54.6 F
New York
Friday, April 19, 2024
type here...
Home Blog

For the Sake of NPR’s Integrity, Katherine Maher Should Step Down

By
TJV news
-
0
Katherine Maher

For the Sake of NPR’s Integrity, Katherine Maher Should Step Down

In the arena of public trust, the credibility of news organizations hinges profoundly on the perceived impartiality and integrity of their leadership. A recent revelation concerning National Public Radio (NPR) brings this delicate balance into stark relief, casting shadows of doubt over the impartiality that is sacrosanct in journalism.

Katherine Maher, who has recently taken the helm as CEO of NPR, was discovered to have donated $500 to Fair Fight, a political action committee led by Stacey Abrams, known for its staunch stance on election integrity issues, particularly following the contentious 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race. It is essential to scrutinize the implications of such a donation made by someone who now leads a major, taxpayer-funded national news organization.

The essence of this concern lies not in the mere act of donating — as private citizens undoubtedly have the right to support political causes of their choosing — but in the particular alignment of this donation with a group that has actively challenged the legitimacy of an election outcome. Stacey Abrams, after her defeat in the 2018 race, vehemently contested the results, levied serious accusations against the integrity of voting systems, and engaged in legal battles that were ultimately dismissed, with her organization bearing the cost of legal fees for what was determined to be a baseless challenge.

Now consider a hypothetical yet analogous scenario where a high-ranking executive at ABC News had made donations to a fund supporting Donald Trump post-January 6, amidst swirling controversies and debunked claims of a stolen election. The uproar from the journalism community and the public would be swift and unforgiving, likely culminating in a forced resignation due to the untenable position of appearing to endorse alleged falsehoods about democratic processes.

This isn’t just about individual rights or partisan affiliations; it’s about the broader implications for journalistic integrity. NPR, funded by public dollars, occupies a unique position of trust. It is expected to deliver news and analysis that is not only factual but also free from the taint of partisan bias. This expectation is not merely idealistic but foundational to the role of the press in a democracy.

The revelation of Maher’s donation to an organization that has been at the forefront of contesting electoral outcomes without substantive evidence raises serious questions. It unavoidably colors perceptions of NPR’s neutrality and undermines its credibility, especially in the run-up to another election cycle. If the leader of such an organization has financially supported efforts that many consider to be undermining the democratic process, how can the public be assured that the coverage provided by her organization remains unbiased?

The role of a CEO in any organization, especially a journalistic one, carries the burden of not just managing operations and strategy but also embodying the ethical and professional standards that the organization espouses. In the case of NPR, Maher’s past donation, though legally and ethically her right as a private citizen, becomes a point of contention in her role as a leader of a national news organization.

This issue is further compounded by Maher’s history of controversial public statements and the broader accusations of pervasive progressive bias at NPR, highlighted by the departure of a long-serving veteran of the organization. The situation calls for a deeper examination of both the standards applied to media executives and the implications of their personal political activities on their professional responsibilities.

Furthermore, Maher’s public statements, such as the controversial tweet likening modern-day looting to a historical response against a system of oppression, reflect a personal ideology that seems to align closely with the type of progressive groupthink that some critics argue has overtaken NPR. Such views, when expressed by the leader of a news organization, can cast doubts on the fairness and balance of its reporting. This is particularly problematic in an era where the public’s trust in media is already dangerously low.

NPR’s silence in response to inquiries about its awareness of Maher’s donation and whether it believes a person with her background is suitable for the role of CEO only adds to the concerns. Transparency and accountability are crucial in maintaining public trust, especially when it involves a publicly funded entity.

Maher’s controversial TED Talk, in which she questioned the primacy of truth by suggesting that “our reverence for the truth might be a distraction” and promoting the idea that “we all have different truths,” strikes at the heart of journalistic ethics. Such statements, which have drawn widespread criticism from both journalists and public intellectuals, are antithetical to the foundational beliefs of journalism as a profession dedicated to truth-seeking. For journalists at NPR, who pride themselves on rigorous fact-checking and unbiased reporting, such a philosophical stance from their leader is not just confusing but deeply concerning.

Additionally, Maher’s expressed views on the First Amendment and misinformation are troubling. Labeling Senator Tom Cotton’s op-ed as “misinformation” and implying that such expressions of differing opinions should not be published is a stark departure from the traditional journalistic values of free speech and open debate. This stance undermines the role of journalism in fostering a well-informed public discourse and stands in contrast to the values upheld by previous generations of journalists who championed press freedom as fundamental to democracy.

Given these concerns, it becomes increasingly clear that Maher’s position as the leader of NPR is untenable. Her controversial views and actions have not only damaged her reputation for nonpartisanship but have also potentially jeopardized the credibility of NPR itself. In an era where public trust in media is both fragile and paramount, the leader of a taxpayer-funded organization must not only be free of bias but must also be perceived to be free of bias.

The leadership of NPR faces a decisive moment. They must consider whether continuing under Maher’s leadership is in the best interest of the organization and its mandate to serve the public with news that can be trusted. For the sake of NPR’s integrity and its role in upholding the highest standards of journalism, Katherine Maher should step down. This action would serve as a commitment to NPR’s foundational principles and as a signal to the public that it remains a stalwart of unbiased reporting in an increasingly polarized media landscape.

Super Wealthy Americans Pause Purchases of Private Jets & Yachts Hoping for Trump’s Tax Triumph

By
TJV news
-
0
Donald Trump posted a $175 million bond in his NY civil fraud case. Photo Credit: AP

Super Wealthy Americans Pause Purchases of Private Jets & Yachts Hoping for Trump’s Tax Triumph

Edited by: TJVNews.com

Amid the approaching presidential election, members of the ultra-wealthy 1% are strategically pausing their purchases of high-ticket items such as private jets and yachts, anticipating potential tax savings should Donald Trump reclaim the presidency, as was reported on Friday in the New York Post. This calculated delay stems from a belief that Trump’s election could lead to the reinstatement of favorable tax provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which significantly benefitted high-net-worth individuals.

The 2017 legislation, championed by Trump during his first term, included a particularly advantageous tax deduction known as 100% depreciation. According to the information provided in the Post report, this provision allows businesses to deduct the full cost of certain capital investments—such as jets and yachts used predominantly for business purposes—directly from their tax bills. For example, under this rule, a $40 million jet would translate to a $40 million deduction, which at the average tax rate of 37% for the wealthiest Americans, could mean nearly $15 million in tax savings.

These deductions are not only applicable to the initial purchase price but extend to operational costs as well, provided these expenses are justified as business necessities, such as flying to meetings or hosting clients. The current trajectory of tax policy, however, has seen these benefits being phased out. Indicated in the Post report was that the allowable deduction for capital investments has decreased from 80% last year to 60% this year and is scheduled to further reduce to 40% in 2025, reaching zero by 2027 unless there is legislative intervention to extend or restore the cuts.

This looming reduction in tax advantages has motivated affluent individuals and business owners to adopt a wait-and-see approach. A bi-coastal business owner, contemplating substantial investments in both a jet and a yacht, exemplifies this trend. He told The Post, “If I can save millions on my taxes by waiting a few more months, I will.” His statement reflects a broader sentiment among the wealthy, who are aligning their investment decisions with potential political and legislative changes that could favor their financial interests.

