shafik during a congressional hearing in Washington, D.C.. Photo Credit: president.columbia.edu
Edited by: Fern Sidman
In a significant development highlighting the growing concerns over anti-Semitism on college campuses, Jewish students from Columbia University are set to confront President Minouche Shafik during a congressional hearing in Washington, D.C., as was reported by The New York Post on Sunday. The students’ testimonies come amidst mounting pressure on university leaders to address and combat anti-Semitism within academic institutions.
Scheduled for Wednesday, the hearing, titled “Columbia in Crisis: Columbia University’s Response to Anti-Semitism,” will provide a platform for students to voice their experiences of anti-Semitic incidents on campus and demand accountability from university administration, according to the information provided in the Post report. The students will also engage in personal meetings with members of the House of Representatives, including Rep. Elise Stefanik, who has been vocal in her advocacy against anti-Semitism in higher education.
The students will also engage in personal meetings with members of the House of Representatives, including Rep. Elise Stefanik, who has been vocal in her advocacy against anti-Semitism in higher education. In a statement to The Post, Stefanik condemned the pervasive anti-Semitism at Columbia University, characterizing it as symptomatic of a broader systemic problem within the higher education system. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Stefanik’s involvement underscores the seriousness of the issue, as her pointed questions in prior hearings have led to significant repercussions for university leaders. Notably, the Post report revealed that her interrogation contributed to the removal of presidents from prestigious institutions such as Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, who struggled to provide satisfactory responses regarding their handling of anti-Semitism.
In a statement to The Post, Stefanik condemned the pervasive anti-Semitism at Columbia University, characterizing it as symptomatic of a broader systemic problem within the higher education system. The Post report also said that from calls for the genocide of Jews to the presence of swastikas on campus property, anti-Semitic incidents have become distressingly common, creating an environment where Jewish students feel unsafe and marginalized.
The House Committee on Education and The Workforce’s decision to host a hearing specifically focused on Columbia University’s response to anti-Semitism signals a recognition of the severity of the issue and the importance of holding academic institutions accountable for fostering inclusive and respectful environments for all students.
The university expressed willingness to engage in discussions about its efforts to address these issues, emphasizing a proactive approach to ensure the safety and well-being of the campus community, as was explained in the Post report.
The timing of these discussions is significant, as they coincide with a wave of incidents on college campuses across the United States in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attacks against Israel. The escalating tensions in the Middle East have reverberated globally, leading to increased polarization and contentious debates within academic institutions.
One particular incident has drawn attention to Columbia University’s handling of anti-Semitism allegations within its academic ranks. A public health graduate student, Marc Nock, accused Professor Abdul Kayum Ahmed of making disparaging remarks about Jewish philanthropists Joseph Mailman and Armand Hammer. According to Nock, Ahmed suggested that the School of Public Health and its building in Washington Heights should not be named after Jews, insinuating that their contributions amounted to “blood money,” as was affirmed by the Post. Nock characterized Ahmed’s comments as perpetuating anti-Semitic tropes and fostering a hostile learning environment.
A public health graduate student, Marc Nock, accused Professor Abdul Kayum Ahmed of making disparaging remarks about Jewish philanthropists Joseph Mailman and Armand Hammer. Photo Credit: law.columbia.edu
Ahmed reportedly received a letter from Columbia’s School of Public Health, indicating that his employment as a professor would not be renewed next year. The Post report revealed that while the letter did not explicitly cite criticism of Ahmed’s statements or advocacy as a reason, the decision has raised questions about the university’s response to allegations of anti-Semitism.
Several academic leaders have faced criticism for their anti-Israel commentary following the recent attacks, sparking debates about freedom of expression, academic freedom, and the boundaries of acceptable discourse on college campuses.
Nock expressed hopes that Columbia will take proactive measures to prevent the hiring of professors who propagate hate and discrimination. The report in the Post said that Nock’s sentiments reflect broader concerns among students about the need for decisive action to combat antisemitism and promote tolerance and respect on campus.
Yola Ashkenazie, a student at Columbia-affiliated Barnard College, shared her experiences of feeling targeted and threatened as a Jewish student on the Morningside campus. As was detailed in the Post report, Ashkenazie recounted incidents where Israeli students were spat on for speaking Hebrew and where she herself was subjected to online harassment for expressing pro-Israel views. The emergence of social media platforms such as “Barfnard,” which reposted a photo of Ashkenazie carrying an Israeli flag, calls attention to the challenges faced by Jewish students in navigating a campus environment fraught with tensions and hostility.
The Post also reported that Ashkenazie recounted instances of anti-Jewish rhetoric, including chants of “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free” and slogans such as “We Don’t Want Zionism here.” Ashkenazie expressed the distressing sentiment that such rhetoric implies that Jewish students such as herself do not belong on campus.
Ashkenazie also welcomed the upcoming congressional hearing, which will scrutinize Columbia University’s response to anti-Semitism. As per the Post report, she hopes that the hearing will compel the administration to develop a concrete plan to address the fears and concerns of students who feel unsafe on campus.
Yaffa Mashkabov, a graduate student at Columbia’s School of Social Work, shared her own troubling encounter with anti-Semitism in the classroom. As explained in the Post report, Mashkabov recalled a fellow student justifying the rape and kidnapping of Israelis, leaving her stunned and disheartened. As an observant Jew, Mashkabov spoke of the lawsuit filed against the School of Social Work for its treatment of an orthodox Jewish student.
Moreover, the information in the Post report noted that Mashkabov referenced an anti-Semitic flier depicting a skunk in the colors of the Israeli flag and a Star of David, which surfaced on Columbia’s Morningside campus. She offered her view that anti-Semitism is not merely a feeling but a tangible reality faced by Jewish students, and expressed hope that the attention garnered by Congress will lead to positive change.
The incidents described by Ashkenazie and Mashkabov reflect a disturbing trend of anti-Semitism that has permeated Columbia University’s campus, prompting urgent calls for action. The upcoming congressional hearing represents a pivotal moment for the university to address these concerns and implement measures to ensure the safety and well-being of all students.
NYC has seen a record jump in the number of human leptospirosis, a disease caused by rat urine. Credit: Wikipedia.org
By: Tom Ozimek
New York City has seen a record jump in the number of human leptospirosis, a disease caused by rat urine that can cause kidney damage, liver failure, and even death.
The city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene issued an advisory on April 12, warning that the number of human leptospirosis cases continues to trend upward.
The agency said that 24 cases were reported in New York City in 2023, the highest number in a single year on record.
New York City has seen a record jump in the number of human leptospirosis, a disease caused by rat urine that can cause kidney damage, liver failure, and even death.
