54.6 F
New York
Friday, April 19, 2024
Home Blog Page 13

Iran may retaliate against Israel in a matter of days – Bloomberg

0
Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Tabriz, Feb. 17, 2022. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

By Vered Weiss, World Israel News

Contrary to an earlier report by CNN, Bloomberg reports that Iran may be planning to attack Israel in a matter of days in retaliation for an airstrike in Damascus that killed two IRGC generals and other terrorists.

Bloomberg reported that both US and Israeli intelligence indicated that an Iran attack may be imminent.

The report indicates that high-precision missiles or drones could be used in the attack.

This contradicts a CNN report that US officials believed Iran would refrain from attacking Israel directly for fear of evoking a dramatic response from the US.

Up until now, Iran has used proxy terror organizations, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis to strike against Israel.

Iran ramped up its rhetoric against the Jewish State following the airstrike that killed a senior Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) official Mohammad Reza Zahedi in Damascus along with his deputy general and others.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has threatened Israeli embassies abroad, and shortly following the strike, he said on Iranian State TV, “When they attacked our consulate area, it was like they attacked our territory.”

He added, “The evil regime must be punished, and it will be punished.”

A WORLD WITHOUT THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Although Israel hasn’t claimed responsibility for the attacks, it is generally assumed that Israel was behind the strikes that killed the IRGC terrorists.

According to media reports, Israel will launch devastating strikes against Iran’s sensitive nuclear development sites if Tehran directly attacks within its borders.

Both sides seem to be bracing for impact with the IDF cancelling leave for combat units and the Iranian army put on high alert.

Elaph News reported that the Israeli air force has been carrying out drills in recent days aimed at simulating strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and infrastructure.

In addition, Iran is operating a smuggling network spanning much of the region to smuggle a deluge of weapons, including handguns, assault rifles, and other small arms into Palestinian Authority-controlled areas in Judea and Samaria.

 

Former ADL Chief Abe Foxman: Biden’s ‘Ceaseless Criticism’ of Israeli PM Netanyahu ‘Strengthening’ Hamas

0
Jonathan Greenblatt (l) incoming national director for the Anti-Defamation League, talks with Abe Foxman, outgoing director of the ADL, in New York, June 17, 2015. (AP/Julie Jacobson)

By Joshua Klein ( Breitbart) 

The former head of the Anti-Defamation League and longtime Biden supporter, Abraham Foxman, lashed out at President Joe Biden over his constant critiques of the Jewish state and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing the president of undermining its greatest ally in the Middle East and empowering the Hamas terrorist group.

In a post from X on Tuesday, Foxman called for the president to end his “ceaseless criticism” of the Jewish state, claiming it only bolsters Hamas and its allies.

“President Biden-respectfully please stop criticizing PM Netanyahu- while he is not perfect- Hamas went to war against the State of Israel not the PM-your ceaseless criticism only weakens Israel and strengthens Hamas and Israel’s enemies here and abroad,” he wrote.

On Friday, Foxman criticized Biden for demanding an “immediate ceasefire” from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call between the two leaders Thursday, threatening a loss of U.S. support for the war if Israel does not comply.

“I like President Biden and I respect him – but who advised him to threaten Israel  to agree to a ceasefire deal for hostages immediately- knowing that Hamas had rejected every offer Israel made?” he asked. “Why should they make a deal – when America ‘supports’ their ‘position’?”

Following the October 7 massacre in Israel and President Biden’s subsequent expressed support for Israel, Foxman thanked the president “for your compassion, your understanding of history, your moral compass, your values and your steadfast support of the State and people of Israel!”

However, since the attack, President Biden has gradually grown distant from Israel, criticizing the war, while ignoring the abuses of Hamas.

Furthermore, Biden’s remarks have confirmed that the U.S. has effectively adopted Hamas’s demand that a ceasefire precede a deal to release the nearly 140 remaining hostages in Gaza, which include five Americans. The U.S. previously agreed with Israel that a ceasefire must be dependent on such a deal.

Last month, Jerusalem Deputy Mayor Fleur Hassan-Nahoum hit back at the Biden administration’s reported efforts to undermine Israel’s democratically elected government and leader, as well as its current fight against Hamas, noting the strong time-tested alliance between the two countries and how the Jewish state serves as the west’s “first line of defense” against global “jihadi fundamentalism.”

The matter comes as President Biden calls for an immediate unilateral ceasefire in Gaza, signaling a major policy shift and aligning with the demands of Hamas terrorists, even as Israeli negotiators try to leverage military pressure into a hostage deal in Cairo.

On Tuesday, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said that Israel’s efforts to increase humanitarian aid to Gaza are “not good enough,” despite the fact that a record number of aid trucks are entering the territory daily since last week.

Last week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned that Israel was becoming like Hamas, suggesting that both showed the same disregard for civilian life — evidence to the contrary. The ratio of civilians killed to terrorists killed in Israel’s counterattack in Gaza is less than two to one, a historic low.

Joshua Klein is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @JoshuaKlein.

Blinken, in Eid Message, Links Palestinians to Uyghurs in Chinese Concentration Camps

0
Secretary of State Antony Blinken calls Jewish settlements, “illegal by international law”, hours after terrorist attack near Maale Adumim kills one and wounds 7. Photo Credit: AP

By Joel B. Pollak (Breitbart)

Secretary of State Antony Blinken compared Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to Uyghur Muslims forced into Chinese concentration camps in a statement marking the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Fitr on Wednesday.

His statement read:

As we near the end of the holy month of Ramadan, I wish Muslim communities everywhere Eid Mubarak and join in hopes for a safer and more peaceful world. As families and communities come together, we know they do so at a time when many Muslim communities worldwide are suffering. Our thoughts turn to the plight of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, civilians in Syria, women suffering under the Taliban in Afghanistan, Uyghurs in the People’s Republic of China, Rohingya in Burma and Bangladesh, and far too many others.

By implication, Israel — acting in self-defense against Palestinian terrorists who attacked it without provocation on October 7 — is like the Taliban, or the Chinese Communist Party, or governments that are persecuting Muslims.

The Times of Israel appeared to take particular notice of Blinken’s inclusion of Palestinians in the West Bank in his roster of oppressed Muslims. Despite tensions with Israel, West Bank Palestinians are largely self-governing and enjoy a decent quality of life, and have been spared the direct costs of the ongoing war.

Last week, Blinken appeared to compare Israel to the Hamas terrorist group. Earlier this year, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Blinken claimed that Palestinians are ready for peace, and that Israelis are not.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Summit focuses on rising Jew-hatred in K-12 schools

0
Josh Kraft, president of the New England Patriots Foundation and co-chair of the Hate Crimes Task Force for Massachusetts, speaks during a Lappin Foundation online summit about antisemitism in K-12 schools on April 9, 2024. Source: Screen shot from live feed.