Donald Trump’s communication with influential circles about his intentions to restore the 2017 tax cuts further fuels these expectations. As was noted in the Post report, at a recent fundraiser in Palm Beach hosted by hedge fund manager John Paulson, Trump reiterated his commitment to reinstating these tax provisions, a pledge that has resonated strongly with his wealthy supporters and potential donors.

Amid the backdrop of the Palm Beach International Boat Show, where over 800 boats were showcased and more than 55,000 visitors attended, the potential impact of the upcoming presidential election on luxury asset purchases became a focal point of discussion among industry insiders. According to the Post report, a source involved with the event highlighted a palpable sense of anticipation, with many attendees deliberating whether to delay purchasing decisions until after the election, reflecting broader trends within the luxury sectors of yachts and private jets.

The consideration of postponing such significant investments is driven by the Republican Party’s promises to reinstate full tax write-offs for certain business expenses, including those associated with the operation and purchase of yachts and jets, the Post report said. These incentives are highly attractive to businesses and wealthy individuals, offering substantial financial benefits that can significantly influence purchasing decisions.

The yacht and private jet industries are notoriously discreet, often characterized by private sales and a clientele that values confidentiality. This privacy extends to the sales figures of events like the boat show, which remain undisclosed, adding an element of mystery to the market’s dynamics. However, the Post report pointed out that the sentiment among potential buyers at the show was clear, with many opting to wait and see how the political landscape evolves, especially regarding tax policy, before committing to large expenditures.

This strategic postponement is corroborated by trends noted by industry experts such as Michael Mikolay, CEO of Mikolay Jet Group. The report in the Post said that Mikolay has observed a slowdown in demand across various classes of private aircraft. For instance, the market for super-midsize jets, such as the Gulfstream G280 or Bombardier Challenger 300 — capable of flying distances like New York to London — has seen a dip. These aircraft, while luxurious and efficient, come with a hefty price tag starting around $12 million. Similarly, demand for ultra-long range aircraft, which can cost upwards of $75 million and cover distances from New York City to the Middle East, like the Bombardier Global 6000 or Gulfstream G700, has also softened.

The Post report said that Mikolay also pointed out that the current market for pre-owned jets is facing a surplus, with supply outstripping demand. This observation is reflected in the sales figures: between October 2023 and March 2024, there were 719 jets sold, a decline from the 815 jets sold during the same period the year prior.

These trends suggest a cautious approach among buyers, who are sensitive to changes in economic policies that could affect their investment returns. As explained in the Post report, the possibility of restored tax benefits plays a significant role in this dynamic, potentially leading to deferred decisions on high-value purchases until after the election’s outcome is clear.

The situation in the yacht market presents a varied picture. According to super yacht broker Jamie Edmiston, the most luxurious yachts—those costing upwards of $65 million—continue to attract international buyers without a noticeable decline in sales, as per the information contained in the Post report, However, the market for slightly less expensive yachts, ranging from $40 million to $65 million, is experiencing a softening. This indicates that while the ultra-luxury segment remains resilient, the broader market is becoming more cautious, likely due to economic factors and the anticipation of potential changes in tax policy.

Tax considerations are particularly influential in the decision-making processes of those purchasing luxury assets for business purposes. As was reported by the Post, one source in the jet industry noted that while personal luxury expenditures such as purchasing a high-end Birkin bag may proceed uninhibited, investments in business assets such as jets are scrutinized more closely for potential tax savings. The possibility of major tax incentives, such as those seen in previous administrations, can lead to deferred purchasing decisions. The report added that business owners, understanding the substantial savings that could arise from favorable tax legislation, are inclined to delay acquisitions until the fiscal environment becomes clearer.

This sensitivity to tax implications is not unique to the super-wealthy but is a common factor across all economic segments—everyone seeks to minimize their tax liabilities within the bounds of the law. This strategic financial behavior is especially pronounced during election years, as noted by Amanda Applegate, a partner at Soar Aviation Law. The Post reported that she observed that sales typically slow down in presidential election years, with the slowdown becoming more pronounced as the election nears, particularly around August.

David Hernandez, Chair of Business Aviation and Regulation practice at the law firm VedderPrice, provided insights to the Post concerning the challenges and strategies involved in these high-stakes investments.

Hernandez advises his clients on the risks associated with delaying purchases in anticipation of more favorable tax treatments. While the lure of potential tax savings is significant, this strategy does not come without its pitfalls, as was detailed in the Post report. One major risk is the possibility of increased prices at the end of the fiscal year. Sellers are often aware that buyers who delay their purchases in hopes of capitalizing on tax breaks might become desperate as the year closes. This can lead to inflated prices, negating some of the financial benefits the buyer might have gained from any new tax incentives.

Moreover, Hernandez highlighted another growing concern that is making potential buyers hesitant: increased scrutiny by the IRS. As was noted in the Post report, following an announcement in February, the IRS has ramped up audits of jet owners, particularly targeting high-income individuals who might be using these expensive assets for personal rather than business-related travel. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel emphasized that with expanded resources, the IRS is intensifying its efforts to ensure that those who claim business deductions for aircraft are genuinely using them for legitimate business purposes, such as flying to meet clients or oversee investments, the Post added. This move is part of a broader initiative to ensure that high-income groups meet their tax responsibilities without exploiting loopholes.

The IRS’s focus is on verifying the actual use of private jets that are written off as business expenses. This means that owners need to be diligent about documenting their use of the aircraft to substantiate their tax deductions. Pointed out in the Post report was that the misuse of such deductions for personal travel, such as trips to vacation destinations like the Bahamas, could lead to significant penalties and back taxes, adding a layer of financial and legal risk to owning a private jet.

This enhanced scrutiny has added a “chilling factor” to the market, as potential buyers must now weigh the benefits of owning a private jet against the increased risk of audits and the implications of being found non-compliant with tax laws. The combination of potentially higher prices due to strategic purchasing delays and the risk of rigorous tax audits is reshaping how individuals approach the acquisition of luxury aircraft.

 

Man sets himself on fire outside Trump trial in NYC

By
TJV news
-
0

A man has set himself on fire outside the courthouse in New York where former US President Donald Trump is on trial.

The man was in the designated protest area outside the courthouse, Fox News reported

It comes after jury selection for Trump’s hush money trial concluded with 12 people, and six alternatives, chosen to decide whether the former US president covered up payments to women who alleged they had affairs with him.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Video Appears To Show Pro-Palestinian Activist Shoving Israeli Arab At Columbia University

By
TJV news
-
0
screenshot

By Ilan Hulkower(Daily Caller)

A masked pro-Palestinian activist near Columbia University appeared to shove and throw a punch at an Israeli Arab who was expressing pro-Israel sentiments Thursday near Columbia University.

“I was physically attacked by pro-terror protesters before my lecture at Columbia University. Instead of a lecture, I had to file a complaint with the police. They may have drawn blood but these cowards will never stop me,” Yoseph Haddad, the Israeli Arab, tweeted alongside a video of the incident.

The altercation appeared to begin with the masked protester shoving Haddad from behind. When Haddad got up, the masked protester appeared to throw a punch. Haddad then ran away from the confrontation.

“I just got punched in the face,” Haddad said. Blood appeared to be present on his lip. Police then escorted the angry protestor away, who said he did not punch Haddad.