The city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene issued an advisory on April 12, warning that the number of human leptospirosis cases continues to trend upward.
The agency said that 24 cases were reported in New York City in 2023, the highest number in a single year on record.
In fact, 6 cases have been reported so far in 2024, twice as high as the average annual number of cases between 2001 and 2020.
While human leptospirosis infections can be caused by contaminated soil and water during natural disasters like floods and hurricanes, in New York they’re mostly caused by rat urine.
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease caused by several species of bacteria. In New York, it’s mostly associated with the Norway rat.
“Infected animals excrete the bacteria in their urine, and bacteria can persist in warm, moist environments for weeks,” the advisory states.
“Transmission occurs through direct contact with infectious urine or urine contaminated water, soil, or food, entering the body through open wounds or mucous membranes.”
In New York, the average number of locally acquired cases of the disease was 15 per year during 2021–23. That number was just 3 per year on average between 2001 and 2020.
There have been six deaths associated with the disease in New York between 2001 and 2023, with cases of acute renal and hepatic failure, and occasionally severe pulmonary distress.
While it’s unclear what accounts for the rise in infections, the city’s health department suggested excessive rain and unseasonably warm temperatures may have something to do with it.
The alarming advisory comes exactly a year after New York City Mayor Eric Adams appointed Kathleen Corradi as the city’s first-ever citywide director of rodent mitigation, which his office dubbed the “rat czar.”
“New York City has done a lot recently when it comes to fighting public enemy number one: rats,” Mr. Adams said in a statement on April 12, 2023. “But it was clear we needed someone solely focused on leading our rat reduction efforts across all five boroughs.”
The appointment of Ms. Corradi as “rat czar” came as Mr. Adams’s office announced a $3.5 million investment in an accelerated rat reduction plan.
Earlier in 2022, Mr. Adams signed four pieces of legislation to fight rats.
“Today, we’re making clear that rats don’t run our city. New Yorkers do,” Mr. Adams said at a press conference on Nov. 18, 2022.
“The four bills I sign today will help create a cleaner city for New Yorkers,” he said. “The legislation will create rat mitigation zones, codify garbage set out times, and reduce rats in construction areas and other buildings with large rodent infestations.”
While it’s unclear how many rats there are in New York City, research in mid-2023 from MMPC Pest Control suggests the city’s rat population has grown to around 3 million.
Former President Donald Trump sits in Manhattan criminal court with his legal team in New York, April 15, 2024. (Jabin Botsford/Pool Photo via AP)
By: Thomas Beaumont & Amelia Thomson-Deveaux
The first criminal trial facing former President Donald Trump is also the one in which Americans are least convinced he committed a crime, a new AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll finds.
Only about one-third of U.S. adults say Trump did something illegal in the hush money case for which jury selection began Monday, while close to half think he did something illegal in the other three criminal cases pending against him. And they’re fairly skeptical that Trump is getting a fair shake from the prosecutors in the case — or that the judge and jurors can be impartial in cases involving him.
Still, half of Americans would consider Trump unfit to serve as president if he is convicted of falsifying business documents to cover up hush money payments to a woman who said he had an affair with her.
While a New York jury will decide whether to convict Trump of felony charges, public opinion of the trial proceedings could hurt him politically. The poll suggests a conviction could hurt Trump’s campaign. Trump enters a rematch with President Joe Biden as the first presumptive nominee of a major party — and the first former president — to be under indictment. A verdict is expected in roughly six weeks, well before the Republican National Convention where he will accept the GOP nomination.
Trump has made the prosecutions against him a centerpiece of his campaign and argued without evidence that Biden engineered the cases. That argument helped him consolidate GOP support during the Republican primary, but a conviction might influence how many Americans — including independent voters and people long skeptical of Trump — perceive his candidacy.
“Any conviction should disqualify him,” said Callum Schlumpf, a 31-year-old engineering student and political independent from Clifton, Texas. “It sets a bad example to the rest of the world. I think it misrepresents us, as a country, as to what we believe is important and virtuous.”
Yet, a cloud of doubt hangs over all the proceedings. Only about 3 in 10 Americans feel that any of the prosecutors who have brought charges against Trump are treating the former president fairly. And only about 2 in 10 Americans are extremely or very confident that the judges and jurors in the cases against him can be fair and impartial.
“It’s very obvious political persecution,” said Christopher Ruff, a 46-year-old political independent and museum curator from Sanford, North Carolina. “I’m no fan of Trump in any way, shape or form. Didn’t vote for him, never will. But it’s obviously all political.”
Consistent with AP-NORC polls conducted over the past year, the new poll found that about half of Americans say Trump did something illegal regarding the classified documents found at his Florida home, and a similar share think he did something illegal regarding his alleged attempt to interfere in Georgia’s vote count in the 2020 presidential election. The poll also found that nearly half of Americans believe he did something illegal related to his effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
Prosecutors in New York will argue that Trump falsified his company’s internal records to hide the true nature of a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen. Cohen alleges he was directed by Trump to pay adult film actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 one month before the 2016 election to silence her claims about an extramarital affair with Trump.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to the 34-count indictment and denied any affair with Daniels.
The poll found that 35% of Americans say Trump has done something illegal with regard to the hush money allegations. Slightly fewer, about 3 in 10, think he did something unethical without breaking the law. Fourteen percent think he did nothing wrong at all. Those numbers haven’t shifted meaningfully in the year since he was first charged in the case.
Eliot Spitzer, the former Governor of New York and Adam Leitman Bailey, a well-known attorney are in a dispute. Credit: YouTube.com
Edited by: Jane Zakharova
In the heart of New York City, a legal drama is unfolding that has the real estate industry on the edge of its seats. The dispute involves two of the city’s most prominent figures: Eliot Spitzer, the former Governor of New York, and Adam Leitman Bailey, a well-known attorney.
The epicenter of this dispute is a prime piece of real estate located at 985 Fifth Avenue, which is currently owned by Spitzer. The former governor has grand plans for this property, intending to demolish the existing structure and replace it with a 19-story, 26-unit condominium.
However, Bailey, who represents the co-op next door, has challenged Spitzer’s plans. He argues that Spitzer has effectively relinquished ownership of a 350-square-foot parcel of land by allowing the co-op at 980 Fifth Avenue to use it. This argument is based on a legal principle known as adverse possession, which allows a person to gain ownership of a property if they have occupied it without the owner’s permission for a certain period.
This seemingly minor disagreement over a small piece of land has escalated into a full-blown war between two of New York’s most aggressive lawyers. Bailey has even sought an order of protection against Spitzer, alleging that the former governor has engaged in harassment and attempted to intimidate a key witness in the case.