(JNS) Some 200 people, including educators, students and parents, participated in a Lappin Foundation virtual summit about the national strategy to counter antisemitism in K-12 schools on Tuesday.

Josh Kraft, president of the New England Patriots Foundation and co-chair of the Hate Crimes Task Force for Massachusetts, told attendees that it is “so essential” for elementary, middle and high schools to be “armed and equipped with the tools needed to combat antisemitism.”

 

There was a 140% increase in antisemitic attacks against Jewish children in primary and secondary schools in the three months after Oct. 7, according to the Anti-Defamation League.

“The K-12 schools are always the first line of defense for any and every issue, as the teachers are with kids from seven in the morning until late in the afternoon,” said Kraft, whose father is New England Patriots owner and Jewish philanthropist Robert Kraft. “Whatever happens in our society, in our community, infiltrates into our schools.”

Much of the discussion during the hour-long summit addressed the national action plan to combat antisemitism, which the Biden administration unveiled last year, with a course of recommended actions.

The event came just weeks after the Massachusetts Teachers Association held a webinar titled “The struggle against anti-Palestinian racism,” which critics said spread antisemitism and anti-Israel propaganda. (The Lappin Foundation is based in Massachusetts.)

In December, the association’s board had approved plans for the professional development division to create curricular resources on history and current events in “Israel and occupied Palestine,” and days earlier, the board had signed off on a resolution directing its leadership to lobby the White House to “stop funding and sending weapons in support of the Netanyahu government’s genocidal war on the Palestinian people in Gaza.”

Representing 117,000 members at public schools, colleges and universities, the association wields considerable influence in shaping curricula taught in primary schools, which have seen an uptick in antisemitism.

At Marblehead High School, students received a world cultures handout identifying Jewish claims to “Palestine,” claiming that Abraham’s God instructed him to “move his family to Palestine” and that Moses’s people “finally reached Palestine and settled down” after the Jewish leader died, David Magen, a freshman at the public school, told the summit.

“The summary completely erased the name Israel and Judea,” Magen said. “When I was asked on a homework assignment to answer what is the relationship between Palestine and Judaism, I answered that this handout was filled with historical inaccuracies, antisemitic tropes and that Palestine did not exist in those biblical times.”

“Most importantly, I wrote that there is no relationship between Palestine and Judaism, and in all capital letters, I said, this is antisemitism,” the freshman added.

In a conversation that ran more than an hour with the chair of the school’s history department, Magen discussed the inaccuracies in the handout, he said. The department head assured him that the handout would be scrapped and the curriculum would be updated based on his feedback.

“Unfortunately, not every school in America has teenagers that are able and willing to do the same,” he said of his decision to speak up and, essentially, educate his educators.

The example suggested an instance of the heart of the summit, which sought to provide teachers with tools to teach about Judaism, Israel and Jew-hatred fairly and accurately, and to empower parents and students to fight back against anti-semitic indoctrination.

Wicked increase in Jew-hatred

Peggy Shukur, vice president of the east division of the Anti-Defamation League, offered summit attendees a preview of the ADL’s forthcoming annual report on antisemitic incidents.

“Spoiler alert: Incidents reported in 2023 will represent the highest numbers ever reported to us, with a rise in each of the three categories,” she said. “We track assaults, vandalism, and harassment.”

 

Shukur, whose region covers the northeastern United States, including Massachusetts, added that the ADL has tracked a nearly 400% increase in antisemitic incidents since Oct. 7.

“Our experience in Massachusetts and New England is no exception,” she said, noting that antisemitic bomb threats, swatting and assault were on the rise in New England even before Oct. 7.

“There were nearly 500 K-12 incidents reported nationally in 2022, and we will see a dramatic rise here, too,” she said.

Previewing the ADL annual report, Shukar said K-12 school incidents include “swastikas scrawled on desks, playgrounds and school buildings; antisemitic images AirDropped to large groups of unwitting students; harassment directed at visibly Jewish students; and teachers saying Jews are rich, powerful and control banks.”

While each Massachusetts school district has oversight over its curriculum under general state guidelines, “unvetted curriculum is being developed, sometimes created through teacher unions or other groups with some kind of ideological agenda, resulting in the existence of curricula that is biased and sometimes antisemitic,” Shukar said.

Affirmative Jewish culture

Shukar recommended that educators hold open conversations with students about Jewish pride and culture—not just about Jew-hatred.

The ADL prepared a new online program for middle and high school students, which familiarizes them with Jewish culture and identity, “which in turn allows them to recognize antisemitism and challenge it when they see it,” she said.

A workshop for educators helps ensure that “they are prepared when antisemitism reaches the classroom or the school community,” and a 20-minute online, interactive antisemitism mini-course affords them “an overall understanding of antisemitism and the most common antisemitic tropes,” she said.

Those concerned about rising Jew-hatred in K-12 schools must be “a curriculum watchdog,” to “make sure that the curriculum being used doesn’t inadvertently, or maybe intentionally, perpetuate antisemitic stereotypes or bias,” Shukar added.

That “inadvertent” perpetuation of Jew-hatred may be one of the more important things to tackle in schools, according to Maddie Katzen, co-chair of the foundation’s Lappin Teen Antisemitism Task Force.

A student at Whittier Regional Vocational Technical High School in Haverhill, Mass., Katzen’s first experience with antisemitism came in fifth grade when two middle-schoolers and a high school freshman dragged their feet along the rubber particles of a field to create a large swastika.

“Because I was so young, I didn’t really understand what was happening and what this attack even meant,” Katzen told summit attendees.

The school worked with a local synagogue, and Katzen credits the rabbi who was brought in to talk to middle and high school students about why the swastika is a hateful symbol in helping her understand and process the situation.

 

“In the elementary school where I was, I was told the boys who did this didn’t understand what they were doing. But it still hurt Jewish students very much,” she said. “Educating students about antisemitism proactively before something happens may very well prevent something like this from happening in your communities.”

Jeffrey Riley, who served as the state commissioner of elementary and secondary education from 2018 to 2024, told attendees that it’s the wrong approach to hope that things outside one’s control, like when Israel’s war against Hamas will end, will bring about changes.

“The problem of antisemitism is real. I believe it’s something that we can’t get around or wait out,” he said. “It requires that we work together to make sure all of our kids have a better world.”

