Connect with us

Special Features

Likud MKs Blast Knesset, Court for Tolerating Anti-Israel Incitement

Published

on

According to Col. (ret.) Dr. Reuven Erlich, head of the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, incitement to violence, terror and hatred against Israel are part of the raison d’être of the PA, as opposed to a simple symptom of Authority policy. Thus, he said that incitement is a strategic political decision, fully backed by the PA leadership. Since the PA needs coordination with Israeli troops to prevent Hamas from taking over the territory, the leadership does not openly call for the destruction of Israel. But it is blatant in the fact that it refuses to condemn terror attacks, demonizes Israel and glorifies terrorists.

Likud MKs Amir Ohana and Oren Hazan (Likud) blasted Arab MKs on Monday for inciting against the state of Israel and, criticized the political echelon and judiciary for allowing them to do so entirely unfettered. Photo Credit: Hillel Maeir

Likud MKs Amir Ohana and Oren Hazan (Likud) blasted Arab MKs on Monday for inciting against the state of Israel and, criticized the political echelon and judiciary for allowing them to do so entirely unfettered.

Speaking at a Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee session on the Palestinian Authority (PA) policy regarding incitement against Israel, Ohana argued that the fight against incitement must start from within the Knesset itself.

“When we talk about incitement, we have to start from this house – with MKs who stand at attention in memory of terrorists, join terrorist flotillas, refuse to call terror by its rightful name, glorify terrorists and incite against Israeli citizens and the police, yet continue on to serve in the Knesset,” Ohana said.

“This is a blatant failure of the system, and especially of the Supreme Court, which refuses to remove the parliamentarian status of the culprits even though their statements and actions are in violation of Israeli law,” he concluded.

Oren Hazan added that many Jewish Israelis are also guilty of offering moral support for incitement. “We are the real culprits,” he said, and added that Israel cannot condemn the (PA) for incitement when the Israeli system itself tolerates incitement by lawmakers. He called on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee to clearly delineate a new state policy to change the situation.

The session was attended by COGAT and Ministry of Strategic Affairs representatives along with several institutions specializing in the study of PA incitement in different fora, including education, media and transfer of funds.

According to Col. (ret.) Dr. Reuven Erlich, head of the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, incitement to violence, terror and hatred against Israel are part of the raison d’être of the PA, as opposed to a simple symptom of Authority policy.

Thus, he said that incitement is a strategic political decision, fully backed by the PA leadership. Since the PA needs coordination with Israeli troops to prevent Hamas from taking over the territory, the leadership does not openly call for the destruction of Israel. But it is blatant in the fact that it refuses to condemn terror attacks, demonizes Israel and glorifies terrorists.

Former intelligence officer and Director of the Project on Regional Middle East Developments at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, reported that in 2016 the PA has transferred more than NIS 1 billion to security prisoners, families of deceased terrorists or released prisoners, representing 7% of the PA total budget. He added that the 2004 decision to transfer the responsibility for the stipends from the PA to the Palestinian Liberation Organization Treasury is nothing but a “trick.”

Kuperwasser also argued that the financial “compensation” to security prisoners is directly correlated to the gravity of their sentence and that members of the security forces who carried out particularly heinous crimes are often promoted once they get out.

Like Ohana and Hazan, Kuperwasser criticized the Israeli government for failing to act. He said that Israel fears enabling Hamas in Judea and Samaria by destabilizing Mahmoud Abbas’ powerbase there, as well as international and regional condemnation against the state for human rights violations.

“The conflict here is between truth and lies, between good and evil. [To the Palestinian Authority] Israel is a project of the devil,” explained Itamar Marcus, the founder of Palestinian Media Watch (PMW). For example, the word ‘occupation’ in Palestinian lingo refers to 1948, and to cities like Tel Aviv.

According to the Israeli experts, the facts directly contradict  Abbas’ statements to US President Donald Trump during their meeting in Washington that the PA educates their society towards peace. 

Committee Chairman MK Avi Dichter (Likud) lamented the absence of any operative and strategic plans from the government representatives to deal with this phenomenon.

“It is inconceivable that the State of Israel should conduct a political campaign in order to achieve peace when our supposed partner conducts an ever growing policy of incitement,” said Dichter.

“If legislation is needed, the committee knows how to legislate,” he concluded. “The committee intends to deal with the subject of Palestinian incitement with all means available.”

By: Ilana Messika
(TPS)

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement --

Trending

Daily Newsletter

Get all the breaking news delivered right to your inbox as it happens

Sign Up Now!

ONE MONTH FREE

At Your Doorstep

No more hassles running to the newsstand, as each week for a month, you can now sit back, relax and enjoy the Jewish Voice in the comfort of your own home!