In response, Spitzer has accused Bailey of dishonesty and has requested the court to discipline him. He has referred to Bailey’s law firm as a “perjury factory” and has expressed his disbelief at the disregard for ethics and truth by practicing lawyers.
Bailey, on the other hand, has retorted that Spitzer is attempting to divert attention from the merits of the case. He maintains that Spitzer cannot refute the co-op’s claim of adverse possession over the disputed land.
The outcome of this legal tussle will have far-reaching implications for property rights and future building projects in New York City. As the drama unfolds, the city watches with bated breath, awaiting the verdict that could reshape its skyline.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the intensity and importance of real estate disputes in New York City. It underscores the lengths to which parties will go to protect their interests and the impact such disputes can have on the city’s landscape. As the city waits for the outcome, one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the battle is far from over.
The legal battle between Spitzer and Bailey is more than just a dispute over a small piece of land. It is a clash of titans, a showdown between two of the city’s most formidable legal minds. Both men are known for their aggressive tactics and their refusal to back down, making this a battle worth watching.
Spitzer, once known as “The Sheriff of Wall Street” during his tenure as New York’s Attorney General, is no stranger to controversy. His plans to redevelop 985 Fifth Avenue have been met with resistance, not just from Bailey, but also from residents of the co-op next door. They fear that the new condominium will block their views and decrease the value of their properties.
On the other side of the battle line is Bailey, a lawyer known for his tenacity and his willingness to fight for his clients. He has represented the co-op at 980 Fifth Avenue with vigor, challenging Spitzer’s plans at every turn.
Ohebshalom made it to the Public Advocate’s Worst Landlords Watchlist in 2022 for his management of two Washington Heights buildings located at 705 and 709 West 170th Street. Pictured above is plaster chunks atop a child’s bed at 709 West 170th Street (courtesy of 709 West 170th Street Tenants Association)
By: Jane Zakharova
In a shocking development that has sent shockwaves through the real estate community, an arrest warrant has been issued for Daniel Ohebshalom, a landlord who has been dubbed the city’s “worst landlord” due to his egregious neglect of tenant rights and property maintenance. Ohebshalom, who is based in Los Angeles, made it to the Public Advocate’s Worst Landlords Watchlist in 2022 for his management of two Washington Heights buildings located at 705 and 709 West 170th Street. He is now facing the legal consequences of nearly 700 violations that have been reported against him.
Ohebshalom, who also goes by the name Shalom, has repeatedly missed deadlines and extensions that were offered by the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development to correct these violations. His failure to address these issues in a timely manner demonstrates a complete lack of responsibility and respect for his tenants. The tenants of his buildings have been forced to endure unacceptable living conditions, including an interior entryway door made of plywood, unreliable heat and hot water, and exterior doors that do not latch shut. These conditions have reportedly invited homeless individuals to use the building for drug use. In response to these complaints, the city eventually replaced the plywood with a metal door. However, the fact that the city had to step in to address the issue speaks volumes about Ohebshalom’s negligence.
The landlord was held in contempt of court in February 2023, and again last summer for failing to remedy hazardous violations. These violations included infestations of roaches and mice, other rodent problems, and numerous counts of lead paint. Despite being given one more month to follow court orders in January of this year, Ohebshalom failed to make the necessary fixes.
Now, Ohebshalom faces up to 60 days in Rikers Island. However, he has the opportunity to shorten his stay if he manages to cure the violations while behind bars. This case underscores the serious consequences that landlords can face for neglecting their properties and failing to address violations. It’s a stark reminder that landlords like Ohebshalom, who show a complete disregard for their responsibilities, will eventually have to face the consequences of their actions.
This lawsuit is a stark reminder of the responsibilities that come with being a landlord. It highlights the importance of maintaining properties to a high standard and addressing any issues promptly and effectively. Failure to do so can result in severe legal consequences, as demonstrated by Ohebshalom’s case. It serves as a warning to other landlords about the importance of adhering to regulations and ensuring the well-being of their tenants.
This case should serve as a wake-up call to all landlords about the importance of maintaining their properties and respecting the rights of their tenants. It’s a clear demonstration of the serious consequences that can result from neglect and disregard for tenant rights. It’s a sobering reminder that being a landlord is not just about collecting rent.
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators blocked roadways in Illinois, California, New York and the Pacific Northwest on Monday. Credit: AP
By: Sophia Tareen
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators blocked roadways in Illinois, California, New York and the Pacific Northwest on Monday, temporarily shutting down travel into some of the nation’s most heavily used airports, onto the Golden Gate and Brooklyn bridges and on a busy West Coast highway.
In Chicago, protesters linked arms and blocked lanes of Interstate 190 leading into O’Hare International Airport around 7 a.m. in a demonstration they said was part of a global “economic blockade to free Palestine,” according to Rifqa Falaneh, one of the organizers.
Traffic in the San Francisco Bay Area was snarled for hours as demonstrators shut down all vehicle, pedestrian and bike traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge and chained themselves to 55-gallon drums filled with cement across Interstate 880 in Oakland. Protesters marching into Brooklyn blocked Manhattan-bound traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge. In Eugene, Oregon, protesters blocked Interstate 5, shutting down traffic on the major highway for about 45 minutes.
Protesters say they chose O’Hare in part because it is one of the largest airports. Among other things, they’ve called for an immediate cease-fire in the war between Israel and Hamas.
Anti- war protesters have demonstrated in Chicago near daily since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel that killed around 1,200 people. Israeli warplanes and ground troops have since conducted a scorched-earth campaign on the Gaza Strip.
The Israeli offensive has killed more than 33,700 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count but says women and children make up two-thirds of the dead.
O’Hare warned travelers on the social platform X to take alternative forms of transportation with car travel “substantially delayed this morning due to protest activity.”
Some travelers stuck in standstill traffic left their cars and walked the final leg to the airport along the freeway, trailing their luggage behind them.
Among them was Madeline Hannan from suburban Chicago. She was headed to O’Hare for a work trip to Florida when her and her husband’s car ended up stalled for 20 minutes. She got out and “both ran and speed walked” more than a mile (1.6 kilometers). She said she made it to the gate on time, but barely.
“This was an inconvenience,” she said in a telephone interview from Florida. “But in the grand scheme of things going on overseas, it’s a minor inconvenience.”
While individual travelers may have been affected, operations at the airport appeared near normal with delays of under 15 minutes, according to the Chicago Department of Aviation.
Inbound traffic toward O’Hare resumed around 9 a.m.