Haddad also posted a photo of his cut lip. “I’m not moved by some stupid and violent pro-Hamas protesters,” he wrote in Hebrew after noting that he received messages from Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers inquiring about his wellbeing.

Haddad also tweeted out other photos of the demonstration that day. “They can curse, they can threaten, they can also attack… But they cannot stop me and the truth that I represent as a proud Israeli Arab citizen. I will keep fighting to counter their anger!” he wrote.

Haddad is a correspondent for the Israeli news outlet i24 News and the CEO of Together Vouch For Each Other. Haddad’s organization is dedicated toward “bridging the gap between the Arab sector of Israeli society with Israeli society as a whole,” the Jewish National Fund says. Haddad also served in the IDF.

Biden admin sanctions additional supporters of ‘violent extremists in the West Bank’

By
TJV news
-
0
President Joe Biden speaks on the US banking system after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, March 13, 2023. (Shutterstock)

(JNS) The U.S. Treasury Department announced new sanctions on two Israeli charities and an Israeli citizen for supporting “violent extremists in the West Bank” on Friday.

The Mount Hebron Fund and Shlom Asiraich (“The Well-Being of Your Prisoners”) raised the equivalent of $140,000 and $31,000, respectively, in crowdfunding campaigns for Yinon Levi and David Chai Chasdai.

The crowdfunding campaigns were removed from their respective websites, and the funds for Levi were “withheld by a local financial institution,” according to Treasury.

Shlom Asiraich previously raised money for Yigal Amir, who assassinated former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.

The Biden administration sanctioned Levi and Chasdai in February along with two other Israelis that it accused of engaging in “extremist settler violence” and “undermining peace, security and stability in the West Bank.”

The U.S. State Department added Ben Zion (“Bentzi”) Gopstein to that list on Friday. Gopstein was convicted of incitement to racism by an Israeli court in January.

“The Department of State is today designating Ben Zion Gopstein, the founder and leader of Lehava, an organization whose members have engaged in destabilizing violence affecting the West Bank,” said State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller. “Under Gopstein’s leadership, Lehava and its members have been involved in acts or threats of violence against Palestinians, often targeting sensitive or volatile areas.”

U.S. sanctions against Israelis have been deeply criticized by Israeli politicians, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said he protested to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in February.

“If the U.S. wanted to use it in an equal manner it would have imposed sanctions on hundreds of thousands of Palestinians,” Netanyahu said at a press conference in February. “I told Blinken it is a highly problematic thing.”

Israel Downplays Iran Strikes; Proof of Capability, Rather than Escalation

By
TJV news
-
0

Joel B. Pollak(Breitbart)
Israel downplayed reported airstrikes against Iran that appeared to hit targets near that country’s suspected nuclear program on Friday, seeming to cast the operation as proof Israel could reach the sites, rather than a full-scale attack.

As Breitbart News noted, there were media reports that Israeli drones, or missiles, had hit targets near Isfahan, Iran — close to the Natanz nuclear facility — as well as targets in Syria and Iraq. Israel’s Army Radio repeated these reports.

However, there were no reports of what the damage might have been, and one Israeli lawmaker — national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir — posted dismissively on Twitter/X that the attack had been a “scarecrow,” or “lame.”

That post appeared to represent an acknowledgment by Israel that it was, in fact, the source of the strikes — which would have been a counterattack to Iran’s massive missile and drone attack last weekend, which Israel intercepted.

While some in Israel wanted a more forceful response, seeing an opportunity to target Iran’s nuclear program and even the regime itself, others believed that simply demonstrating Iran’s limits, and Israel’s capabilities, was enough.

The U.S. appeared to discourage a strong Israeli response, with President Joe Biden reportedly telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to respond, and that the U.S. would not be party to any counterattack by Israel.

However, Israel had already pledged to respond to any attack originating from Iranian territory — as most of the missiles and drones had done — with a direct attack on Iran. Israeli military leaders reaffirmed that pledge this week.

There were reports that Israel had agreed to limit its response to Iran in exchange for obtaining U.S. approval for an operation in the city of Rafah, in Gaza, to destroy the last Hamas battalions there.

It is also possible that the U.S. threatened to allow a United Nations Security Council resolution approving a Palestinian state to pass if Israel did not restrain itself. The administration was coy about whether it would veto the resolution until just hours before the vote.

The most immediate threat to Israeli security is Iranian-backed Hezbollah, the terrorist army on its northern border. As Breitbart News reported this week, some 60,000 Israelis are still refugees from Israel’s northern border towns. Hezbollah continues to fire missiles, rockets, and drones at those communities, and Israel has been returning fire. Earlier this week, it was confirmed that Israeli commandos were operating on the Lebanese site of the border.

For Israelis, the priorities are finishing Hamas, rescuing the hostages, pushing Hezbollah back from the border, and removing the threat to shipping by the Houthis in Yemen.

Iran backs all of these groups, but remains distant, for now.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Who Are the 12 Jurors Seated in the Trump Hush Money Trial?

By
TJV news
-
0

Kristina Wong(Breitbart)

Here is a breakdown of the 12 jurors seated in the trial of former President Donald Trump. The trial is taking place in solidly-Democrat Manhattan, making it challenging for Trump’s defense to find fair and impartial jurors.

The jurors who were selected on Thursday include:

— A man who lives in Hells Kitchen, works in investment banking, has an MBA in finance, is married and lives with his wife, and enjoys hiking, music concerts and living with his wife. He describes himself as agnostic, but raised Catholic. He said he uses X, follows Truth Social Posts via X, follows trial witness Michael Cohen, the anti-Trump X account user Mueller She Wrote, and follows news on the Ukraine and Israel Wars. He said he also listens to SiriusXM radio.

— A man who lives in West Village, has worked as a security engineer for 25 years, is married with three children, and whose wife is a teacher. His hobbies are his children, and metal and woodworking. He said he does not have social media and follows a “spattering” of news outlets. He answered “yes,” when asked “Have you, a relative, or a close friend ever worked for any company or organization that is owned or run by Donald Trump or anyone in his family?”

— A man who lives in the Upper East Side originally from Lebanon, is retired but still consults with some clients, has an MBA, is married with a son and a daughter, enjoys fly fishing, and skiing and does yoga and meditation every morning. He said he follows the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and CNBC. His brother in law is a lawyer.

— A woman who lives in the Upper East Side who grew up in New Jersey, works as a speech therapist for the Department of Education, has a B.A. and Master’s degree, is single with no children, lives alone, enjoys walks, restaurants, and taking advantage of living in New York City, said, “I don’t watch any news or follow it too closely.” She said she subscribes to the New York Times’ “morning whatever” and CNN’s Five Things newsletters, listens to podcasts about reality TV, and has a mom who works for the state of New Jersey. She said about Trump, “I do have opinions, yes,” but she insisted she can be fair and impartial. She also said, “I do not agree with a lot of his politics and his decisions as a president, but I have really taken the past two days to reflect and make sure that I could leave that at the door and be a totally impartial juror, and I feel like I can.”

— A man who lives in Murray Hill, is originally from Ohio, works for an eyewear company in commerce, is unmarried with no children, lives with an accountant, likes the outdoors and animals. He said he did not have a “strong opinion” about Trump, and said, “Some things I am in favor, for things I am not in favor.”

