The Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Express Monday in a lawsuit over rules it imposes on merchants who accept its cards.
Under their contracts, merchants who accept American Express generally can’t encourage customers to use other credit cards, The Seattle Times reports. American Express prevents merchants who accept its card from offering customers discounts or other incentives to use other cards or expressing a preference for other cards, even as the other credit cards charge a smaller fee. The federal government and a group of states sued over American Express’ so-called anti-steering provisions, arguing that they violate federal law, The Seattle Times reports.
The Supreme Court said the company has traditionally charged higher fees to merchants than competitors because its clientele are wealthy. The higher merchant fees are in place so its cardholders get better rewards.
On Monday the court ruled 5-4 in favor of American Express, allowing it to continue to bar merchants from steering customers to cards with lower fees.
“In this case, we must decide whether Amex’s anti-steering provisions violate federal antitrust law. We conclude they do not,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in an opinion for himself and his conservative colleagues. Thomas said “Amex’s business model has spurred robust interbrand competition and increased the quality and quantity of credit-card transactions.”
American Express cheered the ruling in a brief statement after it was announced.
“The Supreme Court’s decision is a major victory for consumers and for American Express. It will help to promote competition and innovation in the payments industry,” the statement said.
Justice Stephen Breyer, who used to teach antitrust law at Harvard University, wrote a dissenting opinion for himself and three liberal colleagues, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Breyer, who took the unusual step of reading a summary of his dissent from the bench, said the court’s decision was “contrary to basic principles of antitrust law.”
The retail industry also expressed displeasure with the ruling. “Today’s ruling is a blow to competition and transparency in the credit card market,” National Retail Federation general counsel Stephanie Martz said in a statement. “The American Express rules in question have amounted to a gag order on retailers’ ability to educate their customers on how high swipe fees drive up the price of merchandise.”
In 2010, the Obama administration and more than a dozen states sued American Express along with Visa and MasterCard, which had similar anti-steering rules. While Visa and MasterCard agreed to change their practices, American Express decided to go to trial. The company accounts for about a quarter of the credit card market in the United States as measured by transaction volume and has about 50 million cards in circulation in the United States, The Seattle Times reports.
By: James Rybach
International latest news2 weeks ago
‘Jexodus’ Group Helps Jewish Millennials Leave Democratic Party
Op-Ed1 week ago
Political Trends: Jew-Hate & Socialism Have Always Gone Hand-in-Hand
Health3 weeks ago
Measles Outbreak in Bklyn’s Orthodox Jewish Community Continues to Grow; Health Dept Warns Parents
Arts & Culture1 week ago
“The Spy Behind Home Plate” – Riveting Film on Unknown Jewish Hero
Arts & Culture1 week ago
“Highway Through History” Exhibit to Display Archaeological Finds Unearthed in Excavations at Tel Beit Shemesh
Politics1 week ago
PLEASE JOIN US NEXT THURSDAY: SIT-IN AT NANCY PELOSI’S OFFICE
Local3 weeks ago
Leaked CUNY E-mail Shows Kingsborough CC Downplays Anti-Semitism
National News3 days ago
Donald Trump Jr. Defends Chelsea Clinton After NYU Students Accuse Her of Inspiring New Zealand Mosque Massacre