Near Seattle, the Washington State Department of Transportation said a demonstration closed the main road to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Social media posts showed people holding a banner and waving Palestinian flags while standing on the highway, which reopened about three hours later.
About 20 protesters were arrested at the Golden Gate Bridge demonstration and traffic resumed shortly after noon, according to the California Highway Patrol. The agency said officers were making arrests at two points on the interstate, including one spot where roughly 300 protesters refused orders to disperse.
“Attempting to block or shut down a freeway or state highway to protest is unlawful, dangerous, and prevents motorists from safely reaching their destinations,” the agency said in a statement.
Oregon State Police said 52 protestors were arrested for disorderly conduct following the Interstate 5 protest in Eugene, Oregon, about 110 miles (177 kilometers) south of Portland. Six vehicles were towed from the scene.
In the wake of Iran’s overnight attack on Israel, Speaker Mike Johnson has announced plans for the House to vote on aid for both Israel and Ukraine in the coming days, according to a report in The New York Times. The announcement comes amid escalating tensions in the region and a renewed push to bolster support for key U.S. allies.
Speaking on Fox News, Speaker Johnson stressed the importance of standing with Israel in the face of adversity, emphasizing the House Republicans’ commitment to advancing aid packages for the embattled nation. He highlighted his previous efforts to introduce aid bills aimed at assisting Israel and expressed determination to revisit the issue once more.
“We’re going to try again this week,” Johnson declared, signaling the House’s intent to address the urgent needs of Israel and potentially include aid for Ukraine in the legislation, as was indicated in the NYT report. He acknowledged that the details of the aid package are still being finalized, but assured that options are being explored to address the supplemental issues at hand.
The decision to include aid for Ukraine alongside assistance for Israel reflects a broader effort to address foreign policy challenges and demonstrate solidarity with key allies. U.S. funding for both Israel and Ukraine has faced obstacles in Congress, with previous aid packages languishing amid political gridlock and partisan disagreements.
Initially, Johnson had resisted taking up a $95 billion aid package for Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan passed by the Senate. Similarly, the NYT also reported that the Senate had refused to consider a House Republican proposal that conditioned aid to Israel on domestic spending cuts, underscoring the complexities surrounding foreign aid appropriations.
The outcome of this legislative endeavor will not only shape America’s stance on global security challenges but also reaffirm its commitments to longstanding allies in the face of adversity.
Amidst political deliberations and consultations with key stakeholders, Johnson remains cautiously optimistic about garnering support for aid proposals related to Ukraine, with some Republicans reportedly favoring conditioning the aid as a loan, as was noted in the NYT report.
Johnson’s recent meeting with former President Donald J. Trump in Florida calls attention to the delicate balancing act between appeasing conservative factions within the Republican Party and advancing bipartisan initiatives. Trump’s purported endorsement of conditioning aid to Ukraine as a loan adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing negotiations surrounding foreign aid appropriations.
“I think these are ideas that I think can get consensus, and that’s what we’ve been working through,” Johnson remarked, expressing confidence in the viability of potential aid proposals, the NYT report said. However, the specifics of the proposed legislation remain fluid, with Johnson emphasizing the need to finalize a comprehensive package before sending it to the Senate for approval.
According to the information in the NYT report, before the recent attacks in Israel, Johnson had entertained the idea of bringing up a $95 billion spending package for Ukraine and Israel, passed by the Senate in February, and moving it through the House alongside a second bill containing policies endorsed by the conservative wing of the Republican Party. This strategic maneuver aimed to secure support from Republicans while advancing bipartisan aid initiatives for Ukraine.
Representative Michael McCaul, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, echoed sentiments regarding the interconnectedness of the conflicts in Israel and Ukraine, advocating for a comprehensive approach to addressing both crises. McCaul emphasized the urgency of addressing national security concerns through legislative action, highlighting the need for swift congressional deliberations.
Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) said: “The State of Qatar hosts Hamas’ leaders in their capital of Doha. Now initially, Qatari officials claimed they are exercising leverage on Hamas. They have the ability to expel these terrorists if they don’t release the hostages or at least engage in reasonable negotiations.” Credit: budd.senate.gov
Edited by: Fern Sidman
Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Joni Ernst (R-IA), and Rick Scott (R-FL) have initiated legislation that targets Qatar’s designation as a major non-NATO ally of the United States. According to a report on Wednesday on the JewishInsider.com web site, the legislative push emerges from concerns over Qatar’s financial connections to terrorist groups, specifically Hamas, and its inaction in using its influence to secure the release of the remaining 133 Israeli hostages being held in captivity in Gaza by the Iranian backed terror group.
The senators’ legislation seeks to leverage Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally, a designation that brings various military and economic benefits, as a bargaining chip to force the Gulf nation to sever its ties with Hamas and take a more active stance against global terrorism. As was reported on the JewishInsider.com web site, the proposed law mandates a 90-day period within which the State Department must assess the U.S.-Qatar relationship, determining whether it aligns with U.S. national interests and whether Qatar has used its influence over Hamas effectively.
The legislation outlines specific criteria that Qatar must meet to retain its status. These include demonstrating an active effort to use its leverage over Hamas, ceasing support (both direct and indirect) to terrorist organizations, and either expelling or extraditing members of Hamas, as per the information provided in the JewishInsider.com report. Failure to meet these criteria would result in the immediate termination of Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally, a condition that would remain until the Gulf nation complies with all the stipulated requirements.
A point of contention highlighted in the bill is Qatar’s undermining of negotiations for a hostage deal. JewishInsider.com also reported that the senators have accused Qatar of making public calls for a cease-fire that does not condition on the release of the hostages and of claiming a lack of leverage over Hamas, actions that the U.S. lawmakers see as contradictory and harmful to efforts in securing the release of U.S. nationals held hostage.
This legislation represents a significant escalation in the scrutiny of Qatar’s foreign relations, particularly concerning its financial and material support for Hamas.
The discussion of revoking Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally (MNNA) by U.S. lawmakers calls attention to the dynamic and conditional nature of international relations, particularly in the context of geopolitical and security interests. The MNNA status is a significant designation by the United States, providing various military and financial advantages, such as cooperative defense research, shared military training, and priority delivery of defense material, according to the information contained in the JewishInsider.com report. However, this status is not just an honor but also a statement of trust and mutual interest, implying that the recipient country aligns with the U.S. on crucial international policies, including counterterrorism.
The controversy around Qatar’s MNNA status primarily revolves around its interactions with Hamas, an organization designated as a terrorist group by the United States. The U.S. perceives Qatar’s actions, or lack thereof, against Hamas as not just a passive stance but as support for the group, which is inconsistent with the responsibilities and expectations attached to being an MNNA.