— A woman who lives in Upper Manhattan, works as a product development manager for a multinational apparel company, is unmarried with no children, enjoys exploring New York and eating, said, “I don’t really follow the news,” but uses Google and reads industry-specific outlets. She said, “I don’t have strong opinions about him, but I don’t like his persona, how he presents himself in public. I don’t really agree with some of his politics, but that does not mean I can’t be impartial.” She added, “I don’t like some of my co-workers, but I am not going to — but I can hear him out and understand his point of view and understand his issues.” She also said, “He just seems very selfish and self serving, so I don’t really appreciate that in any public servant. So I don’t, I mean I don’t know him as a person, so I don’t know how he is in terms of his integrity or anything in his personal life. But how he is in public and how he himself portrays himself in public, it just seems to me it is not my cup of tea.”

— A woman who lives on the Upper East Side who works as a physical therapist, has a B.A. and doctorate in physical therapy, is married with no children, and has a husband who works as a coach for a professional sports team, and enjoys running, playing tennis, and paddle boarding with husband and dog. She said she reads the New York Times, USA Today, and CNN. She also listens to podcasts related to sports and faith. She said her in-laws are attorneys. She said she did not have strong feelings about Trump.

The jurors who were selected on Monday and Tuesday include:

— A man who lives in West Harlem and works in sales, who is married, enjoys “anything outdoorsy,” and said he follows the New York Times, Daily Mail, some Fox News and MSNBC.

— A man who lives in Chelsea, is a corporate law attorney, is not married with children, enjoys hiking and running, and get his news from the the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and Google.

— A woman who lives in Harlem, is a teacher and lives with her brother, a basketball coach. She enjoys writing, theater, and traveling, and gets her news from Google and TikTok. She said she listens to podcasts on relationships and pop culture, as well as the Breakfast Club podcast.

— A woman who lives in Chelsea and works as a software engineer. She has three roommates, and said she gets news from the New York Times and TikTok.

— A man who lives on the Upper East Side and is a civil litigator. He said he knew virtually nothing about criminal law and election finance. He said he did not think a former president should be held to a higher standard and said he was ambivalent about Trump, saying something things he liked, and some he did not. He said he was not sure if he had any opinion about his character.

As far as alternates, the first one selected is:

— A woman who lives in Midtown East, is an analyst for an asset manager, lives with a self-employed boyfriend, likes to run and hang out with friends and eat, and reads the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times. Her sister is a law student.

Judge Juan Merchan ordered reporters to stop specifying the physical appearances of jurors, after one juror asked to be dismissed out of concern she would be identified.

The court convenes on Friday at 9:30 a.m. to continue questioning potential alternates.

The court needs five more before opening arguments can begin.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has accused Trump of violating New York state law by falsifying business records in an alleged attempt to hide an alleged campaign finance violation that involved paying former adult actress Stormy Daniels a hush money payment before the 2016 election.

The case is New York v. Trump, No. 71543-23, in the New York Supreme Court for New York County.

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on ”X”, Truth Social, or on Facebook.

Israel had to strike Iran but also needs to rebuild trust with US

By
TJV news
-
0
A Revolutionary Guard's speed boat fires a missile during a military exercise, July 28, 2020. (AP/Sepahnews)

By Yaakov Katz

On July 13, 2007 President George W. Bush placed a phone call from the Oval Office to Jerusalem. He was looking for Israel’s prime minister at the time, Ehud Olmert.

Months earlier, Israel had brought intelligence to the Americans about a nuclear reactor North Korea was building in northeastern Syria. Olmert had asked Bush to attack and destroy it and, after months of deliberations, the president was calling to inform the prime minister of his decision.

“I cannot justify an attack on a sovereign nation unless my intelligence agencies stand up and say it’s a weapons program,” the president told the Israeli premier. Instead, he said, he would be taking the issue to the International Atomic Energy Agency and then to the United Nations.

At first, Olmert listened but when Bush was done speaking, his response was forceful and immediate.

“Mr. President,” he started. “I understand your reasoning and your arguments but don’t forget that the ultimate responsibility for the security of the State of Israel rests on my shoulders and I’ll do what needs to be done and trust me – I will destroy the atomic reactor.”

It was a moment that could have led to a great crisis between Israel and the United States especially at a time when the IDF feared that the bombing of the reactor could lead to an all-out regional war with Syria and Hezbollah. But, it didn’t. Bush respected Olmert’s forceful stance and while he disagreed with the decision, he ordered his staff not to get in Israel’s way.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the Olmert-Bush phone call ever since Sunday morning and after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had his own phone call with President Joe Biden following the Iranian missile and drone assault against Israel. Both are cases of presidents trying to impress upon a prime minister a policy with which the Israeli leader disagrees, and in both the prime minister pushed back.

There was a similar tension with the Americans in 1981 when Menachem Begin decided to take unilateral action against the Osirak nuclear reactor Saddam Hussein was building near Baghdad. Then-president Ronald Reagan was adamantly opposed to Israeli action and while the US allowed a sharply-worded resolution to pass at the Security Council, Reagan said that he would not publicly condemn Israel. “That would be an invitation for the Arabs to attack,” he said at the time.

Osirak and Syria were two cases separated by 26 years, but connected by a similar foundation – an Israeli understanding that even at the risk of deteriorating ties with the United States, it needs to do what is right for the security of its people. America might not like it, but as seen in these two cases of existential threats, when explained with conviction, the crisis is averted.

The reason the crisis could be averted was because there was a strong foundation of respect between the governments, something that is sadly missing today to the blame of both sides. The Biden administration came into office with a distrust of Netanyahu and made it very clear that it did not want him reelected. When he returned to office at the end of 2022, the White House again made clear its distrust with Netanyahu, his coalition partners and their policies.

It might seem like a lifetime ago, but think back to last year when it was questionable if Netanyahu would even get a meeting with Biden on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. Being invited to the White House, a given under past presidents and prime ministers, was not even in the cards and the New York meeting was only finalized days before it took place.

That meeting was on September 20, just 17 days before the October 7 attacks. While the snub of Netanyahu was obviously not what motivated Yahya Sinwar and Mohammed Deif to launch the Oct. 7 attacks, it is hard not to think what was going through their minds when they saw the tension with the US. If anything, it most certainly didn’t make them consider that they needed to change their plans. On the contrary, if there was a time to attack, it was now.

Israel didn’t exactly help itself either. The judicial reform that ripped the country apart, the constant attacks by Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich against Biden, as well as Netanyahu’s refusal to rein them in, did not help foster trust. In the end, as one Washington insider explained to me this week, you get what you ask for.

And this is why, after everything, when Iran attacked on Sunday morning, the interception of the missiles and drones was only the first challenge. The next part was coming up with the appropriate response – which finally took place on Friday morning against a military base near Isfahan – while trying to get the Americans on board for whatever might happen next.

On the one hand, it is hard for Israel to retaliate when it does not feel that America is with it. The fear of a wider conflict, particularly with Hezbollah and the potential damage and devastation to the Israeli home front, is hard to think about when knowing that America is not immediately in your corner. On the other hand, it is almost impossible to imagine an American president sitting on the sidelines as Israel is hit with thousands of missiles from Lebanon and Iran. The president doesn’t have to agree with the decision but it will be hard for him to refuse support like the continued supply of munitions and spare parts so Israel can fight back.