Former Cornell junior pleads guilty to rape and death threats against Jews

0
Stock illustration of a gavel. Credit: Pixabay.

Patrick Dai admitted that he wrote on a message board on Oct. 28 and Oct. 29 that he was going to “shoot up” a dining hall at Cornell that “caters predominantly to kosher diets and is next to the Cornell Jewish Center that provides residential accommodations for students,” per the U.S. Justice Department.

Dai also fessed up to posting that he would “bomb [a] Jewish house,” “stab” and “slit the throat” of Jewish men on campus, rape Jewish women and throw them off a cliff, behead Jewish babies and “bring an assault rifle to campus and shoot all you pig Jews,” according to the Justice Department.

“This defendant is being held accountable for vile, abhorrent, antisemitic threats of violence levied against members of the Cornell University Jewish community,” stated Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general at the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

“In the elevated threat environment that we have seen since Oct. 7, we have been vigilant and stand ready to hold perpetrators of hate crimes accountable,” Clarke said. “Antisemitic threats of violence are unacceptable in our society, and we will not tolerate this conduct.”

Dai “used the Internet to make horrific threats to kill and injure Jewish students attending Cornell University. The federal felony conviction he sustains today underscores that those who break the law by making violent threats will be found and prosecuted, even if they attempt to hide by posting anonymously,” said Carla Freedman, U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York.

“His guilty plea today means he will be held accountable for his threats against members of his own Cornell University community,” Freedman added.

Dai is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 12, when he will face up to “five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, restitution to victims and a maximum of three years of supervised release,” according to the Justice Department.

‘That Is A Lie’: Fox News Segment Comes Unglued After Former Obama Official Calls Trump Antisemitic

0
Screenshot/Rumble/Fox News

(DCNF) A Wednesday Fox News segment became testy when a former official for President Barack Obama’s administration called former President Donald Trump “antisemitic” after his comments on Jews voting for President Joe Biden.

Trump on Wednesday said that “any Jewish person that votes for a Democrat or votes for Biden should have their head examined” in the context of the Israel-Hamas war. Fox News contributor and former Obama State Department spokesperson Marie Harf cited this as evidence Trump is antisemitic as an argument ensued with former Republican Speaker of the Oklahoma House T.W. Shannon on “The Faulkner Focus.” (RELATED: Mike Pence Calls On Trump To ‘Apologize’ For Dinner With Nick Fuentes And Ye)

“Donald Trump has repeatedly questioned the loyalty, he has repeatedly questioned the loyalty of Jewish Americans,” Harf said. “He has said antisemitic and offensive things about how Jewish Americans should vote.”

“Oh my gosh! When?” Shannon asked. “Name one time that Donald Trump has been antisemitic. That is a lie.”

Host Harris Faulkner jumped in to interrupt their crosstalk.

“Lady and gentleman, each of you. Each of you. Antisemitic, anti-Israel, anti-all of it,” Faulkner said. “All of it is what we are covering here and we have to get our facts right. I didn’t hear what you’re talking about, Marie, but what I did hear him do is call Biden out for not having clear policy or successful policy with Israel. I’ll bring you back another day.”

The United Nations in March passed a resolution calling for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war after the U.S. abstained from the vote.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Republican Senators Initiate Legislation that Targets Qatar’s Status as Non-NATO Ally of the US

0
Ted Budd AP

Republican Senators Initiate Legislation that Targets Qatar’s Status as Non-NATO Ally of the US

Edited by: Fern Sidman

Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Joni Ernst (R-IA), and Rick Scott (R-FL) have initiated legislation that targets Qatar’s designation as a major non-NATO ally of the United States. According to a report on Wednesday on the JewishInsider.com web site, the legislative push emerges from concerns over Qatar’s financial connections to terrorist groups, specifically Hamas, and its inaction in using its influence to secure the release of the remaining 133 Israeli hostages being held in captivity in Gaza by the Iranian backed terror group.

The senators’ legislation seeks to leverage Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally, a designation that brings various military and economic benefits, as a bargaining chip to force the Gulf nation to sever its ties with Hamas and take a more active stance against global terrorism. As was reported on the JewishInsider.com web site, the proposed law mandates a 90-day period within which the State Department must assess the U.S.-Qatar relationship, determining whether it aligns with U.S. national interests and whether Qatar has used its influence over Hamas effectively.

The legislation outlines specific criteria that Qatar must meet to retain its status. These include demonstrating an active effort to use its leverage over Hamas, ceasing support (both direct and indirect) to terrorist organizations, and either expelling or extraditing members of Hamas, as per the information provided in the JewishInsider.com report. Failure to meet these criteria would result in the immediate termination of Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally, a condition that would remain until the Gulf nation complies with all the stipulated requirements.

A point of contention highlighted in the bill is Qatar’s undermining of negotiations for a hostage deal. JewishInsider.com also reported that the senators have accused Qatar of making public calls for a cease-fire that does not condition on the release of the hostages and of claiming a lack of leverage over Hamas, actions that the U.S. lawmakers see as contradictory and harmful to efforts in securing the release of U.S. nationals held hostage.

This legislation represents a significant escalation in the scrutiny of Qatar’s foreign relations, particularly concerning its financial and material support for Hamas.

The discussion of revoking Qatar’s status as a major non-NATO ally (MNNA) by U.S. lawmakers underscores the dynamic and conditional nature of international relations, particularly in the context of geopolitical and security interests. The MNNA status is a significant designation by the United States, providing various military and financial advantages, such as cooperative defense research, shared military training, and priority delivery of defense material, according to the information contained in the JewishInsider.com report.  However, this status is not just an honor but also a statement of trust and mutual interest, implying that the recipient country aligns with the U.S. on crucial international policies, including counterterrorism.

The controversy around Qatar’s MNNA status primarily revolves around its interactions with Hamas, an organization designated as a terrorist group by the United States. The U.S. perceives Qatar’s actions, or lack thereof, against Hamas as not just a passive stance but as support for the group, which is inconsistent with the responsibilities and expectations attached to being an MNNA.

Representative Budd’s proposal to reconsider Qatar’s MNNA status is a manifestation of broader concerns among some U.S. lawmakers about Qatar’s international conduct, especially regarding its relationship with Hamas.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Rep. Budd stated, “Seeking the release of the hostages demands strength and moral clarity. We demand it of our own leaders, and we should require it from our major allies. He continued: “The State of Qatar hosts Hamas’ leaders in their capital of Doha. Now initially, Qatari officials claimed they are exercising leverage on Hamas. Then they publicly stated thereafter that they have no leverage. And now, they’re promoting a ceasefire regardless of the release of the hostages. The truth is that Qatar does have significant leverage over Hamas. They have the ability to expel these terrorists if they don’t release the hostages or at least engage in reasonable negotiations.”