Representative Budd’s proposal to reconsider Qatar’s MNNA status is a manifestation of broader concerns among some U.S. lawmakers about Qatar’s international conduct, especially regarding its relationship with Hamas.
In a speech on the Senate floor, Senator Budd stated, “Seeking the release of the hostages demands strength and moral clarity. We demand it of our own leaders, and we should require it from our major allies. He continued: “The State of Qatar hosts Hamas’ leaders in their capital of Doha. Now initially, Qatari officials claimed they are exercising leverage on Hamas. Then they publicly stated thereafter that they have no leverage. And now, they’re promoting a ceasefire regardless of the release of the hostages. The truth is that Qatar does have significant leverage over Hamas. They have the ability to expel these terrorists if they don’t release the hostages or at least engage in reasonable negotiations.”
He added that, “The truth is that Hamas is not interested in releasing the hostages, and Qatar seems equally uninterested in forcing them to do so. It is time that we hold nations like Qatar accountable for their dithering and their stalling. I do not introduce this bill lightly. It is not where I started with this relationship, but it is a reflection of where we are today as a result of the repeated warnings that Members of Congress have given to Qatar about the liability of continuing to host Hamas.”
Budd emphasized that, “The time for talking is over, and the time for action is now. If we don’t see action, then Qatar must face consequences. At the end of the day, this bill represents another step towards securing the freedom of our fellow Americans.”
His statement reflects a serious consideration of the bilateral relationship dynamics, emphasizing that such a privileged status requires continuous evaluation and must be merited through actions that align with U.S. interests and security imperatives.
Senator Joni Ernst’s comments further amplify the sentiment of disappointment or dissatisfaction with Qatar’s stance, indicating a broader spectrum of concern within the U.S. legislative body about whether Qatar is meeting the expectations tied to its MNNA status, as was suggested in the JewishInsider.com report.
Ernst told the JewishInsider.com that she hasn’t seen the change in posture and attitude from Qatar she’s been looking for. “I’ve told the foreign minister this — they need to step up,” she said. “They need to make sure Hamas is getting back to the table, or get rid of them.”
Other lawmakers don’t yet seem prepared to take the step laid out in the bill.
Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), who signed a joint statement with Budd, Ernst and other colleagues last month saying that Qatar should expel Hamas leadership if negotiations fail, indicated he found the bill premature.
Coons indicated that he had personally engaged with Qatari officials, including the ambassador and foreign minister, urging them to do more to pressure Hamas towards constructive negotiations. The JewishInsider.com reported that he acknowledged the ongoing efforts by President Biden, to apply diplomatic pressure on Qatar and Hamas. However, he cautioned against immediately revoking Qatar’s major non-NATO ally status, suggesting that such a drastic measure should be considered only if Qatar unequivocally fails to take substantive action.
Senator Roger Wicker, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also expressed reservations about the proposed bill, emphasizing the importance of cautious deliberation. According to the JewishInsider.com, Wicker, a Republican from Mississippi, highlighted Qatar’s historical cooperation with the United States and underscored the mutual benefits derived from their bilateral relationship. He stressed the need for governments to engage in direct dialogue rather than resorting to legislative measures.
Similarly, Senator Roger Marshall, a Republican from Kansas, echoed Wicker’s sentiments, stating that he has not seen sufficient evidence to justify Qatar losing its status as a major non-NATO ally, the report added. Marshall’s remarks suggest a reluctance among some lawmakers to endorse measures that could potentially strain diplomatic ties with Qatar.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin also weighed in on the matter during a recent congressional hearing, commending Qatar for its efforts in facilitating hostage releases. As per the JewishInsider.com report, Austin acknowledged Qatar’s role as a key mediator in hostage negotiations and reiterated the country’s commitment to resolving such matters swiftly.
In a move that could reshape the landscape of social media and technology, former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin is reportedly eyeing a partnership with an artificial intelligence (AI) firm to facilitate a bid to acquire TikTok, as was reported by the New York Post. This revelation comes in the wake of growing Congressional concerns over the popular video-sharing app’s ownership by China-based ByteDance and its potential implications for national security.
Mnuchin’s interest in acquiring TikTok was first disclosed following the passage of a bill by House lawmakers, mandating ByteDance to divest its ownership of the app within six months or face a complete ban in the United States, according to the Post report. Now, insiders familiar with the matter reveal that Mnuchin is actively pitching a plan to rebuild TikTok’s algorithm on American soil as a strategic move to assuage Congressional apprehensions and navigate China’s stringent export regulations.
Central to Mnuchin’s strategy is the belief that overhauling TikTok’s sophisticated algorithm is paramount in addressing national security concerns. Indicated in the Post report was that the app’s algorithm, responsible for curating and recommending content to users, is seen as a potential avenue for data collection and surveillance, raising red flags among lawmakers.
Sources close to Mnuchin indicate that he recognizes the complexity and scale of the task at hand, acknowledging the necessity of partnering with an AI firm possessing advanced capabilities and expertise in algorithm development. The report in the Post explained that given the magnitude of the endeavor, Mnuchin is reportedly open to collaborating with multiple tech firms to ensure the successful reconstruction of TikTok’s algorithm within the confines of US jurisdiction.
However, both Mnuchin’s spokesperson and TikTok declined to comment on the matter to the Post.
As Mnuchin lays the groundwork for a potential bid to acquire TikTok, industry observers and experts have identified Oracle, the software giant led by billionaire Trump donor Larry Ellison, as a logical candidate to join forces with Mnuchin in this endeavor. According to the information provided in the Post report, Oracle’s involvement in the TikTok saga is not unprecedented; the company had previously been on the brink of acquiring TikTok during Mnuchin’s tenure as Treasury secretary as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to compel ByteDance to divest its ownership.
TikTok, in its bid to assuage concerns surrounding data security and user privacy, has committed to storing the data of its US users on servers operated by Oracle, a component of its “Project Texas” initiative, the Post report said. This proactive measure is designed to placate regulatory and legislative scrutiny while bolstering confidence in TikTok’s commitment to operating within US regulatory frameworks.
However, Oracle’s silence in response to inquiries regarding its potential involvement in Mnuchin’s bid leaves much to speculation and conjecture. Despite this, industry analysts posit that an Oracle-TikTok partnership would likely encounter less regulatory scrutiny compared to potential deals with tech behemoths such as Google, Meta (formerly Facebook), and Apple, as was detailed in the Post report. Oracle’s established presence in the technology sector and its previous engagement with TikTok position it as a feasible and relatively low-risk partner in Mnuchin’s bid.