Beyond the need to work to restore trust – which might not even be possible anymore – the recent and unprecedented attack from Iran underscores something else that Israelis need to keep in mind – the world only likes us when we are under attack or as Dara Horn called it in her brilliant book: “People love dead Jews.”

In the aftermath of the attack, the world united in declaring its support for Israel’s right to defend itself but, the moment the attack was over, called for restraint. In other words, only when Israel is attacked can it defend itself, but that defense is exactly that, a defense; not an offense.

This is a mistake that emboldens Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah. It is an exact repeat of what happened in Gaza – Israel was attacked in an unprecedented way but when it responded with a ground offensive, it was immediately told to stop.

Isn’t it time for this to change?

Jewish Students at Columbia U Applaud Removal of Anti-Israel Protesters

By
TJV news
-
0

Jewish Students at Columbia U Applaud Removal of Anti-Israel Protesters

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a decisive action that has sparked widespread reactions across Columbia University, police in riot gear arrested over 100 anti-Israel protesters on Thursday afternoon from an encampment on the campus, following orders from the university’s President, Minouche Shafik, as was reported by The New York Post.   This move, intended to restore order and enforce university policies, has been met with relief by some Jewish students who felt threatened by the escalating tensions.

Sophomore Jonny Lederer expressed a sense of increased safety following the police intervention, highlighting the significance of the moment for those who felt alarmed by the size and fervor of the anti-Israel demonstrations. The Post report indicated that according to Lederer, the presence of a large group openly supporting what he described as a “pro-Hamas cause” was particularly unnerving and made the intervention seem necessary for maintaining peace and security on campus.

The response by the NYPD was marked by restraint, as described by witnesses. Officers asked protesters if they would voluntarily disperse, and upon refusal, proceeded to make arrests. According to the information provided in the Post report, this methodical approach aimed to manage the situation without violence, although the presence of riot gear and the physical removal of protesters called attention to the seriousness with which the university and law enforcement were treating the breach of campus rules.

Eden Yadegar, a Jewish student from Barnard College, which is affiliated with Columbia, expressed deep concerns about the environment at Columbia, suggesting that anti-Semitism and anarchy had been allowed to proliferate unchecked for months, the Post report said. Her remarks illustrate a palpable fear among Jewish students that the campus had become a breeding ground for hostility and intimidation, which necessitated a firm administrative response. “The action taken by our leadership today was, unfortunately, an absolutely necessary one,” Yadeger stated, according to the Post.

 

Tyler Korff, a Columbia alum and co-founder of the Columbia Jewish Alumni Association, lauded the university and the NYPD for their decisive actions against the clearly anti-Semitic and anti-American protests, as was noted in the Post report. Korff’s approval of the clampdown reflects a broader sentiment among many in the university’s Jewish community, who have felt increasingly besieged by the nature and tone of the anti-Israel rhetoric on campus. “These protests and rallies are meant to threaten and intimidate students, and the message today should be very clear: enough is enough,” Korff asserted, according to the Post report.

A student who preferred to remain anonymous voiced a concern to the Post that resonates with many: “How can you learn when you have to watch your back?” This sentiment highlights the anxiety that can pervade academic life when students feel their physical and psychological safety is compromised.

Many students, including a 20-year-old who expressed his distress over the situation, insist that the high tuition fees they pay should guarantee a secure and conducive learning environment. “We pay a lot of money to come here and we should feel safe and protected,” he stated, the Post report said. His remarks encapsulated the expectation that the university administration has a duty to safeguard its students against any form of harassment or danger stemming from campus activism.

 

 

U.S. Vetoes Palestinian State at United Nations

By
TJV news
-
0
AP

Joel B. Pollak(Breitbart)

The United States used its veto on Thursday at the United Nations (UN) Security Council to block a Palestinian state from being declared unilaterally.

American policy has held for decades that a Palestinian state should emerge after negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Still, the Biden administration played coy until the last hours before the UN Security Council vote, with the White House dodging questions about a potential veto until the State Department announced the U.S. position earlier on Thursday.

In an explanation of the U.S. vote, Ambassador Robert Wood said:

The United States has worked vigorously and with determination to support Palestinian statehood in the context of a comprehensive peace agreement that would permanently resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Since the attacks of October 7, President Biden has been clear that sustainable peace in the region can only be achieved through a two-state solution, with Israel’s security guaranteed. There is no other path that guarantees Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state.

There is no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace and with dignity in a state of their own. And there is no other path that leads to regional integration between Israel and all its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia.

We also have long been clear that premature actions here in New York, even with the best intentions, will not achieve statehood for the Palestinian people.

As members of the Security Council, we have a special responsibility to ensure that our actions further the cause of international peace and security and are consistent with the requirements of the UN Charter.

As reflected in the report of the Admission Committee, there was not unanimity among Committee Members as to whether the applicant met the criteria for membership as set forth in Article 4 of the UN Charter.

For example, there are unresolved questions as to whether the applicant meets the criteria to be considered a State.

We have long called on the Palestinian Authority to undertake necessary reforms to help establish the attributes of readiness for statehood and note that Hamas – a terrorist organization – is currently exerting power and influence in Gaza, an integral part of the state envisioned in this resolution.

For these reasons, the United States voted “no” on this Security Council resolution.

The U.S. tried to portray a Palestinian state as something that “Hamas and its Iranian backers” would oppose, though Hamas denounced the U.S. veto.

Israel welcomed the veto. The Israeli government had argued against Palestinian statehood, either at the UN or outside of it, arguing that recognizing a Palestinian state in the present context would reward Hamas for terror.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, “The Zionist Conspiracy (and how to join it),” now available on Audible. He is also the author of the e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Iran fires air defense batteries in provinces as explosions heard near Isfahan

By
TJV news
-
0
istock

(AP) — Iran fired air defense batteries early Friday morning as explosions could be heard near a major air base near Isfahan, raising fears of a possible Israeli strike following Tehran’s unprecedented drone-and-missile assault on the country.

It remained unclear if the country was under attack, as no Iranian official directly acknowledged the possibility and Israel’s military did not respond to a request for comment. However, tensions have remained high in the days since the Saturday assault on Israel amid its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip and its own strikes targeting Iran in Syria.

One Iranian government official and later Iran’s state-run television broadcaster suggested sites may have been targeted by drones.

IRNA said the defenses fired across several provinces. It did not elaborate on what caused the batteries to fire, though people across the area reported hearing the sounds.

 

In particular, IRNA said air defenses fired at a major air base in Isfahan, which long has been home to Iran’s fleet of American-made F-14 Tomcats — purchased before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Chinese foreign minister criticizes US role in Gaza talks during visit to Indonesia
The semiofficial Fars and Tasnim news agencies also reported the sound of blasts, without giving a cause. State television acknowledged “loud noise” in the area.

Isfahan also is home to sites associated with Iran’s nuclear program, including its underground Natanz enrichment site, which has been repeatedly targeted by suspected Israeli sabotage attacks. However, state television described all sites in the area as “fully safe.”