He added that, “The truth is that Hamas is not interested in releasing the hostages, and Qatar seems equally uninterested in forcing them to do so. It is time that we hold nations like Qatar accountable for their dithering and their stalling. I do not introduce this bill lightly. It is not where I started with this relationship, but it is a reflection of where we are today as a result of the repeated warnings that Members of Congress have given to Qatar about the liability of continuing to host Hamas.”

Budd emphasized that, “The time for talking is over, and the time for action is now. If we don’t see action, then Qatar must face consequences. At the end of the day, this bill represents another step towards securing the freedom of our fellow Americans.”

His statement reflects a serious consideration of the bilateral relationship dynamics, emphasizing that such a privileged status requires continuous evaluation and must be merited through actions that align with U.S. interests and security imperatives.

Senator Joni Ernst’s comments further amplify the sentiment of disappointment or dissatisfaction with Qatar’s stance, indicating a broader spectrum of concern within the U.S. legislative body about whether Qatar is meeting the expectations tied to its MNNA status, as was suggested in the JewishInsider.com report.

Ernst told the JewishInsider.com that she hasn’t seen the change in posture and attitude from Qatar she’s been looking for. “I’ve told the foreign minister this — they need to step up,” she said. “They need to make sure Hamas is getting back to the table, or get rid of them.”

Other lawmakers don’t yet seem prepared to take the step laid out in the bill.

Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), who signed a joint statement with Budd, Ernst and other colleagues last month saying that Qatar should expel Hamas leadership if negotiations fail, indicated he found the bill premature.

Coons indicated that he had personally engaged with Qatari officials, including the ambassador and foreign minister, urging them to do more to pressure Hamas towards constructive negotiations. The JewishInsider.com reported that he acknowledged the ongoing efforts by President Biden, to apply diplomatic pressure on Qatar and Hamas. However, he cautioned against immediately revoking Qatar’s major non-NATO ally status, suggesting that such a drastic measure should be considered only if Qatar unequivocally fails to take substantive action.

Senator Roger Wicker, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also expressed reservations about the proposed bill, emphasizing the importance of cautious deliberation. According to the JewishInsider.com, Wicker, a Republican from Mississippi, highlighted Qatar’s historical cooperation with the United States and underscored the mutual benefits derived from their bilateral relationship. He stressed the need for governments to engage in direct dialogue rather than resorting to legislative measures.

Similarly, Senator Roger Marshall, a Republican from Kansas, echoed Wicker’s sentiments, stating that he has not seen sufficient evidence to justify Qatar losing its status as a major non-NATO ally, the report added. Marshall’s remarks suggest a reluctance among some lawmakers to endorse measures that could potentially strain diplomatic ties with Qatar.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin also weighed in on the matter during a recent congressional hearing, commending Qatar for its efforts in facilitating hostage releases. As per the JewishInsider.com report, Austin acknowledged Qatar’s role as a key mediator in hostage negotiations and reiterated the country’s commitment to resolving such matters swiftly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biden Admin Claims Date Set by Netanyahu for Rafah Assault is Pure “Bluster”

0
The friction between the Israeli and U.S. administrations was further highlighted in a phone conversation between Netanyahu and President Biden on Monday, their first in over a month. Credit: AP

Biden Admin Claims Date Set by Netanyahu for Rafah Assault is Pure “Bluster”

Edited by: TJVNews.com

The Biden administration is challenging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s assertion that a specific date has been set for a ground offensive into Rafah, dismissing it as political posturing fueled by Netanyahu’s precarious position at home, according to senior administration officials as reported by CNN on Wednesday.

Publicly, the administration has cast doubt on Netanyahu’s claim made on Monday regarding Israel’s decision to launch a wide scale offensive into the southern Gaza city, as was reported by CNN. Top Biden national security officials stated on Tuesday that no such date had been communicated to them.

Privately, multiple senior administration officials view Netanyahu’s announcement, followed by a declaration on Tuesday that “no force in the world” would prevent Israeli troops from entering Rafah, as bravado rather than concrete strategy.

The prime minister finds himself grappling with the challenge of balancing his stated objective of eradicating Hamas with the immense pressure to secure a ceasefire that would result in the release of Israeli hostages, as per the information provided in the CNN report. Israeli authorities argue that four Hamas battalions remain entrenched in Rafah and must be neutralized.

Netanyahu is also confronted with the reality of a ticking clock – once the conflict concludes, Israel is anticipated to undergo a political reckoning, potentially leading to the fragmentation of Netanyahu’s fragile far-right governing coalition.

In response to Netanyahu’s plans for Rafah, American officials have emphasized that the U.S. has not received a comprehensive plan from Israel outlining the operational details of such an undertaking, the CNN report said. This includes concerns about evacuating the majority of Rafah’s estimated 1.4 million civilians prior to any military action.

The CNN report indicated that Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated on Tuesday, “We do not have a date for any Rafah operation, at least one that’s been communicated to us by the Israelis,” while also remarking, “I don’t see anything imminent.” President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan echoed this sentiment, telling reporters, “If he has a date he hasn’t shared it with us.”

Furthermore, during a call with Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin on Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant reportedly conveyed Israel’s ongoing preparations for a potential invasion of Rafah but did not indicate a specific date for such an operation, as was reported by CNN. According to sources familiar with the call, Israel is focused on formulating a comprehensive plan that prioritizes the protection of civilians.

The Biden administration’s response underscores its awareness of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s precarious political situation, particularly his alignment with an ultra-conservative government, considered the most right-wing in Israeli history, the CNN report said. Despite this sensitivity, U.S. officials have refrained from publicly commenting on Israeli politics throughout the Gaza war, aiming to maintain diplomatic discretion.

Nevertheless, private criticisms of Israel’s government have occasionally surfaced, with President Biden himself expressing concerns during a donor event in Washington in December. Noted in the CNN report was that Biden urged Netanyahu to reconsider his approach to the conflict, reflecting broader tensions within the U.S.-Israel relationship amid ongoing hostilities in the region.

During a recent virtual meeting, top Biden national security officials engaged with Israeli counterparts, including Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer and National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, seeking clarity on Israel’s plans for a potential ground offensive into Rafah. CNN reported that specifically, the U.S. officials pressed for details on the logistical challenges of evacuating civilians from the area, including housing arrangements and provisions for basic necessities like food and water.

However, Israeli officials reportedly provided incomplete answers to these inquiries during the meeting, prompting the need for further discussions and a subsequent in-person follow-up session scheduled for the coming week, as was detailed in the CNN report. Blinken confirmed the anticipated continuation of dialogue between the two sides, emphasizing the importance of addressing critical operational details.