Tobin Marcus, a former economic adviser to Vice President Biden during the Obama administration, asserts that Oracle’s involvement in the TikTok saga aligns with its historical entanglement in the matter, further validating its suitability as a partner in Mnuchin’s bid.
In addition to Oracle, Microsoft emerges as another logical contender in the race to acquire TikTok. The information in the Post report indicated that the tech giant, which boasts a significant investment in OpenAI, had previously come close to acquiring TikTok in 2020.
Supporters of Donald Trump participate in a rally in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)
By: Mark Sherman
The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned whether federal prosecutors went too far in bringing obstruction charges against hundreds of participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. But it wasn’t clear how the justices would rule in a case that also could affect the prosecution of former President Donald Trump, who faces the same charge for his efforts to overturn his election loss in 2020.
The justices heard arguments over the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding in the case of Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who has been indicted for his role in disrupting Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump. Fischer is one of 330 people facing that charge, which stems from a law passed in the aftermath of the Enron financial scandal more than two decades ago to deal with the destruction of documents.
Trump is facing two charges in a separate case brought by special counsel Jack Smith in Washington that could be knocked out with a favorable ruling from the nation’s highest court. Next week, the justices will hear arguments over whether the former president and presumptive nominee for the 2024 Republican nomination has “absolute immunity” from prosecution in that case, a proposition that has so far been rejected by two lower courts.
Smith has argued separately in the immunity case that the obstruction charges against Trump are valid no matter how the court decides Fischer’s case. The first former U.S. president under indictment, Trump is on trial on hush money charges in New York and also has been charged with election interference in Georgia and with mishandling classified documents in Florida.
It was not clear after more than 90 minutes of arguments precisely where the court would land in Fischer’s case. Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch appeared most likely to side with Fischer, while liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor seemed more favorable to the Justice Department’s position.
Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson, a former federal public defender, expressed interest in more of a middle-ground outcome that might make it harder, but not impossible, for prosecutors to use the obstruction charge.
Some of the conservative justices said the law was so broad that it could be used against even peaceful protests and also questioned why the Justice Department has not brought charges under the provision in other violent protests.
“There have been many violent protests that have interfered with proceedings,” Justice Clarence Thomas said. He was back on the bench Tuesday after an unexplained one-day absence.
Gorsuch appeared to be drawing on actual events when he asked Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar whether people could be charged with obstructing an official proceeding if they rose in protest inside the courtroom, heckled the president at the State of the Union or pulled a fire alarm in the Capitol complex to delay a vote in Congress.
Alito, suggesting the government’s reading of the law is too broad, asked whether the charge could be applied to people who disrupted the day’s court session by shouting “Keep the January 6 insurrectionists in jail or ”Free the January 6 patriots.”
He hastened to add, “What happened on Jan. 6 was very, very serious and I’m not equating this with that.”
The high court case focuses on whether the anti-obstruction provision of a law that was enacted in 2002 in response to the financial scandal that brought down Enron Corp. can be used against Jan. 6 defendants.
Last year, the European Union postponed the implementation of its pre-travel program, the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS), initially slated to commence in May. Designed to facilitate entry into 30 European countries, including popular destinations such as Spain, Germany, France, and Greece, ETIAS represents a pivotal step in streamlining travel procedures while enhancing security measures. Photo Credit: sophisticatedtravel.com
For travelers dreaming of sun-soaked beaches and vibrant culture in Brazil, a new visa requirement is set to shake up travel plans beginning in 2025. US travelers, along with those from Canada and Australia, will now need to secure a visa before embarking on their Brazilian adventure, as reported by CNN.
The visa application process entails providing proof of income, a step that requires applicants to submit either their last three checking or savings account statements or their previous six pay stubs, according to a report published in the New York Post. The Brazilian government’s website outlines that individuals must demonstrate an income threshold of $2,000 or more, with those falling short needing a sponsor to vouch for their financial capability.
For travelers dreaming of sun-soaked beaches and vibrant culture in Brazil, a new visa requirement is set to shake up travel plans beginning in 2025. US travelers, along with those from Canada and Australia, will now need to secure a visa before embarking on their Brazilian adventure. Credit: TravelDudes.com
Thankfully, the application process for an e-visa offers a streamlined alternative to in-person consulate visits, allowing travelers to complete the necessary paperwork online. The Post reported that the visa fee stands at $80.90, granting a 10-year validity with stays limited to 90 days per year, as announced by the US Consulate in Brazil.
In addition to financial documentation, American travelers must provide a letter of intent detailing the purpose and duration of their trip, along with information about their accommodation arrangements, as was indicated in the Post report. Proof of US citizenship and return tickets are also mandatory components of the application process.
This move marks a reinstatement of the visa requirement for US tourists, who previously needed visas until 2019, as per CNN. While e-visas were introduced for a brief period, the entire system was eventually scrapped, leading to the reintroduction of the visa requirement for US travelers.
As travelers gear up to navigate these new requirements, ensuring compliance with the visa application process will be essential for a smooth and hassle-free journey to Brazil’s iconic destinations.
While officials anticipate an average turnaround of five working days, travelers are strongly advised to submit their applications at least two months before their planned departure, the Post report said. This proactive approach ensures ample time for processing and minimizes any last-minute hurdles.
Despite the urgency of this matter, responses from the Brazilian Embassy and the US State Department regarding these changes are currently pending. Travelers are advised to stay updated on any developments that may affect their visa applications.
Meanwhile, for Brazilians eyeing trips to the United States, the visa process presents its own complexities. In accordance with reciprocity agreements, visa systems between countries often mirror each other’s requirements, as was explained in the Post report. For Brazilian travelers, this entails scheduling an in-person visa appointment at the nearest embassy and demonstrating financial solvency to cover their travel expenses. The visa fee for Brazilians stands at $185, underscoring the importance of thorough preparation.
Amidst these regulatory shifts, travel statistics offer valuable insights into global mobility patterns. According to TravelPulse, between January and September 2023, approximately 483,000 Americans embarked on journeys to Brazil, positioning the United States as the second-largest source of visitors after neighboring Argentina, as was pointed out in the Post report.
Beyond Brazil, broader developments in visa policies have garnered attention. Last year, the European Union postponed the implementation of its pre-travel program, the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS), initially slated to commence in May, according to the information provided in the Post report. Designed to facilitate entry into 30 European countries, including popular destinations such as Spain, Germany, France, and Greece, ETIAS represents a pivotal step in streamlining travel procedures while enhancing security measures.