Dubai-based carriers Emirates and FlyDubai began diverting around western Iran about 4:30 a.m. local time. They offered no explanation, though local warnings to aviators suggested the airspace may have been closed.

Iran later announced it grounded commercial flights in Tehran and across areas of its western and central regions. Loudspeakers informed customers of the incident at Imam Khomeini International Airport in Tehran, online videos purported to show.

 

Iranian state television began a scrolling, on-screen alert acknowledging a “loud noise” near Isfahan, without immediately elaborating.

Hossein Dalirian, a spokesman for Iran’s civilian space program, said on the X social media platform that several small “quadcopter” drones had been shot down. A state television reporter in Isfahan said the same in a live report, saying “several small drones were flying in the sky over Isfahan, which were fired at.”

Meanwhile in Iraq, where a number of Iranian-backed militias are based, residents of Baghdad reported hearing sounds of explosions, but the source of the noise was not immediately clear.

Rockland County Synagogue Destroyed in Massive Blaze: Volunteers Rush to Save Torah Scrolls

By
TJV news
-
0

Rockland County Synagogue Destroyed in Massive Blaze: Volunteers Rush to Save Torah Scrolls

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a poignant display of determination and faith, volunteers from the Chaverim of Rockland County bravely entered the remnants of their synagogue in upstate New York to rescue sacred Torah scrolls after a devastating fire, as was reported by The New York Post on Thursday. The Chassidim of the Heights temple, a place of worship and community, was engulfed in flames earlier this week, leaving behind a scene of destruction and loss.

The fire, which was eventually extinguished by Rockland County firefighters, did not deter the members of a local volunteer safety patrol from undertaking a risky mission to salvage the Sifrei Torah; as was indicated in the Post report. According to CBS News, the volunteers faced a heartrending scene: the synagogue they cherished had been reduced to charred remains. Yet, their resolve led them to a safe that contained the Torah scrolls.

The effort to retrieve the scrolls was neither quick nor easy. The group spent over an hour amidst the debris, employing buzzsaws and crowbars to cut through the metal and pry open the safe. The moment the safe was opened was bittersweet, marked by both relief and sorrow. As per the information provided in the Post report, Steven Goldenberg, a member of the Chaverim of Rockland County, described the emotional toll of the rescue, highlighting the sadness of seeing the Torah scrolls in uncertain condition, wrapped in a plastic bag to protect what was left of them.

Tragically, the recovery confirmed the volunteers’ worst fears: two of the three scrolls had suffered severe damage not only from the fire but also from the water used to extinguish the blaze, the Post report affirmed.  Water pouring out of the safe upon its opening was a stark indication of the damage endured by these precious texts.

Despite the loss, the community plans to honor the damaged Torah scrolls with the dignity they deserve. As reported by ABC 7, the members of the synagogue will hold a special burial ceremony, a tradition that respects the sanctity of Torah scrolls by giving them a burial similar to that afforded to human beings.

The fire has left the congregation without a physical place of worship, as the remaining structure had to be demolished for safety reasons.  Yet, the spirit of the community remains resilient. Fortunately, there were no injuries reported from the incident. The Post reported that the temple, which had been operating within a family residence and was under construction for expansion, is now at the center of an intense investigation led by the Rockland County Arson Investigation Unit to determine the cause of the blaze. The exact cause of the fire at the synagogue has yet to be determined, and authorities have not speculated publicly on whether the fire was an accident or arson.

The investigation into the fire’s origin is ongoing, with the arson unit meticulously combing through evidence to track down potential causes. As was explained in the Post report, this process is critical not only for the synagogue’s future security measures but also for providing closure to a community rattled by the loss of their place of worship and Torah study. The outcome of this investigation will likely impact local and possibly national discussions on the safety of religious communities and the need for enhanced protective measures during significant religious observances.

This incident occurred amid heightened security measures by New York police and law enforcement agencies nationwide, which have increased patrols around synagogues due to an alarming escalation of anti-Semitic incidents as the Jewish community prepares for the upcoming Passover holiday, according to the information contained in the Post report.

The Chassidim of the Heights had only recently received permission from the village of Pomona to transform the existing residence into a fully functioning synagogue. Noted in the Post report was that this approval was part of a broader vision to expand the facility to accommodate a growing congregation. The fire has put a temporary halt to these plans, devastating a community eager to see their place of worship flourish.

Despite the destruction, the spirit of the congregation remains unbroken. Members of the Chassidim of the Heights have expressed a steadfast resolve to rebuild their temple. This commitment to reconstruct the destroyed structure is a testament to the resilience and unity of the community, which has come together in the face of adversity.

In the meantime, the congregation of Chassidim of the Heights is navigating this challenging period with hope and perseverance, planning not just for the immediate recovery but for the long-term revitalization of their communal and spiritual life. The rebuilding efforts will undoubtedly require significant resources and support, both from within the local community and from broader networks that stand in solidarity with the congregation. As they lay the groundwork for their future, the story of Chassidim of the Heights will likely serve as a shining example of unwavering faith and community resilience in the face of tragedy.

 

NPR CEO Katherine Maher Reveals How She Ruined Wikipedia

By
TJV news
-
0
Katherine Maher

By Lucas Nolan (Breitbart)

Katherine Maher, NPR’s newly appointed CEO, is facing criticism over her past tweets as a veteran editor accuses the organization of leftist bias. But along the way, another interesting line of investigation has opened — how Maher wrecked Wikipedia by turning away from “free and open” discussions on the “online wikipedia” because that goal represents a “white male westernized construct.”

The Daily Mail reports that Katherine Maher, NPR’s newly appointed CEO, has sparked controversy after a resurfaced clip from a 2021 panel discussion hosted by the Atlantic Council revealed her calling the First Amendment the “number one challenge” in American journalism. During the discussion, Maher, who previously served as the CEO of Wikimedia the parent organization of Wikipedia, argued that the First Amendment provides a “fairly robust protection of rights,” making it “a little tricky to address some of the real challenges of where bad information comes from.”

The controversy has also brought to light some of Maher’s past tweets, which include a veiled shot at former President Donald Trump, branding him a ‘deranged racist sociopath,’ and her support for President Biden by sharing selfies wearing his campaign hats. Maher has also expressed views on gender and language, tweeting, “I do wish Hillary wouldn’t use the language of “boy and girl” – it’s erasing language for non-binary people.”

But beyond her extreme leftist political views, many of Maher’s statements reflect on her time leading the parent foundation of Wikipedia. Her comments about a “free and open” Wikipedia where multiple sides of an argument could be presented to users actually being a “white male Westernized construct” are eye opening, and explain how Wikipedia became a cesspit of fringe leftist beliefs where any balance or conservative viewpoints are immediately crushed.

Maher’s attitude and leadership at Wikipedia goes a long way in explaining how the site devolved from an online encyclopedia into a source of fake news and extreme leftist groupthink. Over the years, Breitbart News has investigated and reported on many fake news hoaxes that began life on Wikipedia, including one about Breitbart News itself:

Framing Breitbart

Breitbart News has also been the subject of a Wikipedia hoax on its own page where left-wing editor “Snooganssnoogans” added a claim in early 2017 that Breitbart promoted the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory, which claims John Podesta’s e-mails about pizza are coded references to a child sex ring connected to the Clintons. The cited source doesn’t claim this and Breitbart’s only appearance in the article is an embedded tweet from its verified account, which mentioned one of Podesta’s pizza-related e-mails weeks before the conspiracy theories emerged.