In addition to logistical concerns, Israeli officials defended the necessity of entering Rafah, citing the need to prevent Hamas from regrouping and launching further attacks. According to the CNN report, they argued that the efforts invested in rooting out Hamas during the initial months of the conflict would be rendered futile if action is not taken to address the remaining threats posed by the Iranian backed terror group in Rafah.

The President warned that support for Israel’s military operations in Gaza was dwindling amidst the sustained bombardment, highlighting the urgency of reevaluating strategies to achieve lasting peace in the region, as per the information in the CNN report.

Outrage erupts as Jerusalem hospital treats Hamas terrorist

0
View of the Hadassah Ein Kerem hospital. (Moshe Shai/FLASH90)

By JNS

Dozens of protestors swarmed the halls of Jerusalem’s Hadassah Mount Scopus Medical Center on Wednesday morning after news got out that the hospital was treating a member of Hamas’s “Nukhba force.”

The Nukhba terrorists were one of the leading participants in the terror group’s Oct. 7 attack on the western Negev, during which some 1,200 people were murdered, thousands were wounded and 253 were taken as hostages.

Following calls on social media for people to mobilize in protest, Hadassah closed the entrance to its intensive care unit, covering the glass door with an Israeli flag in an attempt to prevent protesters from locating the terrorist.

“I am on my way to Hadassah Mount Scopus Hospital, which is committing a heinous act and has forgotten the horrible massacre and what these despicable terrorists have done to our daughters and the Israeli people,” tweeted Herzl Hajaj, whose daughter was killed in a 2017 terrorist attack.

“We will not forget and not be silent,” wrote Hajaj, who represents Choosing Life, a forum of Israeli terror victims and bereaved families.

INTEL CHIEF WARNS OF RISING POTENTIAL FOR TERROR ATTACKS IN THE US
In video footage of the incident, Hajaj can be seen arguing with medical staff and security outside a hospital room, which is guarded by at least two armed soldiers, before being escorted off the premises.

“Is this where the terrorist son of a bitch is hospitalized? Is the terrorist hospitalized here?” he shouts, asking security guards to “take the terrorist out of here, not us.”

 

Hadassah, in a statement shared with Hebrew media on Wednesday afternoon, noted that “every security prisoner treated in Israeli hospitals is brought [there] under the responsibility and according to a decision of the Ministry of Health, the security forces or the army.

“Hadassah is not informed of the details of the arrest and circumstances of individual detainees and is certainly not involved in the decision [regarding] where they will be treated.”

According to Israel’s Makor Rishon newspaper, some staff members of Hadassah’s intensive care unit initially refused to treat the terrorist. However, the hospital’s director instructed them to provide care.

The Israeli daily claimed that, according to official figures, at least 25 Palestinian terrorists have been treated in Israeli hospitals since Oct. 7, some of which have been treated alongside Israeli soldiers wounded while fighting in the Gaza Strip.

In October, fans of the Beitar Jerusalem soccer club tried to break into the emergency room of Ramat Gan’s Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer following reports that terrorists were being treated there.

In response to the incident, Israeli Health Minister Moshe Arbel instructed all public hospitals to stop treating Hamas terrorists.

However, in December, a Palestinian terrorist captured by Israeli soldiers in Gaza was admitted to a Petach Tikvah hospital for surgery. The terrorist was reportedly wounded during an exchange of fire.

Israeli airstrike eliminates three sons of Hamas chief Haniyeh

0
Hamas terror chief Ismail Haniyeh's three sons that were killed in an airstrike. (Twitter Screenshot)

By JNS

An Israeli Air Force strike in the Al-Shati Camp on the northern Gaza coast killed six relatives of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, Arab media reported on Wednesday.

The strike, which reportedly targeted a vehicle, killed three of Haniyeh’s sons and an identical number of his grandchildren, according to Gaza’s Hamas-affiliated Shehab News Agency.

Hazem, Ameer and Mohammed Haniyeh were all members of Hamas. Ismail Haniyeh reportedly had 13 children.

The Doha-based terror leader confirmed their deaths, telling Qatar’s Al Jazeera, “I thank God for this honor that he bestowed upon us with the martyrdom of my three sons and some grandchildren.”

The Israel Defense Forces did not immediately comment on the alleged airstrike.

A video circulating on social media showed the Hamas leader receiving the news while visiting wounded Palestinians from Gaza at a Doha hospital.

In October, Hamas claimed that an airstrike in Gaza City’s Sheikh Radwan neighborhood killed 14 relatives of Haniyeh. The terrorist leader’s brother and nephew were killed in the alleged strike, reports said.

Haniyeh’s sisters are Israeli citizens and live in a Bedouin town in the Negev. Earlier this month, Israeli security forces arrested one of them on suspicion of associating with and supporting Palestinian terrorists.

Haniyeh’s niece gave birth to a premature baby in February, who was treated at the neonatal intensive care unit at Soroka Medical Center in Beersheva.

Tucker Carlson slams pro-Israel Christians

0
Tucker Carlson speaks at the Heritage Foundation 50th anniversary gala Friday night in National Harbor, Maryland

By David Rosenberg, World Israel News

Right-wing pundit Tucker Carlson came under fire Tuesday, after he took aim at Christian supporters of the State of Israel during an interview with an anti-Israel pastor.

Carlson, who was fired from Fox News last year and now hosts “Tucker Carlson Uncensored” on Twitter/X, interviewed Munther Isaac, a Lutheran pastor in Bethlehem and long-time Israel critic who has accused Israel of “genocide” and who recently signed onto a letter demanding President Joe Biden force Israel into a permanent ceasefire with Hamas.

In his Easter sermon last month, Isaac declared the Christian cross to be “an important Palestinian symbol.”

In the interview, which was published Tuesday, Isaac criticized American Christian Zionists, claiming their financial support for Israel was used in part to displace Palestinian Christians.

“A lot of the money that comes from churches…goes not just to the Israeli military but to the building of settlements. Many of these settlements are built on land confiscated from Palestinians, and in many cases, from Palestinian Christian families,” Munther claimed.

“It is very obvious to me that many Evangelical leaders in the United States care much more about the highly secular government of Israel than they care about Christian communities in the Middle East,” Carlson responded.

Munther later blamed the October 7th invasion and subsequent massacres on Israel’s policies, a claim which went unchallenged by Carlson. Immediately following October 7th, Munther had lauded the attacks, calling them a testament to “the strength of the Palestinian man who defied his siege.”

“Not continuing to support Israel unconditionally, without holding them accountable, which is, in my opinion, what drove us to this mess right now, with the catastrophe of thousands of Palestinians killed and October 7th and all of that – it is all of these policies.”

Carlson, apparently accepting Isaac’s accusations against Israel, chided Republican lawmakers for their support of the Jewish state.