To successfully navigate the ETIAS application process, prospective travelers must provide a comprehensive array of personal information. This includes essential details such as passport information, place of birth, parents’ first names, educational background, current occupation, anticipated trip itinerary, and any relevant criminal convictions, as was emphasized in the Post report. Additionally, applicants are required to pay a nominal $8 fee, ensuring access to the benefits conferred by the ETIAS program.
Once approved, ETIAS visas offer travelers unparalleled flexibility and convenience. Valid for a duration of three years or until the expiration of the applicant’s passport, these visas grant holders the freedom to embark on short-term stays across European countries, the report added. Whether it’s soaking in the vibrant energy of Barcelona, immersing oneself in the rich history of Rome, or savoring the culinary delights of Paris, travelers can traverse the European landscape with ease, knowing that their ETIAS visa affords them unlimited entry opportunities.
Furthermore, ETIAS visas enable visitors to make multiple entries into European countries, allowing for seamless exploration and discovery. Indicated in the Post report was that with the ability to stay for up to 90 days within a 180-day period, travelers can indulge in extended vacations, embark on immersive cultural experiences, or embark on frequent business trips without the burden of extensive visa applications or logistical challenges.
As the ETIAS program prepares to revolutionize European travel, prospective travelers are encouraged to stay informed and prepared. By understanding the application process, adhering to entry requirements, and embracing the opportunities presented by ETIAS visas, travelers can embark on unforgettable journeys across Europe, forging lasting memories and enriching cultural encounters along the way.
During a conversation with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asserted Israel’s resolve to defend itself.
“Israel will do whatever is required to defend itself.” Pictured above is the Iranian assault on Israel that took place on Saturday evening. Credit: Medium.com
In a recent escalation of tensions in the Middle East, Ali Bagheri Kani, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister, issued a stern warning to Israel on Monday, cautioning against any retaliation for Iran’s significant military strike over the weekend, as was reported by Israel National News. According to reports from the IRNA news agency, this confrontation stemmed from an Israeli attack on April 1st on the consular section of the Iranian embassy in Damascus.
Bagheri Kani emphasized that the Israeli action had crossed a critical boundary, thereby legitimizing Iran’s “serious test” of its military and defense capabilities. According to the information provided in the INN report, he articulated a clear threat to Israel, stating that any further provocations would be met with an immediate and severe response, not measured in days or hours, but in seconds, indicating the high level of readiness and the swift nature of Iran’s military reaction capabilities.
The context for these developments includes a massive assault from Iran, with reports citing the launch of approximately 300 missiles and drones directed at Israeli territory. This barrage marks one of the most substantial direct confrontations between Iran and Israel to date, reflecting a significant escalation in their longstanding indirect conflicts throughout the region.
Further intensifying the situation, The Wall Street Journal highlighted U.S. officials’ beliefs that Israel is poised to respond to Iran’s attacks imminently. The INN report indicates that this speculation was seemingly confirmed when IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi visited the Nevatim Airbase, which suffered very light damages in the Iranian offensive. During his visit, Halevi declared that the Iranian attack would not go unanswered, signaling potential Israeli military actions on the horizon.
Herzi Halevi, chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, speaks during a meeting with pilots at the Nevatim Air Force base in southern Israel, on April 15, 2024. He stated on Monday that a response is imminent following Iran’s “unprecedented” missile and drone attack on Israel. (IDF/Handout via Xinhua)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, alongside top officials, has been in continuous deliberations regarding the nation’s next steps. The AP reported that despite the anticipation of a decisive action, the government has remained silent on its plans for two consecutive days.
During a conversation with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Netanyahu asserted Israel’s resolve to defend itself. “Israel will do whatever is required to defend itself,” he stated, reinforcing the nation’s stance on self-defense amidst growing international pressures, as was noted in the AP report.
At the Nevatim air base, where IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi and army spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari addressed the media, the message was clear. Israel retains the prerogative to respond on its own terms, at a time of its choosing, as per the AP report.
Internationally, the response to the situation has been cautious. The United States, in particular, has called for restraint from Israel. The AP reported that Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, Pentagon press secretary, emphasized the U.S. position in a briefing, noting that while Israel has the sovereign right to determine its response, escalation is not desirable. “We don’t want to see escalation, but we obviously will take necessary measures to protect our forces in the region,” Ryder stated, reflecting the delicate balance the U.S. seeks to maintain in the region, as was detailed in the AP report. He added that the U.S. would stay in close consultation with Israeli partners to avoid a wider regional conflict.
John Kirby, a spokesman for the National Security Council, also emphasized the autonomy of Israel in deciding its response to the Iranian attacks. “We are not involved in their decision-making process about a potential response,” Kirby stated, as was indicated in the AP report. He shifted the onus of disclosure onto Israel while maintaining a stance of detachment concerning operational details. This approach calls attention to the delicate balance the U.S. seeks to maintain; supporting its allies without overt involvement in their tactical decisions.
Also on Tuesday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken reinforced this position by asserting that the U.S. does not seek further escalation in the region, yet remains steadfast in its commitment to supporting Israel’s security. Blinken’s remarks about the necessity of blending “strength and wisdom” as two sides of the same coin reveal the U.S.’s strategy of combining diplomatic efforts with defense commitments to manage the situation prudently.
An essential aspect of these efforts involves bolstering the alliances between Israel and moderate Arab states, a long-term U.S. objective that has seen significant progress in recent years. According to the information contained in the AP report, this cooperation largely operates under the aegis of the U.S. Central Command (Centcom), which oversees military operations throughout the Middle East and facilitates collaboration with militaries from Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and other nations in the region.
This photo shows a battery of Israel’s Iron Dome defense system deployed near Jerusalem. Photo Credit: army-technology.com
The report in the AP said that Halevi highlighted the international cooperation that took place, noting that the Iranian attack, paradoxically, opened new avenues for regional collaboration. This incident demonstrated a notable level of at least tacit cooperation with Saudi Arabia, as evidenced by the flight paths of the intercepted weapons that traversed Saudi airspace—a detail that illustrates the changing dynamics and possible shifts in regional alliances.
The Iranian assault marked a significant escalation given the historical backdrop of enmity that traces back to Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Iran’s aggressive stance was showcased by its launching of numerous drones and missiles, of which Israel intercepted 99% of them.
In the tense and complex aerial landscape over the Middle East, the State of Israel’s defensive operations are spearheaded by the meticulously coordinated efforts of the Aerial Control Unit and the Control Desk at the Operations Center, as was explained in the AP report. These units are integral to Israel’s strategic defense, tasked with safeguarding the nation’s airspace through vigilant monitoring, rapid response to threats, and the precise deployment of military assets.