However, editors kept the material even after it was challenged. An article in the Independent would later repeat this false accusation along with other negative material copied from Wikipedia’s Breitbart article. One editor suggested citing the article for other claims on the page. Breitbart News has never promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, but justlikemanyothernewsoutlets, it has reported on the connection between the Clintons and the late accused sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Ironically, Breitbart has been banned from Wikipedia for nearly two years after editors deemed it “unreliable” in a discussion claiming Breitbart publishes “fake news” on its site.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has been a particularly fierce critic of the site’s loss of balance, which again can be attributed to Maher’s leadership:

On May 14, Sanger published a blog piece titled “Wikipedia Is Badly Biased” and started by declaring Wikipedia’s “Neutral Point of View” policy dead. Having founded the online encyclopedia with Jimmy Wales and having been involved in the original drafting of the policy, Sanger offered particular insight into its development and its practice in recent years. On the current policy’s rejection of providing “equal validity” to different views, Sanger stated this went directly against the original policy’s intent and that “as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.”

Providing examples, Sanger noted former President Obama’s article excludes most notable scandals during his Administration, such as the bungled ATF Fast and Furious operation that armed Mexican cartels who killed a U.S. border agent or the targeting of Tea Party groups by the IRS. By contrast, Sanger pointed to Trump’s article containing overwhelmingly negative sections on the President regarding his “public profile” as well as investigations and impeachment. The sections critical of Trump and his presidency are nearly as long as those dealing with his presidency overall. He further criticized Wikipedia repeatedly saying Trump makes false statements rather than attributing such characterizations to sources.

Read more at the Daily Mail here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship.

U-Haul Ultimatum: Pro-Israel Group Demands Columbia President’s Resignation Amid Soaring Anti-Semitism

By
TJV news
-
0
screenshot

U-Haul Ultimatum: Pro-Israel Group Demands Columbia President’s Resignation Amid Soaring Anti-Semitism

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a striking demonstration of frustration and demand for administrative accountability, a pro-Israel activist group took a bold step against Columbia University’s leadership on Thursday, highlighting a deepening conflict over anti-Semitism on campus. According to the information provided in a report by the New York Post, the group, Accuracy in Media, mobilized a fleet of U-Haul trucks bearing messages aimed directly at Columbia’s President, Minouche Shafik. The Post report added that the trucks, adorned with mobile billboards, were not just a protest but a symbolically loaded statement: “Minouche Shafik, it’s time to resign and we’re here to help you move.”

This vivid display of dissent came in response to an abysmal failure by President Shafik to adequately address and curb instances of anti-Semitism within the university. The tension has been exacerbated by her testimony on Wednesday, before Congress, which left many critics disgusted by her lack of adequate responses as they called for her resignation. Indicated in the Post report was that the mobile billboards, one of which was positioned strategically outside President Shafik’s official residence on Morningside Drive, close to the main campus, shed light on the urgency and severity of the grievances held by members of the pro-Israel community.

The activists’ message was clear and further amplified by the website “ColumbiaHatesJews.com,” promoted on the billboards, where supporters are encouraged to demand the university take a stronger stand against the alarming escalation of the most egregious manifestations of anti-Semitism among its students and faculty, as per the Post report.  This online platform serves as a rallying point, aiming to consolidate and voice collective discontent, advocating for significant administrative changes.

This protest by Accuracy in Media is part of a series of actions targeting Columbia University, which has been a hotspot for heated protests and clashes since the outbreak of the war that Hamas terrorists launched on Israel on October 7th, as was detailed in the Post report. The university has been criticized for having a permissive attitude towards anti-Israel sentiment that has crossed into overt and reprehensible anti-Semitism. The Post report also noted that these criticisms came to a head during recent campus protests where chants such as “Settlers, settlers go back home, Palestine is ours alone” and “Resisting is justified when people are occupied” were heard, referencing the tragic Hamas led October 7 terror attack on southern Israel, which resulted in the brutal massacre of 1200 Israelis and others as well as the abduction of 250 people who were held as hostages by the terror group in Gaza,

Moreover, the university’s decision to suspend students for using violent and anti-Semitic language during protests against Israel’s actions has added another layer of controversy.

The actions taken by Accuracy in Media reflect a broader dissatisfaction with how Columbia University, under President Shafik’s leadership, has handled issues of anti-Semitism and campus safety. For many in the pro-Israel community, these are not just administrative failures but are seen as moral failings that compromise the integrity of the academic institution. The call for President Shafik’s resignation represents a critical demand for leadership that not only understands but actively combats anti-Semitism, ensuring that all students can pursue their education in an environment free from hate and bias.

Columbia University President Minouche Shafik faced intense scrutiny during congressional hearings on Wednesday over her handling of anti-Semitic incidents on campus.

Tyler Korff, co-founder of the Columbia Jewish Alumni Association, criticized President Shafik’s definitions and responses to anti-Semitism as “grossly inadequate.” Indicated in the Post report was that he highlighted a troubling variation of the chant used by anti-Israel protesters on campus: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be Arab.” Korff argued that such rhetoric is not only anti-Semitic but also evokes genocidal sentiments, posing a direct threat to Jewish students and undermining the university’s commitment to a safe and inclusive environment, the Post report added.

The implications of these chants and the university’s tepid response to them have had a palpable impact on Jewish students at Columbia. According to the information contained in the Post report, descriptions  of students feeling unsafe and even facing penalties for expressing pro-Israel views are alarming, suggesting a biased campus atmosphere that prioritizes certain political expressions over others. Such an environment not only stifles free speech but also contradicts the principles of academic freedom and diversity that should define any leading educational institution.

Despite these serious concerns, Korff expressed a desire for a more constructive approach rather than demanding immediate leadership changes. The Post report pointed out that he advocated for working collaboratively with the university to address these issues, focusing on enhancing public safety and improving the educational climate.

However, the situation at Columbia University raises significant questions about the responsibilities of academic institutions in handling political and racial tensions. The university’s leadership, under Shafik’s stewardship, appears to be at a critical juncture where the decisions made now will likely have long-lasting impacts on the community’s fabric.

 

 

 

 

Barnard Student Isra Hirsi, Daughter of Rep. Ilhan Omar, Suspended Due to Pro-Hamas Activism

By
TJV news
-
0
Isra Hirsi/Instagram

Edited by: TJVNews.com

The unfolding events at Columbia University’s campus, involving raucous protests against Israel, have led to significant repercussions for some students, including Isra Hirsi, the daughter of Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar, according to a report that appeared on Thursday in the New York Post.  Hirsi, a 21-year-old student at Barnard College, which is affiliated with Columbia, has been suspended due to her active role in these protests.

On Thursday, Hirsi disclosed through a post on X (formerly known as Twitter) that she and two other students, Maryam Iqbal and Soph Dinu, were suspended from their academic pursuits. As was reported by the Post, in her message, Hirsi expressed surprise and distress over the suspension, noting her previously unblemished disciplinary record at Barnard. She emphasized her commitment to the cause, stating that the suspension was a result of her standing “in solidarity with Palestinians facing a genocide.”