“It would be pretty easy for Republicans in the U.S. Congress to say ‘We support the government of Israel, but if touch a single Christian, harm a single church, prevent any Christian from practicing his religion, you’re done.’”

“If you wake up in the morning and decide that your Christian faith requires you to support a foreign government blowing up churches and killing Christians I think you’ve lost the thread,” Carlson said, in a quote which was later retweeted by pundit Candace Owens.

Owens recently parted ways with The Daily Wire, a conservative outlet, after Owens accused Israel of genocide and liked a tweet claiming Rabbi Shmuley Boteach was “drunk on Christian blood.”

Caroline Glick, a conservative American-born columnist now living in Israel, excoriated Carlson, calling the interview a “hit piece.”

“This is mendacious hit piece that shows Tucker’s generally well-hidden hand,” Glick tweeted Tuesday.

“The Christian population of Bethlehem all but disappeared after the PLO took over in 1996 due to Islamic persecution. The only Christian population in the Middle East that is growing is the Christian community in Israel.”

The Christian community in Gaza disappeared after Hamas took over in 2005. In 2002, PLO terrorists took nuns and priests hostages in a standoff with IDF forces in the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem.”

John Podhoretz, editor of the right-leaning Commentary magazine and a former speechwriter for presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, took to Twitter/X to call Carlson “Anti Semite filth” in response to Tuesday’s interview.

David Friedman, who served as U.S. Ambassador to Israel under then-President Donald Trump, pointed to the demographic shift in areas under Palestinian Authority control to rebut Isaac’s claims.

“Tucker, my friend, before the Palestinians took over Bethlehem pursuant to the Oslo Accords in the mid-1990’s, Bethlehem was under Israeli control and its population was 80% Christian.”

“It was one of the centers of the Christian world. Since Oslo and the resulting Palestinian rule, Bethlehem became 80% Muslim and Christians are afraid. But they don’t speak out against the Palestinian Authority because you just can’t and survive.

Will the world admit it was wrong?

0
Israeli soldiers operate against Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip, Jan. 20, 2024. Credit: IDF.

 

 

 

 

 

By Phyllis Chesler

(JNS) I hate to repeat the obvious, but one must tell the truth when the most lethal lies against Jews and Israel are repeated 24/7, in every language on earth, day after day, year after year.

Hamas’s war against Israel is unprecedented. Not only have these demons purposely attacked civilians and kidnapped precious souls whom they are still torturing daily in tunnels and private homes, but they and other Iranian proxy armies have forced the internal displacement of more than 200,000 Israeli citizens and killed 645 soldiers and security officers. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad have wounded more than 3,000 Israeli soldiers.

 

As if this were not horrifying enough, almost the entire world—including the media, the mobs, government leaders and international organizations—have been supporting what is, essentially, an Islamic religious war against the Jews. This is not about territory or “occupation.” This war is about exterminating the Jewish people in the name of jihad. Moreover, the jihadists don’t confine their violence to Israel. They intend to conquer the West and ultimately convert or murder all “infidels” everywhere.

This is breathtakingly clear, yet too many Westerners refuse to believe it.

All this compounds Israel’s trauma. How can Israelis feel safe when their own military and intelligence services failed to protect them on Oct. 7? When Israeli government decisions dating back decades appeased Hamas and Iran just as American presidents have done?

How can Israelis feel safe now that the American administration has forced Israel to withdraw most of its forces from Gaza before the IDF could destroy Hamas? An administration that has been far less concerned with the Israeli hostages—who include American citizens—than with empowering Hamas? Has President Joe Biden even noticed that Hamas still refuses to return any hostages or agree to a phased ceasefire? Why should it? Global propaganda, along with American and United Nations actions, have further empowered and legitimized it.

Those of us who care about Israel and the West must realize that Israel is both a seriously traumatized country and an amazingly resilient one. Who but Israelis would have so swiftly organized trauma units for the returned and tortured captives and the surviving eyewitnesses? Who but Israel would give battle-weary soldiers 10 days of rest accompanied by psychiatrists and psychologists?

Who but Israel would allow anti-government activists to so freely (and dangerously) demonstrate against their own leaders during a time of war? Who but Israel would have engaged in such pinpoint targeting of Hamas terrorists, avoiding civilians in a way that no other army has ever done?

The dense fog of war will clear after Israel has finally destroyed every last Hamas tunnel loaded with weaponry and the fact-based truth about Hamas and Iran’s war against Israel becomes transparent. When that happens, I wonder about those people who believe that Israel deserved Oct. 7 because they have swallowed the lie that Israel is not only an “oppressor, apartheid entity” but a nation that thirsted for “revenge” and allegedly went on to deliberately target women and children, cause famine and commit a “genocide”? Will they finally admit they were wrong?

I doubt it. They are unlikely to accept that the crimes attributed to Israel are Hamas and Iran’s crimes. Nor that diabolic paranoids and indoctrinated haters are essentially confessing their own crimes when they project them onto their victims.

 

People may always refuse to understand that accidents happen in war and most other countries—Muslim armies, American armies, British armies, Russian and Chinese armies—have caused far more civilian deaths in a single war than Israel has caused over 80 years of war.

In Hitler’s era, it was only the Nazis, the preexisting Jew-haters in Europe and Muslim lands, who brayed for the death of the Jews or minimized and denied what was happening to the Jews.

Now almost the entire world has spewed that bloodthirsty cry. Mobs are in the streets everywhere, cheering Hamas’s barbarism. Never has Israel been in such danger before.

What will the world say, if it says anything, when its allegations have been proven completely false? Will they still insist that they did not know, that no one told them?

Many, of course, will claim that they were right all along. Like Holocaust deniers, they will assert that whatever facts Israel presents are lies and disinformation.

Once again, Israel stands almost alone, accused of crimes it never committed. At this point, no matter how much Israel tries to do the right thing, it will never be credited for it. Thus, Israel must do whatever it takes to survive against the most fiendish odds.

Center for American Progress head calls for one-state solution

0
USAID staff in Pretoria meet U.S. Ambassador to South Africa Patrick Gaspard on Sept. 11, 2013. Credit: USAID Southern Africa/Creative Commons.”

(JNS) Patrick Gaspard, a former U.S. ambassador to South Africa and current president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, told Politico that he no longer believes in a two-state solution.

“This is difficult, but we need to talk about whether the two state solution continues to be the sole pathway to peace,” he the publication’s West Wing Playbook.

“I think that you ultimately get to peace and a ceasefire that is enduring if you have a state that integrates the fulsome rights of Palestinians and Israelis living side-by-side,” he added.