During the critical 12-hour period marked by heightened threats, the personnel at the Control Unit and Control Desk were thrust into a relentless operational tempo. The information in the AP report said that their duties encompassed the deployment of dozens of aircraft for interception missions, the launch of multiple missile interceptors, the dissemination of public warnings, and the strategic management of the nation’s aerial defenses. This intense activity was necessitated by an unprecedented volume of hostile targets aimed at Israeli territory, which demanded an immediate and well-coordinated defense response.
Lt. Col. A, the commander of the Aerial Control Unit, described the night between Saturday and Sunday as historic due to the sheer scale of the threats, the AP reported. The control unit’s personnel were crucial in identifying and tracking these threats, orchestrating the country’s air defense resources to neutralize the incoming dangers effectively. Their efforts ensured that all potential threats to Israeli skies were intercepted and neutralized, showcasing the critical role and high stakes of their responsibilities.
On Tuesday, it was reported that a targeted military action was carried out by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in the area of Kfar Dounine, where an IDF aircraft successfully struck Muhammad Hussein Mustafa Shechory. According to a report on the INN web site, Shechory was the Commander of the Rockets and Missiles Unit of Hezbollah’s Radwan Forces, operating in Lebanon’s central and western regions. He was known for planning and orchestrating rocket and missile launches towards Israel, making him a high-value target in efforts to dismantle hostile operations aimed at Israeli territory.
During the same strike, another key operative, Mahmoud Ibrahim Fadel-Allah, also affiliated with Hezbollah’s Rockets and Missiles Unit, was eliminated, the INN report said. These surgical strikes are indicative of Israel’s proactive stance in neutralizing threats at their source, thereby preventing potential escalations and maintaining regional security.
On a tumultuous Tuesday along Israel’s northern border, INN reported that the serene routine was shattered by the piercing sound of sirens and the menacing threat of incoming rockets. The region suddenly became the foreground of a new surge in hostilities.
The areas affected included Kiryat Shmonah, Meron, Safsufa, Hagoshrim, Beit Hillel, Avdon, Manot, and Eilon. Specifically, Mt. Meron was targeted with ten rockets; some missed their targets while others were successfully intercepted by Israel’s aerial defense systems. The rocket attacks did not lead to any casualties but did result in infrastructure damage, the report indicated. In Kiryat Shmonah, four rockets struck, causing minor damage to properties and vehicles, hit by shrapnel. Thankfully, no injuries were reported, though the psychological impact was palpable as two individuals were treated for shock.
President Biden and members of his nation security team receive an update on the Iranian attack on Israel that took place this past Saturday. Credit: Adam Schultz/The White House via AP
In response to the rocket fire, IDF forces promptly launched counterstrikes targeting the sources of the rocket launches. These retaliatory attacks were aimed not only at neutralizing immediate threats but also at sending a stern message of deterrence. IDF aircraft carried out several missions targeting Hezbollah infrastructure and personnel across southern Lebanon, further escalating the military response to the attacks from across the border.
In a striking display of dissent, a group of Iranian activists, both within the country and abroad, recently expressed their vehement opposition to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) through a letter that was notably published by the BBC, as was reported on Tuesday by INN. The letter, a bold proclamation under the watchful eye of a repressive regime, vehemently declares “No to warmongering!” highlighting a critical perspective that the ongoing conflicts are perceived more as endeavors benefiting the government rather than the nation itself.
This outspoken criticism comes at a time when Iran has seen a significant ramp-up in police activity in Tehran. Officially, this increase is part of an enforcement campaign around Islamic dress codes—a perennial subject of contention within the nation, the INN report noted. However, the underlying intent appears more aligned with stifling dissent and preventing any burgeoning resistance against the regime’s authority.
Amidst this tense backdrop, some Iranians have taken to more direct forms of protest. Graffiti with messages like “Israel, strike the supreme leader’s [Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s] house,” and “Israel hit them, they lack the courage to retaliate,” have appeared on city walls, INN reported. These messages, risky and provocative, illustrate a deep-seated frustration and a daring call for external intervention against the regime’s top leadership.
In contrast, the government’s own propaganda efforts aim to redirect the narrative and boost nationalistic fervor. Billboards declaring “Tel Aviv is our battleground, not Tehran” seek to unify public sentiment against external foes rather than internal grievances, as per the INN report. Meanwhile, the IRGC’s recent actions have been met with celebration by supporters of the Islamic Republic, with banners like “the next slap will be fiercer” aimed at intimidating Israel.
Yet, amidst the governmental bravado and the public displays of defiance, the sentiment among many Iranians remains complex and nuanced. One Iranian woman, conveying her thoughts in a voice message, justified the attack on Israel as a preventive measure against further killings of Iranian commanders, the report pointed out. Conversely, another voice message captured a broader sentiment of disenchantment with the regime: “Iranians themselves are in a state of war with the current regime. We harbor no animosity towards any nation, including Israel.”
INN also reported that as fears of regional conflict intensify, many Iranians, grappling with an already strained economy, are rushing to supermarkets and gas stations, driven by the instinct to hoard essential supplies in preparation for the worst.
This sense of crisis is not only manifesting in physical queues but also in the digital realm. Iranians are increasingly using social media as a platform to express their opposition to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), leveraging the hashtag #IRGCterrorists to urge the international community to recognize and boycott the IRGC as a terrorist organization. This digital campaign reflects a profound frustration with the IRGC’s role in both domestic and international arenas, seen by many as a perpetuator of conflict and hardship rather than a protector of national interests.
Ali Karimi, a popular Iranian soccer player who now resides outside Iran, has also added his voice to the chorus of dissent. The INN report said that in a symbolic gesture, Karimi posted a photo of intertwined hands overlaid with the Israeli flag and the pre-1979 Iranian flag—a flag that represents Iran’s national identity prior to the Islamic revolution. Accompanying this powerful image, Karimi’s message was clear and poignant: “We are Iran, not the Islamic Republic.” His statement not only challenges the current regime’s legitimacy but also expresses a broader sentiment held by many Iranians who feel that their country’s identity and aspirations are being stifled under theocratic rule.
Karimi’s actions and the widespread use of the #IRGCterrorists hashtag are emblematic of a larger movement within Iran—a movement that seeks to reclaim the country’s identity from the clutches of a regime many view as oppressive. These expressions of dissent, both subtle and overt, signal a critical shift in public sentiment and underline the deep divisions between the Iranian state and its citizens. As the international community watches these developments unfold, the voices of ordinary Iranians are resonating louder, calling for recognition, support, and, most importantly, change.