The student group CU Apartheid Divest, with which Hirsi is involved, released a statement following the suspensions. It detailed that the actions taken by Barnard’s administration were informed by reports from Columbia University Public Safety. According to the dean of Barnard College, Leslie Grinage, the suspended students were involved in an “unauthorized encampment” on Columbia’s campus, the Post report affirmed. Despite multiple requests on Wednesday from both Barnard and Columbia to cease their involvement, the students did not comply, leading to their suspensions.

This disciplinary action aligns with a broader pattern of enforcement related to the ongoing protests, which have seen at least three people arrested overnight in connection with the tent protest at the Morningside campus, according to the information in the Post report. Hirsi’s suspension, particularly given her high-profile background as the daughter of a prominent U.S. congresswoman, brings additional attention to the protests and the responses by university administrations.

As one of three children of Rep. Omar and her ex-husband Ahmed Hirsi, Isra has actively participated in and promoted the campus protests, describing her involvement as part of a “huge historic moment,” as was stated in the Post report.

Following her participation, Hirsi shared footage of herself at the protest on the social media platform X. A day after posting the footage, Hirsi revealed she had been suspended from Barnard College. In a resolute response to her suspension, she expressed that the protesters “will not be intimidated” and vowed to continue the anti-Israel protest until their demands—which include the divestment from companies they accuse of being complicit in genocide, transparency in Columbia University’s investments, and full amnesty for all students facing disciplinary actions—are met, the Post report said.

Hirsi, who self-identifies on X as an “angry black girl,” has been vocal during the pro-Hamas protests, using her platform to amplify the cause and engage with a broader audience. Her activism has gained additional visibility through the support of her mother, Rep. Ilhan Omar, who herself has been a controversial figure in U.S. politics, the Post report noted. Omar, known for her radically left-wing stances, faced significant backlash from Republicans and was removed from the Foreign Affairs Committee in February of the previous year due to remarks that were widely criticized as anti-Semitic.

 

 

 

Israel Retaliates Against Iran: Conducts Airstrike on Military Base Near Isfahan

By
TJV news
-
0

Israel Retaliates Against Iran: Conducts Airstrike on Military Base Near Isfahan

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a significant escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, the Israeli military conducted an airstrike on a military air base near Isfahan, central Iran, early on Friday, as was reported in The New York Times. This operation marks what is believed to be Israel’s first direct military retaliation following Iran’s unprecedented missile and drone assault on Israel five days prior. The strike adds a new chapter to the intensifying conflict between the two nations, which has shifted from a shadowy engagement to a more overt confrontation, the NYT report added.

According to reports from Iranian officials and local news agencies, the attack led to audible explosions near the city of Isfahan. However, it was confirmed that nearby nuclear facilities were not targeted in this strike. Noted in the NYT report was that the precise scale of the damage inflicted by the Israeli operation remains unclear, though the strategic choice of targets suggests a calculated approach aimed at minimizing broader regional escalations while responding firmly to Iranian aggression.

In response to the immediate threat, flight tracking data indicated that civilian aircraft were rerouted away from the region for safety. Additionally, the NYT report affirmed that several airports in the vicinity reportedly closed, reflecting the severity of the situation and the potential for further military actions.

The origins of this direct confrontation date back to an Israeli strike on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria on April 1, which resulted in the deaths of seven Iranian officials. According to the information provided in the NYT report, this incident prompted a severe response from Iran, which launched over 300 missiles and drones at Israel, marking the first direct and substantial military engagement between the two states in recent history.

Israeli leaders had vocally expressed their intent to respond to Iran’s aggressive actions, signaling the potential for retaliation. The airstrike near Isfahan can be seen as a fulfillment of those warnings, underscoring Israel’s readiness to engage militarily to protect its national security interests against Iranian threats.

Meanwhile, Iran’s military leadership, represented by Maj. Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi, has issued stark warnings against Israeli aggression, suggesting that any further military actions by Israel would prompt additional responses from Iran, as per the information in the NYT report. This rhetoric from Iran indicates the high tensions and the likelihood of continued military engagements between the two adversaries.

The Israeli military’s decision to withhold official comments on the strike is in line with its usual policy regarding operations of a sensitive nature. This approach aims to manage the information flow and possibly to maintain strategic ambiguity while assessing the aftermath and preparing for possible further escalations.

Indicated  in the NYT report was that President Joe Biden has advised Israel against any further retaliatory strikes against Iran, amid concerns that such actions could escalate into a more extensive conflict. This advice comes as Israel is already engaged on multiple fronts, including against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, both of which are allies of Iran, the report added.

This complex geopolitical situation was a key topic of discussion in a phone conversation on Thursday between. Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and his Israeli counterpart, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the NYT reported.  According to a statement by Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder, their discussion covered regional threats and Iran’s destabilizing activities in the Middle East. A significant portion of their dialogue also focused on humanitarian concerns, particularly the importance of maintaining and increasing the flow of aid to civilians in Gaza, according to the NYT report. This includes facilitating humanitarian aid through a new route from Ashdod Port in Israel, highlighting the ongoing efforts to alleviate civilian suffering amidst the conflict.

Despite tensions, it was noted that communications between Austin and Gallant have generally been very good. This ongoing dialogue is crucial as both nations navigate the delicate balance of responding to immediate security threats while also considering the broader implications of military actions in the region.

It was also reported that President Biden’s administration once again intervened to moderate Israeli military plans, this time concerning a proposed major assault on the city of Rafah in southern Gaza. The intervention took place during a virtual meeting chaired by Jake Sullivan, the President’s National Security Adviser. According to the NYT report, the discussion focused on evaluating Israeli strategies for the attack. However, the American side raised concerns, particularly regarding the plans’ alignment with Biden’s stringent criteria to minimize civilian casualties.

The White House issued a statement revealing that, while the American team had reviewed Israel’s proposed military actions, they had not been persuaded that these plans adequately safeguarded civilian lives, as per the information provided in the NYT report.  As a result, the two parties agreed to postpone immediate action, allowing more time for consultation and to reassess the strategies presented by Israel.

The discussions were part of a broader conversation addressing security measures against ongoing threats, notably the recent attack by Iran. The American delegation, engaged in these strategic talks, expressed reservations about the courses of action presented, prompting a commitment from the Israeli representatives to reconsider their tactics and engage in further expert-level discussions.

The Israeli delegation was led by two significant figures: Ron Dermer, a close adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a member of the Israeli war cabinet, and Tzachi Hanegbi, the National Security Adviser, the information in the NYT report affirmed. Their involvement shines a spotlight on the high stakes and the complex nature of the security challenges discussed, particularly those concerning the defense against Iran and its implications for regional stability.

The White House’s statement clarified that while the United States supports Israel’s objective to defeat Hamas in Rafah, there is considerable caution against initiating a ground operation. President Biden’s administration is particularly concerned about the potential repercussions of such an operation on the over one million Palestinians who have sought refuge in Rafah, as was pointed out in the NYT report. This hesitation highlights the delicate balance the U.S. aims to maintain between supporting its ally’s security objectives and mitigating the humanitarian impact on Palestinian civilians.

 

123...2,278Page 1 of 2,278
DONATE NOW
Subscribe Now

© The Jewish Voice. All rights reserved.

Website managed by Napollo

About Us

Popular Category

Editor Picks