Israel must exist as a state, Gaspard said. “But I also believe Palestinians—if we are going to solve this problem—need to exist in an Israel that is inclusive of their full rights.”

The “pushback has always been that if you have a single state, you can’t have a Jewish majority state that is democratic in Israel,” Politico noted.

“I think that taking out the possibility of coexistence is, in itself, really cynical and tragic,” Gaspard said.

The Center for American Progress is a left-wing think tank. It is “the most influential Democratic-allied think tank in politics, one that has historically been supportive of both Democratic administrations and the state of Israel,” according to Politico.

“People keep telling me that the situation in Gaza is ‘complicated.’ There’s nothing complicated about being able to say killing innocent people is wrong and needs to stop,” Gaspard wrote on Oct. 27. “We said it when it was Hamas. We can say it now that it’s Israel. This is wrong. This needs to stop.”

He has also accused Israel of “using starvation as a weapon is a war.”

Senior Editor: NPR Employs 87 Democrats in Editorial Positions, 0 Republicans in DC Newsroom

0
NPR image (AP)

By Wendell Husebo (Breitbart)

Far-left National Public Radio (NPR) employs 87 registered Democrats in editorial positions but zero Republicans in the same positions in its Washington, DC, headquarters, NPR Senior Editor Uri Berliner wrote Tuesday.

Berliner, who admittedly leans left, wrote a scathing article about NPR’s illiberal newsroom, slamming the taxpayer-funded network for refusing to address “a diversity problem” within the office.

In an article published in the Free Press, Berliner said he opposed many of the left-wing and perhaps false narratives NPR spun about the coronavirus “lab leak theory,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, Hunter Biden’s laptop, former President Donald Trump, and the 2016 Russia hoax.

“[P]olitics were blotting out the curiosity and independence that ought to have been driving our work,” he explained. His concerns came to a head when he told management in 2021 that NPR, which presents its news stories as unbiased, had a bias problem within the network.

Berliner reported:

So on May 3, 2021, I presented the findings at an all-hands editorial staff meeting. When I suggested we had a diversity problem with a score of 87 Democrats and zero Republicans, the response wasn’t hostile. It was worse. It was met with profound indifference. I got a few messages from surprised, curious colleagues. But the messages were of the “oh wow, that’s weird” variety, as if the lopsided tally was a random anomaly rather than a critical failure of our diversity North Star.

In a follow-up email exchange, a top NPR news executive told me that she had been “skewered” for bringing up diversity of thought when she arrived at NPR. So, she said, “I want to be careful how we discuss this publicly.”

For years, I have been persistent. When I believe our coverage has gone off the rails, I have written regular emails to top news leaders, sometimes even having one-on-one sessions with them. On March 10, 2022, I wrote to a top news executive about the numerous times we described the controversial education bill in Florida as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill when it didn’t even use the word gay. I pushed to set the record straight, and wrote another time to ask why we keep using that word that many Hispanics hate—Latinx. On March 31, 2022, I was invited to a managers’ meeting to present my observations.

Over the years, Berliner wrote, NPR’s newsroom tilted left. In 2011, he said the network’s “audience tilted a bit to the left” but “still bore a resemblance to America at large.” He described NPR listening as 26 percent conservative, 23 percent “middle of the road,” and 37 percent far-left.

That changed by 2023 when only 11 percent of listeners described themselves as conservative, 21 percent as “middle of the road,” and 67 percent left-leaning.

“That wouldn’t be a problem for an openly polemical news outlet serving a niche audience,” he wrote, “but for NPR, which purports to consider all things, it’s devastating both for its journalism and its business model.”

NPR’s business model appears in decline. The taxpayer-funded organization laid off ten percent of its workforce, going from approximately 1,200 to about 1,050 employees after the left-wing media company failed to generate enough revenue, the organization announced in 2023.

Taxpayer funds subsidized NPR’s budget by nearly 11 percent.

NPR’s far-left position was reflected in the network’s coverage when Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Joel B. Pollak appeared on its Morning Edition with Steve Inskeep in 2016. During the interview, Pollak defended Breitbart News’s then-Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon, while calling out NPR’s “racist programming,” as Breitbart News reported:

National Public Radio ombudsman/public editor Elizabeth Jensen has recommended that the taxpayer-funded radio news service bar future live interviews of conservatives who may have controversial views, following an interview Nov. 16 with Breitbart News’ Joel B. Pollak.

(Update, Nov. 21: NPR has clarified its policy and says live interviews of conservatives will continue. See here.)

Pollak, who serves as Breitbart’s Senior Editor-at-Large and In-house Counsel, defended its Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon from false and defamatory claims of antisemitism and “white nationalism.” He also turned the tables, pointing out that NPR has “racist programming,” including a story that called the 2016 election results “nostalgia for a whiter America.”

Wendell Husebo is a political reporter with Breitbart News and a former GOP War Room Analyst. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality. Follow Wendell on “X” @WendellHusebø or on Truth Social @WendellHusebo.

 

Mass Rally at UN Demands Return of Hostages; Nadler Booed for Calling for Aid to Gaza

0
Demonstration in New York at the UN headquarters calling for the return of the hostages, April 7, 2024. Photo Credit: Hostage and Missing Families Forum

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a historic display of solidarity and determination, over 7,000 individuals gathered on a crisp Sunday afternoon near the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, calling for the immediate return of the 133 hostages remaining in Hamas captivity in Gaza, according to a report in The Jerusalem Post. This monumental assembly marks the largest rally outside of Israel to date, drawing attention to the plight of those held captive by the Hamas terrorists and the pressing need for their safe release.

Families of the hostages, whose anguished hearts bear the weight of uncertainty and fear, stood shoulder to shoulder with a diverse coalition of supporters. As was reported by the JPost, among them was Louis Har, a survivor of Hamas captivity in Gaza, whose harrowing ordeal spanned 129 agonizing days. His presence served as a poignant reminder of the human toll exacted by the cruel grip of captivity.

Accompanying the hostages’ families were esteemed members of Congress, local community leaders, and representatives from over 150 organizations spanning synagogues, churches, and schools, as was indicated in the JPost report.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s presence lent further weight to the rally, as he embraced Ruby Chen, father of the late hostage Itay Chen, as per the report in the JPost. Their poignant exchange epitomized the shared grief and unwavering resolve permeating the event.

The rally commenced with a powerful exhibition by activists affiliated with the Hostage and Missing Families Forum.

Amidst the fervor of the event, an installation intended to symbolize the suffering endured by those still in captivity served as a stark reminder of the human toll exacted by conflict. The New York Times reported that seven individuals, wrapped in chains, sat inside dog cages on the ground, while three others stood nearby with their hands chained together. Clad in white clothes with red paint smeared across their bodies, they embodied the anguish and desperation of those ensnared in Hamas captivity.

The installation, a poignant visual representation of the plight of the hostages, underscored the urgency of the rally’s message and the profound impact of conflict on human lives.

Addressing the throngs of impassioned supporters, Louis Har articulated a sentiment echoed by many: the journey toward healing cannot commence until every hostage is safely returned to their homes, as was highlighted in the JPost report. His words resonated deeply, laying bare the enduring trauma inflicted by captivity and the unyielding demand for justice.

“People might think that after one-hundred-and-twenty-nine days in captivity there are easier things to do than to fly here and stand with you–but I can’t start healing until they are all back. None of us can,” Har declared, his voice imbued with steely determination, as was noted in the JPost report. “I’m demanding all the relevant leaders–you know who they are, from all countries and governments, including my own: Strike a deal! Bring them home, now.”

In a heart-wrenching display of courage and resilience, Shira Matalon, (whose family has been torn apart by the captivity of her uncles, Yossi and Eli), delivered a powerful speech that echoed the anguish and longing felt by countless families affected by conflict. The JPost reported that Matalon’s words carried the weight of unimaginable sorrow as she recounted the recent loss of her uncle Yossi, whose death was confirmed in a harrowing Hamas video showcasing his lifeless body.

“In the past six months, we sat Shiva at my home, honoring the memory of four of my most favorite people in the world,” Matalon shared, her voice trembling with emotion. “Eli’s return and Yossi’s proper burial is the least we can hope for in this devastating time.”

However, the event took an unexpected turn when Congressman Jerry Nadler called for humanitarian aid to be sent to the people in Gaza, according to the report in the NYT. He was met with a mix of applause and boos, underscoring the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the divergent perspectives within the crowd.

“As we remember the heinous crimes committed by the Hamas terrorists, we must continue to press for lifesaving humanitarian aid for the Palestinian people, too,” Nadler asserted, as was indicated in the NYT report.

However, as he continued, calling for more support for those suffering in Gaza, a portion of the crowd began to voice their dissent, booing and heckling the congressman. According to the information provided in the NYT report, the tension escalated as more attendees joined in, chanting slogans such as “bring them home” or “shame.”

Shany Granot-Lubaton, an organizer with the Hostages and Missing Families Forum New York, moved swiftly to distance the forum and the families from the disruptive behavior, emphasizing that it did not represent their unified stance on the issue, the NYT reported. Granot-Lubaton highlighted the diverse array of opinions within the community but stressed that the common goal of securing the release of the hostages transcended political divides.

“The minority who interfered with Nadler’s speech does not represent the Hostages Families Forum, nor the families themselves,” Granot-Lubaton affirmed. “We respect and thank Congress member Nadler for coming today and for being a part of our fight to bring every one of our hostages back home.”

Robert Gottheim, Nadler’s chief of staff, sought to clarify the congressman’s remarks, emphasizing that his call for humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people was not an extraordinary statement but rather a recognition of the basic principle of compassion and humanitarianism. “We have to have humanitarian aid for the Palestinian people; that goes without saying,” Gottheim asserted, the NYT report said. conflict.

The JPost also reported that earlier on Sunday, families of the hostages convened with New York City Mayor Eric Adams, underscoring the urgent need for solidarity and support in their quest for justice. The event, organized by COJO, an Orthodox organization based in Brooklyn, provided a platform for families to share their stories and advocate for the safe return of their loved ones.

As Mayor Adams listened intently to the impassioned pleas of the families, Liat Unger, a cousin of Omer Shem Tov, took to the stage to present the mayor with a symbol of hope and solidarity—the hostages’ pin. As per the report in the JPost, this heartfelt gesture served as a tangible reminder of the collective resolve to secure the release of those held in captivity and bring an end to the suffering endured by their families.

NY Appeals Judge Rejects Trump’s Request to Delay his Hush Money Trial

0
A NY appeals court judge rejected Trump’s bid to delay his April 15th hush money criminal trial. Photo Credit: Brendan McDermid/Pool Photo via AP

By: Michael R. Sisak, Jake Offenhartz & Jennifer Peltz

A New York appeals court judge on Monday rejected Donald Trump’s bid to delay his April 15 hush money criminal trial while he mounts a last-minute fight to move the case out of Manhattan, foiling the former president’s latest attempt to put off the historic trial.

Justice Lizbeth González of the state’s mid-level appeals court ruled after an emergency hearing Monday where Trump’s lawyers asked that she postpone the trial indefinitely while they seek a change of venue.

They contended the presumptive Republican nominee faces “real potential prejudice” in heavily Democratic Manhattan and said the jury pool has been polluted by news coverage of Trump’s other recent cases, including his $454 million civil fraud judgment and the $83.3 million he’s been ordered to pay for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. He is appealing both verdicts.

“Jury selection cannot proceed in a fair manner,” Trump lawyer Emil Bove argued, citing the defense’s polling and a review of media coverage.

Trump’s hush money trial is the first of his four criminal indictments slated to go to trial and would be the first criminal trial ever of a former president.

In a separate appellate matter, Trump’s lawyers are challenging a gag order barring him from making comments about jurors, witnesses and others connected to the case. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, recently expanded the gag order after Trump lashed out at his daughter, a Democratic political consultant, on social media. The appeals court will hear that matter Tuesday.

Trump, who lived in Manhattan for decades and rose to fame as a real estate developer shaping its iconic skyline, has suggested the trial should be moved to Staten Island, the only New York City borough he won in 2016 and 2020.

Steven Wu, the appellate chief for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, noted that Merchan, had already rejected Trump’s requests to move or delay the trial as untimely.

“The question in this case is not whether a random poll of New Yorkers from whatever neighborhood are able to be impartial, it’s about whether a trial court is able to select a jury of 12 impartial jurors,” Wu said.

He blamed Trump for stoking pretrial publicity with “countless media appearances talking about the facts of this case, the witnesses, and so on.”

As the appeals court fight was playing out, Merchan released his plan Monday for conducting jury selection, including what jurors will and won’t be asked about their views on Trump.

In a letter to both sides, Merchan declared that choosing jurors isn’t about whether they like or don’t like anyone in the case but whether prospective jurors can assure they will “set aside any personal feelings or biases and render a decision that is based on the evidence and the law.”

Paperwork relating to Trump’s appeals was placed under seal and not publicly available.

Trump had pledged to appeal after Merchan ruled last month that the trial would begin April 15. His lawyers had pleaded to delay the trial at least until summer to give them more time to review late-arriving evidence from a prior federal investigation into the matter. Merchan, who had already moved the trial from its original March 25 start date, said no further delays were warranted.